Syria:
Waiting for Obama
Seemorerocks
Seemorerocks
There
are lots of headlines today, but essentially we will have to wait
until Tuesday (Wednesday NZT) to learn what Obama has to say and how
the US Congress has to say.
There
continues to be escalation and a build-up of naval forces in the
eastern Meditteranean. The Turks, it is reported today,a re moving
their forces into position.
In
the meantime in the west we are being bombarded with fairly crude
propaganda. Every morning I wake up to some speech of Kerry or
Obama, which always repeats the lie that a 'red line' has to crossed
and the Syrians have to be punished and whole world is behind them
except for the dastardly Russians.
This
morning's dose woul d be typical:
Meanwhile
public opinion in the US, Europe and here in New Zealnd is not taken
in and is solidly against war even thoough people are not coming out
into the streets in the numbers that they did in 2003.
The
American empire has been shown at the G-20 to have lost much of its
power over the world: moral power has long gone; all that remains is
its overwhelming military power.
Obama
is backed into to a corner. Either he is going to ignore the court of
world opinion and act totally illegally (and risk WW111) or he is
going to back down and be seen as a coward by politiicians in his own
country.
My
guess (and it is only that) is that the increasingly desperate Obama
will pull out a rabbit at the last minute in his desperate attempt to win over public and congressional support.
This
could be a second false flag, a
chemical weapons attack that will again be ascribed to Assad.
This has been reported by Saudi al-Arabiya and so far has had very
little attention.
This
possibility has been raised in this video:
This
opinion is as good as any for the time being. To see what happens we
will have to wait and see.
Bild
am Sonntag cites high-level German surveillance source suggesting
Syrian president was not personally behind attacks
Arab
League Secretary General Nabil al-Araby has denied that AL’s recent
call for action on Syria translated into their endorsement of a
military intervention. He also warned in an interview to al-Ahram
newspaper that an operation against Syria would “explode” the
entire Middle East.
On
Sept. 6, a public opinion poll was released, giving the Justice and
Development Party (AKP) government a headache. The Transatlantic
Trends survey, prepared annually by the German Marshall Fund of the
United States, revealed that the Turkish public’s opposition to an
intervention in Syria has dramatically increased since last year.
According
to the poll, conducted between June 3 and July 2, 72% of Turkish
people oppose an intervention in Syria, up from 57% last year.
Amid
what is going on in Syria, big questions surround the Syrian
opposition’s options. The political opposition inside Syria rejects
a US strike, is determined to find a political solution and insists
on convening the Geneva II conference, according to lawyer Hassan
Abdel Azim, the general coordinator
Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad denied that he was behind a chemical
weapons attack on the Syrian people, as the White House on Sunday
pressed ahead with the uphill effort of persuading Congress to
approve a military strike to punish Assad.
Hundreds
of western peace activists, including from Britain and from the US,
have volunteered to become "human shields" in
government-held parts of Syria, the Daily Telegraph has learned.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.