UN
Environment Programme: 200 Species Extinct Every Day, Unlike Anything
Since Dinosaurs Disappeared 65 Million Years Ago
Ahmed
Djoghlaf says nations risk economic collapse and loss of culture if
it does not protect the natural world
John
Vidal
6
September, 2013
Britain
and other countries face a collapse of their economies and loss of
culture if they do not protect the environment better, the world's
leading champion of nature has warned.
"What
we are seeing today is a total disaster," said Ahmed
Djoghlaf,
the secretary-general of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity.
"No country has met its targets to protect nature. We are losing
biodiversity
at an unprecedented rate. If current levels [of destruction] go on we
will reach a tipping point very soon. The future of the planet now
depends on governments taking action in the next few years."
Industrialisation,
population growth, the spread of cities and farms and climate change
are all now threatening the fundamentals of life itself, said
Djoghlaf, in London before a key
UN meeting
where governments are expected to sign up to a more ambitious
agreement to protect nature.
"Many
plans were developed in the 1990s to protect biodiversity but they
are still sitting on the shelves of ministries. Countries were
legally obliged to act, but only 140 have even submitted plans and
only 16 have revised their plans since 1993. Governments must now put
their houses in order," he said.
According
to the UN Environment Programme, the Earth is in the midst of a mass
extinction of life. Scientists estimate that 150-200 species of
plant, insect, bird and mammal become extinct every 24 hours. This is
nearly 1,000 times the "natural" or "background"
rate and, say many biologists, is greater than anything the world has
experienced since the vanishing of the dinosaurs nearly 65m years
ago. Around 15% of mammal species and 11% of bird species are
classified as threatened with extinction.
Djoghlaf
warned Britain and other countries not to cut nature protection in
the recession. In a reference to expected
40% cuts to Britain's department of the environment spending,
he said: "It would be very short-sighted to cut biodiversity
spending. You may well save a few pounds now but you will lose
billions later. Biodiversity is your natural asset. The more you lose
it, the more you lose your cultural assets too."
He
urged governments to invest in nature. "If you do not, you will
pay very heavily later. You will be out of business if you miss the
green train."
Mounting
losses of ecosystems, species and genetic biodiversity is now
threatening all life, said Djoghlaf. In immediate danger, he said,
were the 300 million people who depended on forests and the more than
1 billion who lived off sea fishing.
"Cut
your forests down, or over-fish, and these people will not survive.
Destroying biodiversity only increases economic insecurity. The more
you lose it, the more you lose the chance to grow.
"The
loss of biodiversity compounds poverty. Destroy your nature and you
increase poverty and insecurity. Biodiversity is fundamental to
social life, education and aesthetics. It's a human right to live in
a healthy environment."
Djoghlaf
lambasted countries for separating action on climate change from
protecting biodiversity. "These are the two great challenges.
But the loss of biodiversity exacerbates climate change. It is
handled by the poorest ministries in government, it has not been
mainstreamed or prioritised by governments. Climate change cannot be
solved without action on biodiversity, and vice versa."
The
UN chief said that children were losing contact with nature. "We
are moving to a more virtual world. Children today haven't a clue
about nature. Children have not seen apple trees. In Algeria,
children are growing up who have never seen olive trees. How can you
protect nature if you do not know it?"
A
major UN report in the impacts of biodiversity loss that will be
launched in October is expected to say that the economic case for
global action to stop the destruction of the natural world is even
more powerful than the argument for tackling climate change.
It will say that saving biodiversity is remarkably cost-effective and
the benefits from saving "natural goods and services", such
as pollination, medicines, fertile soils, clean air and water, are
between 10 and 100 times the cost of saving the habitats and species
that provide them.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.