Arrest
of Gov’t Critic and Journalist Max Blumenthal Signals Escalation in
War on Alternative Media The
SWAT-style raid on the home of government critic and journalist Max
Blumenthal signals a new level of escalation in the US government’s
war on dissent.
by
Alan Macleod
Mint Press, 1 November, 2019 Max
Blumenthal, the editor of independent media outletThe
Grayzone,
was secretly arrested on October 25 in a “SWAT-style”
morning raid on his Washington D.C. home. He was held in D.C. Central
Detention Facility for two days incommunicado, without the ability to
communicate to the outside world, having been refused a phone call.
He claims to
have been shackled by his hands and ankles for some time and kept in
a series of cages and cells. Blumenthal was arrested on a
five-month-old assault charge stemming from an incident that took
place during the D.C. Venezuelan Embassy siege.
A
Venezuelan opposition supporter, Naylet Pacheco, claims that
Blumenthal kicked her in the stomach several times during a conflict
between the embassy protectors and supporters of opposition leader
Juan GuaĆdo, who proclaimed himself President of Venezuela in
January. At the time of the incident, The
Grayzone was
publishing a series of investigativereports and news updates
that contradicted the Trump administration’s narrative, noting how
much of the supposedly grassroots uprising, was, in fact, funded by
Washington and exposing the corruption and violent tactics of
opposition members. The warrant for the charge had initially been
rejected. It was, however, revived later without Blumenthal’s
knowledge.
“If
the government had at least told me I had a warrant I could have
voluntarily surrendered and appeared at my own arrangement. I have
nothing to fear because I’m completely innocent of this bogus
charge,” he
said.
“Instead, the federal government essentially enlisted the DC police
to SWAT me, ensuring that I would be subjected to an early morning
raid and then languish in prison for days without even the ability to
call an attorney.”
A
War on Dissent
When
asked for comment, political comedian and TV show host Lee Camp
told MintPress News that this was the latest example
of the government trying to silence dissenting opinion and
controlling the media:
“This
is the continued descent into a fascist state. When the US government
is arresting journalists in dramatic fashion clearly because their
reporting is threatening to the power elite, then what else can one
call it?”
Corporate
media largely
applauded U.S.-backed
regime change efforts in Venezuela, refusing to
even call them a “coup” and instead preferring to frame them
as a people’s “uprising,” taking the same line as the Trump
administration that they claim to “resist.” Many of those same
media outlets have also begun to partner with the government in a
stated effort to fight fake news. The primary
consequence of
which has been to undermine and reduce the reach of alternative
media, a vital counterweight to the corporate message. In response
to a
call to arms in
the Washington
Post,
algorithm changes to Facebook, Google, YouTube, Bing, and others have
led to independent news sites being de-ranked, disincentivized, and
sometimes, deleted.
Despite
his ordeal, Blumenthal has still been treated better than others who
ran afoul of the U.S. government. Chelsea Manning is still held in
prison, Edward Snowden is in exile, while Julian Assange, whose
condition in solitary confinement is deteriorating,
faces a highly uncertain future. On Assange, mainstream media largely
applauded his April arrest, describing it as a “long overdue”
(Washington
Post) and “satisfying”
(Saturday
Night Live)
detention of an “anti-American” (National
Review)
“narcissistic” (Washington
Post)
“Internet Troll” with an “outsized view of his own importance”
(theTimes)
leaving his “voluntary confinement” (theDaily
Beast)
to finally “face justice” (Daily
Mail)
for his “indisputable crime” (New
York Times).
The
Embassy Siege
The
Trump administration refused to recognize the results of the January
2019 elections that awarded NicolƔs Maduro another term in office.
Instead, it announced its support for self-appointed President Juan
GuaĆdo as the rightful head of Venezuela. This, despite the fact
that GuaĆdo has never stood for the office and that over
80 percent of
the country didn’t even know who he was. Following GuaĆdo’s
self-declaration of his presidency, the Trump administration demanded
that all Venezuelan diplomats leave the United States, so those in
Venezuela’s Washington D.C. embassy formally invited peace
activists to enter and protect the integrity of the building.
Just
as GuaĆdo attempted to take the presidential palace in a coup
attempt in April, supporters of the far-right anti-President tried to
storm the Venezuelan embassy in D.C., an event closely
covered by The
Grayzone,
and by MintPress
News’ Alex
Rubenstein,
who was amongst those invited to protect the building. Rubenstein
detailed how the attackers attempted siege and intimidation tactics
to the embassy protectors out and enjoyed the
tacit support of the local security services, who refused to protect
the embassy’s territorial integrity, a serious diplomatic
violation.
Radio
silence from Corporate Media
The
dramatic story of a SWAT team bursting into a dissident journalist’s
home, bundling him into a car and holding him incommunicado for days
appears not to have interested either corporate media or professional
press freedom groups like Reporters Without Borders or the Committee
to Protect Journalists. When pushed for comment, the US Press Freedom
Tracker excluded this case on a technicality, stating:
There
has been exactly zero mainstream coverage or commentary of the
government’s arrest of a prominent critic, meaning that for those
relying on corporate media to inform and shape their worldview, the
event did not happen. This is all the more remarkable considering
Blumenthal is an award-winning, New York Times bestselling author,
comes from a well-connected family of elite former White House
insiders (his father was a senior aide to President Clinton), and
boasts a huge following on social media.
Meanwhile,
Anya Parmpil (another embassy protector) noted that she was assaulted
in broad daylight by GuaĆdo supporters and in front of the secret
services, who did nothing to protect her.
Many
saw the action as part of a wider government campaign aimed at
silencing dissenting opinions. “The establishment has declared war
on anti-imperialist journalists,” declared Kerry-Anne Mendoza,
Editor-in-Chief of The Canary, “There should be global outrage.”
Middle East specialist Jonathan Cook agreed, claiming it was “the
latest example of the growing crackdown on independent journalism.”
Electronic Intifada’s Ali Abunimah offered his support to
Blumenthal, decrying the U.S. government’s “clear retaliation and
intimidation” tactics.
Meanwhile,
Anya Parmpil (another embassy protector) noted that she was assaulted
in broad daylight by GuaĆdo supporters and in front of the secret
services, who did nothing to protect her.
Many
saw the action as part of a wider government campaign aimed at
silencing dissenting opinions. “The establishment has declared war
on anti-imperialist journalists,” declared Kerry-Anne Mendoza,
Editor-in-Chief of The Canary, “There should be global outrage.”
Middle East specialist Jonathan Cook agreed, claiming it was “the
latest example of the growing crackdown on independent journalism.”
Electronic Intifada’s Ali Abunimah offered his support to
Blumenthal, decrying the U.S. government’s “clear retaliation and
intimidation” tactics.
Others
criticized the mainstream press’ reaction to the arrest of a
prominent critic of the U.S. government. Mark Ames, the founder of
the Moscow-based outlet the eXile, noted that Blumenthal’s
treatment reminded him of “the worst of Russia”, except for the
fact when opposition journalists like Ivan Golunov were arrested,
even the Putin-friendly press decried it. Meanwhile, journalist and
filmmaker Abby Martin offered a thought experiment, tweeting:
Blumenthal
is uncompromising in his position regarding the accusation: “This
charge is a 100 percent false, fabricated, bogus, untrue, and
malicious lie,” he
declared.
“It is clearly part of a campaign of political persecution designed
to silence me and The
Grayzone for
our factual journalism exposing the deceptions, corruption and
violence of the far-right Venezuelan opposition.”
Far
from the wholesome image they enjoy in much of the press, the
Venezuelan opposition has a long and exceptionally violent history of
attacking political opponents, including journalists. Their many
campaigns to oust President Maduro from power have
included beheading innocent
passers-by and roastingAfro-Venezuelans alive
in the street in an attempt to terrorize the population into
surrender.
After
reporting on this violence in 2017, journalists Abby Martin and Mike
Prysner were
the subject of
a viral fake news campaign that claimed they were informants
gathering information on the opposition for the secret police. They
received dozens of death threats as part of a campaign in Venezuela
to find
and lynch them.
The two escaped unharmed but others were not so lucky. TeleSur’s
Adriana Sivori was shot
in the back by
the same opposition movement while wearing a bulletproof vest and
helmet marked “press.” Meanwhile, journalists for the Globovisión
network were covered with gasoline by far-right protestors
who attempted
to set
them on fire. This “warm welcome” is extended to those in the
press who the U.S.-backed opposition feel will not present them as
positively as corporate media does.
These
incidents were not mentioned, let alone condemned, by human rights or
press freedom groups, indicating, as does the Blumenthal arrest, that
some consider the right to free speech as dependent on who is doing
the talking and what they are saying.
Filmmaker
Dan Cohen described Blumenthal’s
treatment as a “blatant attempt to stifle and suppress” The
Grayzone’s
reporting on the U.S.’ attempts to overthrow the Venezuelan
government, adding, “Everyone who cares about press freedom in the
US should speak out against this.”
Judging
by their silence, very few in the mainstream media do.
A
History of Violence
Blumenthal
is uncompromising in his position regarding the accusation: “This
charge is a 100 percent false, fabricated, bogus, untrue, and
malicious lie,” he
declared.
“It is clearly part of a campaign of political persecution designed
to silence me and The
Grayzone for
our factual journalism exposing the deceptions, corruption and
violence of the far-right Venezuelan opposition.”
Far
from the wholesome image they enjoy in much of the press, the
Venezuelan opposition has a long and exceptionally violent history of
attacking political opponents, including journalists. Their many
campaigns to oust President Maduro from power have
included beheading innocent
passers-by and roastingAfro-Venezuelans alive
in the street in an attempt to terrorize the population into
surrender.
After
reporting on this violence in 2017, journalists Abby Martin and Mike
Prysner were
the subject of
a viral fake news campaign that claimed they were informants
gathering information on the opposition for the secret police. They
received dozens of death threats as part of a campaign in Venezuela
to find
and lynch them.
The two escaped unharmed but others were not so lucky. TeleSur’s
Adriana Sivori was shot
in the back by
the same opposition movement while wearing a bulletproof vest and
helmet marked “press.” Meanwhile, journalists for the Globovisión
network were covered with gasoline by far-right protestors
who attempted
to set
them on fire. This “warm welcome” is extended to those in the
press who the U.S.-backed opposition feel will not present them as
positively as corporate media does.
These
incidents were not mentioned, let alone condemned, by human rights or
press freedom groups, indicating, as does the Blumenthal arrest, that
some consider the right to free speech as dependent on who is doing
the talking and what they are saying.
Filmmaker
Dan Cohen described Blumenthal’s
treatment as a “blatant attempt to stifle and suppress” The
Grayzone’s
reporting on the U.S.’ attempts to overthrow the Venezuelan
government, adding, “Everyone who cares about press freedom in the
US should speak out against this.”
Judging
by their silence, very few in the mainstream media do.
Max
Blumenthal: Donald Trump PROTECTING Al-Qaeda in Idlib, Syria!
Going
Underground, RT
We
speak to Max Blumenthal of the Grayzone Project on his new book ‘The
Management of Savagery’, detailing the West’s history of
promoting radical Islam for geopolitical goals, Syria and the latest
chemical attack allegations and the situation in Idlib, the US’
increasing sanctions on Venezuela and their destructive effects on
Venezuelans and more!
On
June 16, an American media activist living in rebel-held Syrian
territory sat down before a camera to
vent his frustration with a former employer. Bilal Abdul Kareem
described how he and his online outlet, On the Ground News, had
beencontracted
by CNN to
film the documentary Undercover
in Syria.
“This
was with CNN and their correspondent Clarissa Ward, which I have
big-time respect for, big-time respect as a journalist, as a person,”
Abdul Kareem remarked.
With
a sardonic grin, Abdul Kareem described how he was slighted:
“ThisUndercover
in Syria,
you can Google it — it won the prestigious Peabody Award, and it
won the prestigious Overseas Press Club Award, which are basically
the highest awards in journalism for international reporting. Now,
[CNN] barely mentioned my name! I’m telling you, somehow CNN must
have forgotten that I was the one that filmed it, I guess they forgot
that.”
Indeed,
Abdul Kareem’s name was a mere footnote in the Peabody
Awards press release on
its honoring of CNN. The organization praised Clarissa Ward for
“[going] undercover into northern Syria to document Russian
influence on the fighting and to navigate the ongoing devastation,”
but credited Abdul Kareem only in small print, despite the fact that
he was responsible for providing CNN with its on-the-ground footage.
At
the April 2017 ceremony where the network’s Undercover
in Syria won
the Overseas Press Club Award, CNN president Jeff Zucker was on hand
to deliver the keynote address. CNN later touted the award in a press
release that celebrated the access Ward was granted to eastern Aleppo
by the Islamist insurgents that had controlled it. The network noted
that her work resulted in her being invited to testify before the
United Nations Security Council. But CNN made no mention of Abdul
Kareem’s role in the special.
Contrary
to Abdul Kareem’s claim that CNN had simply “forgotten” him,
the network may have had reason to airbrush him out of its public
relations material. The man Ward contracted to take her into
rebel-controlled territory was well established as one of the top
English-language propagandists for al-Qaeda’s Syrian affiliate,
Jabhat al-Nusra, along with other extremist groups fighting the
Syrian government.
In
fact, the Saudi Arabian news outlet Al
Arabiya reported
on June 7 that Abdul Kareem officially joined al-Nusra in 2012.
Abdul
Kareem denied this accusation in a Facebook
video response.
"I am not, nor have I ever been, nor do I need to be a part of
al-Qaeda. I don't have any need for that,” he said, noting that he
is considering legal action against Al Arabiya for its report.
However,
one of Abdul Kareem’s closest colleagues has also been accused of
membership in Syria’s al-Qaeda franchise. Akif Razaq, an employee
of Abdul Kareem’s online media group, On the Ground News, was
recently stripped
of British citizenship for
his alleged involvement with al-Nusra. A notice presented by British
authorities to Razaq’s family in Birmingham accused him of being
“aligned with an al-Qaeda-aligned group” and declared that he
“presents a risk to the national security of the United Kingdom.”
During
Abdul Kareem's Facebook video response to the Al Arabiya report, he
was seated beside Razap. Razaq has also co-hosted On the Ground News
segments with him.
While
Abdul Kareem insisted there was “no proof” of his membership in
the Salafi-jihadist organization, rebels inside Syria tell a
different story.
Journalist
or jihadist videographer?
AlterNet
contacted Abdullah Abu Azzam, an activist affiliated with the rebel
group Kataib Thawar al-Sham. Abu Azzam, who asked to be identified by
a pseudonym out of fear of retaliation by al-Nusra, is one of many
opposition activists who have come into contact with Abdul Kareem and
his colleagues. Speaking to AlterNet by Whatsapp, he said Abdul
Kareem was not only a propagandist for al-Nusra, but well known as a
member of the group.
Fighters
in Thawar al-Sham, according to Abu Azzam, refer to Abdul Kareem as
the "American mujahid” (mujahid is Arabic for jihadist).
Abu
Azzam claimed Abdul Kareem had applied his videography skills to make
a series of YouTube videos for the official account of Jaish
al-Fatah, the Salafi-jihadist fighting coalition led by al-Nusra. He
added that Abdul Kareem worked directly with the late public
relations director for Jaish al-Fateh, Ammar
Abu al-Majid.
For these videos, he said Abdul Kareem used the alias, Abu Osama.
According
to Abu Azzam, Abdul Kareem collaborated directly with Salafi cleric
Abdul Razzaq al-Mahdi, a key ideological leader of extremist rebels
in Syria. Al-Mahdi, one of the most popular guests on Abdul Kareem’s
programs, was a co-founder of Syrian al-Qaeda’s most recent
rebranding as Hay’at
Tahrir al-Sham.
He later defected to the competing Salafist militia Ahrar al-Sham.
One
of the videos Abdul Kareem made, Abu Azzam said, was a segment for
the Salafi-jihadist propaganda channel Knowledge
Is Key,
titled “Islamic Fatwas from the Scholars of Syria.” The video
featured Ammar Abu al-Majid as its host.
When
asked how he knows Abdul Kareem made the video, Abu Azzam replied, “I
was in photography with Ammar.”
AlterNet
contacted the senior press manager for CNN International, along with
CNN’s Middle East press officer and public relations coordinator,
to request comment on Abdul Kareem’s relationship to the network.
We asked for details about Abdul Kareem’s contractual obligations
with CNN and whether the network felt his well-documented
relationship with al-Qaeda compromised the reporting it carried out
in Syria.
CNN
did not respond.
'An
American in Syria who is with the rebels and mujahideen'
Bilal
Abdul Kareem is one of the most remarkable characters to emerge from
Syria’s six-year civil war. An erstwhile comedian and theater actor
from New York City, he has softened his image with a self-effacing
charm and friendly temperament that recalls the style of a children’s
television show host.
Abdul
Kareem arrived in Syria in 2012 after a stint promoting the
NATO-backed Islamist rebels in Libya. With his On the Ground News, he
quickly established himself as the leading English-language reporter
on Salafi groups in Syria, and the only American media figure
welcomed as a long-term resident in al-Nusra-controlled territory.
Dozens
of other journalists have been kidnapped and even killed in these
extremist-held areas. When asked why he had not faced the same
dangers from al-Qaeda, Abdul Kareem said in his Facebook video
response to Al Arabiya, “I don't feel threatened by them because I
think there's a mutual respect.”
Abdul
Kareem demonstrated his influence -- and mutual respect -- when a
British woman named Shukee Begum traveled to ISIS-controlled
territory to reunite with her jihadist husband, Jamal al-Harith, who
had been released from Guantanamo Bay after intensive lobbying by the
British government. When Begum decided she wanted to escape from
ISIS, Abdul Kareem stepped
in to
facilitate her release to al Qaeda-controlled territory in northern
Syria.
Last
December, AlterNet’s Grayzone Project exposed Bilal
Abdul Kareem’s involvement with
some of Syria’s most notorious jihadist figures and his open
propagation of their sectarian ideology. Most prominent among the
clerics granted a friendly audience by Abdul Kareem was Abdullah
al-Muhaysini, the Saudi Arabian hate preacher and warlord praised by
Abdul Kareem as “probably the most loved cleric in the Syrian
territories today.”
Muhaysini
is indeed popular among the Al Qaeda-allied rebels of Syria,
and holds
considerable sway over
the entire region of Idlib. He has appeared in refugee camps to
recruit child soldiers, raised millions of dollars for jihadist
offensives and granted his blessing to the mass executions of
captured Syrian soldiers on the grounds that the captives
were kuffar,
or blasphemers. The cleric's goal, like that of ISIS, has been to
establish an exclusively Sunni state purged of Shia, Druze and
Christian citizens of Syria, and run according to a strict
interpretation of Islamic law.
This
June, Abdul Kareem appeared as a guest on a special Ramadan program
on Muhaysini’s Jihad’s Callers Center. Introduced by co-host
Khattab al-Otaibi as “an American in Syria who is with the rebels
and mujahideen,” Abdul Kareem was welcomed by
Muhaysini. “Greetings to our media man, the great innovator, Bilal
Abdul Kareem!” the rotund cleric said with a grin.
Clearly
pleased with the promotion he was granted, Muhaysini has promoted his
interviews with Abdul Kareem to followers of his WhatsApp channel.
Today,
Salafi-jihadist leaders refer to Abdul Kareem as their “media man.”
But there also was a time when Abdul Kareem was CNN’s media man, as
well. It was when Clarissa Ward, the network’s Middle East
correspondent, contracted Abdul Kareem to help lead her and her crew
into eastern Aleppo and Idlib, both areas under the control of
al-Nusra and extremist groups like Ahrar al-Sham that have been
responsible for well-documented atrocities. She was on her way to
meet the rebels she would later describe as “heroes on the ground.”
Promoting
the armed opposition
When
Ward first entered Syria, it was the early stage of the revolt
against the government of President Bashar al-Assad. She had posed as
a tourist to enter the country.
“Then,
I sort of slipped off into an alleyway in the old city, put a
headscarf on, and went and lived with some activists for a week,”
Ward recalled.
She returned from her journey into rebel-held territory with what
amounted to a commercial for the Free Syrian Army, a now-defunct
collection of CIA-backed militias, who in her words, “pledge to
defend the Syrian people against the Assad regime.”
It
was the beginning of a long and fruitful relationship with the Syrian
opposition as it evolved into an armed insurgency led by al-Qaeda’s
local franchise.
Ward
had been aware of Abdul Kareem’s presence in the rebel bases of
power since at least 2014, soon after he emerged seemingly out of the
blue through On the Ground News. Ward promoted Bilal
Abdul Kareem’s “must read” work on her Twitter account and
praised him for “extraordinary brave reporting.”
She
was hardly alone among her colleagues in paying tribute to Abdul
Kareem, as AlterNet previously documented. Besides working with CNN,
he has produced reports in cooperation with the U.K.'s Channel 4, the
BBC and Sky News. He has been praised by CNN’s Hala Gorani, who
branded him as an “independent journalist,” and was named Al
Jazeera’s “Personality of the Week.”
The
New York Times'
Ben Hubbard published a sympathetic profile of Abdul Kareem,
summarizing him euphemistically as "an American with a point of
view and a message." For an accompanying photo, the Times chose
a screenshot from a video in which Abdul Kareem rationalized suicide
bombing. The Intercept’s Murtaza Hussain likewise offered a
similarly fawning portrait of Abdul Kareem, complimenting him for
providing "a unique perspective on the conflict in Syria"
and portraying him as a target of U.S.-led coalition drones.
It
remains unclear if members of the foreign press were apprised of
Abdul Kareem’s close affiliation with al-Nusra, the local al-Qaeda
affiliate, or if they even cared. After all, Abdul Kareem was a
valuable asset: an American embedded in the heart of rebel-controlled
areas who was eager to assist a cast of Western correspondents
parachuting in to ingratiate themselves with the armed opposition.
Abdul
Kareem never attempted to conceal his sectarian agenda. As AlterNet
documented, he once praised the late al-Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki
and openly questioned whether Shia are actually Muslim. In his
friendly sit-down with Abdul Razzaq al-Mahdi, Abdul Kareem introduced
the extremist preacher who has called for the genocide of Syria’s
minority sects as a religious expert who “specializes in
understanding the Shia ideology.”
Special
guest of al-Nusra
Ward’s
coverage for the Undercover
in Syria CNN
special took place in rebel-held eastern Aleppo and Idlib. In these
areas, she appeared in a full black niqab to comport with the dress
code imposed by al-Nusra, whose legal apparatus had forbidden the
wearing of colorful hijab and even outlawed smoking cigarettes and
playing music.
Working
alongside Abdul Kareem, Ward documented the aftermath of bombings by
the Syrian and Russian militaries and the cruelty they visited on the
civilian population. She framed the
Syrian government’s battle to oust the jihadist-led rebels from
eastern Aleppo as “a war on normalcy.”
At
the time, Ward was possibly the only Western reporter welcomed into
al-Nusra-controlled territory. Kidnappings and the gruesome killing
of journalists like James Foley had become the order of the day in
areas of Syria controlled by rebel militias and ISIS. Lindsey Snell,
one of the last Western journalists to report from Idlib, reported on
her kidnapping by al-Nusra. “The group fully acknowledged that I’d
been granted permission to report,” Snell wrote, “but said they
suspected me of being a spy, an accusation they’ve made against
every journalist they’ve kidnapped in Syria.”
Ward
had no such problems in the area, and that may have been thanks to
Abdul Kareem and the cozy relationship he enjoyed with the
Salafi-jihadist militias that dominated eastern Aleppo and Idlib.
Her
safety was also ensured by “Abu Youssef,” the bodyguard CNN hired
to protect Ward and her producer. It is unclear if he was from a
rebel group.
Ward
closed an Undercover
in Syria report
with a bittersweet reflection on her bodyguard:
We
hand over a bag full of British chocolates to our security guards.
Abu Youssef thanks us and quietly hands each of us a folded piece of
white paper with our initials on it.
“Promise
me you won’t read these until you get back home to London,” he
says.
Two
flights and 72 hours later, we open the letters.
“I
hope you have a good idea of us,” they read. “Please tell the
world the truth about Syria.”
The
"heroes on the ground...are the Islamist factions"
Six
months later, in August 2016, Ward appeared at the United Nations
Security Council to testify to
her version of the truth. She was there as a guest of then-U.S.
ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power, who was described by
the Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg as “the most dispositionally
interventionist among Obama’s senior advisers.” The U.N. session
Power arranged appeared to be consistent with her interventionist
crusade.
Besides
Ward, Power had solicited testimony from Zaher Sahloul and Samer
Attar, the directors of the Syrian American Medical Society. SAMS
assistance coordination units have set up hospitals in refugee camps
and within Syrian territories exclusively held by Syria’s rebels,
including in al-Qaeda-run Idlib. From 2013 to 2015, SAMS received
over $5.8
million in support for
its activities from the U.S. Agency for Aid and International
Development (USAID). In 2015, according to the Washington Post, Chase
Bank closed SAMS'
bank account without explanation.
Sahloul,
for his part, is the American ringleader of the Syrian opposition.
After unsuccessfully lobbying Barack Obama for a NATO-imposed no-fly
zone over opposition-held areas of Syria, Sahloul accused the
president of having “allowed a genocide in Syria.”
On
Sept. 20, 2016, Sahloul was a participant in
a rally in New York dedicated to ramping up conflict with Iran. The
rally was organized by
the exiled Iranian People’s MEK, a militant cult of personality
dedicated to regime change in Iran that has paid handsome
fees to
prominent former U.S. officials to shill on its behalf. After the
rally, the neoconservative columnist Eli Lake hailed Sahloul
and his colleagues as “Syrian-Americans who stood up to Iran.”
At
the U.N., Ward was seated beside
Sahloul and Attar,
and repeatedly heaped praise on the two opposition activists. She
lashed out at the “international community” for “wringing their
hands on the sidelines while homes, hospitals and bakeries and
schools were bombed,” an apparent plea for military intervention
against the Syrian government.
Her
jeremiad might have been straightforward advocacy, but its content
was well in line with her network’s editorial agenda, which has
encouraged primetime personalities like Jake
Tapper and Arwa
Damon to
also make the case for attacking Syria.
Ward’s
speech crested with a tribute to Salafi-jihadist insurgent groups
like al-Nusra and Ahrar al-Sham.
“The
only ones who have emerged as heroes on the ground, along with brave
doctors like Dr. Sahloul and Dr. Attar, alongside the White Helmets,”
Ward declared, “are the Islamist factions — even to those who
hate fundamentalists.
Even to those who see that the rebels
themselves are carrying out atrocities, and not because the people
there are all terrorists, but because the Islamists are the ones who
have stepped in to fill the void.”
Whitewashing
rebel atrocities, attacking critics
During
her U.N. testimony, Ward slipped in a bizarre reference to the rebels
who had been transferred by bus from territory they lost to other
zones of opposition control in accordance with internationally
brokered agreements.
“Many
of them are loaded onto buses and never see the light of day again,”
she claimed, falsely suggesting that the so-called “green buses”
common to such transfer deals were a one-way ticket to slaughter.
There
was, in fact, one incident where such a gruesome scenario took place
during a population transfer agreement. But it did not fit the regime
change narrative propagated by CNN, so Ward and her colleagues did
their best to gloss over it.
On
April 15, a suicide bomber affiliated with the armed
opposition attacked
a convoy of buses evacuating
civilians from Shia-majority villages that had been besieged for
years by rebels led by al-Nusra and Ahrar al-Sham. When the bomber
arrived, he had reportedly dangled bags of potato chips from his
truck to lure hungry children toward him. Over 100 evacuees were
killed in the blast, including 80 children.
The
massacre in Rashidin was one of the most obscene atrocities of the
Syrian civil war. But Assad and his forces were not responsible.
Indeed, the killers were the very men Ward had celebrated before the
U.N. as “heroes on the ground."
CNN
covered the incident in a single brief report, with correspondent
Nick Patton Walsh downplaying the atrocity as a "hiccup."
Ward,
meanwhile, was preparing a special episode on the chemical attack
that took place earlier that month in al-Nusra-controlled Idlib.
Titled, "Gasping
for life:
Syria’s merciless war on its children,” the CNN special consisted
of footage of child casualties of the alleged sarin gas attack filmed
by rebel-affiliated organizations like SAMS and the White Helmets.
(Ward’s special aired during CNN host Jake Tapper’s “The
Lead.”)
More
than 30 people were killed in that attack under circumstances that
were shrouded in mystery and which remain hotly
debated and
subject to critical
reporting.
The U.S. government’s official narrative holds the Syrian
government responsible for the chemical attack, but concrete proof
has been hard to come by.
Ward
dispensed with skepticism in her special and cranked up the regime
change rhetoric for maximum emotional potency. Of the high-definition
footage of children gasping for breath, she commented, “When you
watch these children choking on what were likely their last breaths,
you understand what evil is.”
Days
after the special aired, Max Abrahms, a national security researcher
and professor at Northeastern University, took
to Twitter to
criticize the flagrant inconsistency between CNN’s coverage of the
bus bombing and the chemical attack. His comments sent Ward into a
frenzy, prompting her to accuse him of being “way out of line.”
“Show
us the special of the bloodier opposition attack,” Abrams
countered. “We saw your special on the less lethal Assad attack.
CNN should do specials on both.”
“We
covered it,” Ward shot back, clearly flustered by the challenge.
“I'm going to block you now because I have just spent 20 mins
arguing about Syria w/someone who's never even been to Syria.”
In
a previous exchange,
Ward had attempted to deflect Abrahms’ criticism of her work by
accusing him of “encourag[ing] the death threats.”
Selective
listening
During
her acceptance of
the International Center for Journalists' Excellence in International
Reporting Award, Ward boasted of the sensitivity she displayed during
interviews with jihadists who had infiltrated Syria to join ISIS.
“I
don’t think we can be selective in who we listen to,” Ward
proclaimed. “I don’t think we can be selective in who we try to
understand. I fundamentally believe we can’t afford to dismiss
people. That’s not our job.”
But
Ward has not followed her own advice where the majority of Syria’s
population is concerned. Her coverage has tuned out the voices of the
18 million people who live under government control in order to
propagate a one-sided narrative aimed at generating public support
for regime change. Since the beginning of Syria’s civil war, CNN
has virtually ignored the experiences of those who live in constant
fear of the U.S. and Gulf-backed rebels that Ward branded as
"heroes."
In
her apparent zeal for access, Clarissa Ward solicited a working
partnership with one of al-Qaeda’s top propagandists in Syria,
Bilal Abdul Kareem. Having reaped the benefits of its star
correspondent’s partnership with a jihadist “media man,” CNN
now seeks to erase their affiliation altogether.
Max Blumenthal is a
senior editor of the Grayzone
Project at AlterNet, and
the award-winning author of Goliath and Republican
Gomorrah.
His most recent book is The
51 Day War: Ruin and Resistance in Gaza. Follow
him on Twitter at@MaxBlumenthal.
Ben
Norton is a reporter for AlterNet's Grayzone Project. You can follow
him on Twitter at @BenjaminNorton.