What
is TYLER? Anonymous reveals details of its own 'WikiLeaks' project
The
hacktivist collective Anonymous will reportedly launch TYLER – a
'secure, no cost and decentralized' online leaks release platform to
circumvent problems inherent in WikiLeaks - on the day many (and
Mayans) believe to be the end of the world.
RT,
22
October, 2012
One
of the group’s members, who specified that he is representing the
collective, spoke about the TYLER project and the rift with WikiLeaks
in an email interview with the Voice of Russia.
According
to unnamed hacker, the conflict between Anonymous and Julian
Assange’s whistleblowing site revolves around the coercive fund
raising techniques and a lack of transparency regarding WikiLeaks
finances.
Previously,
Anonymous has been a longtime advocate of WikiLeaks and its founder
Julian Assange, vocally supporting the website’s mission of sharing
secret data, news leaks, and classified information with the public.
However,
information recently posted by Anonymous on AnonPaste.me says
WikiLeaks "has chosen to dishonor and insult Anonymous and all
information activists" by requiring payment to view documents it
previously made available for free.
But
Anonymous is not a structured group with a defined leader – and the
identity of the people behind the posts slamming WikiLeaks for asking
for donations and various Twitter usernames remains unclear. The
uncertainty has left many wondering whether these opinions represent
the group as a whole, or just a few scattered members.
The
hacktivists, claims the person who spoke to the Voice of Russia, see
it as an ethical violation – and have responded by saying they may
reveal information about WikiLeaks itself.
“What
we would like to see released – either legitimately or leaked to
Anonymous by a WikiLeaks insider – is the WikiLeaks financial
records. We do not possess these, but should they be delivered to us
we would certainly disclose them. An organization that preaches
transparency to the world should provide it for themselves”, the
Anonymous member said.
The
annoyance that Anonymous members seem to be experiencing is likely
due to the fact that they take credit for some of WikiLeaks’ major
data publications.
Anonymous
and other hacktivists claim they provided WikiLeaks with the more
than 2 million emails released as part of the Syria files. They also
apparently worked together to leak the Stratfor files – millions of
emails from a Texas-based global intelligence company.
When
asked about the future of WikiLeaks, the anonymous hacker said
“Julian has threatened on at least one previous occasion to pull
the plug on the project because the fundraising was not meeting his
expectations. It was at that time that Anonymous began planning to
field our own alternative disclosure platforms.
Julian desperately
needs WikiLeaks, and he is the only one that can pull the plug on the
project. I rather think that so long as he is in dire straits, he
will not do so – despite any threats from him to the contrary.”
WikiLeaks
admits the paywall’s presence is less than ideal, but says it is
financially necessary.
“WikiLeaks
faces unprecedented costs due to involvement in over 12 concurrent
legal matters around the world, including our litigation of the US
military in the Bradley Manning case. Our FBI file as of the start of
the year had grown to 42,135 pages,” a written response from the
website said.
But
at least some Anonymous members see the paywall as nothing more than
a fundraising tool for Julian Assange, leading members to speak out.
A
statement on pastebin.com said that Anonymous cannot support the “One
Man Julian Assange show,” adding that while the group continues to
support the original idea behind WikiLeaks, the website doesn’t
seem to stand for that idea anymore.
The
questions of who was behind that statement, how many of the
collective's members support it and can a pastebin.com post really
represent the entire "legion" remain unanswered. But it
would appear that the group is now choosing to focus on the future,
and their TYLER project.
The
serious VoR interview was lightened by some tongue-in-cheek comments
about the future features of TYLER, with the Anonymous member saying
he could reveal a lot about the project, but isn’t going to – and
confirming the release date was chosen because it coincided with the
Mayan calendar’s “end of the world.”
But
the project has been in the works for months, and is clearly
important to the group. Anonymous believes it to be unique as a
disclosure platform, because “It will not be deployed on a static
server. TYLER will be P2P encrypted software, in which every function
of a disclosure platform will be handled and shared by everyone who
downloads and deploys the software.
In
theory, this makes it sort of like BitCoin or other P2P platforms in
that there is virtually no way to attack it or shut it down. It would
also obviously be thoroughly decentralized.”

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.