Exxon
Has an Oil Shortage
WSJ,
28
November, 2012
On
a forested plain in Alberta next month, massive mechanical shovels
will start scooping tons of oil-rich sands and loading them into
three-story-tall dump trucks.
The
trucks will haul the sands to the $11 billion Kearl
oil-sands-processing facility, which will sift out the prized
Canadian crude and provide Exxon Mobil Corp. XOM +0.02% with up to
170,000 barrels of oil a day for decades to come.
The
world's largest publicly traded oil company by market capitalization
is counting on Kearl and 20 other new projects to jump-start its
slumping oil and gas output, which plummeted to three-year lows in
its most recent quarter.
Exxon
shares have gained 3.9% so far this year, though they are little
changed from where they stood five years ago. The shares closed at
$88.10 on Wednesday on the New York Stock Exchange.
Some
analysts are skeptical the spate of projects—from Indonesia and
Papua New Guinea to the deep waters off West Africa—will begin by
2014 as Exxon predicts and deliver the infusion of oil and gas it
anticipates. Exxon estimates the projects could increase its daily
oil production by up to 880,000 barrels, or about 22% of its current
daily output.
"Delays
are the rule, not the exception, in this industry," said Fadel
Gheit, an analyst with Oppenheimer & Co.
Analysts
with UBS expect Exxon's 2012 production to be down 5.7% for the year,
compared with an expected 2.9% drop for Chevron Corp., CVX +0.20% a
2.7% decline for BP BP.LN 0.00% PLC and a 2.2% increase for Royal
Dutch-Shell.
Increasing
oil output has become daunting for energy companies such as Exxon,
because big oil fields in easy to reach locations have gotten scarce,
and government-controlled oil companies from countries such as Russia
and China have become more aggressive, spending freely to outbid
Western firms for the rights to the best projects.
There
are other obstacles to production growth, including depletion of
existing oil fields, which generally lose 5% to 7% of their output
per year, according to analysts.
Lysle
Brinker, director of energy-equity research for IHS-CERA, said Exxon
has a good record for completing major projects close to budget and
schedule. "They'd be the first to admit it doesn't always go
smoothly, but Exxon has a better reputation than most for hitting its
deadlines," Mr. Brinker said.
Exxon
declined to discuss the start-up risks associated with specific
projects. In discussions with analysts and investors, its executives
have stressed they aren't looking to increase production overnight or
at the expense of profitability, but bet on big projects that will
provide significant profits for the long haul.
Exxon's
annual spending on exploration and production projects has increased
sharply: It now plans to spend around $37 billion per year through
2016, up from less than $20 billion in 2009.
Off
the coast of Angola, Exxon is expecting additional production from an
expansion of its Kizomba project, a series of deep-water oil wells
that were among the first for that West African nation. With a 40%
stake, Exxon will get 40,000 barrels per day of the targeted output.
In
Indonesia, an offshore project known as Banyu Urip is expected to
produce about 165,000 barrels per day by the end of 2014, with
roughly 75,000 barrels for Exxon, a 45% owner.
In
Papua New Guinea, meanwhile, a liquefied-natural-gas project is
expected to export up to 940,000 cubic feet of gas—equivalent to
166,000 barrels of oil—to China and other Asian markets by 2014.
But
the venture is proving more costly than anticipated: Exxon increased
the price tag on the project by 21% to $19 billion this month, citing
changes in foreign-exchange rates and delays from work stoppages.
The
brunt of its projected production growth through 2014, 37%, comes
from Canadian oil-sands projects such as Kearl, which has been in the
works since 2009.
But
the oil-sands projects are in remote locations that require many
workers and billions of dollars in capital. They are also hamstrung
in reaching customers outside of Canada due to limited pipeline
capacity.
The
700,000-barrel-per-day Keystone XL pipeline, which will carry
Canadian crude to Gulf coast refiners, is seen as one way around
those limitations, but the project has faced stiff opposition from
environmentalists.
Final
approval of the project was delayed by President Barack Obama because
of environmental concerns, but with the election over he is expected
by many observers to give final approval. That approval may come with
additional environmental requirements, however, which could add costs
to and slow development of future oil-sands pipelines.
Even
if all of the new projects come to pass, they wouldn't make up for
Exxon's possible exit from a burgeoning project in southern Iraq that
was expected to produce up to 1.6 million barrels a day for the
company by 2016.
Iraqi
officials said Exxon recently notified them that it plans to sell its
60% operating stake in the West Qurna project to another firm. The
Iraqi government has said Exxon must choose between operating in
southern Iraq or in semiautonomous Kurdistan in the north, where
Exxon last year signed an agreement to explore for oil in defiance of
Baghdad. Exxon has declined to comment on its plans in southern Iraq.
Still,
despite the company's challenges, some analysts are loath to bet
against Exxon. They estimate that investments such as the Kearl
project, and the company's recent $1.6 billion purchase of Denbury
Resources Inc.'s DNR +0.46% holdings in the Bakken Shale oil field in
and around North Dakota, will help the company rebound.
Next
year "should look better," for Exxon, said Raymond James &
Assoc. analyst Pavel Molchanov, who expects the company's output will
grow 3%.