Top
end caught flat-footed as property slump worsens
Melbourne's
rich and famous are facing losses of up to 25 per cent in the luxury
apartment market as the top-end property slump worsens
6
May, 2012
Prestige
areas, including Toorak, Brighton, East Melbourne, Southbank and St
Kilda Road, where hundreds of $1 million-plus apartments have been
for sale, have been hit hardest over the past year, according to
research by Australian Property Monitors.
Owners
of some of the most expensive penthouses and flats in the city are
having to slash their asking prices by millions in some cases to
close deals. Others have had to sell for well below what they paid,
even after years in the exclusive buildings.
Industry
sources say Lleyton Hewitt is one to feel the pinch, cutting the
asking price for his St Kilda Road penthouse from $15 million to $10
million. The tennis champ bought the 19th-floor of the Yve
development for $8.32 million in 2004, and spent nearly four years
fitting it out.
The
tough conditions, blamed on a glut of luxury apartments and jitters
about the economy, are set to get worse as more than 13,000 new
inner-city apartments hit the market.
Andrew
Wilson, senior economist at the Fairfax-owned analysts APM, said the
top-end apartment market was facing a ''convergence of negative
factors''.
''The
popularity of penthouse, inner-city living has certainly dropped off
sharply since the heady days of the boom before the global financial
crisis,'' he said.
''Subdued
performance for the sharemarket, the slowdown in the wider property
market and signals that Victoria has one of the worst performing
economies on the mainland - it's all happening at once.''
Jean-Pierre
Heurteau paid about $3.23 million in 2006 for an off-the-plan,
two-bedroom apartment in the Lucient building on St Kilda Road.
The
interior decorator hoped to get at least $2.9 million for the
14th-floor flat when it was listed last year, but had to settle for
$2.81 million.
''It's
the times,'' he said. ''I don't think it was because the apartment
was wrong or bad, the apartment was fabulous. It's just the way it
is.''
Valuer
John Sommers, of McRae Property, said many owners were learning the
hard way that off-the-plan apartments are often sold at prices that
had little to do with their actual value, and could take years to
show any meaningful capital growth.
''The
price that's paid is a reflection of what the developer needs to make
out of the project to make it all stack up,'' he said.
''It's
not just at the top end, it's apartments in those locations in modern
buildings.''
In
one example, a four-bedroom apartment in Docklands was bought for
$3.5 million in 2004 and sold late last year for the same price.
Melbourne's median unit price rose 44 per cent over the same period.
Buyer's
advocate Mal James said a big issue for the $1 million-plus apartment
market was that buildings were always facing competition from the
''next best thing''.
''The
demand is there initially because they are new and exciting, but in
two or three years yours isn't new and exciting, then demand is
lower,'' Mr James said. ''I also don't think it means the market is
falling apart because someone tried and failed to get some big
number.''
Agents
argue that statistics purporting to measure the prestige property
market are ''alarmist'' and ''misleading'' because they are based on
few sales.
Icon
Property's Robert Mitchelson said that while there was no doubt the
market was ''tough'', deals were still being done and some buyers
were now wanting to get back into the market because of the recent
price falls.
Analysts
Charter Keck Cramer estimate that 49 new buildings with about 13,100
apartments are under construction or being marketed for sale in the
CBD, Southbank, St Kilda Road and Docklands.
It
is Budget Day in Australia today.
This article points out how bad things have got.
Few
measures for business to cheer in a tougher trading environment
AUSTRALIAN
businesses endured a much tougher trading environment last month, and
economists doubt today's budget will contain much to reverse the
trend.
7
May, 2012
Reported
profitability, export volumes and trading conditions slumped last
month, according to a National Australia Bank monthly business
survey. Conditions deteriorated across all industries, especially for
transport and utilities firms.
Based
on a survey of 400 firms, use of available production capacity fell
to 79.4 per cent, the lowest level since the middle of 2009.
"Mining
continued to outperform all other industries, while manufacturing
conditions remained worryingly low," the survey's authors said.
Peter
Anderson, head of the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry,
told The Australian businesses needed to be realistic about what to
expect from the budget given the government's desire to forecast a
surplus.
HSBC's
chief economist Paul Bloxham agreed, saying there would be little to
cheer about.
"There's
likely to be no room for treats or extra spending for businesses,"
he said. "Nevertheless, the government's reported decision to
boost payments to families in lieu of the education tax refund might
lead to a bit more consumption spending, which might help.
"Not
going ahead with the carbon tax would be the single best thing the
government could announce," Mr Anderson said, adding it was
unlikely, "but we are looking forward to confirmation of the one
percentage point cut in company tax."
The
company tax rate is expected to fall to 29 per cent on July 1, but
the measure is not legislated. The opposition opposes the cut because
it is linked to revenue from the minerals resource rent tax, which it
also opposes.
Mr
Anderson said he worried the government might pay for the cut by
reducing R&D incentives.
"Apart
from measures already announced, such as a $5000 deduction for new
car purchases and the likely introduction of 'loss-carry backs',
businesses should not be expecting too much this budget," said
Brian Redican, an economist at Macquarie Bank.
James
McIntyre, an economist at Commonwealth Bank, said small businesses in
particular would welcome new loss provisions, which are expected to
allow firms to offset losses and prior tax paid up to a nominal cap.
"But
big businesses will be worried about how the measure is going to be
paid for," he said. The Business Working Group, which
recommended "loss carry-backs", also suggested scrapping
mining firms' ability to deduct prospecting and exploration costs
immediately, which could save up to $1.2 billion across four years.
Mr
Redican said that rumoured public-sector cuts of up to 30 per cent in
some federal departments could spell trouble for businesses in the
ACT. "Big public-sector job cuts would hit local cafes and
restaurants, even stationery suppliers to government departments,"
he said.
The
Business Council of Australia has argued for a cap on government
taxes at 23.7 per cent of GDP, as lower taxes tend to foster quicker
economic growth, which is good for business. The government expects
tax receipts to be 22.6 per cent this financial year, but projects
they will rise to 24 per cent in 2014.
"Maintaining
an explicit cap for the level of taxation as a share of GDP as a
discipline to the size of government is an essential element of
keeping Australia competitive," the BCA said in its pre-budget
submission.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.