France
accuses Syria of 3 chemical attacks, Assad slams Western logic
At
least three chemical attacks were staged in Syria between April and
August, a declassified French intelligence report claims, while
President Bashar Assad said it was “illogical” for the government
to launch a chemical weapons strike.
2
September, 2013
The
declassified nine-page French intelligence report,
issued by the country’s external and military services, suggests
government forces loyal to President Assad were behind the attack,
which took place on August 21 in eastern Ghouta, on the outskirts of
Damascus.
The
report alleges the strikes were directed from government-controlled
areas to the east and west of Damascus and targeted rebel zones; the
intelligence also describes "massive
use of chemical agents"
involved in the attack.
“Unlike
previous attacks that used small amounts of chemicals and were aimed
at terrorizing people, this attack was tactical and aimed at
regaining territory,"
government sources commented to Reuters.
The
source added that since then Assad’s forces had subsequently bombed
the areas to erase evidence of strikes.
Moreover,
the report alleges the Syrian government staged at least three
chemical attacks since April, according to AFP, including those in
the towns of Saraqib and Jobar in April. Those attacks appeared to
have killed about 280 people.
The
report was published on the websites of the French presidency, the
Foreign Ministry and the Defense Ministry at 5 pm Paris time (7 pm
GMT).
"We
are going to give the MPs everything we have – classified until now
– to enable every one of them to take on board the reality of the
unacceptable attack,"
French Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault said Monday.
Syrian
activists inspect the bodies of people they say were killed by nerve
gas in The Ghouta region, in the Duma neighbourhood of Damascus
August 21, 2013.(Reuters / Bassam Khabieh)
French
President Francois Hollande has backed a call from US President
Barack Obama for a military strike against the Syrian government as a
punitive response to the Aug. 21 chemical attack. However, after
Obama requested an authorization from the Congress, France said they
do not intend to act alone and intends to create a coalition for
intervention in Syria.
"It's
not for France to act alone. The president is continuing his work of
persuasion to bring together a coalition without delay. This act
cannot be left without a response,"
PM Ayrault reiterated after presenting an intelligence report on
Syria to lawmakers, his defense and foreign ministers, intelligence
and security officials.
"France
is determined to penalize the use of chemical weapons by Assad's
regime and to dissuade [further attacks] with a forceful and firm
response,"
Ayrault said. "The
objective is neither to topple the regime nor to liberate the
country,"
he said, adding that only a political solution in Syria was possible.
Ayrault
also said no vote was scheduled for Wednesday’s parliamentary
debate on the Syrian conflict. The French constitution doesn't
require a vote for the president to be able to authorize military
action, Ayrault added.
Assad
slams ‘illogical’ accusations of chemical attacks
Meanwhile,
Syrian President Bashar Assad has derided allegations from the West
that his government was behind alleged chemical attacks in the
country. He challenged the world to provide “the slightest
proof” he had used chemical weapons against his own people, and
questioned the logic behind such accusations.
“Supposing
that our army wants to use weapons of mass destruction… Is it
possible that it does so in an area that it is itself in, and where
soldiers are wounded by these weapons, which UN inspectors noted
while visiting hospitals in which they were treated. Where is the
logic?”
the Syrian leader said.
“We
have challenged the United States and France to come up with a single
piece of proof,”
he told Le Figaro. “Obama
and Hollande have been incapable of doing so.”
People
demonstrate against a US-led strike on Syria in front of the White
House in Washington on August 31, 2013.(AFP Photo / Nicholas Kamm)
“Anybody
who contributes to the financial and military reinforcement of
terrorists is the enemy of the Syrian people. If the policies of the
French state are hostile to the Syrian people, the state will be
their enemy,”
Assad said, adding that the French people themselves were not
enemies, but the French government’s policies were regarded as
hostile.
“There
will be repercussions, negative ones obviously, on French interests,”
he concluded.
Assad
said that any military action from the country would spark negative
repercussions on French interests, calling the region a “powder
keg.”
“The
whole world will lose control of the situation. Chaos and extremism
will spread. The risk of a regional war exists,”
he said. Assad’s comments came before the French intelligence
report was published.
UN
chemical attack investigation
The
samples collected by the UN chemical investigation team of the
suspected chemical attack in Ghouta are to be examined by the Swedish
Defense Research Institute in the northern city of Umea, said Ake
Sellstrom, who leads the investigation, Russian media reported.
Sellstrom
rebuffed assumptions that the samples were not reliable due to too
much time having elapsed after the attack. He noted that the material
was collected in a short time, so there is a good chance for accurate
analysis.
"It
is rarely possible to collect samples after such a short time,"
Sellstrom said. The Defense Research Institute says the analysis of
samples brought back from Syria will take about two weeks. Some
samples will also be studied in Finland.
The
publication of the intelligence report follows Russian Foreign
Minister Sergey Lavrov’s call for lifting the veil on all available
information regarding the alleged chemical attack.
He
added that the evidence provided by the US was not convincing,
‘nothing concrete, no
geographical coordinates or details.'
Finally,
he warned that a strike on Syria would lead to a huge increase in
extremism and have the opposite effect to what the Western powers
desire.
The
Russian minister had previously warned that Western military action
would sink efforts to organize a peace conference in Geneva.
"If
the action announced by the US president – to the great regret of
all of us – does in fact take place... it will put off the chances
of (holding) this conference for a long time, if not forever",
Lavrov said.
On
Saturday, Russian President Vladimir Putin labeled the idea that the
Syrian government would use chemical weapons on its own people when
UN inspectors were in Damascus as “utter
nonsense.”
The Russian President called the affair a “provocation”
by Syrian rebels hoping to embroil Western powers in the conflict.
The
Geneva conference which is due to take place in late 2013, is
meant to bring the Syrian government of President Bashar Assad and
the Syrian National Coalition, the two main opposing sides of the
conflict, to the negotiating table in a bid to find a political
solution to the crisis.
Insight:
As Obama blinks on Syria, Israel, Saudis make common cause
If
President Barack Obama has disappointed Syrian rebels by deferring to
Congress before bombing Damascus, he has also dismayed the United
States' two main allies in the Middle East.
2
September, 2013
Israel
and Saudi Arabia have little love for each other but both are
pressing their mutual friend in the White House to hit President
Bashar al-Assad hard. And both do so with one eye fixed firmly not on
Syria but on their common adversary - Iran.
Israel's
response to Obama's surprise move to delay or even possibly cancel
air strikes made clear that connection: looking soft on Assad after
accusing him of killing hundreds of people with chemical weapons may
embolden his backers in Tehran to develop nuclear arms, Israeli
officials said. And if they do, Israel may strike Iran alone, unsure
Washington can be trusted.
Neither
U.S. ally is picking a fight with Obama in public. Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that the nation was
"serene and self-confident"; Saudi Foreign Minister Prince
Saud al-Faisal simply renewed a call to the "international
community" to halt Assad's violence in Syria.
But
the Saudi monarchy, though lacking Israel's readiness to attack Iran,
can share the Jewish state's concern that neither may now look with
confidence to Washington to curb what Riyadh sees as a drive by its
Persian rival to dominate the Arab world.
Last
year, Obama assured Israelis that he would "always have Israel's
back". Now Netanyahu is reassuring them they can manage without
uncertain U.S. protection against Iran, which has called for Israel's
destruction but denies developing nuclear weapons.
"Israel's
citizens know well that we are prepared for any possible scenario,"
the hawkish prime minister said. "And Israel's citizens should
also know that our enemies have very good reasons not to test our
power and not to test our might."
That
may not reassure a U.S. administration which has tried to steer
Netanyahu away from unilateral action against Iran that could stir
yet more chaos in the already explosive Middle East.
Israel's
state-run Army Radio was more explicit: "If Obama is hesitating
on the matter of Syria," it said, "Then clearly on the
question of attacking Iran, a move that is expected to be far more
complicated, Obama will hesitate much more - and thus the chances
Israel will have to act alone have increased."
Israelis
contrast the "red line" Netanyahu has set for how close
Iran may come to nuclear weapons capability before Israel strikes
with Obama's "red line" on Assad's use of chemical weapons
- seemingly passed without U.S. military action so far.
"HEAD
OF THE SNAKE"
Saudi
Arabia, like Israel heavily dependent on the United States for arms
supplies, is engaged in a historic confrontation with Iran for
regional influence - a contest shaped by their leading roles in the
rival Sunni and Shi'ite branches of Islam.
Riyadh
is a prime backer of Sunni rebels fighting Assad, whose Alawite
minority is a Shi'ite offshoot. It sees toppling Assad as checking
Iran's ambition not just in Syria but in other Arab states including
the Gulf, where it mistrusts Shi'ites in Saudi Arabia itself and in
neighboring Bahrain, Yemen and Iraq.
Saudi
King Abdullah's wish for U.S. action against Iran was memorably
contained in leaked U.S. diplomatic cables, including one in which a
Saudi envoy said the monarch wanted Washington to "cut off the
head of the snake" to end Tehran's nuclear threat.
Disappointment
with Obama's hesitation against Assad came through on Sunday in the
Saudi foreign minister's remarks to the Arab League in Cairo, where
he said words were no longer enough.
Riyadh
and its allies in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) risk ending up
empty-handed in their latest push for U.S. backing in their campaign
to rein in Iran, said Sami al-Faraj, a Kuwaiti analyst who advises
the GCC on security matters:
"The
idea of a punishment for a crime has lost its flavor. We are on the
edge of the possibility that military action may not be conducted,"
he said. "Congress, for sure, ... will attach conditions to what
is already going to be a limited strike. At the end, we as Gulf
allies, may end up with nothing."
Israel
does not share the Saudi enthusiasm for the Syrian rebel cause,
despite its concern about Assad's role as a link between Iran and
Lebanese and Palestinian enemies. The presence in rebel ranks of
Sunni Islamist militants, some linked to al Qaeda, worries the Jewish
state - though Riyadh, too, is keen to curb al Qaeda, which calls the
royal family American stooges.
EGYPTIAN
LESSONS
Saudi
and Israeli support for U.S. air strikes in response to Assad's
alleged use of poison gas scarcely stands out less amid a global
clamor of reproach for Damascus. But the recent Egyptian crisis saw
them more distinctly making common cause in lobbying Washington -
since their preference for Egypt's army over elected Islamists was at
odds with much of world opinion.
That,
too, reflects shared anxieties about the strength of Islamic populism
and about Iran, which found a more sympathetic ear in Cairo after the
election of President Mohamed Mursi.
Israeli
political commentators used terms such as "betrayal" and
"bullet in the back from Uncle Sam" when Obama abandoned
loyal ally Hosni Mubarak during the popular uprising of 2011.
While
some Western leaders voiced unease at the army's overthrow of Mursi
in July and bloody crackdown on his Muslim Brotherhood, in Israel
even Obama's mild rebuke to the generals - delaying delivery of four
warplanes to Egypt - caused "raised eyebrows" of
disapproval, an official there said.
A
"gag order" from Netanyahu kept that quiet, however, as
Israel's military kept open the communications with Egypt's armed
forces, not least over militant attacks near their desert border, in
a manner that has been the bedrock of the U.S.-brokered peace treaty
binding Israel and Egypt since 1979.
Unusually,
it was Saudi Arabia which was the more vocally critical of
Washington's allies over its Egypt policy.
As
U.S. lawmakers toyed with holding back aid to the new military-backed
government, Riyadh and its Gulf allies poured in many more billions
in aid and loans to Cairo.
And
Saudi Arabia told Washington defiantly that it would make up any
shortfall if the United States dared to turn off the taps: "To
those who have declared they are stopping aid to Egypt or are waving
such a threat, the Arab and Muslim nations ... will not shy away from
offering a helping hand to Egypt," foreign minister Prince Saud
said last month.
DISCREET
DIPLOMACY
More
quietly, Israel has been engaged in direct discussions with the White
House, urging Obama not to waver in support of Egypt's military and
saying it is time to act on Syria.
An
official briefed on U.S.-Israeli discussions said Israeli intercepts
of Syrian communications were used by Obama administration officials
in making their public case that Assad was behind the August 21 gas
attacks and must be penalized.
Netanyahu,
whose frosty rapport with Obama blossomed into a display of harmony
on the president's visit to Israel in March, has ordered his
ministers not to criticize Obama publicly after the president's
decision to take the Syrian issue to Congress.
A
government source said the prime minister told his cabinet on Sunday:
"We are in the middle of an ongoing event. It is not over and
there are sensitive and delicate issues at play.
"There
is no room here for individual comments," he said. "I'm
asking you not to behave irresponsibly when it comes to our ally,
just so you can grab a fleeting headline."
That
did stop Tzachi Hanegbi, a Netanyahu confidant who sits on
parliament's defense committee, complaining on Army Radio that Obama
had delivered further proof to Iran - and North Korea - that "there
is no enthusiasm in the world to deal with their ongoing defiance
regarding nuclear weaponry".
"To
us it says one thing: ... in the words of our sages: 'If I am not for
myself, then who is?'"
Israel
clearly hopes still that Congress will give Obama the green light for
strikes against Assad but is also likely to be wary of deploying its
own lobbying power among lawmakers.
That
risks being counter-productive and, in any case, the president has
made clear that threats to Israel from Syrian chemical weapons are
among his own arguments for war.
Concern
in Washington over a go-it-alone Israeli strike on Iran are still
strong; Israel is unlikely to use the nuclear warheads it is assumed
to possess but any strike on its distant and populous enemy would
have unpredictable consequences.
As
a result, U.S. leaders have beaten a path to Jerusalem - Obama
himself in March but also Secretary of State John Kerry several
times, relaunching talks with the Palestinians in the process, and
General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff,
who made his third visit to Israel last month.
Gadi
Shamni, an Israeli military attache in the United States until last
year, said that on the Iranian issue, "there were times when we
were in the same book, then the same chapter.
"Right
now we are on the same page. There is a lot of flow of intelligence
and views and understanding."
MILITANT
THREAT
For
all the unease that Israel has about Syria's rebels, who have at
times fired into the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, it is pushing
hard against Assad now after learning to live with the Syrian leader
and his father over the past 40 years. One Israeli official said the
message from Netanyahu was clear:
"There
is a man in nominal control of Syria who is using chemical weapons
against civilians. That has to be stopped."
That
sentiment is echoed in Riyadh. Abdullah al-Askar, chairman of the
foreign affairs committee in the Shoura Council, said that U.S.
strikes should aim to end Assad's rule.
Askar,
who said he was speaking in a personal capacity, told Reuters: "If
the attack is just a punishment to show that the international
community will not stand for chemical attacks, Assad will just remain
in his place and do his bloody work.
"The
second scenario is to finish the business."
Mustafa
Alani, a Gulf analyst with good connections to Saudi officials, said
the kingdom was also warning Washington that a failure to attack
Assad would benefit their common enemy al Qaeda: "No action will
boost the extremist position," he said, explaining that rebel
despair at U.S. inaction on Syria would push more fighters to switch
allegiance to Islamist militants.
Paraphrasing
what he said was a Saudi argument, Alani said: "Without a
punishment of the regime, extremists will enjoy wider support and
attract more moderate fighters."
Riyadh
already shares rebel frustrations with the shortage of U.S. military
aid reaching Syria, despite Obama's commitment in June to step up
assistance after poison gas was first used.
A
senior U.S. official spoke of a "stable relationship" with
Riyadh "on core national security areas". But the official
also conceded: "While we do not agree on every issue, when we
have different perspectives we have honest and open discussions."
As
with Israel over Iran, those are likely to continue.
Robert
Jordan, U.S. ambassador to Riyadh in 2001-03, said intelligence chief
Prince Bandar bin Sultan and ambassador to Washington Adel Jubeir had
been "very outspoken" in their belief the rebels that can
be trusted and should get military backing.
Obama
denies seeking the "regime change" Riyadh wants. But Jordan
added: "It doesn't mean they won't keep pushing for it."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.