The
western media are taking this report for granted as proof that the
perpertrators of the chemical wepons attack of August 21 were the
Syrian government.
'Not
bulletproof’: Russia says UN chemical attack report does not show
who was responsible
Russia’s
UN representative says the newly unveiled report on the chemical
attack of August 21 in Syria offers no “bulletproof data or
conclusions” on who ordered it. The US and UK say the study
confirms the regime was behind the attack.
RT,
16
September, 2013
“The
report is diligent but very technical. It avoids categorical
judgments and inferences, and it needs to be studied,” Vitaly
Churkin told the Russian media at the UN headquarters in New York.
“As
people examine it, everyone can draw their own conclusion, but I hope
that won’t be driven by political motives.”
US
President Barack Obama's national security adviser, Susan Rice, said
in a statement the technical evidence of high-grade sarin revealed in
the report "reinforces our assessment that these attacks were
carried out by the Syrian regime, as only they had the capability to
mount an attack in this manner."
Earlier,
Washington envoy to the UN Samantha Power said the study proved that
“only the regime” had the capacity to carry out the attack on a
Damascus suburb that the US claims took more than 1,400 lives. UK
Foreign Secretary William Hague also said the findings were “fully
consistent” with the previous British stance that Bashar Assad’s
forces were responsible for the attack.
Churkin
said that suggestions the attack was a rebel provocation “cannot be
shrugged off”.
The
38-page report was compiled by a UN expert team, which inspected
Damascus at the end of last month, and collected over 30 samples from
victims and the environment. Its authors state that it found “clear
and convincing evidence that surface-to-surface rockets containing
the nerve agent sarin” were released on “a relatively large
scale” during the August attack. The report doesn't blame either of
the sides.
UN
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has labeled the incident a “war
crime”.
Churkin
also told journalists “not to jump to conclusions” when
questioned about whether Cyrillic alphabet markings, which were found
on fragments of rockets reportedly used in the attack, proved that
they were in possession of government forces. He said that UK and US
assertions that rebels do not have the capacity to execute a large
scale gas attack were “not grounded in reality”.
Last
week, Russia and the United States put forward a proposal that would
see Syria hand over its chemical weapons to international observers.
Syria has also applied to join the Chemical Weapons Convention - an
international treaty that regulates the destruction of such weapons -
next month
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.