Putin:
Syria chemical attack is ‘rebels' provocation in hope of
intervention’
The
alleged chemical weapons use in Syria is a provocation carried out by
the rebels to attract a foreign-led strike, Russian President
Vladimir Putin said at the G20 summit
6
September, 2013
There
was no 50/50 split of opinion on the notion of a military strike
against the Syrian President Bashar Assad, Putin stressed refuting
earlier assumptions.
Only
Turkey, Canada, Saudi Arabia and France joined the US push for
intervention, he said, adding that the UK Prime Minister’s position
was not supported by his citizens.
Russia,
China, India, Indonesia, Argentina, Brazil, South Africa and Italy
were among the major world’s economies clearly opposed to military
intervention.
President
Putin said the G20 nations spent the “entire” Thursday evening
discussing the Syrian crisis, which was followed by Putin’s
bilateral meeting with UK Prime Minister David Cameron that lasted
till 3am Moscow time.
Russia
“will help Syria” in the event of a military strike, Putin
stressed as he responded to a reporter’s question at the summit.
“Will
we help Syria? We will. And we are already helping, we send arms, we
cooperate in the economics sphere, we hope to expand our cooperation
in the humanitarian sphere, which includes sending humanitarian aid
to support those people – the civilians – who have found
themselves in a very dire situation in this country,” Putin said.
Russia’s
President Vladimir Putin gestures during a press conference at the
end of the G20 summit on September 6, 2013 in Saint Petersburg (AFP
Photo)
Putin
said he sat down with US President Barack Obama on the sidelines of
the G20 summit and talked for about half an hour in “a friendly
atmosphere”.
Although
the Russian and the American leaders maintained different positions
regarding the Syrian issue, Putin said they “hear” and understand
each other.
Russian
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and US Secretary of State John Kerry
will continue discussing the situation in Syria “in the short run,”
Putin said.
Meanwhile,
President Obama reiterated in his summit speech that the US
government believes Syrian President Bashar Assad’s forces were
behind the chemical weapons use.
Obama
pledged to make a good case on the issue for both the international
community and the American people, saying many nations are already
“comfortable” with the US’ opinion.
While
admitting “a number of countries” at the summit stressed any
military action plan should go through the UN Security Council, Obama
said the US is in a different “camp” that questioned the UNSC
effectiveness.
“Given
the Security Council’s paralysis on this issue, if we are serious
about upholding a ban on chemical weapons use, then an international
response is required and that will not come through the Security
Council action,” Obama said.
'A
dangerous precedent'
Both
presidents stressed that the situation in Syria could create a
dangerous precedent, but supported their points with contrasting
arguments.
Obama
stressed his “goal” and US “responsibility” was to maintain
international norms on banning chemical weapon use, saying he wanted
the enforcement to be “real.”
US
President Barack Obama answers a question during a press conference
in Saint Petersburg on September 6, 2013 on the sideline of the G20
summit (AFP Photo)
“When
there is a breach this brazen of a norm this important, and the
international community is paralyzed and frozen and doesn’t act,
then that norm begins to unravel. And if that norm unravels, then
other norms and prohibitions start unraveling, and that makes for a
more dangerous world,” Obama said.
Putin,
on the contrary, stressed that setting precedents of military action
outside a UN Security Council resolution would mean the world’s
smaller countries can no longer feel safe against the interests of
the more powerful ones.
“Small
countries in the modern world feel increasingly vulnerable and
insecure. One starts getting the impression that a more powerful
country can at any time and at its own discretion use force against
them,” Putin said, citing the earlier statement made by the South
African President.
Such
practice would also make it much harder to convince North Korea to
give up its nuclear program, Putin pointed out.
The
meeting of the leaders of the major world economies - G20 - took
place in St. Petersburgh, Russia. The participants of the summit
focused on economic issues during round-table talks, including
unemployment, the lack of global investment, and better international
financial regulation. While on the sidelines the conversation shifted
to the issue of the alleged chemical weapons attack in Syria and the
possibility of military action in the war-torn country.
Troubled
waters: Naval forces line Syrian shores
The
alleged chemical weapons use in Syria is a provocation carried out by
the rebels to attract a foreign-led strike, Russian President
Vladimir Putin said at the G20 summit
6
September, 2013
Mounting
pressure for a Western strike on Syria has seen naval forces both
friendly and hostile to Damascus build up off the embattled country’s
coastline.
The
potential of a US strike against Syria in response to an August 21
chemical weapons attack in a Damascus suburb gained steam on
Wednesday, when a resolution backing the use of force against
President Bashar Assad's government cleared the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee on a 10-7 vote.
President
Obama has decided to put off military action until at least September
9, when the seemingly recalcitrant US House of Representatives
reconvenes to vote on the measure.
Following
the August 21 Ghouta Attack, which killed anywhere between 355 to
1,729 people, the diplomatic scramble to launch or stave off a
military strike on Syria was mirrored by the movement of naval forces
in the Eastern Mediterranean, off the coast of Syria.
The
deployment of US and allied naval warships in the region has been
matched by the deployment of Russian naval warships in the region.
While
the Western vessels have in many cases been deployed in the event a
military strike against Syria gets a green light, Russian President
Vladimir Putin has said Russia’s naval presence is needed to
protect national security interests and is not a threat to any
nation.
Below
is a brief summary of the naval hardware currently amassed off
Syria’s shores.
USA
The
US Navy has five Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyers off
the coast of Syria, which its top admiral says is “fully ready”
for a wide range of possible actions.
The
USS Ramage, USS Mahan, USS Gravely and USS Barry are each armed with
dozens of Tomahawk cruise missiles, which have a range of about 1,000
nautical miles (1,151 miles) and are used for precise targeting.
The
ships are also equipped with surface-to-air missiles capable of
defending the vessels from air attacks.
On
August 29, the USS Stout was sent to relieve the USS Mahan, but a
defense official told AFP that both ships might remain in the area
for the time being.
Adm.
Jonathan Greenert, the chief of naval operations, told an audience at
the American Enterprise Institute on Thursday that the US ships are
prepared for what he called a "vast
spectrum of operations,"
including launching Tomahawk cruise missiles at targets in Syria, as
was done in Libya in 2011, and protecting themselves in the event of
retaliation, AP reports.
In
addition to the destroyers, the United States may well have one of
its four guided missile submarines off the coast of Syria. At one
time these subs were equipped with nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles.
Nowadays, they are capable of carrying up to 154 Tomahawk cruise
missiles.
It
was also announced on Monday that the US had deployed the USS San
Antonio, an amphibious transport ship, to the Eastern Mediterranean.
The
USS San Antonio, with several helicopters and hundreds of Marines on
board, is “on station in the
Eastern Mediterranean”
but “has received no
specific tasking,”
a defense official told AFP on condition of anonymity.
The
deployment of the USS Antonio comes despite promises from President
Obama that no amphibious landing is on the agenda, as the US has
ostensibly ruled out any “boots
on the ground.”
While
the wording of the draft resolution set to be put before the House
does not permit a ground invasion, the wording of the text could
potentially allow troops to carry out non-offensive operations within
Syria, including securing chemical weapons stockpiles and production
facilities.
On
Monday, it was also announced the USS Nimitz super carrier had moved
into the Red Sea, though it had not been given orders to be part of
the planning for a limited US military strike on Syria, US officials
told ABC News.
The
other ships in the strike group are the cruiser USS Princeton and the
destroyers USS William P. Lawrence, USS Stockdale and USS Shoup.
The
official said the carrier strike group has not been assigned a
mission, but was shifted in the event its resources are needed to
“maximize available
options.”
The
USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier and strike group is also in the
northern Arabian Sea.
Russia
Russia,
Syria’s longtime ally and primary arms supplier, has its only
overseas naval base located in the Syrian port of Tartus, which has
reportedly been used to support Russia’s growing number of naval
patrols on the Mediterranean. However, Russia insists recent efforts
to bolster its naval presence in the region are not in response to
Western threats of a military strike.
Reported
movements of many Russian ships in the region are coming from
anonymous Russian defense ministry sources and have not been
confirmed. RT contacted the Russian Navy to ask for confirmation of
the reported ship movements, though no comment was forthcoming.
On
Friday, for example, the large landing ship, Nikolai Filchenkov, was
reportedly dispatched from the Ukrainian port city of Sevastopol for
the Russian Black Sea port of Novorossiisk, from where it is
eventually expected to reach the Syrian coast, a source told Interfax
News Agency.
"The
ship will make call in Novorossiisk, where it will take on board
special cargo and set off for the designated area of its combat duty
in the eastern Mediterranean,"
the source said.
RIA
news agency quoted an unnamed senior naval source as saying on Friday
that the frigate, Smetlivy, would leave for the Mediterranean on
September 12-14, and the corvette Shtil and missile boat Ivanovets
would approach Syria at the end of the month.
The
Russian destroyer Nastoichivy, which is the flagship of the Baltic
fleet, is also expected to join the group in the region.
Deputy
Defence Minister Anatoly Antonov, who was unable to comment on
specific reports, said on Thursday the Russian navy currently had a
"pretty strong group"
there.
"The
Russian navy does not intend to take part directly or indirectly in a
possible regional conflict," he told the state Rossiya 24
broadcaster.
"Our
navy vessels are a guarantee of stability, guarantee of peace, an
attempt to hold back other forces ready to start military action in
the region."
Also
reportedly in place in the eastern Mediterranean are the frigate
Neustrashimy, as well as the landing ships Alexander Shabalin, the
Admiral Nevelsky and the Peresvet.
They
are expected to be joined by the guided-missile cruiser Moskva.
The
Moskva, set to arrive in a little over a week’s time, will take
over operations from a naval unit in the region.
"The
plans of the naval unit under the command of Rear Admiral Valery
Kulikov had to be changed a little. Instead of visiting a Cape Verde
port, the cruiser Moskva is heading to the Strait of Gibraltar. In
about ten days, it will enter the eastern Mediterranean, where it
will replace the destroyer Admiral Panteleyev as the flagship of the
operative junction of the Russian Navy,"
a source told Interfax on Wednesday.
Panteleyev
incidentally, only arrived in the east Mediterranean Sea on Wednesday
after leaving the Far-Eastern port city of Vladivostok on March 19 to
join the Russian standing naval force as its flagship.
The
SSV-201 reconnaissance ship, Priazovye, is also reportedly on its way
to join the group in the Eastern Mediterranean. Accompanied by the
two landing ships, Minsk and Novocherkassk, the intelligence ship
passed through the ‘Istanbul Strait’ on Thursday, which helps
form the boundary between Europe and Asia.
FRANCE
On
August 31, French military officials confirmed the frigate Chevalier
Paul, which specializes in anti-missile capabilities, and the
transport ship, Dixmude, were in the Mediterranean. French officials
denied they are in the region to participate in military action
against Syria, but were rather taking part in training and operation
preparations.
Despite
their presence in the region, France currently has no ship-based
missiles, so any offensive action would come from the air in the form
of long-range Scalp missiles, similar to those the nation used in
Kosovo in 1999 and in Libya in 2011, Time reports.
Italy
Two
Italian warships set sail for Lebanon on Wednesday in a bid to
protect 1,100 Italian soldiers in the United Nations Interim Force in
Lebanon, Syria’s southeastern neighbor, Agence France Presse
reported.
The
Italian ANSA news agency reported that a frigate and a torpedo
destroyer boat departed from Italy's southeastern coast on Wednesday
and would provide additional protection to the soldiers in the event
the Syrian conflict further deteriorates.
UK
As
of August 29, the Royal Navy's Response Force Task Group was deployed
in the Mediterranean as part of long-planned exercise Cougar 13. The
force includes helicopter carrier HMS Illustrious, type-23 frigates
HMS Westminster and HMS Montrose, amphibious warship HMS Bulwark and
six Royal Fleet Auxiliary ships.
The Trafalgar-class nuclear
submarine HMS Tireless was also believed to be in the area at the
time, after it was detected in Gibraltar.
On
the same day that British media started touting Britain’s “arsenal
of military might” which would be available in the event of
intervention, British Prime Minister David Cameron lost a vote
endorsing military action against Syria by 13 votes. In light of the
shocking parliamentary defeat, Foreign Secretary William Hague said
the UK would only be able to offer the US “diplomatic support.”
The
UK’s Conservative Chancellor, George Osborne, confirmed that the UK
would not seek a further vote on action in Syria.
Syria
'chemical weapons' crisis: LIVE UPDATES
RT,
6
September, 2013
Friday,
September 6
20:51
GMT: The UN has drawn up emergency plans for a military
strike on Syria, but at the same time will continue to deliver aid to
the region, UN humanitarian chief Valerie Amos said after her trip to
Damascus, AFP reported.
"We
continue to update and look at our contingency planning,"
Amos stated, noting that the UN has great concern for its staff on
the ground and still has “a
commitment to continue our humanitarian operations.”
20:35
GMT: US
Deputy National Security Adviser Tony Blinken, an aide close to
President Obama, told NPR Friday that military action in Syria is
unlikely without congressional approval. Blinken asserted that “the
president has the authority to act”
if Congress votes down the proposal next week, but “it’s
neither his desire nor intention to use that authority absent
Congress backing him.”
18:55
GMT:
Syrian President Bashar Assad barely used any of his chemical weapons
stockpile in the alleged attack near Damascus on August 21, according
to the US Ambassador to the United Nations.
"We
assess that although Assad used more chemical weapons on August 21
than he had before, he has barely put a dent in his enormous
stockpile,"
Samantha Power said at the Center for American Progress think-tank in
Washington.
"We
have exhausted the alternatives"
to military action, she said, adding that Assad counted on Russia’s
support.
17:23
GMT:
Friday, September 6th, a so-called Tweet storm rages on the popular
networking service for awareness on #OpSyria911. Organizers of the
storm, Anonymous hacktivist group, urged opponents of a military
intervention to “call,
fax, email, and write a letter to your representatives and voice your
disdain for any military actions intruded on the Syrian people.”
15:59
GMT:
The Leaders and Representatives of Australia, Canada, France, Italy,
Japan, Republic of Korea, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Turkey, the United
Kingdom and the United States of America issued a joint statement on
the sidelines of the Group of 20 Nations Leader’s Meeting in Saint
Petersburg, Russia regarding the crisis in Syria.
“The
international norm against the use of chemical weapons is
longstanding and universal. The use of chemical weapons
anywhere diminishes the security of people everywhere. Left
unchallenged, it increases the risk of further use and proliferation
of these weapons,”
the joint statement issued by the White House read.
“We
condemn in the strongest terms the horrific chemical weapons attack
in the suburbs of Damascus on August 21st that claimed the lives of
so many men, women, and children. The evidence clearly points
to the Syrian government being responsible for the attack, which is
part of a pattern of chemical weapons use by the regime.
We
call for a strong international response to this grave violation of
the world’s rules and conscience that will send a clear message
that this kind of atrocity can never be repeated. Those who
perpetrated these crimes must be held accountable.”
The
statement went on the show its support for a UN Security Council
resolution, but “recognized”
the Council had remained paralyzed for two years.
The
statement further condemned “in
the strongest terms”
human rights violations in Syria on all sides.
15:52
GMT:
France says that any military action against Syria would only entail
military targets so as to avoid civilian casualties. President
Francois Hollande said all G20 states has condemned the use of
chemical weapons and agreed they were deployed in Syria. He further
warned that if the UN Security Council could not agree on a response
to the attack, a coalition must be created to respond. He did say,
however, that France would wait on conclusions from UN inspectors
investigating the August 21 attack in a Damascus suburb before
deciding to act.
"We
shall await the report of the inspectors just as we will await (US)
Congress," he told a news conference after a summit of G20
nations in St. Petersburg,
in reference to US President Barack Obama's decision to ask for
Congressional approval before launching a strike.
15:38
GMT:
Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan said on Friday almost all of
the leaders at the G20 summit in St. Petersburg accepted that an
operation needed to be carried out against Syria in response to an
alleged chemical weapons attack in a Damascus Suburb on August
21.
"Almost
all the leaders who have attended the summit are closely following
the massacre the Syrian regime carried out on its people and the
leaders have expressed that an operation is extremely necessary
against Damascus,"
Reuters cites Erdogan as saying.
15:20
GMT:
The Russian Foreign Ministry has asked the world to consider claims
made by Mother Agnes Mariam el-Salib – mother superior of St. James
Monastery in Qara, Syria – who told
RT
there is proof the footage of the alleged chemical attack in Syria
was fabricated.
“I
maintain that the whole affair was a frame-up. It had been staged and
prepared in advance with the goal of framing the Syrian government as
the perpetrator,”
she said.
“The
key evidence is that Reuters made these files public at 6.05 in the
morning. The chemical attack is said to have been launched between 3
and 5 o’clock in the morning in Guta. How is it even possible to
collect a dozen different pieces of footage, get more than 200 kids
and 300 young people together in one place, give them first aid and
interview them on camera, and all that in less than three hours? Is
that realistic at all? As someone who works in the news industry, you
know how long all of it would take.”
15:15:
GMT:
US President Barack Obama refused to say directly what he would do if
Congress doesn't approve Syria strikes when asked the question at the
press conference during the G20 summit.
However
he said that “given
Security Council paralysis on this issue, if we are serious about
upholding a ban on chemical weapons use, then an international
response is required, and that will not come through Security Council
action.”
15:07
GMT:
The alleged chemical weapons attack in Syria was “carried
out by rebels as a provocation”
to create the possibility for a foreign intervention, Russian
President Vladimir Putin told reporters at a press conference during
the final day of the G20 summit.
While
Russia, China, India, Indonesia, Argentina, Brazil, South Africa and
Italy are among the major world’s economies which oppose the
intervention, only Turkey, Canada, Saudi Arabia and France join the
US in its call for military action in the war-torn country, adding
that the UK Prime Minister’s position was not supported by his
citizens.
In
case of intervention, Putin stressed that Russia will help Syria as
“we
are already helping, we send arms, we cooperate in the economic
sphere, we hope to expand our cooperation in the humanitarian sphere,
which includes sending humanitarian aid to support those people –
the civilians – who have found themselves in a very dire situation
in this country.”
13:54
GMT:
The discussion of the Syrian issue at the G20 summit in St Petersburg
has not decreased the possibility of a military operation against the
republic, says British Prime Minister David Cameron. He said
that although the talks were very helpful, the summit was never about
making a decision on the matter.
If
the United Nations Security Council fails to agree on a resolution
authorizing military intervention in the Syrian conflict, action
without its approval can’t be ruled out either, Cameron said.
The
UK, along with several other members of the group, agreed to seek
free access for humanitarian aid to Syria through the UN, he told a
media conference at the end of the gathering.
13:42
GMT:
Russia President Vladimir Putin and US leader Barack Obama have
discussed Syrian crisis on the sidelines of G20 summit in St
Petersburg, says Russian presidential aid Yuri Ushakov. However,
“there remains a difference in opinions” following the meeting,
Ushakov said. Putin and Obama have agreed to continue discussing the
settlement for the Syrian crisis on the level of their foreign
ministers.
13:03
GMT:
A military strike on Syria will put an end to all the efforts made by
the UN-Arab League envoy on Syria, Lakhdar Brahimi, to politically
resolve the conflict, agreed the participates of the G20 summit
breakfast meeting, said Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.
"I
cannot say that this was the prevailing opinion, but many responsible
states are coming to a very clear understanding that the use of
force, bypassing the UN Security Council, will put an end to all
efforts for a political resolution and carrying out the Geneva-2
peace conference made by Lakhdar Brahimi,"
Lavrov said.
"Our
common conclusion is to do everything possible to prevent the
military scenario in Syria,"
Lavrov added. "There
is still time for this."
The
US did not participate, while Canada, Kazakhstan, South Korea,
Senegal, Mexico, Brazil, Germany, Turkey, France and Russia were
present at the meeting.
12:40
GMT:
The Turkish Prime Minster Tayyip Erdogan has said that almost all
leaders at the G20 summit in St Petersburg accept the need for a
military operation against Syria.
12:00
GMT:
The U.S. has ordered its diplomats to leave Lebanon as Congress
debates Syria military strikes, in a move that will be interpreted
that the possibility of a military strikes has moved a step
closer.
The
US State Department has ordered nonessential U.S. diplomats and
family members to leave Lebanon due to security concerns. They have
also urged US citizens to avoid all travel to Lebanon because of
current safety and security concerns.
"The
Department of State drew down non-emergency personnel and family
members from Embassy Beirut due to threats to U.S. Mission facilities
and personnel,"
a statement on the Beirut embassy's website said.
11:55
GMT:
The Geneva II peace conference is under threat in the current
situation, said UN-Arab League envoy on Syria Lakhdar Brahimi during
the G20 summit held in St. Petersburg, Russia.
11:50
GMT:
The Syrian government has announced that it is offering a bounty to
anyone who captures a "non-Syrian
terrorist",
or helps to apprehend one, state television said. A bounty of 500,000
Syrian pounds (roughly $4,000) will be offered for capture, while
200,000 Syrian pounds (about $1,500) goes to anyone who gives
information regarding terrorist locations.
The
statement said the identities of those who provided information would
be kept secret and their "protection
ensured".
Concerning Syrian rebels who informed on their comrades, state
television added, that they would be granted amnesty and “their
affairs will be settled.”
11:29
GMT:
Moscow has warned Washington against staging attacks on Syria’s
chemical weapons depots.
"With
particular concern, we perceive the fact that among possible targets
for attacks are objects of military infrastructure securing the
safety of Syrian chemical weapons arsenals,”
according to a statement in the comment of the Department of
Information and Media relations of the Russian Foreign Ministry,
issued on Friday.
“In
this regard, we would like to warn the US government and its allies
from inflicting any assaults on chemical facilities and adjacent
territories,”
the document says.
11:22
GMT:
The crisis in Syria should be resolved through political means and
not a military strike, Chinese President Xi Jinping told his US
counterpart Barack Obama during the G20 summit in St. Petersburg in
Russia.
"A political solution is the only right way out
for the Syrian crisis, and a military strike cannot solve the problem
from the root," Xinhua news agency quoted Xi as saying. "We
expect certain countries to have a second thought before action,"
he added.
10:50
GMT:
The UN nuclear watchdog has confirmed receipt of a request from
Russia to estimate the impact if a missile were to hit a small Syrian
reactor that contains radioactive uranium.
"I
can confirm that the IAEA has received a formal request from the
Russian Federation. The agency is considering the questions raised,"
IAEA spokeswoman Gill Tudor said in an email to Reuters.
A
military strike on Syria could have catastrophic effects if the
research reactor near Damascus was struck "by
design or by chance,"
Russia said in a statement earlier this week.
10:32
GMT:
British scientists found traces of sarin gas in soil and fabric
samples collected in Syria, the UK Ministry of Defence has confirmed
earlier reports, BBC states.
9:43
GMT:
EU defense ministers have agreed that embattled Syrian President
Bashar Assad used chemical weapons in an attack in a Damascus suburb
on August 21, reports AFP.
Meanwhile, US President Barack Obama
told G20 leaders in St. Petersburg that the US was “confident”
Assad’s forces had used chemical weapons. Obama urged the G20
leaders to support the international ban on chemical weapons and
authorize the use of military force against Syria.
7:55
GMT:
A Russian parliamentary delegation will not travel to Washington to
meet with Congress to discuss Syria, announced Russian lawmaker and
State Duma representative, Sergey Naryshkin.
03:48
GMT: US
President Barack Obama instructed the Pentagon to expand the list of
potential Syria targets as a reaction to new intelligence that Syrian
President Bashar Assad has been moving troops and chemical weapons
equipment, military officials told the The New York Times. This means
that the original list of at least 50 major sites will be further
expanded.
03:20
GMT:
The US State Department responded to Russian President Vladimir
Putin’s remarks that US Secretary of State John Kerry “lied”
about the influence of Al-Qaeda in Syria, saying that it is
“preposterous”
and a mischaracterization of what America’s top diplomat actually
said.
Kerry
is “not
losing sleep after such a preposterous comment that was based on an
inaccurate quote and was completely mischaracterized,”
State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters in Washington.
Putin
made his remarks on Wednesday, reportedly referring to the Secretary
of State’s testimony before the US Senate Foreign Relations
Committee a day earlier, where Kerry said that Al-Qaeda’s presence
within the Syrian opposition has not been increasing.
02:00
GMT:
US Navy destroyers in the Mediterranean are “fully
ready”
to launch cruise missiles into Syria as part of a US military
campaign that would not involve “extraordinary”
monetary costs, a top admiral said
Thursday.
Greenert,
a chief naval operations officer who focuses on preparedness of Navy
forces, also seemed to confirm the rough estimate made by US Defense
Secretary Chuck Hagel on Wednesday in front of the House Foreign
Affairs Committee, when he told Congress that a US campaign in Syria
would likely cost "tens
of millions"
of dollars.
"The
numbers are nagging but they're not extraordinary at this point,"
Greenert said at an event held by the conservative think-tank
American Enterprise Institute, though defense budget analysts say
Hagel's figure is a low estimate.
'Obama
to attack Syria regardless how Congress votes'
America's
envoy to the United Nations singled out Russia for criticism - for
its outspoken opposition to strikes. And that's as the UN chief
himself ruled out a military solution to the Syrian crisis - warning
that a strike would have tragic consequences and fuel sectarian
violence in the region. Investigative journalist Charlie McGrath has
commented on the U.S. envoy's statements - saying international trust
in Washington's words has all but eroded.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.