Posts
The
terrible (and deteriorating) human rights situation in Britain
I
have spent some wakeful hours thinking about recent events in
Britain, trying in vain to make sense of things. Why is it that
concern about sexual abuse and paedophilia are regarded somehow as a
right-wing thing. The Left quite correctly points to atrocious human
rights abuses (especially of children, in Israel but they completely
ignore the most atrocious abuses at home.
Much
of my attention has been focused on the case of Tommy Robinson and
through that I have become aware of a evil can-of-worms which centres
around paedophilia and the abuse of girls by Muslim (yes, Muslim!)
grooming gangs. Tommy Robinson and his like could never be my
political travelling mates – it is obvious that many of these
people are zionist and quite happy to gloss over the war crimes of
Britain from Afghanistan to Syria.
And yet, for all that it is clear that they are pointing to something very real and disgusting and that the British State is coming down hard on them for essentially blowing the whistle on an unspeakable evil while at the same time ignoring the crimes and who is committing them.
And yet, for all that it is clear that they are pointing to something very real and disgusting and that the British State is coming down hard on them for essentially blowing the whistle on an unspeakable evil while at the same time ignoring the crimes and who is committing them.
Meanwhile this is the message of Theresa May to the Muslim community. I doubt that she wished happy Christmas or Easter to her Christian community.
My
theory and I don’ have too much (apart from deductive logic) to
back it up is that we essentially have two stories. Abroad, the
Empire has its own strategic interests in the Middle East and are
more than happy to bomb and destroy the lives of Muslims in their
thousands. They also aid and abet the evil regimes of Israel, Saudi
Arabia and the gulf states. At home, they deadly afraid to “offend”
their own Muslim populations.
Britain,
especially, has been in a parlous state for some time – essentially
bankrupt – and kept afloat by money from the Saudis and others.
They are also involved in lucrative arms deals with these same
companies – and thereby are complicit in war crimes in places like
Yemen. The British government is unwilling to bite the hand that
feeds them and so has allowed the Saudis, in particular to set up
mosques and supply their own preachers that have been the one guilty
of real hate speech. This has seen limited exposure on British
television (all going back several years,nothing recently) but
absolutely nothing has happened except that the government has
doubled down on a campaign of harassment of those like Tommy Robinson
who speak out.
My suspicion is that the authorities are terrified that if they do not stomp out any criticism of this lamentable situation they will have riots on their hands - started by Muslim mobs. I have heard quite plausible stories that the local imam will turn up at the local police station and say that if they not let one of their people go they will foment riots. There are even stories that Muslim communities are able to tell the police who can patrol in their areas and who cannot.
All of this points to the deep social collapse of British society that accompanies economic stagnation, deep political corruption and financial crimes being carried out by the CIty of London. This is why we have a deteriorating human rights situation in Britain of which the Julian Assange and Skripal cases are just the most obvious.
Because his supporters will be perceived to be racist football hooligans by the liberals who inhabit leafy suburbs free of the social problems of working class areas like Luton, Leeds, Rochdale and of the Muslims that they bend over backwards to defend and because the liberals don't seem to be particularly concerned by cases such as the Rochdale and Leeds pedophile and "sexual grooming" (judging by the lack of coverage outside the tabloid media) the case of Tommy Robinson will be largely and studiously ignored.
And then there are cases such as the young victim of abuse who was imprisoned in a secret trial and kept in awful conditions that are detailed in articles below.
They never even see the light of day.
Here are just a few news stories to illustrate my point:
Here are just a few news stories to illustrate my point:
I listened to Katie Hopkins whom I had only known through attacks by the press. Turns out she is a lot more reasoned (and reasonable) than I had been led to believe.
This speech by Tommy Robinson on his political suppression and the conditions he had (and has) to endure in British prisons came as a very unpleasant revelation to me. It has to be seen in light of the cases below
Katie Hopkins: How sharia law is creeping into the US
This speech by Tommy Robinson on his political suppression and the conditions he had (and has) to endure in British prisons came as a very unpleasant revelation to me. It has to be seen in light of the cases below
Tommy
Robinson of The Rebel.media was barred from giving this speech five
times by various universities. It's about his experiences in "the
British police state.
Here is the latest on his case. The judge who sent him to prison for 13 months for 'contempt of court' didn't even bother watching his livestream.
THE
JUDGE who jailed Tommy Robinson for 13 months admitted he watched
little of Robinson’s Facebook live stream that was used as evidence
that Robinson was in “contempt of court.”
According
to Robinson’s producer Caolan Robertson, who was in court during
Robinson’s sentencing, Judge Geoffrey Marson QC admitted that he
barely watched Robinson’s livestream, despite it being the reason
he was arrested.
“The
number one most significant thing that actually caused a little bit
of a gasp in the courtroom from a couple members of the press was
when the judge actually admitted that he hadn’t watched the full
livestream of Tommy talking,” Robertson said on the Alex Jones Show
on Tuesday. “He only watched a very, very brief moment of it before
he made up his mind [to imprison Tommy.]”
In
contrast, during the arrest, the police told Robinson he was
“creating a breach of peace” based on “the content of what
you’re streaming:”
In
other words, the content the judge never bothered to watch.
It
seems that Judge Marson didn’t base his decision to imprison
Robinson exclusively on the evidence presented.
Additionally,
Robinson and his film crew were reporting outside the courthouse
where the Muslim grooming trial was almost over, and, according to
Robertson, they were careful to only report on facts of the case
which were already public given that Robinson was previously accused
of committing contempt last year.
Interestingly,
RT reported on this before the outlet scrubbed its article due to the
judge’s gag order against press covering the arrest – meaning
that this simple fact was kept hidden from the public:
RT
spoke to Robinson’s producer, Caolan Robertson, about the
confrontation outside of Leeds Crown Court and Robinson’s
subsequent arrest.
“Their
case has been going on for about a year,” Robertson said. “Tommy
had all the publicly available information… and on that live stream
he repeated the information that was already public. We were very
careful with language [as to not risk being held in contempt of
court].”
The
judge imprisoned Robinson under the assumption that his reporting
would cause a mistrial by influencing jury opinion. But since
Robinson was reporting on publically available facts – and thus
facts already available to the jury – how could this be accurate?
And
to declare a mistrial, a judge would have to look at what information
had been leaked and whether it could have reasonably swayed the
opinion of a jury.
Since
Judge Marson admitted he had never bothered to look into the content
of Robinson’s livestream, how could he know that Robinson’s
reporting was evidence of jury tampering?
And
if Judge Marson wanted to keep a public attention away from the
trial, he completely screwed that up by fueling an international news
story with his arrest of Robinson and his sequential gag order
against press coverage.
Judge
Marson helped Robinson by shining a supernova of a spotlight on the
trial which Robinson couldn’t have done alone; in short, Judge
Marson created a Streisand Effect.
Judge
Marson’s very own tactics have contributed to the alleged harm he
claims Robinson has done by merely reporting on the trial, and
despite claiming he’s defending the due process of those accused at
the trial, Judge Marson seems to have actually violated the due
process of Robinson.
Mr
Choudary who was imprisoned for urging Muslims to support ISIS and
terror groups was sentenced to 5 years in jail, however, he is
expected to serve just 2 and a half years.
It’s
reported that Choudary is at a ‘separation centre’ in HMP
Frankland.
The
Police have expected a large backlash when he is released.
“It
is likely to encourage some of his followers to become more vocal and
defiant in their extremist behaviour,” ‘The Sunday Times’
quoted a Scotland Yard source as saying.
- The paedophiles preyed on girls as young as 13 during a sickening operation
- Shabir Ahmed, Abdul Aziz, Adil Khan and Abdul Rauf are fighting deportation
- They have received close to a million pounds after getting the same for their trial
- By contrast Charlie Gard's parents were denied aid to fight to keep their son alive
- Report out from the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance
- Blames increase in hate crimes and racism in UK on the 'worrying examples of intolerance and hate speech in newspapers'
- Claims Islamophobia rises when media reports when terrorists are Muslim
This
morning, I received one of the most harrowing letters I have read in
my life. It came from Melanie Shaw's prison cell.
UK
Column News stands by its description of
Melanie Shaw as a political prisoner convicted of undisclosed crimes
in a secret hearing.
The
clarity of both her handwriting and her analysis throughout this
letter reconfirms to me that she is of clear mind and is
being subjected to a cynical psikhushka regime
to break her spirit and discredit or delete her testimony of
Establishment child abuse in the Thatcher era.
Many
of the prison "staff" who have neglected, mocked and abused
her (including by threatening effective rape in her cell) at
various East Midlands jails appear to be private corporate employees
and/or to lack any suitable warder training, and they certainly seem
to have no shred of humanity or intention
to abide by the common law...
