‘All-Out’ Pushing Syria War
US Military Leadership Continues to Oppose Conflict
7
September, 2013
The
word on the House of Representatives is clear: President Obama
doesn’t
have the votes to
push through a resolution endorsing his planned attack on Syria, and
he may in fact lose big.
It’s
going to take a lot of backroom deals and lobbying to convince
Representatives to go against the will of the American public,
overwhelmingly opposed to the war, just a year ahead of the
elections, but that lobbying may be coming.
AIPAC
and its usual auxiliaries in the Israel Lobby are looking to turn the
tide toward war, promising
to “go all-out” next week in
lobbying Congress to support the war, along with a “major
mobilization” of US Jewish leaders.
The
Israel Lobby’s uncanny knack for getting its way in the US Congress
is almost legendary, and if there’s one group that rivals them in
influence, it’s defense industry PACs. They haven’t been publicly
pro-war, but
their beneficiaries have been,
and with military contractors seeing
their stock prices surge on
talk of war, it’s not hard to imagine why.
Conspicuously
not on board for the war, however, are the American voting public,
whose opinion is at the fore with elections coming next year, along
with US
military leadership, which has made its displeasure surprisingly
public in
the lead-up to war.
Israeli
analysts are already expressing concern that an inability to sell the
war could
dramatically undermine AIPAC’s influence and reputation,
but the American voter and the Pentagon are not insignificant foes on
this matter, and this may be a case of the Lobby biting off more than
it can chew.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.