Showing posts with label Hollande. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hollande. Show all posts

Sunday, 15 November 2015

Hollande: the usual double standards apply

France was part of the coalition that conducted 5,900 airstrikes on Gaddafi's army. When ISIS took over parts of Libya, not one single airstrike.


What goes around comes around

France delivered weapons to Syria rebels, book reveals


6 May, 2015

French President Francois Hollande admitted to delivering weapons to Syrian rebels in 2012 despite an embargo, according to a new book coming out in France this month.

"We began when we were certain they would end up in the right hands. For the lethal weapons it was our services who delivered them," Hollande told author Xavier Panon in an interview in May last year.

The book by the journalist specialising in diplomatic and military issues, is entitled "In the corridors of French diplomacy".

French President Francois Hollande, pictured on May 6, 2015 in Paris, admitted to delivering weapons to Syrian rebels in 2012 despite an embargo, according t...

French President Francois Hollande, pictured on May 6, 2015 in Paris, admitted to delivering weapons to Syrian rebels in 2012 despite an embargo, according to a new book ©Michel Euler (Pool/AFP)

Panon wrote that France delivered canons, machine guns, rocket launchers and anti-tank missiles to the rebels fighting Bashar Al-Assad's regime in an uprising that has turned into all-out civil war and drawn in thousands of foreign jihadists.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights says over 200,000 people have been killed in the fighting.

Panon said the weapons delivered in the second half of 2012 were aimed at aiding the rebellion as opposed to having a decisive effect on changing the course of the conflict.

At the time an European embargo on weapons was in place since June 2011. It was lifted in May 2013.

Until now, France has only admitted to delivering non-lethal weapons to the rebels such as bullet-proof jackets or night-vision goggles.

The book traces a series of diplomatic and military moves by the French government both under Hollande and previous president Nicolas Sarkozy.
One of these was the planned air strikes against the Syrian regime for its use of chemical weapons in August 2013 which Washington backed down from after a diplomatic agreement.

The book names several planned targets of the strikes such as the "intelligence unit of the Syrian army which controls the chemical system."

A political advisor told the author the planned strikes had two objectives, to change the "political order" in Syria and to destabilise Russia, which backs Damascus, to pressure Moscow into changing its approach to the conflict.



Sunday, 30 August 2015

Hollande and Merkel back Putin's Ceasefire Plan, Minsk II salvaged

Apart from one brief report in Reuters unmentioned in the western media, including Deutsch Welle
‘Minsk peace deal on Ukraine must be respected’ – Merkel after talks with Poroshenko

RT,
29 October, 2015

The terms of the Minsk ceasefire deal on eastern Ukraine cannot be called into question, German Chancellor Merkel said in Berlin after meeting with Ukrainian leader Poroshenko – just days after he said the “times of pacifism” were “over.”

“The first and foremost condition is that everything is done to make the ceasefire agreement a reality. The task at hand means that what we agreed in Minsk has to be respected,” Chancellor Angela Merkel told reporters on Monday, referring to the February peace plan based on an OSCE-brokered agreement between Kiev and self-proclaimed rebel republics in eastern Ukraine.

Merkel insisted that the Berlin meeting with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and French President Francois Hollande had been called to help “implement the Minsk deal, not to call it into question.”
'Pacifism over': #Poroshenko presents tanks, Humvees, weaponry to #Donbass forces (VIDEO)https://t.co/AUXhYqVstxpic.twitter.com/7XxZIzNGQB
— RT (@RT_com) August 22, 2015

The German leader said that Poroshenko has assured her of Kiev’s commitment to withdrawing weaponry from the front line of the conflict – and a readiness to pull back weapons under 100mm in caliber. While the withdrawal of lighter weaponry was not outlined in the Minsk deal, eastern Ukrainian rebel forces unilaterally pulled back arms of less than 100mm caliber at the end of July, saying it was an act of good will in the hope that Kiev would follow suit.

According to Merkel, a broader arms withdrawal was recently discussed in a telephone conversation between the leaders of the ‘Normandy Four’ – France, Germany, Russia and Ukraine.



Both Kiev and the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics have been blaming each other for frequent ceasefire violations, including the use of heavy weaponry that they had agreed to pull back under the Minsk Protocol. The OSCE monitoring mission has confirmed that both sides have violated the agreement. Shelling continues to hit parts of the densely populated city of Donetsk: in July, one person was killed and several others injured as Ukrainian forces shelledresidential blocks and a city hospital. Overall, the conflict has claimed more than 6,700 lives since Kiev sent in the army in April of 2014 for what it called an “anti-terrorist operation.”

Poroshenko ‘sought backing for all-out war’?


However, it is the recent statements by Poroshenko that have been interpreted as signs of the imminent resumption of all-out war in the rebel-controlled areas. On Saturday, the Ukrainian leader bluntly stated that “the Minsk agreement despite all criticism has given us time to build up Ukraine’s defense,” adding that “the times of airheaded pacifism and shortsighted rejection of security issues are forever in the past now.”
'Russians & Ukrainians NOT brothers' - Poroshenko http://t.co/2slkhXrY33pic.twitter.com/scjzYndZqD
— RT (@RT_com) August 21, 2015

With Poroshenko’s remarks coming on the eve of his meeting with Merkel and Hollande, Moscow reacted by saying it hoped that the European leaders would put pressure on Kiev to stick to the Minsk agreements. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Merkel and Hollande, who signed the Minsk deal as guarantors, will have to save their own reputations and make sure that Ukraine does everything it has pledged to do to achieve peace.


According to political analyst Aleksandar Pavic, Poroshenko’s visit most likely served as a public relations stunt amid serious domestic economic problems. It could also mean he is seeking to gain backing for a new military operation in eastern Ukraine.



“I think Petro Poroshenko is just trying to get additional public support for what he’s being prepared to do, inside and outside Ukraine: a new push to resume war in Ukraine. So, I think he probably has the backing of his Western sponsors, and this is just something that needs to be more public… Obviously, the rhetoric that’s coming out of Kiev is that Minsk, the Minsk agreements, are pretty much dead,” Pavic told RT.
#Putin goes to Crimea – but where’s the Western outrage? (Op-Edge by @NeilClark66)http://t.co/8vhyugBx0Vpic.twitter.com/t6HDjUklSV
— RT (@RT_com) August 22, 2015

The analyst believes that one of the major problems forcing Poroshenko to seek more public support is the rampant corruption in post-coup “oligarchic-run” 
Ukraine – corruption that he has publically vowed to fight. Media reports, such as one published by the German agency dpa, suggested that fighting corruption in Ukraine was to be the focus of the agenda in Berlin.

“Nobody’s serious about dealing with corruption in Ukraine. It’s obvious after more than a year, a year and a half of the war, ever since the Maidan, that, if anything, Ukraine is even more corrupt than it was. It’s now a place being run by the oligarchs, and it’s a much less democratic place than it was,” Pavic said, adding that the new Ukrainian authorities have only been consistent in their push for war in Donbass.


Calling Poroshenko’s Saturday statement on the Minsk deal “scandalous,” the analyst pointed to the lack of response coming from the West.

“In effect, he’s saying that, “No, we weren’t interested in peace when we were negotiating the Minsk agreement. We were just interested in buying time because we were losing the war, and now that we are rearmed, we’re ready to resume the war.” Western capitals haven’t responded, and really needed to respond very negatively to Poroshenko’s statements if they were serious about real peace in Ukraine and the Minsk agreement… They’re actually encouraging Poroshenko to resume war,” Pavic said.Wha


Breaking: Hollande and Merkel back Putin's Ceasefire Plan, Minsk II salvaged

Monday, 30 March 2015

The GermanWings crash

An interesting and different variation to the standard MSM reporting

Holland blames US for Germanwings D-AIPX. Shot down?

François Hollande wütend über Germanwings-Abschuss


25 March, 2015


For links see German original below

The mysterious story of the crashed in southern France on 24/03/2015 Airbus A320 D-AIPX of German Wings takes another dramatic turn: Well, the French President François Hollande mixed into the debate. His indictment: Barack Obama had the 150 victims on his conscience. The US has shot down the machine.



The controversial message caused a sensation and was immediately picked up by mirror, FAZ, SZ and Focus. That a French president accused of an allied NATO nation so soon after such a tragedy that would be unique in history, would Hollande not recently been the CIA - the most famous intelligence agency of the United States - accused of responsibility for the Charlie Hebdo massacre (AMR) reported ,



Hollande in the wording: "Those damn A-Merde Rikaner have done it again! Having already launched in 1988 the Iran Air Flight 655, now had an airplane of our partners in Germany to believe it! You want to push us in the shoes of Frenchman and blackmail us so that we increase the pressure on Russia. Fucking A Merde Rikaner! "



Hollande's outburst was not without echo from Washington. President Obama spoke of a "great disappointment and a deep breach of trust", which Hollande had committed. Secretary of State John Kerry spoke of "a barbarous language of the 19th century" and Alt-government adviser Henry Kissinger warned Hollande that such rhetoric could quickly lead to a "Regime Change in beautiful France".



Experts believe meanwhile that Hollande may not could be to blame for the tragedy. In 1980, a historical parallel occurred when the Italian passenger machine Itavia Flight 870 was of Italian NATO warplanes at Ustica (Italy) accidentally shot down because they were in at that time in a dogfight with Libya; Italy covered up the tragedy over 30 years. Something similar could now be undermined by the French Government, which seeks Hollande possibly to cover up his verbal attack on the United States.



So far, however, no theory to crash German Wings D-AIPX can withstand critical examination. Media expert and editor of the tabloid Kai Diekmann advises the press for restraint: "About Fast judgments, lurid headlines and claimed that anyone knew already sure what happened, must be regarded as idiotic."






Germanwings D-AIPX: Hollande beschuldigt USA, Abschuss?



http://amr.amronline.de/2015/03/25/germanwings-hollande-beschuldigt-usa-des-abschusses/



Die mysteriöse Geschichte um den am 24.03.2015 in Süd-Frankreich abgestürzten Airbus A320, D-AIPX von Germanwings nimmt einen weiteren dramatischen Verlauf: Nun mischt sich der französische Präsident François Hollande in die Debatte. Seine Anklage: Barack Obama habe die 150 Opfer auf dem Gewissen. Die USA haben die Maschine abgeschossen.

Die brisante Meldung erregte großes Aufsehen und wurde sofort von Spiegel, FAZ, SZ und Focus aufgegriffen. Dass ein französischer Präsident so kurz nach einer solchen Tragödie eine verbündete NATO-Nation beschuldigt, wäre einmalig in der Geschichte, hätte Hollande nicht kürzlich bereits die CIA – die bekannteste Geheimdienstbehörde der USA – beschuldigt, das Charlie Hebdo Massaker mit zu verantworten (AMR berichtete).

Hollande im Wortlaut: “Diese verdammten A-Merde-Rikaner haben es schon wieder getan! Nachdem sie 1988 bereits den Iran-Air-Flug 655 abgeschossen haben, musste nun ein Flugzeug unserer Partner in Deutschland dran glauben! Sie wollen es uns Franzosen in die Schuhe schieben und uns erpressen, damit wir den Druck auf Russland weiter erhöhen. Verdammte A-Merde-Rikaner!”

Hollandes Wutausbruch blieb nicht ohne Echo aus Washington. Präsident Obama sprach von einer “großen Enttäuschung und einem tiefen Vertrauensbruch”, welchen Hollande begangen habe. Außenminister John Kerry sprach von “einer barbarischen Sprache aus dem 19. Jahrhundert” und Alt-Regierungsberater Henry Kissinger warnte Hollande, dass derartige Rhetorik schnell zu einem “Regime Change im schönen Frankreich” führen könne.

Experten nehmen unterdessen an, dass Hollande eventuell nicht unschuldig an der Tragödie sein könnte. 1980 ereignete sich eine historische Parallele, als die italienische Passagier-Maschine Itavia-Flug 870 von italienischen NATO-Kampffliegern bei Ustica (Italien) versehentlich abgeschossen wurde, da sich diese zu jenem Zeitpunkt im Luftkampf mit Libyen befanden; Italien vertuschte die Tragödie über 30 Jahre lang. Ähnliches könnte nun der französischen Regierung unterlaufen sein, was Hollande eventuell mit seinem verbalen Angriff auf die USA zu vertuschen sucht.

Bisher kann allerdings keine Theorie zum Absturz von Germanwings D-AIPX einer kritischen Prüfung standhalten. Medienexperte und Chefredakteur der Bildzeitung Kai Diekmann rät der Presse zu Zurückhaltung: “Überschnelle Urteile, reißerische Überschriften und jegliche Behauptung, man wisse schon sicher, was passiert ist, muss als idiotisch gewertet werden.”

Saturday, 7 February 2015

Putin, Poroshenko to Discuss Ukraine Sunday with French, German Leaders

From Jon Hellevig, Moscow


Alexander Mercouris has given a blitz review of the Putin talks with Hollande & Merkel. 


Drawing from that, I would say something very serious is going on. Hollande & Merkel are really trying this time, they are dead serious and scared shit for what might happen if...but as the 5 h talks evidence, Putin does not seem to be caving into the demands, but at the same time he is doing everything not to humilate the guests, cause this time they came with dead earnest pleas. 


Putin is therefore trying to come up with something nice for them to take home. - What I am concerned of is what will these leaders do for the people suffering in Donbass, what to do to prevent daily nazi artillery sheltering of Donetsk and other places of Donbass. That is what counts. Cause when one person dies, then the world comes to an end.


TALKS IN MOSCOW
Alexander Mercouris


Via Facebook

They have apparently continued for 5 hours and are still not finished though it seems some sort of document is being prepared for tomorrow.
Three comments:

1. If negotiations go on for 5 hours that does not suggest a smooth and conflict free discussion.

2. One of the most interesting things about the Moscow talks is that they mainly happened without the presence of aides and officials i.e. Putin, Hollande and Merkel were by themselves save for interpreters and stenographers. Putin and Merkel are known to be masters of detail and given his background as an enarque I presume Hollande also is. However the German and French officials will be very unhappy about this. The Russians less so because since the meeting is taking place in the Kremlin they are listening in to the discussions via hidden microphones.

One wonders why this is happening? Even if the Russian officials are not listening in Merkel and Hollande will assume they are. The fact that Russian officials were not present is therefore less significant than that German and French officials have been barred from the meeting by their respective chiefs, suggesting that Merkel and Hollande do not entirely trust them.

There has been an extraordinary degree of secrecy about this whole episode and it rather looks as if Merkel and Hollande were anxious to stop leaks and to prevent information about the talks from getting out. Presumably this is why their officials were barred from the meeting. From whom one wonders do Merkel and Hollande want to keep details of the meeting secret? From the media? From other members of their own governments? From the Americans? What do they need to keep so secret? The frustration and worry on the part of all these groups must be intense.


3.The fact that the British are excluded from the talks is going down very badly with many people here in London. It has not escaped people's notice that this is the first major negotiation to settle a big crisis in Europe in which Britain is not involved since the one that ended the Franco-Prussian War in 1870. Of course it is largely the fault of the inept diplomacy of Cameron, who has taken such an extreme pro-Ukrainian position that Moscow simply doesn't see him as someone worth talking to. Also one suspects Merkel and Hollande do not trust Cameron not to leak the whole discussion to whomever they want to keep it from. Having said that it is difficult to see this as anything other than further evidence of Britain's decline into complete irrelevance. I cannot imagine Thatcher being excluded in this way. If the United Kingdom is indeed in the process of breaking up (and as I suspected the Scottish referendum settled nothing with polls indicating that the SNP may make an almost clean sweep of all the seats in Scotland in the election in May) then the slide into irrelevance still has a long way to go.


Putin, Hollande, Merkel talks on Ukraine ‘constructive’, possible document in progress – Kremlin



Russia's President Vladimir Putin (C) talks to German Chancellor Angela Merkel as French President Francois Hollande looks on during a meeting on resolving the Ukraine crisis at the Kremlin in Moscow February 6, 2015. (Reuters/Maxim Zmeyev)

RT,

3 February, 2015


Talks between Russia’s President Putin, France’s President Hollande, and German Chancellor Merkel have been constructive and work is underway on a possible joint document aimed at implementing the Minsk agreements, said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov.


“On the basis of proposals made by the French President and German Chancellor, there is currently ongoing joint work to prepare the text of a possible joint document on the implementation of the Minsk agreements – a document that would include proposals made by Ukrainian President Poroshenko and proposals put forward today by Russian President Putin,” Dmitry Peskov said after the talks between the three leaders finished in Moscow on Friday.

He explained that after the document is prepared it will be presented to both sides in the conflict in Ukraine for approval. Peskov characterized the talks as “constructive, informative and substantive.”

Joint document with proposals will be presented 4 approval 2 all sides of conflict,

The preliminary results of the talks will be discussed in a telephone call between the ‘Normandy Four’ – Russia, France, Germany, and Ukraine – on Sunday, he said.

The French government viewed the talks as having been “constructive and meaningful,” RIA Novosti reported, citing French media sources in the Hollande administration. Meanwhile, German sources said that the document on Ukraine will include suggestions from each of the 'Normandy Four' leaders.

View image on Twitter
talks now over.Dinner is next.Still no info on whether they'll come 2 media or not

“Currently, there is work underway on a possible joint document, which will allow the Minsk agreements [on ceasefire in Ukraine] to be fulfilled,” the French sources said.

This was also confirmed by German government spokesman Steffen Seibert in a statement.

Following both the talks and a joint dinner, French President Francois Hollande and German Chancellor Angela Merkel have traveled back to the airport.

The importance of the talks has been highlighted by the fact that the details have been shrouded in secrecy. RT’s Maria Finoshina reported from the Kremlin that the journalists were given a mere 30 seconds to take photographs of the three leaders, and none of them uttered a single word to the press during the photo-shoot.

Conflicting reports from press service on whether talks w/ over or continue.1colleague:No surprise,they make history

Hollande and Merkel arrived in Moscow on Friday evening. They headed straight to the Kremlin for talks on the Ukrainian crisis with President Vladimir Putin behind closed doors in discussion which lasted for nearly five hours.

The Minsk Protocol – an agreement to stop the conflict in eastern Ukraine – was signed in September by representatives of Kiev, the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics, the Russian envoy to Ukraine, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) following talks in the Belarusian capital.

The document outlined twelve points, urging a bilateral ceasefire and calling for measures to resolve the conflict in Donbass. A follow-up memorandum listed concrete steps to enforce a ceasefire, including a pullback of heavy weaponry, the creation of a 30-kilometer buffer zone, a ban on offensive operations and combat flights, as well as the setting up of an OSCE watchdog mission.


The ceasefire agreement was initially lauded as successful, with prisoner swaps taking place and fighting reducing in intensity. However, in January there was a rapid escalation in the conflict, with both the Kiev government and the rebels blaming each other for starting an offensive at Donetsk’s main airport, which was partly held by the Ukrainian armed forces at the time. Kiev stepped up its military operation and the shelling of Donbass cities after losing the airport, and self-proclaimed officials responded with harsh rhetoric, also pledging to fight back and attack.

Most recently, a dramatic escalation of fighting turned the eastern city of Debaltsevo, between Donetsk and Lugansk, into a warzone, with civilians coming under intense shelling. Destroyed tanks and armored vehicles littered the city’s streets. Local militia fighters said that they had negotiated a humanitariancorridor for civilians in the area, which was later confirmed by Kiev.

However, the evacuation of Debaltsevo did not go smoothly from the very outset. Russian journalists, including an RT crew, came under sniper fire at a checkpoint near the city, with militia firing back. According to RT’s Roman Kosarev, “bullets were flying two or three meters” away from the group. Luckily, nobody was injured in the shootout.



Friday, 9 January 2015

"Civilised man must unite to meet barbarism" - Sarkozy


"The EU 1%ers are now capitalizing on these murders to crack down on their own population. Sarkozy already met Hollande and they both agreed that new levels of firmness and vigilance need to be implemented. Does that not reek of a French 9/11?"

---The Saker

Via Google Translate


Sarkozy has asked Holland to increase "the level of firmness and vigilance"

Sarkozy a demandé à Hollande d'augmenter "le niveau de fermeté et de vigilance"

Nicolas Sarkozy and François Hollande © Elysée


8 January, 2015

Nicolas Sarkozy was back at the Elysee Palace for the first time since May 15, 2012. He was received by François Hollande after the attack against Charlie Hebdo. If he called for political unity, he took the opportunity to request an increase in the "level of firmness and vigilance."

" I think it was my duty to respond to this invitation , "said the former president of the Republic. " Civilized man must unite to respond to barbarism . " He expressed his excitement at the sight of spontaneous gatherings of thousands of French in support of Charlie Hebdo. " I am quite impressed with the attitude of our compatriots and spontaneous demonstrations of unity in a climate of meditation, with great firmness of demand, but a very great dignity on the part of our countrymen . "

Nicolas Sarkozy has called for political unity. And he said he had told Francois Hollande of the need to increase the level of firmness and vigilance, offering the support of the opposition. " I told the President Holland there were decisions to make. I understand that he would make proposals. If it is in a spirit of unity and in order to enhance the effectiveness our security forces we will participate there as well. Not in a spirit of confrontation between the opposition and the majority, but a shared concern for the protection of the French . "

"Civilized man must unite to meet barbarism" (Nicolas Sarkozy)

Tuesday, 6 January 2015

France's Hollande worried by Russian sanctions

Russia sanctions 'must be lifted now' - Hollande


French President Francois Hollande is wary of the impact economic crisis in Russia might have on Europe. He has called for sanctions imposed against Moscow to be lifted as soon as there’s progress in peace talks over Ukraine.