From
a few days ago – I do not think that Australia's position has
changed. I think FM McCully would aspire to the same position,
except he will, mo doubt join the “coalition” after everyone else
has left it.
Australia
backs action against Syria, with or without U.N. approval
Australia,
incoming chair of the U.N. Security Council, has endorsed possible
retaliation against Syria over the use of chemical weapons, even if
the council fails to agree on action.
29
September, 2013
Australia,
a close ally of the United States, is due to take over the rotating
leadership of the council on Sunday, a role that requires it to
assist council members to reach agreement.
But
Foreign Minister Bob Carr said that if it was proved the Syrian
regime had used chemical weapons, the world had a mandate to respond,
even if the United Nations failed to agree on such action.
"We're
moving to a stage where America and like-minded countries are
contemplating what sort of response," Carr told reporters on
Wednesday.
"Our
preference, everyone's preference, would be for action, a response,
under United Nations auspices. But if that's not possible, the sheer
horror of a government using chemical weapons against its people,
using chemical weapons in any circumstances, mandates a response."
The
United States and its allies are gearing up for a probable military
strike against Syria that could come within days and would be the
most aggressive action by Western powers in Syria's
two-and-a-half-year civil war.
Carr
said the most important role for Australia as Security Council chair
was to engage permanent council members Russia and China on their
support so far for Syria.
"Russia
and China can't be vilified in this. They need to be engaged with,
encouraged to look at the evidence, and encouraged to think about
their attitudes towards the Assad regime and what the world does when
a population is being devastated, and now devastated with the
application of weapons that terrifyingly enable mass atrocity
crimes," he said.
The
crisis in Syria, Carr said, had re-exposed a flaw in international
governance, with the right of permanent U.N. Security Council members
to veto any decision.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.