Dedicated to the dedicated nurses, midwives and ambulance staff and to mandated practitioners.
We have been told that the Pfizer mRNA "vaccine" is "safe and effective" and would protect against covid-19; that it would protect against serious symptoms and keep people out of hospital.
Now we have a crisis in our hospitals "because of COVID". The truth is that in this country at least 80% of people in hospital because of COVID have been vaccinated.
The data from Australia is even more stark; I came across the following just this morning:
It appears that we have a crisis in our hospitals and it is getting worse, week-by- week.For example this while I was compiling this article:
Dunedin Hospital is no longer accepting visitors to any of its wards because of an outbreak of Covid-19, combined with increased pressure on capacity.Visitors were turned away from the hospital yesterday after the restrictions were implemented at 6pm.Southern District Health Board chairman Pete Hodgson said there had been an outbreak of Covid-19 at the hospital, which was the reason it had to close the doors.
****
I wish to start with some anecdotes from people that we know:
PATRICK'S STORY
I have a healthy 78-year old friend who we have been worried about for some time as he has had 3 doses of the "vaccine".
A few weeks ago he had very sore feet and was getting round in woollen boots. We immediately suspected blood clots.
He had several on-line consultations with his doctor who could only suggest he bought some special boots but showed little interest in investigating further, something that has become the rule, rather than the exception.
When he finally had to crawl to the bathroom and couldn't walk his family phoned for the ambulance.
The ambulance staff did not believe that he was in pain and couldn't walk until they accidentally kicked him in the foot and he yelled out in pain. He was sent to Wellington hospital in our region and indeed, he did have blood clots, all to do with his smoking or his age and nothing to do with a vaccine booster of course!
He had an operation involving the transplant of veins that appeared to be successful; he was recovering and was, according to his nurse-daughter due to have a second operation on his second leg on the Monday.
We learned that on the evening before he was diagnosed with covid-19 and was put into isolation where he has remained for the week.
During that time he has had no symptoms of COVID other than being irritable and stir-crazy from the isolation.
The latest news is that he has been transferred to Hutt hospital - the one that, as you will see, is having its largest wing closed down soon.
All this is because of a shortage of operating room staff at Wellington hospital.So he was down for an operation on Monday (because it was urgent) and by Thursday there is apparently no staff to do the operation.
CEMETERY WORKERS
We have another friend who has worked outside for 35 years as a gravedigger - the one who reported that in his career he has never buried so many people as he has over the past months, especially following a "vaxathon" last year.
He was done out of a job because he refused to have the vaxx and as far as we know has not been reinstated despite having heard (in the middle of the night of course!) reports of a shortage of crematorium and cemetery workers.
They will never acknowledge or admit that cemetery workers have been mandated out of their jobs but instead produce human interest stories like this.
Public and community-run cemeteries around the country are struggling to recruit staff and volunteers
So, folk just don't want to do the job any more?
Is that it?
THE UNVAXXED NURSES
We have anecdotal information that after an unspecified (but considerable) number of nurses in the hospitals walking out of their jobs because they would not succumb to the vaxx no one has been allowed back to their jobs.
In an interview recently Liz Gunn said that far from people returning to work more and more are leaving the sector because the demands are becoming greater and greater so that those who have received three doses of the mRNA shot will be regarded as "unvaxxed".
All the while, it seems that staff are allowed to work with COVID symptoms but are not allowed to be unvaxxed.
A well-known figure in the movement and my former doctor, René de Monchy had this to say when I asked him:
As to my situation as mentioned in the article, it is indeed so that on 18 November last year I was told that I was not able and permitted to work any more and the hospital said I was not allowed anywhere on the DHB grounds, which would be considered a criminal offense.....
A colleague of mine who is a gynaecologist and who was working in the same hospital, has not been able to work anywhere in hospital or do locum work as a specialist or as a doctor in general because he is unvaccinated.
(edited)
So we have a crisis in the hospitals due at least in good measure to Jacinda Adern sacking her most dedicated nursing staff.
All this is being ascribed to COVID amongst staff (which well might be the case, at least in part) while the other main reason is ignored or even denied.
***
This is further illustrated by this story: another acquaintance had to go to Accident and Emergency (ER) with a kidney infection was not responding to antibiotics.
Although she was regarded as urgent she was shunted off to a room where she was left for a long period of time.
She alluded to the fact that there were very few nursing staff and they were being moved from Emergency to other areas of the hospital.
This was confirmed by her:
"The nurse said they were reducing the number of staff in A&E- they already couldn't cope and reducing numbers would be diabolical".
There have been accounts in the media of staff having to work very long shifts.
There was a story of a woman working in a small rest home, of maybe 50 people, having to work 3 days in a row and grab some sleep in between and couldn't get home for 36 hours.
She reported after having been at work for 2 whole days having to stay on because no one turned up to relieve her.
Changes are being made to our work visas that allows the fast tracking of immigrants in professions where there is deemed to be an acute shortage - medical professionals, builders, project managers, engineers, dentists.
Nurses were not on this list.
A Swedish nurse reported she cannot practise nursing here because her qualifications are not recognised here, all that despite the fact that probably has among the highest standards of nursing in the world.
Another Indian doctor we know who is working with immigrants in a poor neighbourhood reported she had to go "through hell" to get her qualifications recognised. She reported being bullied and generally treated very badly.
AN INTERVIEW WITH STEVE OLIVER
Perhaps the clearest example of how run down the health system is comes from an interview of Steve Oliver with Liz Gunn where he describes his friend having a heart attack in front of him.
Getting only an answering service on 111 which said they were over capacity and to go to a GP. he set off taking his friend to the hospital in Whangarei.
When they got to medical centre where they tried ringing emergency; the phone rang for an hour and a half without being picked up.
His friend started to get anxious and instead of being sedated was told they would ring the police and have him thrown out ion the street.
They managed to finally get an ambulance and when they got to the hospital there were staff everywhere, all clipboards whose only concern was if he had any COVID symptoms.
Steve Oliver was told the hospital was 150% over capacity and he had better go home and see his GP.
After sleeping for 2 days he was told the earliest he can get a PHONE consultation was Monday. The heart attack happened on the previous Thursday.Other comments were that:
Health practitioners are still being mandated when we are being told the mandates are over. The exit from the health profession because people don’t want to take the boosters.
The hospitals let people go to work if they have COVID symptoms. How will that stop people getting sick?
The response from staff to question was “no comment” or that they can’t do anything other than just deal with the fallout.
People are unaware that this is going on until they need the system.
THINGS ARE ONLY GOING TO GET. WORSE
While we are seeing that there are greater levels of hospitalisations of the vaccinated and deaths are constant compared with when we had the original Wuhan strain of Covid-2 things are only going to get worse.
We have not reached flu season yet.
This prognosis came out a couple of days ago from a modeller who I have to say have never got things right
Hawkes Bay describe an increasing number of people admitted to hospital with flu although it has to be asked how they distinguish influenza from COVID seeing they have very similar symptoms.
In any case it is leading to a call for people to get the flu jab although there is evidence that it can only make matters worse
As at Monday, there were 10 people in Hawke's Bay Hospital with influenza.
Four days later, there were 33 people in the hospital with influenza, with one of those patients requiring intensive care support.
It comes during the same week the hospital's ED reported its busiest days on record with almost 200 presentations on both Monday and Tuesday.Now we come to the big story.
THE IMPENDING CLOSURE OF HUTT HOSPITAL
In the midst of a dire health crisis it was announced that the Wellington region's second largest hospital, the Hutt Valley hospital is closing its Heretaunga Wing, which houses 79 percent of the beds and services and 25 percent of the region's capacity as well.
It contains the children's ward, the maternity wing, the coronary care unit and other wards and services.
The reports say that the DHB used a 10-year-old seismic assessment to persuade the Hutt City Council to go easy on it in May 2021
If closed that would leave no maternity services in the Hutt Valley and people may have to go elsewhere where services are already stretched to the maximum.
Everyone, right up to the Health Minister, Andrew Little says they want to keep a hospital in the region but reality on the ground paints a different picture.
There had been talk of shifting birthing to a unit, te Awakairangi, owned by a charitable organisation, the Wright Family Foundation, was mothballed only last year due to lack of funding.
If you thought the problems were limited to the Hutt Hospital you would be wrong.
Within a very short period of time three other hospitals that I know of were singled out for partial closure - all because they are prone to earthquakes.
Firstly there is Wellington hospital where they have discovered they have to move its emergency department "because its structure might fail in a quake"
That must be a really urgent problem that has to be solved immediately (sic)!
Then there is Hawkes Bay Hospital where they have discovered its newest buildings (built in 2004) has been found to be "earthquake-prone" just a month before the Hutt Valley and Wellington announcements. It has been reported that they cannot install their new MRI scanner
Of course it is all a big coincidence and anyone who recalls the 1931 Napier earthquake will realise it is shaky.
But have you heard of any earthquakes in Auckland?
But within a day or so of the announcement about the Hutt Hospital it was announced that its Galbraith building is 'earthquake prone' ("just 20 % of the New Building Standard")
The building currently houses a birthing unit and two maternity wards. (Photo/ NZ Herald)
Again, we have a hospital catering for poorer parts of the population that includes a maternity wing.
In 2019 they were going to scrap the building but once again it is in the headlines.The timing is amazing.
The Hutt Valley Hospital issue has had quite a lot of press but the situation with the other hospitals are, on-the-whole well-hidden. However, this was reported
Isn't it strange how at a time when the health system is in dire crisis and losing staff at an amazing rate that policies are being enacted that would reduce facilities and they would undertake a major reform of the system?
If it is not by design it seems to me that if there nefarious aims this is just how they would go about collapsing a health system that was already in a parlous shape
THE REST HOMES
The situation in the rest homes which was previously almost intolerable has only got worse.
The article reports that the New Zealand Health Group, the largest provider of home support services has had to suspend referrals in Auckland, turning away 20 to 30 a day, due to the lack of registered nurses needed to supervise carers.
Furthermore they report the vaccine mandate took out more than 400 caregivers, and they have lost about 20 per cent of nursing staff to district health boards (DHB) over the past six months because of the pay gap.
In this regard, a friend's mother has been in hospital taking up bed space that is already in short supply while they look for a bed in a rest home.
However, there have been none available anywhere near where she lives.
There was also a story of a woman working in a small rest home, of maybe 50 people, having to work 3 days in a row and grab some sleep in between and couldn't get home for 36 hours.
She reported after having been at work for 2 whole days having to stay on because no one turned up to relieve her.
Another friend has a friend in a Lower Hutt rest home and reported that the old people are underfed and going hungry.
I have looked to see if these shortages are affecting the private hospitals as well.
However, I can find no indication of any problems being identified in the media connected the private system.
QUESTION: If staff are succumbing to COVID in the public hospitals would this not affect the private hospitals as well?
But that is not what we hearing.
Are we being herded into the private system?
A GOVERNMENT SHAKE-UP OF THE HEALTH SYSTEM IN THE MIDST OF CRISIS
A major health reform in the midst of a grave crisis?
In response to the article above, Lower Hutt mayor Campbell Barry said that the Hospital Board needed to make a strong stance about retaining health services in the Hutt Valley while it still had the power to.
This is because the decision-making powers will be transferred to the new government organisation, Health New Zealand, next month.
This move is away from local decision-making towards a single centralised, govenment-controlled organisation, Health New Zealand.
It is unclear what the government has spend on COVID - on propaganda, buying in vaccines and what have you - I recall a figure of 100 BILLION. I came across the following official item that is designed to confuse as much as it is to reveal.
According to the debt clock New Zealand's national debt (which represents 42% of GDP stands at NZ$120 billion with interest payments of $5 billion.
To put this into perspective NZ cannot rely on a petrodollar backed by a huge military.
Instead, it does not earn enough from dairy and tourism (which has been closed down for 2 years) to make ends meet.
It does not take a genius to realise that this situation must have a huge effect on the public health crisis.
We can cover hospital debts only by still more borrowing.
Or we can tighten our belts but it will never be enough.
Conclusion
I am leaving it up to readers to decide how to interpret what I have reported - the degree to which the health system is collapsing or is being COLLAPSED.
Perhaps the fact that they announced the closure of several hospitals all within a short period of time is just a giant coincidence.?
Perhaps the fact that we have a shortage of nurses, cemetery workers etc. is just happenstance?
That is what the media would like you to believe.
They will go anywhere in their explanations other than so much as mention the mandated health workers.
They simply don't exist.
But I for one don't believe in "coinkydinks".
Perhaps I can finish with the following?
We do not know what Jacinda Adern signed up to with Pfizer in 2021
We do not know what she signed to in America in the last week.
We do not know what Jacinda talks about in her daily breakfast discussions with former PM Helen Clark.
But I can tell you what has been revealed about Helen Clark. who after being prime minister of New Zealand cut her teeth at the UN and other globalist organisations.
She is listed as a major participant of a WEF "Preparing for the Next Pandemic" stakeholder meeting at Davos.
This is my best effort of conveying what Geert vanden Bossche had to say. By necessity, like vanden Bossche himself when he talks there will be some repetition.
Last Friday Del Bigtree of the Highwire interviewed Belgian vaccinologist, Geert vanden Bossche for the third time with not only an update but what he calls his final warning.
His arguments are very technical and difficult to grasp - more so than last time when he did not use such a plethora of confusing concepts to explain what he is seeing.
We have spent much of two days trying to grasp what he is saying and to put it in a language that will be comprehensible to those with a basic, but not extensive understanding of virology or evolutionary biology.
What follows is our attempt to bring clarity to a complicated subject.
What I will do is to reproduce what Geert vanden Bossche has to say as best as I can and to provide an initial attempt to unpack that.
To help this I put together a 50 minute video that brings together all the main parts of his presentation.
First, I have to make my own position clear.
Geert is a vaccinologist and evolutionary biologist and so brings his own understanding.
It is my belief that this should be viewed on its own merit and not compared, positively or negatively, with other conclusions that one has taken on.
That would be what I call "contempt prior to investigation".
I am a great enemy of reductionism and the argument that this ipso facto cannot be true because it "contradicts" something else we have taken on. For example, Geert does not talk as others do, such as Peter McCullough or Robert Malone about the nature of the mRNA shot that is not at all a vaccine.
The evidence to me points to the vaccine being an instrument of genocide because of the many mechanisms of injury in the shot (40 of which have been identified from scientific papers by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny).
However, this does not, in any way, to me contradict the contribution of vanden Bossche. It is bringing a different understanding that reinforces the arguments for keeping well away from the "vaccine", especially when it comes to our children.
For what it is worth Dr. Tenpenny on Telegram advised people to watch the video and to keep watching it until they understand it.
It matters little to me that vanden Bossche is an "insider" who has in the past worked for GAVI, or treats the mRNA shot as a "vaccine" and fails to point out things that are actually well outside his scope of practise.
It is, in my mind, essential that people have a grasp of the dire danger so that they understand just how important it is to avoid the shot for us and our children.
I have always regarded it as far more important to remain aware of the greatest dangers rather than live as if the times are normal.
The "information" that comes from the authorities is deceptively simple (nay, simplistic)- and very easy to grasp but highly misleading.
What Geert vanden Bossche is talking about is immune escape that has been defined as:
"Immune escape (aka viral escape and antigen escape) is the ability of a virus to elude an individual’s immune response."
To summarise, what Geert has been talking about since early 2021 is the danger and folly of vaccinating people in the midst of a pandemic.
As opposed to innate immunity in the population, the vaccines produce non-sterilising (or non-neutralising) antibodies which puts immune pressure on the virus encouraging it to mutate rapidly. This was expressed very clearly by Del Bigtree last year using the analogy of killing killer whales and not sharks.
Here are some of what we gleaned from the interview.
THE PANDEMIC IS FAR FROM OVER
The assumption on the part of Fauci and the propagandists for the vaccine is that the pandemic is all but over .
However, the extent of infection is wildly underestimated.
A lot of people are being infected and reinfected and we are seeing one wave after the other.
Infectious pressure is greater than ever before and the virus has become largely immune to potentially sterilising antibodies.
We are being told the vaccines are preventing serious disease but Geert vanden Bossche says:
"Have you heard of a vaccine that increases susceptibility to disease, protects against serious disease but not against mild disease?"
Omicron is not causing serious disease but mild disease.
It does not produce neutralising antibodies but instead induces the production of non neutralising antibodies.
In a normal pandemic prior to mass vaccination we could expect a limited number of waves of infectionand you get back to baseline and the morbidity rates closely would follow the case rates.
This can be seen in the case of South Africa where rates of vaccination are low at around 35%.
But in Omicron never goes back to baseline and we have shorter gaps.
Vanden Bossche states that the vaccinologists and public health authorities overlook that the aim in Nature is to establish an equilibrium between the virus and the host.
You can only do that by controlling the spread and you can only do that if you have neutralising antibodies.
Public health authorities make the sole criterion the number of hospitalisations to persuade us the pandemic is over.
I have been grappling with the situation where in New Zealand where there were 27 deaths "FROM covid" and we were all locked down but now cases, deaths, hospitalisations are way up we are debating the relaxation of restrictions and whether the pandemic is "over".
Just today we had instant confirmation with the announcement of two new variants in New Zealand.
Epidemiologist Michael Baker is predicting New Zealand's Covid-19 case numbers will rise again over the coming months - resulting in increased hospitalisations and deaths.
All that in spite of findings such as the following:
None of that ever made any sense but Geert has explained it to me.
Instead, they continue to propagate the following:
All of that is nonsense of course. Now you can see the likes of Fauci backtracking and flip flopping without ever admitting that he was even a tiny bit wrong.
Sociopaths don't do that.
IMMUNE PRESSURE
With omicron people are getting reinfected because it is the antibodies that are determining - the virus is now free; it no longer has a problem with transmission.
It is now highly transmissive.
The virus is no longer trying to decide how to be more infectious.
The virus is working out how to get round non neutralising antibodies, so it will now will be virulent as well.
For now the omicron variant is, at the moment, preventing transinfection in lungs. It is selecting for a way to get round.
Once that happens transfection will happen in lungs and people will get severe disease in the lungs.
Every time person gets reinfected these non neutralising antibodies are going to be boosted.
The idea that is put forward by Fauci and people like Paul Offit is that the virus will burn itself out and if the vaccine becomes ineffective second generation vaccines can be developed to deal with new variants.
They are, in the opinion of vanden Bossche, using the vaccine as if we were operating outside a pandemic and vaccinating in a normal, prophylactic way.
It is very very clear that the virus will mutate.
It cannot afford to just become virulent. It has to maintain its high level of infectiousness to survive
It cannot afford to just become virulent. It has to maintain its high level of infectiousness to survive
THE IMPORTANCE OF GLYCANS
Vanden Bossche says that a key role is played by glycans.
40% of the surface of the virus is covered in sugars called glycans that are synthesised by the machinery of the host.
They are not recognised by the immune system.
One sugar can SHIELD the entire immune epitopes that are present in the receptor binding domain.
One mutation is all that is needed to reach this situation.
If it doesn't do anything it will get eradicated because - the best way for the virus to propagate is if the host gets mild or moderate disease.
The virus is under extreme immune pressure and so it will mutate.
It cannot afford to just become virulent; it has to maintain its high level of infectiousness, so it needs to combine 2 things - enhanced binding of the non neutralising antibodies to ensure enhanced infectiousness at the upper respiratory tract and preventing , through the antibodies transinfection at the level of the lower respiratory tract.
Glycans need to come in to help the virus meet both these challenges because the responsible antibodies are the same, the non neutralising antibodies need to to ensure enhanced infectiousness whereas they have to prevent them from binding to the virus that is absorbed from the migrating dendritic cells migrating from the upper respiratory tract in order to enable virulence.
The virus is not going to try and eliminate the non-neutralising antibodies because it needs them
It needs them to be infectious.
It is therefore not going to mutate in the way the experts say ( to die out)
It uses the sugar to hide itself so then the blocking of transinfection can happen. The dendritic cells become a vehicle, a taxi cab to bring the virus into the lower respiratory tract.
This mutation got around the neutralising antibodies so the receptor binding domain is freed up and the way the neutralising antibodies are grabbing on is happening faster and enhancing the disease
However, those same antibodies that are enhancing the disease are doing two different jobs.
Those same antibodies that are enhancing the disease are stopping the virus from transinfecting cells in the lower respiratory tract.
It needs the non-neutralising antibodies to be infectious.
It’s not going to get rid of them.
It wants to use them to get through the doors and find a way to continue trans infection which is currently being blocked.
It’s going to use a sugar to coat itself, to hide itself, so that then blocking of transinfection can happen.
Hiding those antibodies that are using it to stop infection by hiding it in sugar can, give rise to serious problems.
A MASSIVE DISASTER WAITING TO HAPPEN
If we wait and see and continue vaccinating it will become too late to do anything, a scenario vanden Bossche hints at.
The more the glycans grow the better they can do their job.
"There will not be one super-variant but rather a series of variants that have greater levels of glycogenation that will overcome the immune pressure that we are putting on the virus that will lead to a rapid succession of variants that have a level of infectiousness that is even higher than omicron so this will not be prevented by the glycans because they will not cover the receptor binding domain that is responsible for increased infectiousness."
SAID IN LAY PERSON'S TERMS
We put this together to try and translate what we heard into language we better understand. No doubt it can do with some improvement
Omicron is a highly infectious but less virulent COVID 19 variant, currently infecting mainly the upper respiratory tract.
Geert says it's inevitable and only a matter of time before the immense immune pressure the vaccines are exerting on the virus will force it to mutate and spread to other parts of the body.
Based on his research and knowledge of the science, he postulates the likelihood that some of the viral particles found in dendritic cells in the nasal cavity will become coated with a glycan, or sugar - hiding them from attacking antibodies and allowing them to travel by stealth into the lungs and other other parts of the body.
"The virus now has an enormous choice of all possible mutants and plenty of opportunities for infection. Two glycochelation sites on the terminus of the receptor binding domain are already available, but the glycans (sugars) are only present now in trace amounts. With the increase in sugars we will have a series of variants with increasing amounts of glycochelation that will see a level of infectiousness even higher than Omicron."
Geert thinks it may be only a month or two before we start to see highly infectious variants with more extensive glyco-chelation that will render the virus completely resistant.
"The experiment we are doing now is exactly what I would do. Immunising all the children. It’s criminal. It’s not going to have a happy ending, unless we do a dramatic reduction of the infectious pressure."
"This theory is one piece of the puzzle. You cannot leave any stone unturned. You come up with a theory. You need to see how it is being matched in reality. I am investing in doing the research, looking at the science. My frustration is that the message is so difficult to convey, whereas this naive narrative that these people are spreading is so easy - shut up, and get yourself vaccinated - and get your kids vaccinated.
"This will be the biggest disaster ever because this is the biggest reservoir for herd immunity. The more children we vaccinate the more we will expedite this immune escape and get to a kind of variant that will be fully immune to the vaccines and highly virulent. "
THE UNVACCINATED AND THE CHILDREN
In the unvaccinated the innate immune system does not distinguish and recognise cell glycan atoms on pathogens fir example.
A change in the glycogenation is not going to prevent them from recognising them.
For the unvaccinated omicron is like a light-weighted vaccine
When Geert started he understood 60-70% of what is happening.
He now understands the virus is even more sophisticated and working in two stages.
There is no way, in the context of the ongoing vaccination that we can prevent this scenario unless we carry out a massive campaign of prophylaxis using hydroxychloriquine, ivermectin or antivirals like Pavloxid to diminish the infectious pressure.
Prophylaxis would have to be repeated monthly or six-monthly for as long as the small part of the population that is capable of generating genuine herd immunity starts to grow again
Things could go very fast and we may be only a couple of mutations away from this scenario and he surmised this could happen in a matter of a couple of months.
If you leave nature to do itself it will eventually restore balance but Geert asks, "do you want to do this?"
If you let nature do the job and restore homeostasis then large numbers of people are going to die
He does not think this is going to happen because it will take a massive campaign and will take Fauci and others to admit they were completely wrong.
He does not know the numbers but what he can say is the losses will be unprecedented.
This experiment is completely unprecedented and is massive, involving all populations and age groups so the damage will also be massive
When the first information came out we should never have had vaccine mandates; we should have had debate mandates
A complicated matter that has been shaped through millions of years through evolution and these people can destroy everything in an instant like the Taliban or ISIS destroying antiquity with one bomb blast. He has this vision as he contemplates the stupidity, arrogance and obstinance of humanity.
The message is to stay away from the vaccine and to leave our children alone
The unvaccinated are the future of the world.
The countries such as in Africa that barely vaccinate will be the winners.
He gives the example of South Africa (35% vaccinated): where there is a steep increase of one omicron variant, then it is calm for a few months and then you have another steep curve.
You don’t see this any more in highly-vaccinated countries.
The children are the biggest route to herd immunity because they have innate immunity to clear this virus.
The more we vaccinate children the more we will expedite this immune escape.
"There will not be one super-variant but rather a series of variants that have greater levels of glycogenation that will overcome the immune pressure that we are putting on the virus that will lead to a rapid succession of variants that have a level of infectiousness that is even higher than omicron so this will not be prevented by the glycans because they will not cover the receptor binding domain that is responsible for increased infectiousness".
When the first information came out we should never have had vaccine mandates; we should have had debate mandates
GEERT CENSORED
Other key scientists such as Robert Malone, Peter McCullough and others have been widely censored and cancelled - the authorities are determined that their message not be heard. It is a little different with Geert - it is still not hard to find his interviews on the internet and he has no been villified but he seems to be invisible.
For example,when I entered the exact title of the following paper of his nothing came up on the search engines
Most of the criticism comes from "covid-sceptics" who are totally unwilling to grapple with the ideas. For example, Rosemary Frei who I have never head of outside of her attacks on him. For example:
I exposed Geert Vanden Bossche’s disinformation campaign in a March 16, 2021, article. Unfortunately, he continues to fear-monger, with the active support of high-profile leaders in the Covid-sceptic community
When people talk straight-of-the bat about "disinformation" and "fear-mongering" I switch off immediately.
They are not even worthy of consideration.
I come back to the start of the article and will assert that his contribution is invaluable, an important part of the picture and besides, what he has asserted in the last 14 months has largely come to pass even if explanations may vary.
Now that you have seen my explanations you should now watch the entire program
First, I have to make my own position clear.
Geert is a vaccinologist and evolutionary biologist and so brings his own understanding.
It is my belief that this should be viewed on its own merit and not compared, positively or negatively, with other conclusions that one has taken on.
That would be what I call "contempt prior to investigation".
I am a great enemy of reductionism and the argument that this ipso facto cannot be true because it "contradicts" something else we have taken on. For example, Geert does not talk as others do, such as Peter McCullough or Robert Malone about the nature of the mRNA shot that is not at all a vaccine.
The evidence to me points to the vaccine being an instrument of genocide because of the many mechanisms of injury in the shot (40 of which have been identified from scientific papers by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny).
However, this does not, in any way, to me contradict the contribution of vanden Bossche. It is bringing a different understanding that reinforces the arguments for keeping well away from the "vaccine", especially when it comes to our children.
For what it is worth Dr. Tenpenny on Telegram advised people to watch the video and to keep watching it until they understand it.
It matters little to me that vanden Bossche is an "insider" who has in the past worked for GAVI, or treats the mRNA shot as a "vaccine" and fails to point out things that are actually well outside his scope of practise.
It is, in my mind, essential that people have a grasp of the dire danger so that they understand just how important it is to avoid the shot for us and our children.
I have always regarded it as far more important to remain aware of the greatest dangers rather than live as if the times are normal.
The "information" that comes from the authorities is deceptively simple (nay, simplistic)- and very easy to grasp but highly misleading.
What Geert vanden Bossche is talking about is immune escape that has been defined as:
"Immune escape (aka viral escape and antigen escape) is the ability of a virus to elude an individual’s immune response."
To summarise, what Geert has been talking about since early 2021 is the danger and folly of vaccinating people in the midst of a pandemic.
As opposed to innate immunity in the population, the vaccines produce non-sterilising (or non-neutralising) antibodies which puts immune pressure on the virus encouraging it to mutate rapidly. This was expressed very clearly by Del Bigtree last year using the analogy of killing killer whales and not sharks.
Here are some of what we gleaned from the interview.
THE PANDEMIC IS FAR FROM OVER
The assumption on the part of Fauci and the propagandists for the vaccine is that the pandemic is all but over .
However, the extent of infection is wildly underestimated.
A lot of people are being infected and reinfected and we are seeing one wave after the other.
Infectious pressure is greater than ever before and the virus has become largely immune to potentially sterilising antibodies.
We are being told the vaccines are preventing serious disease but Geert vanden Bossche says:
"Have you heard of a vaccine that increases susceptibility to disease, protects against serious disease but not against mild disease?"
Omicron is not causing serious disease but mild disease.
It does not produce neutralising antibodies but instead induces the production of non neutralising antibodies.
In a normal pandemic prior to mass vaccination we could expect a limited number of waves of infectionand you get back to baseline and the morbidity rates closely would follow the case rates.
This can be seen in the case of South Africa where rates of vaccination are low at around 35%.
But in Omicron never goes back to baseline and we have shorter gaps.
Vanden Bossche states that the vaccinologists and public health authorities overlook that the aim in Nature is to establish an equilibrium between the virus and the host.
You can only do that by controlling the spread and you can only do that if you have neutralising antibodies.
Public health authorities make the sole criterion the number of hospitalisations to persuade us the pandemic is over.
I have been grappling with the situation where in New Zealand where there were 27 deaths "FROM covid" and we were all locked down but now cases, deaths, hospitalisations are way up we are debating the relaxation of restrictions and whether the pandemic is "over".
Just today we had instant confirmation with the announcement of two new variants in New Zealand.
Epidemiologist Michael Baker is predicting New Zealand's Covid-19 case numbers will rise again over the coming months - resulting in increased hospitalisations and deaths.
All that in spite of findings such as the following:
None of that ever made any sense but Geert has explained it to me.
Instead, they continue to propagate the following:
All of that is nonsense of course. Now you can see the likes of Fauci backtracking and flip flopping without ever admitting that he was even a tiny bit wrong.
Sociopaths don't do that.
IMMUNE PRESSURE
With omicron people are getting reinfected because it is the antibodies that are determining - the virus is now free; it no longer has a problem with transmission.
It is now highly transmissive.
The virus is no longer trying to decide how to be more infectious.
The virus is working out how to get round non neutralising antibodies, so it will now will be virulent as well.
For now the omicron variant is, at the moment, preventing transinfection in lungs. It is selecting for a way to get round.
Once that happens transfection will happen in lungs and people will get severe disease in the lungs.
Every time person gets reinfected these non neutralising antibodies are going to be boosted.
The idea that is put forward by Fauci and people like Paul Offit is that the virus will burn itself out and if the vaccine becomes ineffective second generation vaccines can be developed to deal with new variants.
They are, in the opinion of vanden Bossche, using the vaccine as if we were operating outside a pandemic and vaccinating in a normal, prophylactic way.
It is very very clear that the virus will mutate.
It cannot afford to just become virulent. It has to maintain its high level of infectiousness to survive
It cannot afford to just become virulent. It has to maintain its high level of infectiousness to survive
THE IMPORTANCE OF GLYCANS
Vanden Bossche says that a key role is played by glycans.
40% of the surface of the virus is covered in sugars called glycans that are synthesised by the machinery of the host.
They are not recognised by the immune system.
One sugar can SHIELD the entire immune epitopes that are present in the receptor binding domain.
One mutation is all that is needed to reach this situation.
If it doesn't do anything it will get eradicated because - the best way for the virus to propagate is if the host gets mild or moderate disease.
The virus is under extreme immune pressure and so it will mutate.
It cannot afford to just become virulent; it has to maintain its high level of infectiousness, so it needs to combine 2 things - enhanced binding of the non neutralising antibodies to ensure enhanced infectiousness at the upper respiratory tract and preventing , through the antibodies transinfection at the level of the lower respiratory tract.
Glycans need to come in to help the virus meet both these challenges because the responsible antibodies are the same, the non neutralising antibodies need to to ensure enhanced infectiousness whereas they have to prevent them from binding to the virus that is absorbed from the migrating dendritic cells migrating from the upper respiratory tract in order to enable virulence.
The virus is not going to try and eliminate the non-neutralising antibodies because it needs them
It needs them to be infectious.
It is therefore not going to mutate in the way the experts say ( to die out)
It uses the sugar to hide itself so then the blocking of transinfection can happen. The dendritic cells become a vehicle, a taxi cab to bring the virus into the lower respiratory tract.
This mutation got around the neutralising antibodies so the receptor binding domain is freed up and the way the neutralising antibodies are grabbing on is happening faster and enhancing the disease
However, those same antibodies that are enhancing the disease are doing two different jobs.
Those same antibodies that are enhancing the disease are stopping the virus from transinfecting cells in the lower respiratory tract.
It needs the non-neutralising antibodies to be infectious.
It’s not going to get rid of them.
It wants to use them to get through the doors and find a way to continue trans infection which is currently being blocked.
It’s going to use a sugar to coat itself, to hide itself, so that then blocking of transinfection can happen.
Hiding those antibodies that are using it to stop infection by hiding it in sugar can, give rise to serious problems.
A MASSIVE DISASTER WAITING TO HAPPEN
If we wait and see and continue vaccinating it will become too late to do anything, a scenario vanden Bossche hints at.
The more the glycans grow the better they can do their job.
"There will not be one super-variant but rather a series of variants that have greater levels of glycogenation that will overcome the immune pressure that we are putting on the virus that will lead to a rapid succession of variants that have a level of infectiousness that is even higher than omicron so this will not be prevented by the glycans because they will not cover the receptor binding domain that is responsible for increased infectiousness."
SAID IN LAY PERSON'S TERMS
We put this together to try and translate what we heard into language we better understand. No doubt it can do with some improvement
Omicron is a highly infectious but less virulent COVID 19 variant, currently infecting mainly the upper respiratory tract.
Geert says it's inevitable and only a matter of time before the immense immune pressure the vaccines are exerting on the virus will force it to mutate and spread to other parts of the body.
Based on his research and knowledge of the science, he postulates the likelihood that some of the viral particles found in dendritic cells in the nasal cavity will become coated with a glycan, or sugar - hiding them from attacking antibodies and allowing them to travel by stealth into the lungs and other other parts of the body.
"The virus now has an enormous choice of all possible mutants and plenty of opportunities for infection. Two glycochelation sites on the terminus of the receptor binding domain are already available, but the glycans (sugars) are only present now in trace amounts. With the increase in sugars we will have a series of variants with increasing amounts of glycochelation that will see a level of infectiousness even higher than Omicron."
Geert thinks it may be only a month or two before we start to see highly infectious variants with more extensive glyco-chelation that will render the virus completely resistant.
"The experiment we are doing now is exactly what I would do. Immunising all the children. It’s criminal. It’s not going to have a happy ending, unless we do a dramatic reduction of the infectious pressure."
"This theory is one piece of the puzzle. You cannot leave any stone unturned. You come up with a theory. You need to see how it is being matched in reality. I am investing in doing the research, looking at the science. My frustration is that the message is so difficult to convey, whereas this naive narrative that these people are spreading is so easy - shut up, and get yourself vaccinated - and get your kids vaccinated.
"This will be the biggest disaster ever because this is the biggest reservoir for herd immunity. The more children we vaccinate the more we will expedite this immune escape and get to a kind of variant that will be fully immune to the vaccines and highly virulent. "
THE UNVACCINATED AND THE CHILDREN
In the unvaccinated the innate immune system does not distinguish and recognise cell glycan atoms on pathogens fir example.
A change in the glycogenation is not going to prevent them from recognising them.
For the unvaccinated omicron is like a light-weighted vaccine
When Geert started he understood 60-70% of what is happening.
He now understands the virus is even more sophisticated and working in two stages.
There is no way, in the context of the ongoing vaccination that we can prevent this scenario unless we carry out a massive campaign of prophylaxis using hydroxychloriquine, ivermectin or antivirals like Pavloxid to diminish the infectious pressure.
Prophylaxis would have to be repeated monthly or six-monthly for as long as the small part of the population that is capable of generating genuine herd immunity starts to grow again
Things could go very fast and we may be only a couple of mutations away from this scenario and he surmised this could happen in a matter of a couple of months.
If you leave nature to do itself it will eventually restore balance but Geert asks, "do you want to do this?"
If you let nature do the job and restore homeostasis then large numbers of people are going to die
He does not think this is going to happen because it will take a massive campaign and will take Fauci and others to admit they were completely wrong.
He does not know the numbers but what he can say is the losses will be unprecedented.
This experiment is completely unprecedented and is massive, involving all populations and age groups so the damage will also be massive
When the first information came out we should never have had vaccine mandates; we should have had debate mandates
A complicated matter that has been shaped through millions of years through evolution and these people can destroy everything in an instant like the Taliban or ISIS destroying antiquity with one bomb blast. He has this vision as he contemplates the stupidity, arrogance and obstinance of humanity.
The message is to stay away from the vaccine and to leave our children alone
The unvaccinated are the future of the world.
The countries such as in Africa that barely vaccinate will be the winners.
He gives the example of South Africa (35% vaccinated): where there is a steep increase of one omicron variant, then it is calm for a few months and then you have another steep curve.
You don’t see this any more in highly-vaccinated countries.
The children are the biggest route to herd immunity because they have innate immunity to clear this virus.
The more we vaccinate children the more we will expedite this immune escape.
"There will not be one super-variant but rather a series of variants that have greater levels of glycogenation that will overcome the immune pressure that we are putting on the virus that will lead to a rapid succession of variants that have a level of infectiousness that is even higher than omicron so this will not be prevented by the glycans because they will not cover the receptor binding domain that is responsible for increased infectiousness".
When the first information came out we should never have had vaccine mandates; we should have had debate mandates
GEERT CENSORED
Other key scientists such as Robert Malone, Peter McCullough and others have been widely censored and cancelled - the authorities are determined that their message not be heard. It is a little different with Geert - it is still not hard to find his interviews on the internet and he has no been villified but he seems to be invisible.
For example,when I entered the exact title of the following paper of his nothing came up on the search engines
Most of the criticism comes from "covid-sceptics" who are totally unwilling to grapple with the ideas. For example, Rosemary Frei who I have never head of outside of her attacks on him. For example:
I exposed Geert Vanden Bossche’s disinformation campaign in a March 16, 2021, article. Unfortunately, he continues to fear-monger, with the active support of high-profile leaders in the Covid-sceptic community
When people talk straight-of-the bat about "disinformation" and "fear-mongering" I switch off immediately.
They are not even worthy of consideration.
I come back to the start of the article and will assert that his contribution is invaluable, an important part of the picture and besides, what he has asserted in the last 14 months has largely come to pass even if explanations may vary.
Now that you have seen my explanations you should now watch the entire program
Posts
It appears that we have a crisis in our hospitals and it is getting worse, week-by- week.
For example this while I was compiling this article:
Seismic risk assessments exposing widespread shaky hospital issue 
