Showing posts with label fasciam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fasciam. Show all posts

Sunday, 26 January 2014

Fascism in Japan

Information on Fukushima from Japan dries up



In an excellent piece on Fukushima, Wayne Brittenden from Radio New Zealand touches on how the recent secrecy law in Japan has had a chilling effect on scientists and journalists alike.


He mentions Dr.Tatsuhiko Kodama, who made some very direct criticisms of Tepco and the Japanese government in a speech to the Diet 2 years ago





Wayne Brittenden points out that he has not been heard from for 10 months. 

When he tried to contact Dr. Kodama at his institute he was told that Prof Kodama would be busy for some time, and would he like to email someone else who could answer his inquiries.


When he tried to contact alternative sources they professed never to have heard of Dr. Kodama.


In his interview, Arnie Gundersen said that he is afraid to go back to Japan, but that he has not been subject to any pressure in the United States.


All his contacts in Japan are now reluctant to pass him information.


This was the experience of people from the West who tried to contact people in Stalinist Russia. In that case the person was usually a victim of the Stalinist purges.


For people in Japan it is back to the 1930's.



Here is the original Radio NZ interview



Monday, 22 April 2013

30% Greeks opt for fascism


As much a warning to Americans or New Zealanders (or anyone else) as anything.

President warns Greeks not to take democracy for granted as poll shows 30% think life was better under junta


21 April, 2013

In a public message marking the 46th anniversary of the overthrow of Greece’s democratically-elected government by a military junta, President Karolos Papoulias warned Greeks not to take democracy for granted.

His warning came as a poll for Sunday’s Eleftherotypia newspaper indicated that 30 percent of Greeks thought “things were better under the dictatorship compared to today.”

Democracy has enemies, it is undermined and weakened when phenomena such as anti-parliamentarianism, prejudice and racism develop,” said Papoulias in his message, coinciding with the junta’s rise to power on April 21, 1967.

It is significant for us to honor those who fought against the dictatorship, to remember what went before and to realize that democracy is not a given,” added the president.

The Eleftherotypia poll, conducted by Metron Analysis, suggested that 59 percent of Greeks think the level of security was greater during the junta, 46 percent believe their standard of living was better and 24 percent feel that Greece’s image abroad was superior.

Thursday, 14 March 2013

The dark background of Pope Francis


There is a new pope. Already there are questions about his role in the Argentine dictatorship of the 1970's and he has been accused of being involved in the kidnapping of two priests.

Pope Francis elected as 266th Roman Catholic pontiff
Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio takes name of Francis after accepting his election as 266th head of Roman Catholic church


13 March, 2013

The cardinals of the Roman Catholic church on Wednesday chose as their new pope a man from almost "the end of the world" – the first non-European to be elected for almost 1,300 years and the first-ever member of the Jesuit order.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the archbishop of Buenos Aires, becomes Pope Francis – the first pontiff to take that name – an early indication perhaps of a reign he hopes will be marked by inspirational preaching and evangelisation.

But the cardinals' choice risked running into immediate controversy over the new pope's role in Argentina's troubled history. In his book, El Silencio, a prominent Argentinian journalist alleged that he connived in the abduction of two Jesuit priests by the military junta in the so-called "dirty war". He denies the accusation.

The new pope appeared on the balcony over the entrance to St Peter's basilica more than an hour after white smoke poured from the chimney above the Sistine Chapel, signalling that the cardinals had made their choice. Dressed in his new white robes, the bespectacled Argentinian prelate looked pensive and perhaps a little intimidated as he looked out at the sea of jubilant humanity in the square.

The former Cardinal Bergoglio was not among the front-runners. But he obtained more votes than any other candidate except former pope Benedict in the 2005 conclave, and – although his election came as a surprise – he was certainly not a rank outsider.

According to some accounts, he was not chosen eight years ago because he begged his fellow cardinals not to continue voting for him. As he uttered his first words – "buona sera" – and the cheering died away, he told the crowd that his peers had been tasked with finding a bishop of Rome. "And it seems that they went almost to the end of the world to find him. But we're here," he said with a smile.

After a prayer for his predecessor, Benedict XVI, the new pope invited the faithful in the square to "pray for the entire world". He added: "I hope that this path for the church will be one fruitful for evangelisation."

Faced with a sharp choice between those cardinals who wanted a thorough shake-up of the Vatican and those who did not, it appeared the electors in the Sistine Chapel opted for compromise. Bergoglio has a reputation for both political canniness and reforming drive. Among the tests facing the 76-year-old will be the awesome managerial demands of the job.

The fumata bianca – the white smoke signal that marks the successful conclusion of a conclave – arrived after five ballots at the end of the second day of voting. The smoke that poured out of the comignolo, the copper and steel tube on the roof of the Sistine Chapel, was greeted with cries of delight and applause from the crowd below. Soon after, the bells of St Peter's rang out, confirming that a new pope had taken over the spiritual leadership of the world's 1.2 billion baptised Catholics.

Inside the Sistine Chapel after the final vote was cast, the most junior of the cardinals, James Harvey, a former prefect of the papal household, called in the secretary of the college of cardinals, Monsignor Lorenzo Baldisseri, and the master of papal liturgical ceremonies, Monsignor Guido Marini, to witness the new pope's acceptance of one of the most daunting jobs on Earth.

The most senior of the electors, Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, approached the pope-to-be and – in accordance with tradition – asked him in Latin: "Do you accept your canonical election as supreme pontiff?"

Having obtained his consent, he will have asked: "By what name do you wish to be called?" The master of ceremonies, acting as a notary, will then have summoned two of his staff to act as witnesses, and prepared the document that certifies the new pope's acceptance.

Newly elected popes are taken to be robed in the Room of Tears, its name an indication of the reluctance with which most approach the task. The last holder of the office, Benedict XVI, introduced a change in the ritual that allows the new pope to pray before he is announced to the world.

Benedict abdicated on 28 February, saying that he was no longer able to cope with the burden of his office. He was the first pontiff to resign voluntarily since Celestine V in 1294.The world's Catholics will be looking to his successor to provide not only spiritual inspiration but also firm leadership. The new pope was chosen against a background of turbulence and strife unprecedented in modern times. He takes on the leadership of a church whose faithful have been shocked by a proliferation of clerical sex abuse scandals throughout the rich world and dismayed by events in and around the Vatican.

The day for the 115 cardinal-electors began at about 6.30am local time in the Casa Santa Marta, their simple but comfortable – and highly protected – residence in the walled city state. After breakfast, they made their way to the Apostolic Palace, the home of the popes, for morning mass in the Pauline Chapel. By about 9.30am, they had settled themselves into the Sistine Chapel for prayers and the resumption of voting.

Benedict's startling decision to resign came after years of mounting tension and discreet but venomous infighting in the Roman Curia, the central administration of the Catholic church. Last year, some of the pope's correspondence, pointing to bitter rivalries and maladministration – or worse – in the Vatican was published in book form.

Benedict's butler, Paolo Gabriele, was tried and imprisoned for leaking the documents, but the journalist to whom the papers were passed has said that his source was part of a much broader network of disaffected Vatican employees and officials. Gabriele's arrest coincided with a renewed controversy over the Vatican bank, whose chairman was summarily dismissed last May.

The scandals – and a string of controversies over the pope's own declarations – distracted attention from what was expected to be the central theme of his papacy. Benedict came to the leadership of the Catholic church as the pope who would begin the process of re-evangelising an increasingly secular western world.

That too will be an important challenge for his successor. In the approach to the conclave several cardinals said they wanted a great pastor for the world's biggest Christian denomination.

No indication of how or why the new pope was chosen was expected to emerge. On Tuesday, before the start of the conclave, the cardinal-electors took an oath of secrecy, as had those Vatican employees and officials involved in the election.

Additional precautions included a sweep of the Sistine Chapel to ensure that no listening devices had been planted inside and the use of electronic jamming techniques.


Pope Francis: questions remain over his role during Argentina's dictatorship

Jorge Bergoglio was head of the Jesuit order in the 1970s when the church backed military government and called for patriotism


13 March, 2013

Despite the joyful celebrations outside the Municipal Cathedral in Buenos Aires yesterday, the news of Latin America's first pope was clouded by lingering concerns about the role of the church – and its new head – during Argentina's brutal military dictatorship.

The Catholic church and Pope Francis have been accused of a complicit silence and worse during the "dirty war" of murders and abductions carried out by the junta that ruled Argentina from 1976 to 1983.

The evidence is sketchy and contested. Documents have been destroyed and many of those who were victims or perpetrators have died in the years that followed. The moral argument is clear, but the reality of life at that time put many people in a grey position. It was dangerous at that time to speak out and risk being labelled a subversive. But many, including priests and bishops, did so and subsequently disappeared. Those who stayed silent have subsequently had to live with their consciences — and sometimes the risk of a trial.

Its behaviour during that dark period in Argentine history was so unsaintly that in 2000 the Argentine Catholic church itself made a public apology for its failure to take a stand against the generals. "We want to confess before God everything we have done badly," Argentina's Episcopal Conference said at that time.

In February, a court noted during the sentencing of three former military men to life imprisonment for the killings of two priests that the church hierarchy had "closed its eyes" to the killing of progressive priests.

As head of the Jesuit order from 1973 to 1979, Jorge Bergoglio – as the new pope was known until yesterday – was a member of the hierarachy during the period when the wider Catholic church backed the military government and called for their followers to be patriotic.

Bergoglio twice refused to testify in court about his role as head of the Jesuit order. When he eventually appeared in front of a judge in 2010, he was accused by lawyers of being evasive.

The main charge against Bergoglio involves the kidnapping of two Jesuit priests, Orland Yorio and Francisco Jalics, who were taken by Navy officers in May 1976 and held under inhumane conditions for the missionary work they conducted in the country's slums, a politically risky activity at the time.

His chief accuser is journalist Horacio Verbitsky, the author of a book on the church called "El Silencio" ("The Silence"), which claims that Bergoglio withdrew his order's protection from the two priests, effectively giving the military a green light for their abduction.

The claims are based on conversations with Jalics, who was released after his ordeal and later moved to a German monastery.

Bergoglio has called the allegations "slander" and holds that, on the contrary, he moved behind the scenes to save the lives of the two priests and others that he secretly hid from the death squads. In one case, he claims he even gave his identity papers to one dissident who looked like him so that he could flee the country.

For some, that makes him a hero. Other are sceptical. Eduardo de la Serna, co-ordinator of a left-wing group of priests who focus on the plight of the poor, told Radio del Plate that: "Bergoglio is a man of power and he knows how position himself among powerful people. I still have many doubts about his role regarding the Jesuits who went missing under the dictatorship."

Many in the church are keen to move on from that dark period in the history of Argentina and the church. They say the new pope helped to heal the wounds of the dirty war and to restore the credibility of the Catholic hierarchy.

"As archbishop, he faced a monumental task, and he was even accused of collaboration with the dirty war, which he strenuously denied and was ultimately cleared. If he can restore the credibility of the church there [in Argentina], he can handle the scandals that have befallen the church worldwide because he knows how to connect to the people" said Ramon Luzarraga, theologian-in-residence at the University of Dayton.

But the issue is unlikely to go away any time soon, particularly while high-profile trials are still taking place. This week a Buenos Aires court sentenced the "Last Dictator" Reynaldo Bignone to life in jail for crimes relating to the disappearance of 23 people, including two pregnant women, when he was in power in the 1980s.


Argentine Cardinal Named in Kidnap Lawsuit


17 April, 2005

A human rights lawyer has filed a criminal complaint against an Argentine cardinal mentioned as a possible contender to become pope, accusing him of involvement in the 1976 kidnappings of two priests.

Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio's spokesman Saturday called the allegation "old slander."

The complaint filed in a court in the Argentine capital on Friday accused Bergoglio, the archbishop of Buenos Aires, of involvement in the abduction of two Jesuit priests by the military dictatorship, reported the newspaper Clarin. The complaint does not specify the nature of Bergoglio's alleged involvement.

Under Argentine law, an accusation can be filed with a very low threshold of evidence. A court then decides if there is cause to investigate and file charges.

The accusations against Bergoglio, 68, are detailed in a recent book by Argentine journalist Horacio Verbitsky.

In May 1976, priests Orlando Yorio and Francisco Jalics were kidnapped by the navy. They surfaced five months later, drugged and seminude, in a field.

At the time, Bergoglio was the superior in the Society of Jesus of Argentina.



Friday, 20 July 2012

Fascism in the United States


Ignorance Is Bliss; So Go Back To Sleep
Mike Krieger



19 July 2012

Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away, and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any farther obedience.
- John Locke
When it gets down to having to use violence, then you are playing the system’s game. The establishment will irritate you – pull your beard, flick your face – to make you fight. Because once they’ve got you violent, then they know how to handle you. The only thing they don’t know how to handle is non-violence and humor.

- John Lennon

When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.
- Jimi Hendrix


Go Back to Sleep

Most of you that are taking the time to read this have already experienced some level of “waking up” over the past several years or longer.  Most of you have also probably felt from time to time that the knowledge you possess is a burden and have fully appreciated the meaning of “ignorance is bliss.”  I know this because I have felt these very same emotions at times.  The most important thing to remember; however, is that we are just awake individuals within a wave or cycle of awakening.  There were those that came before us and there will be many, many more to come after us.

Last Thursday, I was at Freedom Fest in Vegas for a brief stint and I had the honor to meet and break bread with some of the most influential minds in the Liberty Movement.  As I sat there at the table at Delmonico’s, thoroughly impressed with the intellect, commitment and total sense of purpose of the people around me I became more sure than ever that TPTB don’t stand a chance.  The problem for those control freak clowns is that ten years ago they had at least 95% of the American populace completely asleep.  I would estimate that number at the moment to be around 75%.  If I am  anywhere close to being right, that means that 25% of the population is at least somewhat aware that things aren’t as they appear to be.  They are asking serious questions and looking for serious answers.

Breaking it down even further, I would say that 5% of the population can be described as fully awake and somewhat committed to fully committed.  This is something like 15 million Americans and is more than enough.  Most importantly, once you are truly awakened you never go back to sleep.  In my five years or so in this adventure I have seen the transformative process of many, many people within my personal circle of friends and contacts.  Not ONE, I repeat not ONE of them has ever fallen back into the matrix mindset.  It just doesn’t happen and it reminds me of quotes about truth and lies.  As Mark Twain said “If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember anything.”  Then there is the counter quote from I can’t remember who that “lies require commitment.”  Believe me, they are committed!  That said, too much is coming out now and what TPTB are doing in the markets is desperately manipulating everything so that another wave does not wake up.  There are terrified that this next wave of people will be the tipping point for their control structure.  They are correct but it is coming soon to smack them in the face no matter what they do.


Obama’s Executive Orders…Connecting the Dots


While we all know about the NDAA, which Obama signed into law late last year that opens the door to the incarceration of American citizens without a trial, what is a little less known are a series of Executive Orders signed by our Noble Peace prize winning Assassinator in Chief.  Of particular interest to me are Executive Order 13603, or “The National Defense Resources Preparedness,” and Executive Order 13618,  “The Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions.”  You don’t need to be Sherlock Holmes to get what these EO’s are all about.  The first one basically gives government control of any and all resources it needs (and seemingly the ability to nullify or suspend existing private agreements) “if” there is a national emergency, while the second one does the same for communications.  So essentially our wonderful government that cares about us so very much is setting the stage to take total control (natural resources and the means of communication) whenever this national emergency that they seem to be fully anticipating comes to fruition.  A good summary of all the EO’s can be found 
here.  They expect the sheeple to be in such a catatonic state of fear and shock that they will beg for daddy government to take away all their rights and ignore the Constitution so that their EBT cards work.  Why else do you think the government is desperately trying to get as many Americans on food stamps as possible?  See my post The Government is Encouraging More Food Stamp Usage, Calling it “Stimulus.
Obama Tells Americans “Your Success Wasn’t Yours”

Regular readers understand that I do not believe there is “free market capitalism” in America today.  Sure there are remnants of it left, but increasingly there is simply crony capitalism in which the Federal government partners with large corporate interests to allow them to grow bigger, more powerful and importantly, more dependent on the government itself for its profits and influence.  This is deliberate, just as it is a deliberate plan to get more people on food stamps.  It is all about power and control.  That said, there are still many small businesses and also large business owners that got to where they are through their own blood, sweat, tears as well as intellect and vision.  While the 0.01% financial oligarchs and crony capitalists all over America should be exposed and called out for the traitorous parasites that they are, this should not mean we just lump all successful people into this category.  Yet, this is exactly what our pathological liar President did in his most recent demonstration of verbal diarrhea.  I am sure everyone has already seen this clip, but I am mentioning it nonetheless because it is so significant.  He stated:

Look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own.  You didn’t get there on your own.  I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart.  There are a lot of smart people out there.  It must be because I worked harder than everybody else.  Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there… If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that.  Somebody else made that happen.

I mean every time I think this guy can’t hit a new low he manages to achieve one within a week.  No mention of the fact that a top campaign contributor to him, Jon Corzine, is a thieving crook.  Nah, nothing to see here folks. Meanwhile, if you read between the lines of his little tirade (look how angry he looks in the video),  it is clear what he is trying to say.  You are a nobody.  You are nothing without the state and without the good graces of the political elite.  We own you.  If the political leaders in Washington D.C. that produce absolutely nothing but hot air and then steal from you left and right say that you do not even own your own success, then indeed you own nothing.  This fits in perfectly with the Executive Orders I referred to earlier.  The game plan and meme here is obvious.  You are cattle.  The government owns your land and its resources, your success and ultimately your mind.  Are we going to let them have them?

Saturday, 19 May 2012

Europe


I Just Got Back From the EU... and It's Worse Than You Imagined

By Graham Summers

18 May, 2012

I just got off the plane from Europe. I went there because I wanted to see the effects of the French election as well as get an "on the ground" perspective of what's really happening in Europe.

I can tell you, the situation in Europe is far FAR worse than the media is even willing to acknowledge.

See below:


The above image was taken at 9PM on Paris’ Avenue de Champs-Élysées (the road leading to the Arc de Triumph) on May 8th, the night Socialist Francois Hollande beat Nicolas Sarkozy.

This is a major four-way intersection, come to an almost complete gridlock as Parisian youth park their cars to block traffic.

The sound was deafening as these kids honked their horns, screamed, sang songs, and waved flags. Did they care about traffic? Nope. Some of them even got out on top of their cars to smoke and dance (like the young man in the white pants in the image above).

These kids, like most youth in the EU are sick of getting the shaft from the political elite. Youth unemployment in France is near 25%. It's at an astounding 50% in Greece and Spain.

So French youth, like others, voted to kick Nicolas Sarkozy out of office. But that's not the BIG story from the French elections.

You see, French Presidential elections take place in two rounds. During the first round, voters will vote for anyone running. The two candidates who receive the most votes will then proceed to the second round, the winner of which will become France's President.

Hollande and Sarkozy were the winners of the first round. But as the final tally in the second round revealed (51% vs. 48%) voters weren't exactly thrilled with either one of them.

Instead, the BIG STORY in the French elections was the fact that the hard right, anti-Euro, anti-immigration party, the Front National Party, or NFP, took the most votes from French youth.

That is correct. When it came time to vote in round one, more French youth voted for a party whose leader wants to break up the Euro, who wants to deal with immigration by kicking out any immigrant who cannot adhere to French principles or who commits a crime, and who once compared the legal French tolerance of Muslims praying in the streets to putting up with Nazi occupation.

Oh, and her father, who founded the NFP, wanted to do away with the concept of immigration completely and once commented that Germany's occupation of France during WWII was "not particularly inhumane..."

As a whole, the NFP took in 20% of ALL French votes during the first round of the French elections. That’s a record high for the party and not far off from Sarkozy’s and Hollande’s first round showings of 25% and 28% respectively.

Put another way, Nationlism is on the rise in France. And it's not over by any stretch.

France will be holding elections for its lower house, the National Assembly, on June 10th and June 17th.

Right now the socialists are in the lead to win, leaving the loosely organized center-right party, Union for a Popular Movement (UMP), with the following options:

1)    Join forces with the NFP to take the control of the National Assembly, or...
2)    Hand France completely over to the Socialists

I cannot say how this will play out. But for now, we must take into account that there is a very real possibility that the NFP may take control of France's lower house.

IF this happens and Francois Hollande proves to be a Presidential dud, then it is not a stretch to imagine that the NFP will gain even more traction in French politics.

Put another way, France could become a Nationalistic, anti-EU nation in the not so distant future.

And that is nothing compared to what's happened in Greece.

Greece has gone through two Governments since its Crisis began: one was the long- standing President, the other was an EU-appointed bureaucrat.

Now, Greece cannot even form a majority in its parliament. In fact, by the look of things there will be a run-off elction in mid-June in which the ANTI-BAILOUT Syriza party will win the majority.

If this happens you can kiss the Second Greek Bailout good-bye. And that's the BEST potential outcome here: the alternative is once again Greece cannot form a majority in parliament and the country descends into total anarchy and chaos.

After all, if Greece cannot form a government... who will be negotiating on its debt/ bailout agreements/ etc. with the rest of the EU?

Make no mistake, the situation in Europe is bad...  How BAD? Well, France, Spain, and Germany have ALL implemented border controls.

That's not a typo. Spain, France, and Germany can each close their borders for up to 30 days at any point if they so choose.

Why are they doing this? Because they know that when the stuff hits the fan and the EU collapses (which it will in the next few months) people are going to attempt to flee with their money... so they have made it so that no one can get it... and no one can get out.

The US media has completely ignored this story because the implications are truly horrifying: that the EU and its banking system could very easily collapse in the coming months.

After all, there are already bank runs taking place in Spain and Greece. Once things pick up steam NO ONE will be immune.

"So what?" You might say. "The EU won't affect the US or other banking systems."

WRONG.

According to Reuters once you include Spain and Italy as well as Credit Default Swaps and indirect exposure to Europe, US banks have roughly $4 TRILLION in potential exposure to the EU.

To put that number in perspective, the entire US banking system is $12 trillion in size.

Heck, no less than Ben Bernanke, Mr. "the sub-prime crisis is contained" has publicly admitted that if the EU goes down, it will potentially take the US with it.

Make no mistake, what's coming will be bigger and worse than 2008. We're talking about bank holidays, civil unrest, and the worse.

On that note, if you have not taken steps to prepare for the end of the EU (and its impact on the US and global banking system), you NEED TO DO SO NOW!

I recently published a report showing investors how to prepare for this. It’s called How to Play the Collapse of the European Banking System and it explains exactly how the coming Crisis will unfold as well as which investment (both direct and backdoor) you can make to profit from it.

This report is 100% FREE. You can pick up a copy today at: http://www.gainspainscapital.com

Good Investing!

Graham Summers

PS. We also feature numerous other reports ALL devoted to helping you protect yourself, your portfolio, and your loved ones from the Second Round of the Great Crisis. Whether it’s a US Debt Default, runaway inflation, or even food shortages and bank holidays, our reports cover how to get through these situations safely and profitably.

And ALL of this is available for FREE under the OUR FREE REPORTS tab at:http://www.gainspainscapital.com

Thursday, 29 March 2012

Climate activist being held in isolation


Climate Activist Tim DeChristopher Being Held in Isolation, Subjected to Cruel and Unusual Punishment



28 March, 2012

In the same March week that an unprecedented heat wave made even President Obama feel “a little nervous,” imprisoned climate change activist Tim DeChristopher languished mysteriously in isolation at the FCI Herlong’s Special Housing Unit in California.

According to a press release from DeChristopher’s Peaceful Uprising organization, an unidentified member of the US Congress possibly engineered the troubling transfer of the courageous “Bidder 70″–who brought national attention to reckless public land auctions in Utah and climate issues–due to personal correspondence between DeChristopher and a friend over a legal fund contributor.

According to Peaceful Uprising, the confinement to isolation limits DeChristopher’s outside telephone communication to 15 minutes per month, among other restrictions, and raises issues of cruel and unusual punishment, especially considering the long waiting list for similar measures:

Tim will continue to be held in isolated confinement pending an investigation. There is no definite timeline for inmates being held in the SHU — often times they await months for the conclusion of an investigation.

Unanswered questions abound over DeChristopher’s extreme treatment and the role of Congressional members. He still faces nearly a year and a half of incarceration–potentially all of it to be served in isolation now.

As President Obama noted to Chicago host Oprah Winfrey about rising global temperatures: “It gets you thinking.”

Such an outrageous act should also get the public, and President Obama, the US Congress and Bureau of Prisons officials to bring an end to DeChristopher’s wrongful isolation–and unfair 2-year prison sentence.

Peaceful Uprising supporters are calling on prison officials–and members of the United States House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security–to intervene and return DeChristopher to Minimum Security Camp at FCI Herlong.

In the past two weeks, he has been allowed out of his 8 X 10 cell (which he shares with one other inmate) four times, each time for less than an hour. The SHU could have been designed by Franz Kafka,” the press release noted.

DeChristopher’s legal team will hold a press conference on Thursday March 29th, at 1:30pm in front of the Salt Lake City Frank E. Moss Federal Courthouse. In the meantime, Peaceful Uprising is urging supporters to contact prison officials and members of the US Congress with the message: “Tim DeChristopher inmate #16156-081 be immediately removed from the Special Housing Unit (SHU) and placed back in the Minimum Security Camp at FCI Herlong.”

FCI Herlong

530-827-8000

Richard B. Ives, WARDEN

Eloisa DeBruler, Public Information Officer

Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Central Office

202-307-3198

Charles E. Samuels, Jr.

Director

United States House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security

PRIORITY CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS TO CALL:

Jim Sensenbrenner, WI, Chairman of Subcommittee

(202) 225-5101

Louie Gohmert, TX, Vice Chairman of Subcommittee

(202) 225-3035

Jason Chaffetz, UT

DC: (202) 225-7751

UT: (801) 851-2500




DeChristopher in ‘isolation’; backers cry foul
Court » They say he’s being unjustly punished for a benign email


29 March, 2012

Utah eco-activist Tim DeChristopher has been placed in a California prison’s "isolated confinement" unit and cut off from email, a move his supporters and attorney allege amounts to political persecution.

Not exactly in solitary, DeChristopher now shares an 8-by-10-foot cell with another inmate, his Salt Lake City attorney said, and has limited access to the outside world.

Tim DeChristopher’s legal team has scheduled a 1:30 p.m. news conference for Thursday in front on the Frank E. Moss U.S. Courthouse, 350 S. Main, Salt Lake City, to discuss issues related to the eco-activist’s confinement. His attorneys will argue their appeal of DeChristopher’s conviction on May 10 before the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver.
)
Prison officials on Wednesday wouldn’t discuss what happened, though they previously confirmed DeChristopher had been removed from standard housing in the Herlong, Calif., federal prison camp. His lawyer and backers say he’s being penalized for an email he sent to a friend, which somehow came to the attention of an undisclosed congressman, who asked for his punishment.

In the email, attorney Pat Shea said, DeChristopher suggested "threatening" to return a legal defense fund contributor’s money if a rumor he heard about them was true. The contributor was a company, Shea said, and DeChristopher had heard that it was moving manufacturing jobs overseas.

"He made the mistake of using the word ‘threat,’ " Shea said. "In the email, he says, ‘I want to investigate this rumor and if it’s true, I’d threaten to return their money or give it to the workers if they’re protesting.’ "

During his imprisonment — but before his latest move — DeChristopher also has written dispatches for online environmental publications and conducted at least one radio interview by phone with KRCL of Salt Lake City.

Shea said DeChristopher told him that the prison official who moved him notified him that a congressman had requested it while his threat is investigated. Shea said there’s no clear time frame for such a probe.

Shea visited DeChristopher on Sunday and said his client fears he’ll be isolated for the rest of his imprisonment — about a year from now if he gets time off for good behavior. The defense team will present its appeal of DeChristopher’s conviction before the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver on May 10, but Shea said he’s unaware of any legal recourse regarding confinement terms.

Supporters at Peaceful Uprising, the Salt Lake City-based climate change and social-justice advocacy group DeChristopher co-founded, say his visiting hours have been curtailed to a single four-hour period each week, and his phone time cut to 15 minutes a month. He is allowed one book in his cell, they said, and may write letters with a small ink cartridge but not a full pen.

He also has been unavailable for media interviews since he was moved March 9.

DeChristopher was imprisoned about eight months ago, sentenced to two years by U.S. District Judge Dee Benson for his conviction stemming from bogus bids on Utah oil and gas leases. DeChristopher opposed a lease sale of federal lands at the end of the Bush administration as critics accused the government of rushing to develop sensitive lands near national parks.

The Obama administration later revoked the leases for further review, but has since resold some of them.

Two DeChristopher allies, both fellow congregants at Salt Lake City’s First Unitarian Church, traveled by train to Reno, Nev., and rented a car to visit him at the California prison this month without realizing he had been isolated the night before. Joan Gregory said she and Krista Bowers were escorted to the visitors’ waiting room before being informed of his move.

"I’m outraged," Gregory said. "They never allowed us to see him."

She said she’s hearing that prisoners often face restrictions because of innocuous personal contacts, and most don’t have a network of admirers to raise a fuss about the limits. DeChrisopher, though, enjoys nationwide environmentalist support, and Peaceful Uprising is urging people to call the prison, the U.S. House committee that oversees prisons and their congressional representative.

Gregory noted that Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, serves on the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security.

"I’m going to be calling every one of these people," Gregory said. "And when I’m through, I’ll call them again."

 Chaffetz welcomed the calls but said he doesn’t have answers.

"Yeah, our phone’s lighting up," he said Wednesday afternoon. "I don’t know who this mysterious congressman is, but it isn’t me."

Tim DeChristopher’s legal team has scheduled a 1:30 p.m. news conference for Thursday in front on the Frank E. Moss U.S. Courthouse, 350 S. Main, Salt Lake City, to discuss issues related to the eco-activist’s confinement. His attorneys will argue their appeal of DeChristopher’s conviction on May 10 before the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver.

If true, he said, a colleague’s intervention would seem an overreach of authority.

"Normally, the legislative branch stays out of these types of matters, and I think that’s right," Chaffetz said."I didn’t prosecute [DeChristopher] and I don’t determine where he sits in prison."

Peaceful Uprising organizer Henia Belalia said it’s perplexing that an email questioning a donor’s values would raise any backlash.

"It’s absurd that that particular email would be grounds for an investigation," she said. Equally puzzling is why the prison officials who routinely read prisoner emails would pass along the information to a congressman. "We really don’t understand why this is happening."

Eloisa DeBruler, public information officer at the prison in Herlong, declined to comment Wednesday. She said the Federal Bureau of Prisons generally does not comment about the reasons behind relocating inmates.

Nonetheless, it is not uncommon for inmates to be transferred during the course of their confinements, depending on space and security issues.