Basically
Obama reiterated that attacking Syria was in the interess of the US,
but in them meantime is postponing action to allow diplomacy to take
place – and (unspoken) undermine it in any way possible.
Obama:
We know Assad regime is responsible for chemical attack
RT,
10
September, 2013
Addressing
the nation, the US president has reiterated that it is in the
national security interests of the United States to respond to the
Assad government’s alleged use of chemical weapons with a limited
military action.
Russia
has proposed placing Syria’s chemical weapons under international
monitoring and eventually destroying them if all parties agree to
denounce military action. China and Iran have endorsed the idea,
which has appeared to gain traction since it was first proposed
Monday. Members of the UN Security Council have expressed doubt over
how the chemical weapons could be safely moved out of an active war
zone.
US
lawmakers admitted their reluctance but pledged to examine the idea
closely. Obama asked Congress to delay voting on whether to authorize
a military strike in response to the proposal.
Obama’s
comments Tuesday follow Syria’s Foreign Minister Walid Muallem’s
admission that Syria would be open to turning over their chemical
weapons to international control. Then, on Tuesday, Syria announced
it would be willing to sign the Chemical Weapons Convention,
revealing all details of the chemical program.
“We
will open our storage sites, and cease production,” Muallem told
Lebanon’s al-Maydeen TV. “We are ready to open these facilities
to Russia, other countries and the United Nations. We intend to give
up chemical weapons altogether.”
US
Secretary of State John Kerry was joined at the Capitol building
earlier in the day by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey. The trio testified
before the House Armed Services Committee and questioned on the
Russian proposal, which Kerry said he regarded with a hesitant
optimism while asking Congress to approve the military strike no
matter what.
“But
make no mistake about why this is now even on the table,” he said.
“They say nothing focuses the mind like the prospect of a hanging.”
Hagel
informed the committee that the earliest a strike against Syria could
take place at this time is now in mid-October.
Obama
wants to keep pressure on Syria as diplomatic option pursued
President
Barack Obama and top national security officials urged Congress on
Tuesday to keep the pressure on Syria over its chemical weapons
arsenal while the United States explores a diplomatic alternative to
military strikes.
10
September, 2013
A
potential diplomatic breakthrough put the brakes on a vote in
Congress over authorizing military force as lawmakers and the
administration sought more time to assess Russia's proposal to put
Syria's chemical weapons under international control.
Obama
has faced stiff resistance in Congress to any military action, and
lawmakers on both sides of the issue were quick to seize on the
Russian proposal as a possible way out despite skepticism about its
eventual success.
A
group of Republican and Democratic U.S. senators began drafting a
modified resolution on the use of military force that would give the
United Nations time to take control of Syria's chemical weapons.
U.S.
Secretary of State John Kerry and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel told
Congress the threat of military action still was critical to forcing
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to bend on his chemical weapons.
"For
this diplomatic option to have a chance of succeeding, the threat of
a U.S. military action - the credible, real threat of U.S. military
action - must continue," Hagel told the House Armed Services
Committee.
The
Senate has delayed a vote planned for Wednesday authorizing military
force. Kerry said Obama might speak to congressional leaders on the
"when and how" of an eventual vote.
"Nothing
has changed with respect to our request for the Congress to take
action," Kerry told the House hearing. "As to when and how,
that's something the president may want to chat with the leadership
about."
Obama
met with Senate Democrats and Republicans at the Capitol in separate
meetings on Tuesday ahead of a nationally televised address from the
White House on Tuesday evening.
"What
he wants is to check out the seriousness of the Syrian and the
Russian willingness to get rid of those chemical weapons," said
Senator Carl Levin, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Armed
Services Committee. "He wants time to check it out."
Senate
Democratic leader Harry Reid would not predict when a Senate vote on
Syria might occur. "The last 24 hours have had some remarkable
changes in what people are talking about," Reid told reporters.
"Let's see what else happens."
The
Russian diplomatic initiative, which emerged after off-the-cuff
remarks by Kerry on Monday alluding to such a deal, marked a sudden
reversal following weeks in which the West appeared headed toward
intervention in Syria's 2 1/2-year-old civil war.
Senate
Republican leader Mitch McConnell became the first of the four top
party leaders in the Senate and House to definitively oppose the
strikes, saying he would not support a resolution on military force
because "a vital national security risk is clearly not in play."
'POTENTIALLY
POSITIVE'
House
of Representatives Speaker John Boehner, a Republican who announced
last week he would support a strike, said the American people still
did not support military action in Syria and Obama needed to make a
stronger case.
A
Reuters/Ipsos poll on Tuesday showed public opposition to military
strikes remained high, with 62 percent of Americans saying the U.S.
military should not intervene in Syria and just 18 percent backing
intervention.
Obama
has said military action is needed to hold Assad accountable for an
August 21 poison gas attack that killed more than 1,000 civilians,
including hundreds of children.
White
House spokesman Jay Carney said the president will claim credit for
the potential diplomatic breakthrough in his speech. "We see
this as potentially a positive development and we see this as a clear
result of the pressure that has been put on Syria," Carney said
on MSNBC of the Russian proposal.
House
Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said the Russian proposal was a
validation of Obama's efforts to take action against Syria. "I
think this is a victory for President Obama if it is real,"
Pelosi told reporters.
At
the House hearing, Kerry told lawmakers that Obama and Russian
President Vladimir Putin had discussed the approach last week during
the G20 summit in Russia and Obama "directed us to try to
continue to talk and see if it is possible."
Kerry
will travel to Geneva, Switzerland, on Thursday to meet Russian
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to discuss the Syrian chemical weapons
proposal, U.S. officials said. Kerry told lawmakers he expected to
get proposals from Lavrov on Tuesday on securing the chemical
weapons.
The
House hearing turned contentious at times. Kerry tangled with
Republican Jeff Miller of Florida over whether the Senate delayed its
Wednesday vote on the resolution to explore diplomacy or because the
administration did not have the support to pass it.
Kerry
accused Miller of wanting to play politics. "I'm not being
political, Mr. Secretary," Miller said. "It's the truth.
They don't have the votes. Read any newspaper in this country and you
will find that out."
Kerry
later shot back: "Look, do you want to play politics here or do
you want to get a policy in place?"
The
Senate's new bipartisan group working on a modified resolution
included Democrats Robert Menendez, Carl Levin, Charles Schumer,
Chris Coons and Robert Casey as well as Republicans John McCain,
Lindsey Graham, Kelly Ayotte and Saxby Chambliss, aides said.
McCain
said the resolution would be offered as an amendment to the
authorization for military force and would set a timeline for
Damascus to turn over chemical weapons or face action. He said he was
willing to see if it worked.
"I
am very skeptical, but I'm certainly willing to give it a chance,"
McCain told reporters.
Carney
noted "there is ample reason to be skeptical" about Syria's
intentions.
"We
need to make sure beforehand that the Syrians are serious and will
actually follow through on a commitment to give up a chemical weapons
stockpile that they've been husbanding for decades against this
international prohibition," he said.
Obama
spoke by phone with French President Francois Hollande and British
Prime Minister David Cameron about the Russia proposal. But in a sign
of how difficult the diplomatic path will be, an emergency
closed-door meeting of the U.N. Security Council on Syria was
canceled after Russia withdrew its request for the session.
Comments from Mike Ruppert -
Comments from Mike Ruppert -
BARACK
OBAMA'S speech was weak, utterly lacking in compelling (or even
admissible) evidence and unconvincing, especially to the world.
He's
looking for a way out and Russia appears to be in the driver's seat
with respect to diplomacy. Barack the Bloody has openly vowed
compliance with international law. He has committed himself to
exploring and pursuing the diplomatic solution... which means he has
backed down. He has lost inertia and initiative.
There
will be no 9-11 false flag attacks. The situation is too tense, too
tinder dry. My guess is that the Obama administration is hoping for
this to die down in intensity so it can be swept under the rug and
proclaimed a victory.
But
what I foresee is a crushing and humiliating defeat for the U.S. at
the UN when the inspection reports come in and as more and more
evidence piles up that the Assad regime did not use the gas, that
this was a false-flag perpetrated by U.S. and allies. The UN can, and
probably will demand presentation of the thus-far missing evidence.
John Kerry is about to have his head handed to him if that happens.
You
can't yank the world around like this.
You
can't yank people around like this.
We
are not going though weeks and months of this.
And
just maybe, seven billion of us are beginning to realize that we can
put an end to this.
Si
se puede!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.