Russia
Today News Declares 9/11 An Inside Job False Flag Attack!
Who
Was Really Behind the 9/11 Attacks?
Too
Many Years of Lies: From Mossadeq to 9/11
The
Official Story of 9/11 is Hogwash
Paul
Craig Roberts
11
September, 2013
Washington
has been at war for 12 years. According to experts such as Joseph
Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes, these wars have cost Americans
approximately $6 trillion, enough to keep Social Security and
Medicare sound for years. All there is to show for 12 years of war is
fat bank balances for the armament industries and a list of destroyed
countries with millions of dead and dislocated people who never
lifted a hand against the United States.
The
cost paid by American troops and taxpayers is extreme. Secretary of
Veteran Affairs Erik Shinseki reported in November 2009 that “more
veterans have committed suicide since 2001 than we have lost on the
battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan.” Many thousands of our troops
have suffered amputations and traumatic brain injuries. At the Marine
Corps War College Jim Lacey calculated that the annual cost of the
Afghan war was $1.5 billion for each al-Qaeda member in Afghanistan.
Many US and coalition troops paid with their lives for every one
al-Qaeda member killed. On no basis has the war ever made sense.
Washington’s
wars have destroyed the favorable image of the United States created
over the decades of the cold war. No longer the hope of mankind, the
US today is viewed as a threat whose government cannot be trusted.
The
wars that have left America’s reputation in tatters are the
consequence of 9/11. The neoconservatives who advocate America’s
hegemony over the world called for “a new Pearl Harbor” that
would allow them to launch wars of conquest. Their plan for
conquering the Middle East as their starting point was set out in the
neoconservative “Project for the New American Century.” It was
stated clearly by Commentary editor Norman Podhoretz and also by many
neoconservatives.
The
neocon argument boils down to a claim that history has chosen
“democratic capitalism” and not Karl Marx as the future. To
comply with history’s choice, the US must beef up its military and
impose the American Way on the entire world.
In
other words, as Claes Ryn wrote, the American neoconservatives are
the “new Jacobins,” a reference to the French Revolution of 1789
that intended to overthrow aristocratic Europe and replace it with
“Liberty, equality, fraternity,” but instead gave Europe a
quarter century of war, death, and destruction.
Ideologies
are dangerous, because they are immune to facts. Now that the United
States is no longer governed by the US Constitution, but by a crazed
ideology that has given rise to a domestic police state more complete
than that of Communist East Germany and to a warfare state that
attacks sovereign countries based on nothing but manufactured lies,
we are left with the irony that Russia and China are viewed as
constraints on Washington’s ability to inflict evil, death, and
destruction on the world.
The
two pariah states of the 20th century have become the hope of mankind
in the 21st century!
As
Oliver Stone and Peter Kuznick prove in their book, The Untold
History of the United States, the American government has never
deserved its white hat reputation. Washington has been very
successful in dressing up its crimes in moralistic language and
hiding them in secrecy. It is only decades after events that the
truth comes out.
For
example, on August 19, 1953, the democratically elected government of
Iran was overthrown by a coup instigated by the US government. Sixty
years after the event declassified CIA documents detail how the
secret CIA operation overthrew a democratic government and imposed
Washington’s puppet on the people of Iran.
The
declassified documents could not have spelled it out any clearer:
“The military coup that overthrew Mossadeq and his National Front
cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of U.S. foreign
policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government.”
In
the 21st century Washington is attempting to repeat its 1953 feat of
overthrowing the Iranian government, this time using the faux “green
revolution” financed by Washington.
When
that fails, Washington will rely on military action.
If
60 years is the time that must pass before Washington’s crimes can
be acknowledged, the US government will admit the truth about
September 11, 2001 on September 11, 2061. In 2013, on this 12th
anniversary of 9/11, we only have 48 years to go before Washington
admits the truth. Alas, the members of the 9/11 truth movement will
not still be alive to receive their vindication.
But
just as it has been known for decades that Washington overthrew
Mossadeq, we already know that the official story of 9/11 is hogwash.
No
evidence exists that supports the government’s 9/11 story. The 9/11
Commission was a political gathering run by a neoconservative White
House operative. The Commission members sat and listened to the
government’s story and wrote it down. No investigation of any kind
was made. One member of the Commission resigned, saying that the fix
was in. After the report was published, both co-chairmen of the
Commission and the legal counsel wrote books disassociating
themselves from the report. The 9/11 Commission was “set up to
fail,” they wrote.
NIST’s
account of the structural failure of the twin towers is a computer
simulation based on assumptions chosen to produce the result. NIST
refuses to release its make-believe explanation for expert scrutiny.
The reason is obvious. NIST’s explanation of the structural failure
of the towers cannot survive scrutiny.
There
are many 9/11 Truth organizations whose members are high-rise
architects,structural engineers, physicists, chemists and
nano-chemists, military and civilian airline pilots, firemen and
first responders, former prominent government officials, and 9/11
families. The evidence they have amassed overwhelms the feeble
official account.
It
has been proven conclusively that World Trade Center Building 7 fell
at free fall which can only be achieved by controlled demolition that
removes all resistance below to debris falling from above so that no
time is lost in overcoming resistance from intact structures. NIST
has acknowledged this fact, but has not changed its story.
In
other words, still in America today official denial takes precedence
over science and known undisputed facts.
On
this 12th anniversary of a false flag event, it is unnecessary for me
to report the voluminous evidence that conclusively proves that the
official story is a lie. You can read it for yourself. It is
available online. You can read what the architects and engineers have
to say. You can read the scientists’ reports. You can hear from the
first responders who were in the WTC towers. You can read the pilots
who say that the maneuvers associated with the airliner that
allegedly hit the Pentagon are beyond their skills and most certainly
were not performed by inexperienced pilots.
You
can read David Griffin’s many books. You can watch the film
produced by Richard Gage and Architects & Engineers for 9/11
truth. You can read the 9/11 Toronto Report, International Hearings
on 9/11.
Actually,
you do not need any of the expert evidence to know that the US
government’s story is false. As I have previously pointed out, had
a few young Saudi Arabians, the alleged 9/11 hijackers, been capable
of outwitting, without support from any government and intelligence
service, not only the CIA and FBI, but all sixteen US intelligence
services, the intelligence services of Washington’s NATO allies and
Israel’s Mossad, the National Security Council, NORAD, the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, Air Traffic Control, and defeat Airport Security
four times in one hour on the same morning, the White House,
Congress, and the media would have been demanding an investigation of
how the National Security State could so totally fail.
Instead,
the President of the United States and every government office
fiercely resisted any investigation. It was only after a year of
demands and rising pressure from the 9/11 families that the 9/11
Commission was created to bury the issue.
No
one in government was held accountable for the astonishing failure.
The national security state was defeated by a few rag tag Muslims
with box cutters and a sick old man dying from renal failure while
holed up in a cave in Afghanistan, and no heads rolled.
The
total absence from the government for demands for an investigation of
an event that is the greatest embarrassment to a “superpower” in
world history is a complete give-away that 9/11was a false flag
event. The government did not want any investigation, because the
government’s cover story cannot stand investigation.
The
government could rely on the mega-media corporations in whose hands
the corrupt Clinton regime concentrated the US media. By supporting
rather than investigating the government’s cover story, the media
left the majority of Americans, who are sensitive to peer pressure,
without any support for their doubts. Effectively, the American
Ministry of Propaganda validated the government’s false story.
Common
everyday experiences of Americans refute the government’s story.
Consider, for example, self-cleaning ovens. How many American homes
have them? Thirty million? More? Do you have one?
Do
you know what temperature self-cleaning ovens reach? The
self-cleaning cycle runs for several hours at 900 degrees Fahrenheit
or 482 degrees Celsius. Does your self-cleaning oven melt at 482
degrees Celsius. No, it doesn’t. Does the very thin, one-eighth
inch steel soften and your oven collapse? No, it doesn’t.
Keep
that in mind while you read this: According to tests performed by
NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), only 2% of the
WTC steel tested by NIST reached temperatures as high as 250 degrees
Celsius, about half the temperature reached by your self-cleaning
oven. Do you believe that such low temperatures on such small areas
of the WTC towers caused the massive, thick, steel columns in the
towers to soften and permit the collapse of the buildings? If you do,
please explain why your self-cleaning oven doesn’t weaken and
collapse.
In
Section E.5 of the Executive Summary in this NIST report it says: “A
method was developed using microscopic observations of paint cracking
to determine whether steel members had experienced temperatures in
excess of 250 degrees C. More than 170 areas were examined . . . Only
three locations had a positive result indicating that the steel and
paint may have reached temperatures in excess of 250 degrees C.”
Analysis of steel “microstructures show no evidence of exposure to
temperatures above 600 degrees C for any significant time.”
In
section 3.6 of the NIST report NIST states: “NIST believes that
this collection of steel from the WTC towers is adequate for purposes
of the investigation.”
How
did these truths get out? My explanation is that the NIST scientists,
resentful of the threat to their jobs and future employment
opportunities and chaffing under the order to produce a false report,
revealed the coerced deception by including information that their
political masters did not understand. By stating unequivocally the
actual temperatures, NIST’s scientists put the lie to the coerced
report.
The
melting point of steel is around 1,500 degrees C. or 2,600 degrees F.
Steel can lose strength at lower temperatures, but the NIST
scientists reported that only a small part of the steel was even
subjected to moderate temperatures less than those obtained by the
self-cleaning oven in your home.
If
you need to think about this a bit more, obtain a copy of The Making
of the Atomic Bomb by Richard Rhodes. Have a look at the streetcar in
photo 108. The caption reads: “The Hiroshima fireball instantly
raised surface temperatures within a mile of the hypocenter well
above 1,000 degrees F.” Is the streetcar a melted lump of steel?
No, it is structurally intact, although blackened with burnt paint.
Washington
would have you believe that steel that survived intact the atomic
bomb would melt from low temperature, short lived, isolated office
fires. What do you think of a government that believes that you are
that stupid?
Who
would support a government that lies every time it opens its mouth?
The
three WTC buildings that were destroyed were massive heat sinks. I
doubt that the limited, short-lived, low temperature fires in the
buildings even warmed the massive steel structures to the touch.
Moreover,
not a single steel column melted or deformed from softening. The
columns were severed at specific lengths by extremely high
temperature charges placed on the columns.
On
this 12th anniversary of 9/11, ask yourself if you really want to
believe that temperatures half those reached by your self-cleaning
oven caused three massive steel structures to crumble into dust.
Then
ask yourself why your government thinks you are so totally stupid as
to believe such a fairy tale as your government has told you about
9/11.
Paul
Craig Roberts, Boiling Frogs Post contributing author, is a former
Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and former associate editor of
the Wall Street Journal. He has been reporting on executive branch
and cases of prosecutorial abuse for two decades. He has written or
co-written eight books, contributed chapters to numerous books, and
has published many articles in journals of scholarship. Mr. Roberts
has testified before congressional committees on 30 occasions on
issues of economic policy, and has been a critic of both Democratic
and Republican administrations
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.