Showing posts with label monetary system. Show all posts
Showing posts with label monetary system. Show all posts

Friday, 12 October 2012

Keynes on currency debauchment


This illustrates the extent to which John Maynard Keynes has been abused since the 2008 crisis.

DYLAN GRICE: This Keynes Quote Sums Up Our Worst Fears About Easy Monetary Policy


10 October, 2012

Societe Generale's Dylan Grice hasn't been thrilled by the Federal Reserve's decision to embark on QE3 — an effort to lower interest rates by buying bonds. And many of the world's central banks are pursuing aggressive monetary policy.

In response, Grice has previously said "the defining feature ofcoming decades will be a Great Disorder".

By this, he means that currency debasement would eventually bring about social disorder.

At today's Big Picture Conference, Grice reiterated this argument when he posted this quote from John Maynard Keynes. Via CapitalismWithoutFailure.com:


"By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some.

The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security but [also] at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth. Those to whom the system brings windfalls, beyond their deserts and even beyond their expectations or desires, become "profiteers," who are the object of the hatred of the bourgeoisie, whom the inflationism has impoverished, not less than of the proletariat.

As the inflation proceeds and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month, all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery.

Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose."



Tuesday, 9 October 2012

Iranian economy


Iran Low on Options as Hyperinflation Concerns Spark Gold Dash
Iran has few policy options to end turmoil in its currency markets, as the U.S. and allies seek to inflict enough economic pain to force the Islamic republic into concessions over its nuclear plans, analysts said


8 October, 2012


The rial has depreciated as much as 40 percent against the dollar in street markets since August and gold purchases have surged as residents seek to shield savings. The currency plunge led to unrest in Tehran’s markets last week as police used tear gas to end protests. Iran has raised interest rates on deposits and opened an exchange center to stabilize the currency market.


The U.S. and European Union are starving Iran of foreign currency by blocking sales of oil, its main export, and other transactions in dollars and euros. Israel has threatened to attack to stop Iran’s nuclear program if the sanctions don’t succeed in curbing it. Iranian leaders say they won’t bow to the pressure, even as the country’s crude output plunges to the lowest in more than two decades.


I don’t see what Iran can do on the economic front other than try to avoid sanctions by exporting to countries that are prepared to use their currency as payment,” said John Williamson, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington. “I don’t think monetary policy changes will make any difference. People aren’t going to examine interest rates when their savings are being confiscated.”

Hyper-Inflation’

The run on the rial has exacerbated inflation that had already been pushed up by the removal of subsidies on energy and food. The official rate rose to 23.5 percent in August. The real rate, which adjusts for the currency depreciation, is three times that, according to Steve Hanke, a professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.


We’re getting into what is technically hyper-inflation,” with an “implied inflation rate” of about 70 percent a month, Hanke said.


Concern that savings are being eroded is leading Iranians to other assets, including gold and property.


Turkish sales of precious metals to Iran jumped to $6.2 billion through July from $21.9 million in the same period last year. Wealthy Iranians in Turkey are collecting gold and exporting it to Iran, the Istanbul-based Zaman newspaper said July 11. Iranians in Dubai and India are also collecting gold and sending it to the central bank, Zaman said, citing a Turkish economy administration official it didn’t name.

Out of Options’

The currency decline is reminiscent of Iran’s economic crisis in the 1980s, when its eight-year long war with neighboring Iraq prompted a rush to buy gold and dollars.


Iranians have made some very big purchases recently,” said Mohamed Zahran, a shopkeeper at Al Matroushi Jewellery FZCO at Dubai’s Gold and Diamond Park said by telephone Oct. 7. “Definitely more than before. Although Iranians have always been good customers, it’s just that we’ve seen more sales.”


While foreign-currency traders and bazaar merchants in Tehran opened their shops this week, prices are climbing so fast that the price of milk jumped 9 percent in a single day last week. The risk of protests spurred President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to call for calm on Oct. 2, blaming the weakening of the rial on foreign pressures.


More than 200 policemen were stationed around Ferdowsi Street, near one of the main trading areas in the capital, on Oct. 4. Earlier in the day, police used teargas to disperse a crowd at the currency market, and were also sent to the city’s bazaar after shopkeepers refused to open.


If some believe that through pressure they can push Iranians to the negotiating table they are certainly mistaken,” Ahmadinejad, 55, said.

Foreign Reserves

Still, some analysts say that behind the scenes Iran may take a more flexible line.


They’re running out of options, no one is going to realistically help shore up their foreign currency reserves,” said Ghanem Nuseibeh, founder of political risk analyst Cornerstone Global Associates. Making concessions on Iran’s nuclear program “will probably be their way out,” he said.


The rial traded at about 30,000 per dollar yesterday in the streets of Tehran. That compares with the official rate of 12,260 rials set by the central bank. Importers of essential goods including medicines, meat and grains have access to that rate at an exchange center opened by the government last month, while other importers of goods such as industrial and agricultural machinery enjoy a smaller discount.

Camouflage the Problem

Edward Bell, an analyst at the Economist Intelligence Unit in London, said Iran’s “strong manufacturing and industrial base” and agricultural output leaves it better placed than most regional economies to be self-sufficient for a period. He said another round of sanctions flagged by the EU would impose a “sharper squeeze on the economy, and that might bring the government back to some negotiations.”


The new exchange center “has clearly not been up to the task” of meeting demand, Bell said. To steady the rial, Iran would have to “inject a lot more money into the market to support the currency, and that means injecting foreign currency reserves into the market to meet demands.”


It’s not clear how much cash would be needed or how much the authorities have at their disposal, he said.


The EIU estimates Iran’s foreign reserves will drop to $70 billion this year from $80 billion in 2011 as sanctions reduce oil exports. Ahmadinejad said in January that the country has $90 billion in reserves earned from crude sales.


Without recourse to hard currency, Iran’s response may be limited to stop-gap measures, such as the new exchange centers or a January move to raise interest rates on rial accounts to as much as 21 percent.


The direction they will go won’t solve the problem, it will repress” it, Hanke said. “All they will they be able to do is camouflage the problem.”


Currency collapse and the energy crisis

The Biggest Energy Crisis Nobody is Talking About

Iran’s Currency Collapses

by DR. KENT MOORS


8 October, 2012

Matters are beginning to come to a head in Iran.

So far, the impact of Western sanctions – an EU embargo of oil purchases, European and U.S. restrictions on Tehran’s access to international banking, and a new move to intensif y the trading restrictions even further – have had a devastating impact.

Iran’s currency, the rial, has collapsed.

Riots have begun. Its government has rapidly lost its authority. And the Iranian economy is unraveling.

This has all the markings of a full-blown crisis.

It will have an uncertain impact on the region and the wider oil market. This could get very unpredictable and very nasty.

I release my next Iranian report this evening.

I wanted to share with OEI readers the core analysis this afternoon.


Sanctions Paralyze Iran’s Economy


Indications are emerging from several quarters that the current sanctions regime has dealt a major blow to the Iranian currency. The developments are prompting foreign initiatives to paralyze the regime in Tehran.

The current perception is that the sanctions may have to be increased before Tehran will show clear signs of relenting,” a source in the EU Energy Commissioner’s office told me on October 6.

Still, it remains too early to determine how far EU members are prepared to go in strengthening anti-trade restrictions. Nonetheless, several policy sources in Brussels, London, and Paris, confirmed last week that a rising consensus believes something additional is warranted.

A complete EU embargo of Iranian oil imports took effect on July 1. That action had widely been expected to put upward pressure on Brent prices in London. While some of that pressure has materialized, continuing demand concerns from the ongoing credit crisis and sluggish employment data have dampened the impact.

Still, a widening of the rift with Iran, coupled with the deteriorating situation on the Syrian-Turkish border, is certain to bring the problem to center stage.

Should Brussels and Washington orchestrate a new stiffening round of sanctions that expands beyond limitations on oil trade with Iran, a far more difficult environment for Tehran would emerge. It would comprise nothing less than an attempt to collapse the domestic Iranian economy, generate an escalation in internal popular unrest, and oblige the religious leadership to step in and delay the nuclear program.

There is now no doubt that the financial collapse has intensified. By the end of the trading week on October 5, the Iranian rial lost almost a quarter of its value. The plunge was due almost exclusively to the Western sanctions.

The list of moves against Iranian has been significant. It includes limitations on oil exports, including those against shippers, insurance underwriters, and financing entities. Next, Iranian access to international banking has been limited. And more recently, the U.S. added sanctions against Bank Markazi (the Iranian Central Bank) and its network. These events have had two overarching results.

And neither has been positive for Tehran.

First, sanctions have made it much harder to raise capital from foreign trade and have hurt Iran’s foreign currency reserves. The second has obliged Iranian reliance on ad hoc and indirect methods of financing trade and repatriating proceeds. Both have markedly increased the cost of trade and dramatically lowered returns.


A Currency in Sharp Decline


The overall impact is now clearly displayed in the currency free fall, a result that the Iranian leadership can no longer hide. By October 6, the rial collapse had accentuated. It fell 9% against the dollar on the previous day alone, exceeding the record low of 37,000 to the dollar set less than one week earlier.

Even that estimate, however, may not tell the full story. Traders say that the exchange rate had actually declined even more, approaching 40,000 rials to the dollar.

The currency has lost about a third of its value since Monday of last week, when the government launched an “exchange center’ that was designed to stabilize the rial by supplying dollars to importers, but appears to have backfired,” a source had earlier reported on October 2.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has often referred to the dollar as “a worthless piece of paper,” but must now contend with his own currency having dropped at least 80% in value against the dollar since earlier this year.

Acquiring reliable base figures from which to determine the real market fall of the currency has been difficult. According to the Iranian website Mesghal, generally regarded as a relatively objective source, the rial traded at 24,600 against the dollar on October 1. What seems beyond question, however, is the observation that the currency’s collapse is indicating that the sanctions are affecting Iran’s ability to earn foreign currency, and that its hard currency reserves are dwindling.

To emphasize the point, Iran’s deputy Majlis (Parliament) Speaker Mohammad-Reza Bahonar announced that national crude oil exports have dropped to around one million barrels per day during the first half of Iranian year (starting on March 19) on average. This figure in June and July fell to around 800,000 barrels per day. Iran’s oil export volume in 2011 was 2.3 million barrels per day, 18% of which was sold to European countries.

The announced total of 800,000 was lower than the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimate of about one million barrels, made only a few days earlier.

Iranian official statements are prone to discount the effect of Western sanctions on the oil industry. The Oil Ministry still maintained that crude production for the remainder of the year would hold steady. But Bahonar was noticeably taking a different, and unusually frank, route in his comments this time around, especially following a higher (though still dramatically reduced year-on-year) figure already public from the IEA.


The West Plans a New Round of Sanctions


Tehran on October 6 indicated it might be prepared to renew talks, but the trial balloon went nowhere. “Been there, done that,” was the way one veteran of the previous fruitless “six plus Iran” talks put it.

The British, French, and German governments are pressing for new measures that will be agreed upon by the EU, possibly by the foreign ministers’ meeting on October 15. To emphasize their determination, the foreign ministers of France, Germany, and the UK issued a joint communiqué requesting their EU counterparts to agree on new measures against Tehran.

We must let Iran know that we have not exhausted our options,” Laurent Fabius, Guido Westerwelle, and William Hague wrote in the letter, a copy of which was seen on October 6.

Versions of what will be proposed vary, depending on the source.

However, the following appears to be the substance of the proposal coming from London. British diplomats have indicated that the three countries were discussing new sanctions ahead of the October 15 ministers’ session to include additional financial, trade, and energy sanctions.

These would include heightened measures to ban transactions with Iranian banks to include exchanges beyond either those directly with the central bank network of subsidiaries and surrogates or those related only to oil/gas sales and purchases.

Primary targets here are expected to be private banking avenues (similar to the alleged $250 billion plus channel using London’s Standard Chartered Bank) and “gray area” transactions on the fringe of the Dubai Exchange that still require bank client activities through European banking houses.

On the trade side, the three countries will push to restrict an expanding category of EU trade with Iran. This would intensify the difficulty of obtaining equipment and material that could constitute dual usage, thereby impairing the ongoing nuclear development program. Yet there are increasing signals both London and Paris (and perhaps Berlin too) are now viewing an increasing trade ban as a more concerted attempt to use domestic economic instability as a way to destabilize the existing leadership structure.

On the energy front, the proposed approach, labeled “a significant new departure” by one British source, is intended to ensure that Iran cannot bypass the oil embargo and continue obtaining finance that could be directed to the nuclear program.

As the opposition grows in the legislature, divisions were beginning to be seen publically among the ministers over the best course of action to combat the currency crisis. On October 2, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade Mehdi Ghazanfari called on security forces to intervene in the open foreign exchange market and control foreign exchange market fluctuations.

Ghazanfari said that the currency trading price fluctuations are not just an economic matter, but a cultural, security, and politic issue.


Iran Takes Defensive Action


While attention is currently focused on the recent sharp drop in the rial’s value, the problem has been recurring for over a year. To combat it, Tehran established a Forex Trade Center (FTC) on September 23 to prevent a continuing drop against foreign currencies, providing dollars to importers of essential foodstuffs, medicine, and fuel at a fixed price.

The official version puts the rate at 2% below the open market’s figures. However, sources have confirmed that market irregularities have forced regulators to exceed that level, straining Bank Markazi hard currency reserves and pressuring the rial even further. In less than the first week of FTC operations, the currency’s effective market rate declined by more than 30 %.

Ghazanfari said that security forces should have a more direct role in controlling the open forex market, all but acknowledging the failure of the FTC and the dwindling options of the government. Earlier, the chief of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Major General Mohammad Ali Jafari said that the IRGC would intervene in the open forex market to battle against illegal profiteers.

This was followed in quick succession by a complete disintegration in the administration’s ability to control the currency situation. Late on October 2, Tehran moved to suspend all gold and foreign exchange trading as a result of uncontrollable pricing fluctuations, Iranian media outlets quoted head of the Gold and Jewelry Union Mohammad Kashti-Aray as saying.

Punctuating the volatility, Iran’s Majanex website, which covers gold and foreign exchange prices, has gradually eliminated the price of the dollar since the evening of October 1, explaining that it has not been able to get accurate and reliable information about the dollar exchange rate.

In its contrast to the value of gold, on the other hand, the rial is virtually disappearing. Where it can still be obtained, a single Bahar Azadi (a gold coin minted and sold by Bank Markazi) was going for at least 10,350,000 rials on October 6, up from 10,250,000 only one day earlier.

We are now rapidly moving into a very tense crisis environment.

I’ll keep you posted on what happens next.

Regarding Iran - a view from Iran


This article is by an American writer currently based on the ground in Iran.
Financial Warfare: Destabilizing Iran’s Monetary System
By Nile Bowie



6th October, 2012



ESFAHAN – Dramatic fluctuations of the Iranian rial triggered small protests among merchants in Tehran’s grand bazaar on October 3rd, 2012. In an attempt by authorities to prevent further devaluation, Iran’s central bank recently issued new limits on the amount of USD available for purchase at a subsidized rate, leading many to panic as the rial fell 40% against the dollar since the start of October. Although the demonstrations were economic in nature, many took advantage of the moment to voice their grievances against the political system, with many crediting President Ahmadinejad with overseeing fiscal mismanagement that has exacerbated Washington’s unceasing barrage of economic sanctions. Ahmadinejad’s political opponents also blame his administration for economic mismanagement, sentiment that is appearing more frequently among Iranian society.

While combating the challenges that economic sanctions represent is an arduous task for any government, it is important to recognize that these sanctions are not aimed against Iran’s government, but at its poor and merchant population. An unnamed US intelligence source cited by the Washington Post claims:

In addition to the direct pressure sanctions exert on the regime’s ability to finance its priorities, another option here is that they will create hate and discontent at the street level so that the Iranian leaders realize that they need to change their ways.

Washington has long engaged in psychological operations that aim to foment the kind of “hate and discontent” among Iran’s factory workers, merchants, shopkeepers, students, and manufacturers – as part of a series of measures taken to coax widespread social discontent and unrest throughout the country to topple the government.

For the average Iranian business owner and worker, US-led sanctions and currency devaluation have affected everyday transactions that provide paychecks and economic viability for millions of people. From urban shopkeepers to rural restaurant owners, many have been forced to close their businesses because they are unable to profit from reselling imported goods purchased with dollars. Isolation from the global banking system has made it increasingly more difficult for Iranian students studying abroad to receive money from their families. Sanctions targeting Iran’s central bank aim to devastate the Iranian export economy, affecting everyone from oil exporters to carpet weavers and pistachio cultivators. By crippling people’s livelihoods and hindering their ability to pursue education and afford necessities such as food and medication, the Obama administration believes such measures will erode public confidence in the government and challenge its legitimacy.

Such policy is not only immoral, but exhibits the fraudulence and dishonesty of the United States toward the values of liberty and the pursuit of happiness it claims to represent. Although western media has gone to great lengths to depict Obama as being reluctant to endorse a tough stance on Iran, it is clear that Washington is quietly pursuing belligerent policy against Tehran – one that has alienated Iranians that seek reconciliation with the United States and greatly escalated tensions and the possibility of war. As demonstrated by the covert measures being taken against Tehran – including sabotage, cyber warfare, and targeted assassinations – Washington is fully committed to preventing Tehran’s independent technological, economic and political development. While US-led sanctions are intended to target all mechanisms necessary for international oil transactions, Iran continues to show defiance by pursuing diplomacy and mutually beneficial economic development with its energy hungry allies across Asia.

China has continued to purchase larger amounts of Iranian oil despite the sanctions regime. While the fledging European Union cuts its ties with Tehran, Beijing has moved closer with Iran to provide credit lines and consumer goods. Additionally, nations such as India, Malaysia and Japan have continued their energy imports from Iran – making efforts to internationally isolate Tehran increasing more difficult. Iran has actively engaged in the modernization of its energy infrastructure, including the construction of fifteen domestic pipelines throughout the country. Furthermore, Iranian firms are planning to construct an electrical power plant and a pipeline to provide energy to Pakistan. In the interest of pursuing mutually beneficially economic development, Tehran has sought further cooperation with its neighbors in Pakistan and Turkmenistan. Iran’s domestic investments emphasize the importance of developing the kind of trade and energy infrastructure needed to continue resistance to hegemony without being internationally isolated.

Tehran has pledged $25 billion to develop its Chabahar port, and an additional $4 billion of investment into several different ports around the country. The expanded trade and energy capabilities that would result from such investment would solidify Iran’s place in the global economy, and its seat among world powers. It is for this reason that “the threat of Iran developing nuclear weapons” is used as a stale pretext to enforce economic sanctions, despite a complete lack of evidence to implicate Iran with weaponizing its nuclear energy program. Tehran must be diligent in finding ways to manage its currency devaluation and economic growth – because of its natural resources and abundant energy wealth, the country is in a unique position to deflect international sanctions and use them to its advantage. By partnering with its international allies, Iran can bolster its domestic manufacturing industries and secure international markets for its products. Policy makers in Washington and Tel Aviv should remember that chess is an Iranian game.

Nile Bowie is a Kuala Lumpur-based American writer, video producer and frequent contributor to Global Research. He explores issues of terrorism, economics and geopolitics. Nile Bowie is currently reporting out of Iran.