Here
is an excerpt from a WSJ article from today – you can read the rest
if you want to subscribe (I do not)
Iran
Plots Revenge on U.S. Officials Say Intercepted Message to Militants
Orders Reprisals in Iraq if Syria Hit
WSJ,
6
September, 2013
The
U.S. has intercepted an order from Iran to Shiite militants in Iraq
to attack the U.S. Embassy and other American interests in Baghdad in
the event of a strike on Syria, officials said, amid an expanding
array of reprisal threats across the region.
Military
officials have been trying to predict the range of possible responses
from Syria, Iran and their allies. U.S. officials said they are on
alert for Iran's fleet of small, fast boats in the Persian Gulf,
where American warships are positioned. U.S. officials also fear
Hezbollah could attack the U.S. Embassy in Beirut.
While
the U.S. has positioned military resources in the region for a
possible strike, it has other assets in the area that would be ready
to respond to any reprisals by Syria, Iran or its allies.
Those
deployments include a strike group of an aircraft carrier and three
destroyers in the Red Sea, and an amphibious ship, the USS San
Antonio, in the Eastern Mediterranean, which would help with any
evacuations.
The
U.S. military has also readied Marines and other assets to aid
evacuation of diplomatic compounds if needed, and the State
Department began making preparations last week for potential
retaliation against U.S. embassies and other interests in the Middle
East and North Africa.....[ ]
Syria
Conflict: Opposition Leader Haytham Al-Manna Criticises Plans For US
Military Intervention As 'Satanic'
Western
military action in Syria would be a "satanic intervention
against a satanic regime", a leading Syrian opposition figure
has warned.
2
September, 2013
Speaking
to the Huffington Post UK, Haytham al-Manna, the Paris-based
spokesman of the National Coordination Committee (NCC), said: "Our
position is against any [western] aggression against Syria. There is
no [option of] military aggression against the regime, it will be
against.. the population."
The
NCC, which consists of a dozen or so secular, leftist political
parties inside Syria, is not a member of the Syrian National Council
(SNC), the coalition of opposition groups recognised as the
legitimate representative of the Syrian people by several western
governments. The latter has long supported western military
intervention against Assad; the former does not.
The
NCC's Manna, a veteran human-rights activist whose brother was killed
by the Assad regime, said US ordnance won't "make the
distinction between military and civilian targets. I saw what
happened in Iraq..and all the [previous] American interventions."
Manna's
brother was killed by the Assad regime but he doesn't support
military intervention
Manna
added: "We are against the intervention in Syria of Hizbollah
[and] of foreign fighters from al Qaeda. We cannot build democracy in
Syria with others."
Criticising
the United States, Turkey, Israel and other regional powers, he said:
"We are not in favour of a satanic intervention against a
satanic regime."
Several
other opposition groups have criticised the NCC for being too soft on
the Syrian government, with the rebel Free Syrian Army (FSA)
dismissing it as "just the other face of the same coin".
But Manna insisted that the "political opposition outside Syria"
is a "minority inside the country". The NCC spokesman
claimed that "the majority of Syrian society is against any
[foreign military] intervention".
Referring
to the proposed 'Geneva II' UN-backed peace conference in
Switzerland, Manna warned that "we have now the opportunity.. to
push all parties, the regime and the opposition, to go to Geneva.. Up
to now, [the Assad regime] accepted it had to go to Geneva.. I am not
sure [Assad] will go at the end of the year.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.