CIA:
The President’s Pretorian Guard & Private Army
Stephen
Lendman
2
Sepetember, 2013
On
August 29, the Washington Post headlined “US spy
network’s successes, failures and objectives detailed in ‘black
budget’ summary,” saying:
Post-9/11,
US spy agencies “built an intelligence-gathering colossus. (It)
remain(s) unable to provide critical information to the president on
a range of national security threats, according to the government’s
top-secret budget.”
Its
budget totals $52.6 billion for FY 2013. WaPo obtained it “from
intelligence contractor Edward Snowden.”
It
discusses a “bureaucratic and operational landscape.” It was
never before subjected to public scrutiny.
It
shows a dominant CIA role. It reveals significant cyberoperations. It
discloses important knowledge gaps about targeted countries.
It
tells nothing about how funds are used. It doesn’t disclose how
effectively it achieves administration or congressional goals.
Washington
Post obtained the 178-page budget summary. It’s “sensitive” and
“pervasive.” It published a portion of what it got.
It
detailed “successes, failures and objectives of” America’s 16
spy agencies. They have 107,035 employees.
Summary
information discusses “cutting-edge technologies, agent recruiting
and ongoing operations.”
It’s
concealing what intelligence officials say poses risks to their
sources and data collection methods.
According
to Director of National Intelligence
(DNI)
James Clapper:
“Our budgets are classified as they could provide insight for foreign intelligence services to discern our top national priorities, capabilities and sources and methods that allow us to obtain information to counter threats.”
Information
WaPo disclosed includes:
(1)
The CIA spends far more than other spy agencies. In FY 2013, it
requested $14.7 billion. It exceeds NSA spending by 50%.
Actual
amounts spent may be much more. Spy agency operations are secret.
Great pains are taken to conceal them. Information revealed may be
the tip of the iceberg. WaPo didn’t explain.
It
obtained one black budget. At issue is do others exist? How many?
Does each agency have its own? Are supplemental funds allocated on
request?
CIA
drone operations are enormously expensive. So is its involvement in
America’s global torture prison network. Dozens are active
worldwide.
(2)
CIA and NSA aggressively hack into foreign computer networks. They
conduct espionage. They sabotage enemy systems.
They
conduct what budget language calls “offensive cyber operations.”
(3)
Long before Snowden’s leaks, intelligence agency officials worried
about “anomalous behavior.”
They’re
concerned about employees and contractors with access to classified
material.
NSA
began investigating 4,000 individuals this year. They hold high level
security clearances. Potentially they can compromise sensitive
information. They can replicate Snowden revelations.
(4)
Intelligence agencies target friends and foes. Pakistan’s called an
“intractable target.”
Counterintelligence
operations focus on China, Russia, Iran, Cuba, Israel and other
countries.
Israel
notoriously spies intensively on America. The CIA calls it
Washington’s main regional spy threat.
Israeli
operatives have close ties to foreign military, criminal and
intelligence sources. They steal everything they can get their hands
on. It includes military and commercial secrets.
They
hack into computers for information. Washington’s Government
Accountability Office (GAO) said Israel “conducts the most
aggressive espionage operation against the United States of any US
ally.”
The
Pentagon accused Israel of “actively engag(ing) in military and
industrial espionage in the United States.”
It’s
hard knowing if Israel is more foe than friend. In response to
billions of dollars annually in aid, the latest weapons and
technology, and numerous other special privileges, it steals US state
and civilian secrets.
(5)
Intelligence agencies claim they focus on terrorism. They call it the
gravest threat to national security. They lied saying so. No domestic
terror threat exists.
US
state terror creates whatever exists abroad. Spying is about control.
It’s about advancing imperial priorities. It wants threats
challenging it eliminated.
It’s
about espionage. It’s for economic advantage. It’s to be one up
on foreign competitors. It’s for information used advantageously in
trade, political, and military relations.
(6)
China, Russia and Iran are hard to penetrate. North Korea may be
hardest of all. It’s “opaque.”
Analysts
know little about five “critical” gaps in its nuclear and missile
programs. They practically known nothing about Kim Jong Un.
Formally,
America’s spy “blueprint” is called the Congressional Budget
Justification for the National Intelligence Program. It’s
classified “top secret.”
It
describes 16 known spy agencies. They track millions of targets.
Operations conducted include hundreds of lethal strikes.
According
to Clapper, threats “virtually defy rank-ordering.” He warned
about “hard choices.”
Information
WaPo revealed explains how US intelligence expanded post-9/11. Over
half a trillion dollars was spent.
Perhaps
it was double or more that amount. Black budgets don’t say.
Claiming it’s to prevent another catastrophic domestic terror
attack doesn’t wash.
So-called
terrorists had nothing to do with 9/11. WaPo didn’t explain. It
said America has “an espionage empire with resources and a reach
beyond those of any adversary.”
Cold
War spending isn’t known. Inflation adjusted it is much higher
today. Advanced technology involves great expense. Supercomputers et
al aren’t cheap.
Current
spending’s separate from $23 billion more. It’s for military
related intelligence. Perhaps it’s double or more what’s
reported.
It
bears repeating. Black budgets are secret. Getting any information
isn’t easy. According to Federation of American Scientists’
Steven Aftergood:
“But a real grasp of the structure and operations of the intelligence bureaucracy has been totally beyond public reach.”
“This kind of material, even on a historical basis, has simply not been available.”
Defense
spending is 10 times more than on spying. At least according to
what’s published. Information revealed may fall far short of
reality. Only selected top secret cleared individuals know for sure.
According
to WaPo, CIA’s dominant position surprised experts. It “was
transformed from a spy service struggling to emerge from the Cold War
into a paramilitary force.”
The
late Chalmers Johnson was a CIA consultant years earlier. He knew how
the agency functioned. He said we’ll:
It’s
the president’s Pretorian guard. It’s his private army. It works
the same way as in ancient Rome.
It
produces fake intelligence to justify policy. It’s loyal by being
willing to lie. It does lots more than that.
It
operates extrajudicially. Originally it had five missions. Four
involved collection, coordination and dissemination of intelligence.
The
fifth is vague. It lets operatives perform other missions. They
include overthrowing sovereign independent governments, assassinating
foreign leaders and key officials, propping up friendly dictators,
and targeting individuals for extraordinary rendition.
CIA
personnel run America’s drone command centers. They operate
worldwide. They’re instruments of state terror. They sanitize
killing on the cheap.
Johnson
wanted CIA intelligence transferred to State Department operations.
He advocated removing all but purely military functions from the
Pentagon.
According
to WaPo, the agency spent billions recruiting and training a new
generation of case officers. It’s staff numbers 21,575.
“If anything, their dependence on high-tech surveillance systems to fill gaps in human intelligence has intensified.”
It
doesn’t surprise. The more sophisticated the tools, the more
they’re used. The more they’re relied on. The more spent on them.
A
section on North Korea says it’s surrounded by surveillance
platforms. Others target Iran. Previously unknown nuclear sites
undetected by satellite images were discovered, said WaPo.
Alleged
Syrian “unencrypted communications” were monitored. Claims about
what’s gotten are easily twisted for political advantage.
Budget
information disclosed “includes a lengthy section on funding for
counterintelligence programs designed to protect against the danger
posed by foreign intelligence services as well as betrayals from
within the U.S. spy ranks,” said WaPo.
Documents
describe programs to “mitigate insider threats by trusted insiders
who seek to exploit their authorized access to sensitive information
to harm U.S. interests.”
This
year’s budget promised a renewed “focus on safeguarding
classified networks.” It reviews “high-risk, high-gain applicants
and contractors.”
They
have needed skills. Snowden was the type computer specialist NSA
needs. He was trained to circumvent computer network security.
Extra
measures are now taken to prevent other employees replicating his
revelations.
US
spy agencies have no constraints on what’s spent. It’s to advance
America’s imperium. Doing it matters most. The sky’s the limit to
reach planned goals.
Stephen Lendman was born in 1934 in Boston, MA. He received a Harvard BA in 1956 and a Wharton MBA in 1960. Since 2005, Mr. Lendman has been writing on vital world and national topics, including war and peace, American imperialism, corporate dominance, political persecutions, and a range of other social, economic and political issues. He hosts The Progressive Radio News Hour on The Progressive Radio Network. Visit Mr. Lendman’s blog site here. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.