It is not "fake news" or a "conspiracy theory" although that is how the "factcheckers", who don't care about the facts, might characterise it.
By rights, as a lynchpin of the whole covid-19 narrative this should be revolutionary, and yet it won't - I can almost guarantee it.
For a start the CDC has announced it "will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel" on December, 31.
A lot of water can go under the bridge between now and then. All it takes is for the WHO to ignore the advice, for the mainstream media and governments - to ignore this advice.
Right at the time when I was hearing about COVID-19 testing I first heard about the PCR tests from "notorious conspiracy theorist", David Icke. I put out the question what exactly is the "COVID-19 testing" they are using but I never got any response, from official channels at least.
And yet everything stems from that.
Every time you hear that that there has been a lockdown in Sydney, Melbourne or elsewhere it is all predicated on the number of cases - even where there are no deaths - and that is because of the PCR test.
And yet I am willing to wager that if you mention the PCR test you will get blank stares.
No one will have even heard of it, let alone understand its significance.
One who does is Christchurch-based GP, Dr. Sam Bailey.
The PCR test was invented by Kerry Mullis, who won the Nobel prize for it.
Here he explains the test that he invented. Ironically, he died of pneumonia a couple of months before covid-19.
It was a German, Dr. Christian Drosten, who was behind the current use of the PCR test that was taken up by the WHO and all the world governments.
If we try to interpret the meaning of all this we are in the realm of speculation or, in the words of the mainstream detractors of the truth - "conspiracy theory"
To reiterate, I doubt very much that this significant news is going to mean diddly-squat, at least at present - there is too much hanging on it. They want to get the population vaccinated and will use the fear-tactics of increasing cases from a Delta strain that does not exist in the sense that it is being sold to us.
PCR Pandemic Interview with Virus Mania's Dr Claus Köhnlein
New Zealand's Dr Sam Bailey talks to Dr Claus Köhnlein (Co-Author, ‘Virus Mania’ ) about everything Covid-19. Diving deep into the reasons for excess mortality, Covid-19 PCR testing, parallels with the HIV epidemic, why coronavirus vaccines are being promoted and much more.
A daily scan through the news gives the impression that the world is constantly invaded by virus epidemics. The latest headlines feature the human papillomavirus (HPV) alleged to cause cervical cancer and the avian flu virus, H5N1. The public is also continually terrorized by reports about SARS, BSE, hepatitis C, AIDS, Ebola, and polio. However, this virus mayhem ignores very basic scientific facts: the existence, the pathogenicity and the deadly effects of these agents have never been proven. The authors of Virus Mania, journalist Torsten Engelbrecht and doctor of internal medicine Claus Köhnlein, show that these alleged contagious agents are, in fact, particles produced by the cells themselves as a consequence of certain stress factors such as drugs, malnutrition, pesticides and heavy metals.
The central aim of this book is to steer the discussion back to a real scientific debate and put medicine back on the path of an impartial analysis of the facts. It will put medical experiments, clinical trials, statistics and government policies under the microscope, revealing that the people charged with protecting our health and safety have deviated from this path. To substantiate these statements, the authors cite dozens of highly renowned scientists and present approximately 1,100 pertinent scientific references.
The topic of this book is of pivotal significance. The pharmaceutical companies and top scientists rake in enormous sums of money by attacking germs and the media boosts its audience ratings and circulations with sensationalized reporting (the coverage of the New York Times and Der Spiegel are specifically analyzed). "The primary purpose of commercially-funded clinical research is to maximize financial return on investment, not health," says John Abramson of Harvard Medical School. Virus Mania will inform you on how such an environment took root-and how to empower yourself for a healthy life.
Lucinda Baulch has been at the Grand Mercure in Wellington for 25 days while she waits for scientific evidence of the PCR tests safety and effectiveness.
The woman, who is a qualified vet nurse, said she had requested additional information from the facility - but had so far not been provided with any.
Once presented with that information she would get a Covid-swab - but until then she could not give informed consent, she said.
"As someone with a medical background and knowing the importance of informed consent, for my own peace of mind I really need that informed consent, I'm entitled to it, it's a right, it's an obligation of the party offering a consent form. For me, that's quite an important step."
Baulch said the longest they could keep her in isolation was 28 days and once released she planned to take it to court.
"The New Zealand government is clearly very confident in the protocol they are using, and that's fantastic, get me on the same page.
"Because if you can prove with evidence, I am a loyal advocate, that's the thing, at the moment I just haven't had the assurances.
"I was very surprised with the lack of response or attempt to provide me with the information."
Baulch said she had seen research from Portugal where a court had ruled the PCR swab was 97 percent ineffective.
If there was strong scientific evidence that proved the theory otherwise, Baulch said she would consent to the swab.
She wanted to know if New Zealand was using the same test as was mentioned in the Portuguese ruling.
Baulch is also a foster carer and said Australian Child Services organised for her to bring three children over to caregivers here.
The three children she travelled with tested negative for Covid-19 and were allowed to leave - and despite being in the same bubble she was not.
Baulch argued everyone around her had no symptoms and was 14 days free during the 14 days so she should be allowed to return to Australia.
She said she believed the children's results were accurate, but did not consent to one herself.
A Ministry of Health spokesperson said the swab used was considered the optimal sample type for RT-PCR testing which was consider the gold standard for the detection of Covid-19.
"This swab type will obtain the optimal sample required and is the preferred collection method for both symptomatic and asymptomatic testing due to its higher sensitivity in detecting the virus.
"If someone does not have a PCR test or a heath check at all, it is not possible to assess whether they are Covid free.
"A total of 1.6 million tests have been taken in MIQ facilities, staff at our borders and in the community. It is safe and effective."
MIQ conditions
A Managed Isolation and Quarantine spokesperson said in a statement that "everyone entering an isolation or quarantine facility is provided with a welcome pack, which includes information about the tests they are required to have, when and how they are taken, and what happens if the results are positive or negative". It is currently being updated to include information about day one testing and recent changes to processes.
"When returnees arrive at an isolation facility they are given information that they are legally required to stay in the isolation facility for a minimum of 14 days. This starts from the time and date they arrive in New Zealand."
In nearly all cases they need a negative Covid-19 test and confirmation from a Medical Officer of Health or a Health Protection Officer that they are a low risk before being allowed to leave the facility, they said.
If a person refuses a day 12 test they have to stay in isolation or quarantine for at least another 10 days, this also applies to anyone else who is in their isolation bubble.
"People refusing their day 12 test are offered a test each day of their extended stay. If they agree to a test, return a negative result and meet the standard exit health criteria ... they would be able to leave without having to remain the full 22 days.
"After 22 days, they would still have to meet the standard exit health criteria (without a test) in order to leave. The maximum time a person who is in a bubble of one and is asymptomatic can be required to remain in an isolation facility under the Quarantine Order is 28 days."
This is Jacinda's "offer" - from last year
Both the Australian health authorities and the US CDC inform people about the limitations of the PCR tests.
This is what the NZ Ministry of Health information says.
I don't think it is going to mollify anyone asking real questions
The accuracy of test results
The viral test for COVID-19 is accurate when taken in ideal conditions. A recent laboratory study found that different COVID-19 testing kits correctly detected COVID-19 in samples more than 95% (and frequently 100%) of the time. When tests were done on samples without the virus, the tests correctly gave a negative result 96% of the time.
But it is important to remember that tests don’t work as well in the real world. No viral test is 100% accurate. In real-world use, the viral test for COVID-19 is not 100% ‘sensitive’ (meaning able to correctly identify people with the disease all of the time). This means that if 100 people who have the disease are tested – some will have a negative result (i.e. a false negative result).
Reasons for a false negative test result could be because:
the sample was taken at the wrong time (too early or too late)
the swab did not pick up any pieces of the virus, or
the sample of mucus (or liquid from the lungs) wasn’t big enough.
This means that it is very important to isolate yourself if a health professional asks you to, even if your test result is negative.
The viral test for COVID-19 is much better at correctly identifying people who don’t have COVID-19 (this is known as a higher ‘specificity’). We expect very few (if any) false positive test results (a false positive being a positive test result for someone who does not have the disease).
What the test results can and cannot tell us
Even when we take the uncertainties of testing into account, the results can tell us a few things.
The following statement is inaccurate - SMR
A positive test tells us that a person either has COVID-19 (whether they have symptoms, or not) or has had COVID-19 recently. We may not be able to distinguish whether the person is currently infectious or not so we will take a precautionary approach.
A positive test cannot tell us:
if the person is currently infectious
how ill the person is likely to become.
A negative test can tell us:
the person was unlikely to be infectious at the time of the test.
A negative test cannot tell us:
if the person was exposed to the virus or not
if they are in the early stages of incubating the disease
if they caught COVID-19 in the past
if they were infectious in the past
that they will not get COVID-19 in the future.
Note: if a person has a negative test result and they are at a higher risk of having COVID-19, they may be tested again.
We all know now that PCR tests are useless for finding cases of covid-19 but very good at helping governments keep us in our own homes under house arrest. In some parts of the world the PCR tests are banned as utterly useless. I explained precisely what’s wrong with these misused tests in a an article on this website subtly called `The PCR Test Is Useless for Covid-19 (But Useful for Crooked Governments).
The big problem, of course, is that the British Government, for example, deliberately ignores the WHO guidelines and does the test in a crooked way which would, in a just and sensible world, result in Johnson, Hancock and their advisors crowded into the dock.
You’d get as good a result if you just divided people into two groups: those with a vowel in their surname and those without a vowel, and then announced that the ones with the vowel all had covid-19 and the rest all needed to change their names within seven days or pay a huge fine.
So, everyone with functioning brain tissue knows that the PCR test is useless, except for political reasons, and that the whole testing programme is an outrageously expensive and disruptive shambles. Only government ministers, scientific advisors and pseudo-journalists at the wretched BBC think that PCR tests are valuable. Did you know, by the way, that the Government has allegedly hired 900 consultants to help with the test and trace scheme? The consultants are being paid £1,000 a day each though what they do for that I cannot imagine. That’s £900,000 a day. I suspect that 99.99% of the population would be happier if the £900,000 a day were spent on dentists.
But that’s not the half of it. Most people seem to have accepted the need for regular PCR testing. Indeed, people in the UK queue up to have it done as often as possible – as though they get some sort of thrill out of having a complete stranger stuff something into a bodily orifice – pushing it in as far as it will go, twizzling it about a bit, and then pulling it out and buggering off without so much as `a thank you very much I’ll give you a ring tomorrow and we’ll have dinner and then do it again’.
There is talk of children having daily tests though I haven’t been able to find any evidence that this would be a good idea for anyone other than the hugely profitable industry now involved in making and looking at the swabs .
What no one ever mentions is that the PCR tests are dangerous and can, if done improperly, cause excrutiating pain. This is probably why some countries don’t like them. There is indeed a great deal of confusion about how far the swab should go. (Or should that be the Klaus Schwab) In Australia the guidelines are that the swab should only go a few centimetres up the nostril but nasopharyngeal swabs can go much further. The United States Department of Health and Human services says that the swab should reach a depth equal to the distance from the nostril to the outer opening of the ear. That’s a huge distance. In Ottawa, Canada, the recommendation is half that distance.
In October last year I reported on at least one case where a healthy individual had noticed cerebrospinal fluid pouring out of her nose after an invasive PCR test. That really isn’t something you want happening. The woman concerned, who was in her 40s, had a PCR nasal swab test and later went to see a doctor complaining of vomiting, a runny nose, a headache and a stiff neck. The pseudo-journalists at the BBC can, if they are interested in facts, find the details in the JAMA Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Surgeons found that the fluid running down her nose was cerebrospinal fluid – the fluid that protects the brain.
Then there was the case which was accepted for The Medical Journal of Australia on the 4th December but which I don’t think has been published yet. This reported a healthy 67-year-old woman who had cerebrospinal fluid coming down her nose and the symptoms of meningitis. This followed a covid-19 swab test. How many are being killed – especially in care homes – by this useless and dangerous test?
The authors of the paper stated that the `techniques for deep nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs may be easily confused’. They offer instructions for those conducting the tests. Here’s one part of their instructions: `it involves swab insertion into the nasal cavity at a plane between the opening of the nose and the external ear canal on the patient, which can be considered as the horizontal plane for the purpose of relationship to surface anatomy. This will allow the swab to be inserted parallel to the nasal floor which would avoid injury to the middle turbinates. Swabs inserted in an upward orientation into the nasal cavity, (greater than 30 degrees) not only have a risk of failing to achieve an adequate diagnostic sample from the desired nasal mucosa and nasopharynx but also puts the patient at greater risk of injury to the thin and delicate areas of the skull base (attachment of middle turbinate and cribriform plate) which are superior and anterior to the sphenoid sinus ostium.’ There is then an illustration for swabbing and the authors conclude: `We urge that this angle is not exceeded when performing diagnostic tests as it places the patient at greatest risk of serious adverse events.’
I suggest that anyone having a PCR test should ensure that the person holding the swab has studied and understood these instructions – and will follow them.
In Tripura, a three-day-old boy bled to death after a nasal swab test. In Saudi Arabia an eighteen month old child died after a test swab broke inside his nasal cavity. These are not safe tests. Children are being traumatised by these incredibly invasive tests. These are not safe procedures and they’re often being done by people who know as much about medicine and human anatomy as I know about running a submarine – though I have seen Ice Station Zebra with Patrick McGoohan, and that film with Gene Hackman and Denzel Washington in it. And there was Red October with Sean Connery. Actually, come to think about it, I probably know far more about submarines than the average test and tracer tester knows about anatomy.
Quite a few things have puzzled me about the PCR test.
First, why the devil do they have to push the swab so far up your nose – and so close to your brain. Where is the indisputable scientific evidence that all the little covid-19 bugs are gathering up there for some reason? Do they like out of the way places? Normally, if you have a bug in your nose it will be in your nose. Where is the solid proof that the test only works if a sample is taken from a spot so far up your nose that the tissue up there probably speaks another language and only gets home once a year? Since these tests are now being performed by people who aren’t doctors or nurses or probably even boy scouts, we need some evidence that the test is essential. Actually, since the tests produce more false positives than real positives they are clearly a waste of time anyway and it would make as much sense if the testing swab were inserted into the umbilicus and given a good twizzle there.
Second, researchers at Johns Hopkins University in the US published a study describing a device which has been developed. It’s a tiny, star shaped micro-device capable of delivering a drug. The devices are no larger than a speck of dust but contain a metal core coated in heat sensitive paraffin wax. At the centre of the core there is the drug.
Now, we know that around half of Americans are reluctant to have the covid-19 vaccination.
I think that this hidden injection technology could be used to vaccinate people through nasal or anal PCR swabs. Is this why anal swabs are being introduced? The procedure works best on intestinal tissue.
This could be used to deliver a vaccine to people without their knowledge or consent.
People who think they are just being tested could be receiving the mRNA jab.
Is this going to happen? Is it going to happen?
How the hell would we know?
The authorities are already collecting the names and details of people who have declined the vaccine. Are they planning to use the PCR test to those who refuse the vaccination?
We cannot trust the government or its advisers. We cannot trust the mainstream media. We definitely cannot trust the BBC which has financial links to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and which long ago betrayed us. We can only trust one another.
Giving vaccines nasally is nothing new. Children sometimes have the flu vaccine sprayed up their noses – that’s a live attenuated vaccine, by the way. Attenuated means it’s weaker. But it could still kill granny, of course. Personally, I might use the stuff to clear the drains but I wouldn’t squirt it up a child’s nose.
And you should perhaps know this: nasal vaccinations are already used on cattle.
The Richie Allen Show Monday February 8th 2021
Richie is joined by Luc from Kate And Luc's Café in Burnage Manchester and also by the irrepressible Dr. Vernon Coleman. Police raided Kate And Luc's café in Manchester yesterday afternoon.
The couple have remained opened during lockdown despite repeated warnings from the local authority. Luc was arrested and actually punched by a policeman. He tells Richie why he will never close his business.
Dr. Vernon Coleman joins Richie every Monday to provide the alternative point of view on coronavirus, from lockdowns to vaccines. Today, Vernon looks at the worrying rise in covid vaccine injuries. Reports are coming in from around the world. Vernon explains to Richie what he thinks might be going on.
The following is a set of questions that I have put together for those who are still "sitting on the fence" and who might be persuaded to do their own research. It is, for that reason more conservative than my own personal position.
I hope that you will take this as a resource that you can share with your friends and relatives.
I am emailing it out to everyone I know.
***
I have been following this for some time and feeling rather uncomfortable about what I was hearing. A video by a rest home worker in the US with a heartfelt cry saying his residents were “droppin like flies” shortly after taking the vaccine made me decide I cannot stay silent
So, I just want to pose the same questions I have asked myself over the past months and invite you to do the research yourself and find your own answers. I do not wish to persuade you of any one viewpoint. I think they are important questions.
Mostly, we get our information from TV sound bites and newspaper articles that do not provide context and often contradict each other, r so we do not get the chance to ask questions.
When we do ask the questions it is often hard to find answers. It takes quite a lot of research as well as a good memory.
I have put in red the items I think warrant a close look
If you find the following useful I would suggest you share it with your friends and ask them to share it with their friends.
If you do not just let it rest there.
COVID-19 TESTING
When covid-19 began to dominate the headlines from March, 2020 there was a lot of reference to testing but on searching I could not find any answers to my questions of what it was and what does it measure? The only answers to the question came from people completely outside the mainstream. This situation has changed quite a bit over the months but to this day the one place I cannot get information is in this country.
We keep hearing that people have tested positive for covid-19. But what does that really mean
Here are some of my questions:
What Is A Covid-19 case?
This is from a (non-practising) GP, Sam Bailey, from Christchurch
The following video is one of the very best explanations that I have come across and comes from a (presumably retired) vice-President of the Pfizer corporation who has impeccable qualifications and yet has been totally censored by the media and social media.
Ex Pfizer Vice President Mike Yeadon Blows The Whistle
Why does this test have to be administered via a catheter up the nose practically to the brain stem, when it is known that other much less-invasive techniques (such as saliva tests) that provide quick answers have not been taken up? In case you don't know, the PCR test is administered by deep insertion of a cotton wool swab with a twisting motion
Why are we not being told about the warnings about the limitations of the PCR test that are on the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) and Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) sites.
The extent to which a positive PCR result correlates with the infectious state of an individual is still being determined.”...There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests.”
Why have deaths due to "other causes", such as heart attack or even car accidents having "covid-19" put as a cause of death if the person had had a positive covid-19 test?
CDC Now Admits that 94% of COVID Deaths had “Another Cause of Death”
At the outset of the pandemic, the CDC had been instructed to change the methodology regarding Death Certificates with a view to artificially inflating the numbers of “Covid deaths”:
Why are comments from qualified and practising virologists and epidemiologists, as well as doctors not beinglistened to, and dismissed as “conspiracy theory” or disinformation?
How do COVID-19 vaccines compare with other existing vaccines?
The clearest explanation I have found is this that explains that the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are not what the media and popular explanations say. If you look at the material from both Pfizer and Moderna they describe their products as “gene therapy” and is an experimental medicine that has either developed in undue haste or was already been developed. As best as I can ascertain the Oxford AstraZenica vaccine is what they say it is, albeit with some caveats.
THE NEW MRNA CORONAVIRUS VACCINES WILL LIKELY CAUSE IMMUNE CELLS TO ATTACK PLACENTA CELLS, CAUSING FEMALE INFERTILITY, MISCARRIAGE OR BIRTH DEFECTS: no
Flu vaccine has been shown to increase the chances of infection by sars-coV-2 by 33%. Why push it?
This is a little-known piece of research cited by Robert F.Kennedy Jr indicating that people in the US military are 36% more prone to being infected with covid=19.
KENNEDY: Pentagon Study Shows Flu Shot Raises Risk Of Coronavirus By 36%, And There’s More:
What follows are some of the more important statements I have come across recently about covid-19 and the vaccines
Mike Yeadon has the perfect credentials and what he says corresponds with the information I got about the immune system while training to be an acupuncturist as opposed to what I get from the media. This is worth, to my mind, a very close listen.
Ex Pfizer Vice President Mike Yeadon Blows The Whistle
This was the video that helped me decide that I could not remain silent. It is a passionate and honest account of a nursing home assistant who decided he could not remain silent but talk of all the deaths that have occured after vaccination of residents whereas in the past year there have been zero deaths.
For me it is sad that these very credible voices are being silenced to the extent they have to seek alternative platforms instead of being part of an open debate.
WHISTLEBLOWER AT NURSING HOME SAYS ELDERLY ARE DROPPING LIKE FLIES AFTER CV-19 SHOT
Posts
