US,
Russia Ramp up Syria Diplomacy at Geneva Talks
11September,
2013
WASHINGTON,
September 11 (by Karin Zeitvogel for RIA Novosti) – US Secretary of
State John Kerry meets Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in
Geneva on Thursday for hastily organized talks on a Russian plan to
prevent a US attack on Syria by placing the war-torn country’s
chemical weapons under international control.
The
White House said Kerry and Lavrov would “explore the path forward”
on Syria during their discussions in Geneva while the State
Department said Kerry would be accompanied by a team of US technical
experts who would “test the seriousness of the proposal” from
Moscow.
In
Moscow, the Russian Foreign Ministry said Kerry and Lavrov spoke by
phone on Wednesday shortly before Kerry was to depart from
Washington. In a statement, the ministry said the two men discussed
the “situation surrounding Syria” but provided no further
substantive details.
The
top Russian and US diplomats and their delegations planned to “talk
specifics of how to get it done and the mechanics of verifying,
securing and ultimately destroying Syria’s chemical weapons,”
State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters.
Psaki
played down reports from Russia that said Moscow has sent its
proposal for Syria to the Washington, saying what the State
Department has received was “ideas that will be part of the
discussion” in Geneva, and not a fully developed proposal.
The
Geneva talks are scheduled to start Thursday and run for at least two
days, with pundits predicting that they could run into next week.
They
came about amid US threats to launch a military strike on Syria in
response to an attack on August 21, apparently involving chemical
weapons, that Washington blames on Syrian President Bashar Assad.
Those
threats were put on hold this week when Russia jumped on a comment
made by Kerry in London saying that the only way for Syria to avert
an imminent US military strike was to turn its chemical weapons over
to international control. Lavrov said Russia was prepared to pressure
Syria to do so.
Lavrov
quickly put the idea to Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem, who
was visiting Moscow, and a little over an hour after Kerry had made
his comment, the Syrians had embraced what Muallem called a “Russian
initiative” that could prevent “US aggression” against Syria.
Diplomacy
moved rapidly after that. Debate on a resolution on Syria’s
chemical weapons, which France brought before the UN Security
Council, was due to begin later Wednesday.
In
a televised address to the nation on Tuesday, US President Barack
Obama said he asked Congress to delay a planned vote on whether to
authorize use of US military force in Syria while Kerry and Lavrov
“pursue this diplomatic path” opened up by the Russian proposal.
Obama
also said that “constructive talks” he had held with Russian
President Vladimir Putin were at least partly responsible for the US
shift from preparing to launch a limited strike on Syria to using
diplomacy in an effort to remove the possibility for Assad’s regime
to use chemical weapons in future.
Psaki
said Obama and Putin first discussed how to remove the threat of
Syria’s chemical weapons at the G-20 meeting in Mexico last year
and have held further talks on the issue since then, including last
week on the sidelines of the G-20 in St. Petersburg.
But
Russia’s “willingness to be a facilitator” in getting Syria to
hand over its chemical weapons stocks “increased significantly
since the attack of August 21st” and increased even more when the
United States threatened to use military force against Syria, she
said.
Obama
said in his speech Tuesday that US forces will maintain their
“current posture to keep the pressure on Assad, and be in a
position to respond if diplomacy fails.”
Russia
has signaled that it wants the US threat of military force against
Syria to be taken out of the equation, something analysts said could
prove to be a sticking point in Geneva, and two Russian lawmakers
said Moscow should send new “defensive weapons” to Iran should
the US attack Syria.
Another
potential complication in Geneva, experts said, could be figuring out
how to ensure the safety of outside experts who could be sent into
Syria in the midst of a civil war that has killed more than 100,000
people to verify and safeguard what is said to be one of the largest
chemical weapons stockpiles in the world.
“That
will be part of the discussion” in Geneva, Psaki said.
“If
this was a simple step without pros and cons, it would have been done
long ago. But I’m sure the safety of anyone involved will be part
of the discussion,” she said.
Syrian
Opposition Wants to Put Chemical Arms Under Russian Control
11September,
2013
BEIRUT,
September 11 (RIA Novosti) – The Syrian opposition’s National
Coordination Committee for Democratic Change said Wednesday that it
had proposed that Russia oversee the war-torn country’s chemical
weapons until a transitional government is formed.
“We
have proposed placing chemical weapons under Russia’s supervision
until a transitional government is formed,” the group’s
spokesman, Haytham Manna, said in an interview with the Al-Mayadeen
pan-Arabic satellite television channel.
“We
realize that [US President Barack] Obama needs to find a way out of
the impasse he has reached,” said Manna, who represents Syria’s
moderate opposition.
Speaking
on the same TV channel, Russia’s ambassador to Lebanon, Alexander
Zasypkin, said Moscow had handed over to the UN Security Council
evidence that chemical weapons in Syria were used by rebel forces.
Russian
President Vladimir Putin said Tuesday that his country’s plan to
place Syria’s chemical weapons under international control would be
feasible only if the United States and its allies pledged not to use
force.
Putin
added that Moscow hoped Syria would accept international control over
its chemical weapon stockpiles and also join the convention
forbidding the use of chemical weapons.
‘Advantage
Putin’ in Syria Diplomacy ‘Tennis’ – US Senator
11
September, 2013
WASHINGTON,
September 11 (RIA Novosti) – If global wrangling over Syria’s
chemical weapons were a tennis match, Russian President Vladimir
Putin would be up a point on his American counterpart Barack Obama,
US Senator Rand Paul said Wednesday.
“It
would be the umpire shouting: ‘Advantage Putin.’ He seems to be
running circles around this administration,” Paul, a Republican
from Kentucky, said on conservative talk show host Glenn Beck’s
radio program as Russian and US diplomats headed to Geneva for talks
on a Russian plan to prevent a possible US attack on Syria.
Russia
floated the plan Monday after US Secretary of State John Kerry said
in a seemingly off-the-cuff statement that Syria could avert a US
military action by surrendering its chemical weapons to the
international community.
After
Syria quickly embraced the plan, the United States shifted from a
military stance to a diplomatic one on Syria, with Obama asking US
lawmakers to postpone a vote authorizing the use of force against and
dispatching Kerry for talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei
Lavrov set to begin Thursday.
Obama
“appears to have backed into this through some sort of lucky
happenstance,” Paul said, adding that he hoped the Russian proposal
would turn out to be “true and sincere” so that “maybe some
resolution comes to the conflict” in Syria, where more than 100,000
people have died during two years of civil war.
But
Paul stopped short of agreeing with Beck that Russia was eclipsing
the United States as the world’s sole superpower, saying Moscow was
merely “grasping to try to continue to look like the superpower
that they once were” while the United States was still “truly a
superpower,” but “a little confused and stumbling” at the
moment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.