Showing posts with label Taleban. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Taleban. Show all posts

Monday, 28 March 2016

Terrorist attack in Lahore, Pakistan

'Targets were Christians’: Taliban faction claims Pakistan park attack that killed over 60

Pakistani rescuers use a stretcher to shift a body from a bomb blast site in Lahore on March 27, 2016. © Arif Ali


RT,
27 March, 2016

Taliban faction Jamaat-ul-Ahrar has claimed responsibility for Sunday’s suicide blast outside a public park in Pakistan’s eastern city of Lahore that killed at least 65 people and injured more than 280. Most of the injured are women and children.

The targets were Christians,” Ehsanullah Ehsan, a spokesman for the faction, said, threatening that more attacks in the region would follow.

We want to send this message to Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif that we have entered Lahore. He can do what he wants but he won’t be able to stop us. Our suicide bombers will continue these attacks.”

Salman Rafique, a health adviser for Punjab’s provincial government, put the death toll at over 60 people.

There are more than 280 injured people,” Rafique said. “Many are now being treated, and we fear that the death toll may climb considerably.”

Police say the blast had been carried out by a suicide bomber.


Most of the dead and injured are women and children,” Mustansar Feroz, superintendent of police for the area told Reuters.

The explosion happened outside Gulshan Iqbal Park, near the park’s parking lot, just outside the exit gate and a few meters away from children's swings.

The park was crowded because Christians are celebrating Easter holiday and many families were leaving the park when the blast occurred, according to senior police officer Haider Ashraf. He also said the death toll could still rise as many of the wounded were in critical condition.

Police said it was not clear whether the attack had deliberately targeted mainly Muslim Pakistan's small Christian minority.

Jam Sajjad Hussain, spokesman for Recuse 112, told Reuters most of the victims are women and children.

DawnNews reports there was little or no security present in the park area and around it.

An eyewitness, talking to DawnNews, said: “The park is huge and has many entrance gates. There was almost no security personnel present there.”

An emergency has been declared at all state hospitals in the city. Authorities are asking for blood donations because supplies are low.

Following the attack, the local government also ordered all public parks to be closed and announced three days of mourning in the province. The main shopping areas have also been shut down and many of the city's main roads are now deserted.

Facebook has activated its 'Safe Check' feature created to help track people after deadly incidents for Lahore.

Waqt News also reports the security personnel have surrounded the area and launched a search operation in and around the park, with rescue teams dispatched to the site.

The army was called in to control crowds outside the park, as some distraught relatives clashed with police and rescue officials.

The United States, Pakistan’s strategic ally, condemned the attack.

The United States stands with the people and government of Pakistan at this difficult hour. We will continue to work with our partners in Pakistan and across the region... to root out the scourge of terrorism,” White House National Security Council spokesman Ned Price said in a statement.

Islamist militants in Pakistan have often attacked Christians and other religious minorities over the past decade, while Christians have accused the government of doing little to protect them.

Lahore is the capital of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's political heartland of Punjab, which is the country’s biggest and wealthiest province


Rescue workers move a body from the site of a blast outside a public park in Lahore, Pakistan, March 27, 2016. © Mohsin Raza


Saturday, 2 November 2013

Iraq and Pakistan violence

1000+ killed: October Iraq’s deadliest month since 2008
Iraq has just experienced its deadliest month in five years with over 1,000 killed amid spiraling violence, a topic that will rank high in talks between Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and President Barack Obama in Washington on Friday.


RT,
1 November, 2013


The spike in deaths for October has created an atmosphere of anxiety and fear amongst the population since most of last month’s victims were civilians, according to government figures.


A total of 855 civilians, 65 policemen and 44 soldiers were killed, according to information from the Iraqi ministries of health, interior and defense, released on Friday.


According to data gathered by iraqbodycount.org, an independent organization that tracks the death toll in the country, the preliminary death toll in Iraq for October is 1,095 - the highest since April 2008, when 1,273 people were killed.


Of the 1,600 people who sustained injuries, 1,445 were civilians, while just 67 were soldiers, and 88 policemen. The data also showed that 33 fighters were killed and 167 arrested.


The grim data was released as Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is in Washington for a meeting with President Barack Obama on Friday. The two leaders are expected to discuss the disturbing spike in Iraqi violence during his White House visit.


Despite heightened security measures being enforced nationwide, Iraq has failed to escape the clutches of a deadly cycle of violence that has left many people – witnesses as they were to years of bloodshed that followed the 2003 invasion and subsequent occupation of the country by the US military – desperate for a return to normalcy.


Violence in Iraq has been on the rise since April, when security forces initiated a deadly crackdown on Sunni protesters, many of whom believe they are being discriminated against by Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's Shi'ite-led government.


Iraqi officials have attempted to thwart the rise in car bombings and suicide attacks by various means, including floating helium balloons, equipped with security surveillance cameras high above Baghdad, and by setting up hundreds of police checkpoints around the country. Thus far, such efforts have been mostly ineffective.


At the same time, identifying the perpetrators - Sunni, Shiite, Al-Qaeda or other - has proven a challenge since it is rare for any group to claim responsibility for attacks.


"We know we have major challenges of our own capabilities being up to the standard. They currently are not," Lukman Faily, the Iraqi ambassador to the US, told AP this week. "We need to gear up, to deal with that threat more seriously. We need support and we need help."


Faily emphasized, however, that the Iraqi people are not interested in US forces on the ground once again in the war-torn country.


"We have said to the Americans we'd be more than happy to discuss all the options, short of boots on the ground."


But Shwan Zulal, an Iraqi and Kurdistan political analyst, said that by acquiring more military capability the Iraqi government will not solve the country’s terrible problems.


Maliki feels he needs to consolidate his power and he needs to arm his army to make him stronger and have a more centralized government within Iraq, because he feels that way he can counter terrorism, but the reality is that the politics in Iraq is broken,” he told RT.


The violence as a result of that, it’s not only because the army is weak but because Iraqi politics as a whole is dysfunctional and hasn’t worked for the last ten years,” He added.


In October 2011, al-Maliki's government refused to allow US forces to remain in Iraq with legal immunity after the nine-year war formally came to a close.


Nearly 4,500 American troops were killed in Iraq between the 2003 invasion and the 2011 pullout. More than 100,000 Iraqis were killed in the same period.


Head of Pakistani Taliban killed by US drone strike



The head of the Pakistani Taliban, Hakimullah Mehsud, was killed by a US drone strike on Friday, Pakistani intelligence officials said. Senior sources within the militant group confirmed the death. 

READ MORE: http://on.rt.com/nw8ayl




Monday, 23 September 2013

Retribution for US drone attacks

Taliban suicide attack on Pakistani church leaves dozens dead
Attack on congregation leaving service in Peshawar is most deadly in history of Pakistan's Christian community


22 September, 2013



Pakistan's embattled Christian community suffered the most deadly attack in its history on Sunday when a pair of Taliban suicide bombers blew themselves up inside a church in the troubled city of Peshawar, killing 75 and wounding more than 100.


The midday attack on the historic church was one of the most lethal aimed at civilians in Peshawar, a city that has been repeatedly struck by militant groups who control swaths of the nearby tribal areas.


Explosions ripped through the congregation of 500 people, including many women and children, as the service at All Saints church was coming to an end and worshippers were about to receive a free meal of rice in the courtyard outside.


Witnesses said the interior of the 130-year-old building was turned into a bloodbath, with severed limbs scattered around and the walls pockmarked with ball bearings used as shrapnel by the bombers.


"I saw myself in the air and then on the ground inside a huge fire of ball," said Sabir John, a worshipper who lost one of his arms in the blast.


An official from the provincial bomb squad said there was evidence of two suicide bombers, each carrying about 6kg of explosives. With a limited number of weekend staff, the city's main hospital was overwhelmed by casualties. There were fears that some would die of their injuries as they lay unattended on stretchers outside the emergency ward.


Dr Arshad Javed, chief executive of the Lady Reading hospital, said: "I have never seen such piles of human bodies. The exact number of the blast victims cannot be ascertained as yet."


Distraught relatives were blocked from entering the hospital to look for family members by police. Some previous suicide bombings have been followed up with attacks on victims after they have been rushed to hospital.


Christians in Peshawar reacted with fury. Protesters outside the church chanted slogans attacking the provincial government for not providing security to worshippers. Some clashed with police, ripping off their uniforms and burning them in front of television cameras. Christians also came out to protest in cities around the country.


The Jundullah wing of the Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility. A spokesman said: "They are the enemies of Islam, therefore we target them. We will continue our attacks on non-Muslims on Pakistani land."


The highly unusual attack on Christian worshippers was reminiscent of a series of brutal bombings against large gatherings of Shias, a minority Muslim sect reviled as heretics by some militant groups. Until now Pakistan's Christian minority, thought to be about 2% of the near 200 million population, have been spared such attacks, though five people were killed by a grenade attack in 2002 on a church in Islamabad frequented by foreigners.


Christians, who tend to be among the poorest sections of society, have suffered prejudice and sporadic bouts of mob violence and church burnings, usually triggered by accusations of anti-Islam blasphemy.


Sunday's attack is likely to be seen as yet another sign of the growing threat from Pakistan's fast-evolving network of militant groups, which include sectarian terrorists, anti-India groups and a homegrown strain of the Taliban influenced by al-Qaida ideology. It could further undermine hopes of a negotiated peace settlement with militants.


An agreement struck earlier in September by leading political parties gave the green light to the government to hold talks with militants, but it did not lead to any reduction in attacks. Counter-terror analysts believe the peace initiative is doomed to fail because the violent fundamentalists ravaging the country reject Pakistan's government and constitution as un-Islamic.


On Sunday three days of mourning were announced as politicians and religious leaders condemned the attack.


"Terrorists have no religion and targeting innocent people is against the teachings of Islam and all religions," said the prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, in a statement. "Cruel acts of terrorism reflect the brutality and inhumane mindset of the terrorists."


Imran Khan, the politician whose party leads the provincial government in Peshawar, rushed to the city from the capital, Islamabad.



Talking to journalists outside the hospital he said the attack was a deliberate scheme to scupper peace talks. "Isn't it strange that whenever peace talks are pursued, these attacks take place, and I want to point out that there was also a drone strike today," he said in reference to a strike by an unmanned US aircraft that killed six suspected militants in North Waziristan on Sunday. Khan has long blamed the CIA's drone campaign as the root cause of Pakistan's current unrest, a position decried by his critics who say militancy and extremism long pre-date drones and the US-led intervention in Afghanistan.

Wednesday, 26 June 2013

Taliban attack in Kabul

Taliban attacks Kabul's presidential palace, CIA, ISAF HQ, Ministry of Defense
Taliban has launched an attack in central Kabul, targeting the presidential palace, the CIA and ISAF headquarters, the Ministry of Defense, as well as an international hotel. All the assailants have been killed in the 90-minute showdown



RT,
25 June, 2013

Local journalist Courtney Body told RT the attack started with a blast and heavy gunfire targeting the palace gate.

What I saw from the outside of that gate is more of a blast wall around the green zone area, as there were giant holes in the concrete walls and the entire gate was destroyed. Apparently, one vehicle was able to get inside and one vehicle was stopped at the gate, and that’s when the attack began,” Body said.

Some 20 journalists, who were waiting at the palace entrance for a presser by President Karzai, were forced to run for cover as they heard the automatic rifle gunfire, and smoke from an explosion blanketed the area.

The palace guards, as well as guards from the adjacent CIA compound, reportedly fired back immediately after the attack on the west gate.

All the attackers were killed in the 90-minute firefight, according to Kabul Police Chief Mohammad Ayoub Salangi. One was killed when he detonated a bomb on his body, and three or four were killed by security forces, he added.

Three security guards were reportedly killed and one more was wounded.

Afghan security force keep watch near the entrance gate of the Presidential palace in Kabul on June 25, 2013. (AFP Photo)

The police chief has also indicated that the damage could have been much worse, as there were schools and offices just outside the gate.

The insurgents were wearing military-style uniform and used fake documents to make their way through the checkpoints in SUVs, but one of the cars was stopped.

Reports indicated that Karzai was in the compound at the time, but a palace official said he was safe.

The Taliban has claimed responsibility for the attack, saying that eight suicide bombers were able to reach the most secure area of Kabul.

The brave mujahideen, with special tactics and help from inside, were able to reach their target with their weapons and cars,” Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said in an email statement quoted by AP.

He said the insurgents carrying hand grenades, a machinegun and rocket-propelled grenades were targeting the presidential palace, the Ministry of Defense, as well as the Ariana Hotel, which is known to house a CIA station.

The area of the city where the attack took place is the site of several important organizations, including the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, as well as the headquarters for the CIA and the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF).



The American Embassy in Kabul was reportedly placed on lockdown, with ISAF confirming a lockdown over its Twitter feed; other facilities in the area are said to be under lockdown as well.



The CIA building in central Kabul was reported to be on fire shortly after the attack, according to 1TV News, a local news broadcaster.

Afghan security forces stand guard as smoke rises from the entrance gate of the Presidential palace in Kabul on June 25, 2013. (AFP Photo)

Ambassador James Dobbins, the US special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, was currently in Kabul after returning from Doha over the weekend. The Afghan talks in Qatar have become stalled since Taliban opened an embassy-like compound, declaring it the 'Political Office of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.'

Taliban officials stated that the newly opened office in Qatar was a response to calls by opponents for the launch of a political process to reach some measure of peace, and end three decades of fighting in Afghanistan.

Steve Zunes, a professor of international studies at the University of San Francisco, pointed out to RT, that the Afghan army would never succeed unless the Afghan people support the country's leadership in the first place.

Even if they are very well trained, even if they have the very best equipment, the strength of the Afghan government <…> doesn’t have credibility with the Afghan people. While the Afghans don’t subscribe to the Taliban’s ideology, they are very frustrated with corruption, inaptitude, and arbitrariness of the Afghan government, including the ongoing repression. They’re resentful of the foreign presence to prop up this government. And it’s this kind of environment that leads to the rise of extremists. So it’s not a security question.”

Wednesday, 19 June 2013

Americans to talk peace with Teliban


US drops demand Taliban renounce al-Qaeda to allow talks to progress
America will engage in its first formal direct talks with the Taliban on Thursday, after dropping its long-standing demand that the movement renounce ties with al-Qaeda in order for them to progress.


18 January, 2013


The US will engage in its first formal direct talks with the Taliban on Thursday, according to officials, in a milestone on the road to peace after more than a decade of war.

The first meeting will take place in Doha, the Qatari capital, after the Taliban opened their first official overseas office and Washington dropped its long-standing demand that the movement renounce ties with al-Qaeda as a precondition for the talks.

The US will have its first formal meeting with the Taliban, and indeed first meeting with the Taliban for several years, in a couple of days in Doha,” a senior official with Obama administration said.

Afghan peace negotiators will also travel to Qatar for talks, according to President Hamid Karzai, speaking as Nato officially transferred authority to Afghan national forces on the ground in Afghanistan.

Just hours after the agreement was announced, four American soldiers were killed by insurgents during an attack on Bagram Air Base. There were very few details of the attack, but a US official said the soldiers were killed by "indirect fire", possibly rockets or mortars.

The challenges ahead were further underlined however by a suicide attack only a few miles from where Mr Karzai was speaking.The Taliban has repeatedly refused to meet Afghan peace envoys.

After months of behind-the-scenes negotiations however, including some in Norway according to Espen Barth Eide, the country’s foreign minister, the movement has now agreed to open the Doha office to facilitate talks.

The office is to open dialogue between the Taliban and the world,” Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said, although he made no reference to peace talks or the Afghan government. “The Islamic Emirate Of Afghanistan [the group’s formal name] doesn’t want any threats from Afghanistan soil to other countries, and neither permits anyone to threaten other countries using Afghanistan soil.

We support a political and peaceful solution that ends Afghanistan’s occupation, and guarantees the Islamic system and nationwide security.”

None of the parties are expecting any imminent breakthrough, but US officials described the opening of negotiations with the Taliban as an “important development” on the road to reconciliation.

They were at pains to be realistic about the road ahead, conceding that levels of trust between parties were “extremely low”.

Officials said the first meeting would simply be an “exchange of agendas” in which both sides laid out what issues they wanted to address. It could be followed by a second meeting in coming weeks.

Recalling the Northern Ireland peace process took years to complete, senior Obama administration officials said the Taliban office was “the first step on what – if it is successful – will be a very long road”, adding that there was “no guarantee that this process will happen quickly, if at all.”

One official significantly added that a requirement for the Taliban to drop relations with al Qaeda – something which had stymied previous attempts at direct talks – was no longer necessary in order for them to progress.

We’ve long had a demand on the Taliban that they make a statement that distances themselves from the movement from international terrorism, but made clear that we didn’t expect immediately for them to break ties with al Qaeda, because that’s an outcome of the negotiation process,” the official said.

President Barack Obama, speaking at the G8 summit in Northern Ireland, called the opening of the Taliban’s political office an important step toward reconciliation between the group and the Afghan government, although he predicted the road ahead will be long and complicated.

David Cameron, the Prime Minister, gave his backing to the talks.

We need to match the security response in Afghanistan ... with a political process to try to make sure as many people as possible give up violence, give up an armed struggle and join the political process,” he said. “It’s the right thing to do – of course it involves all sorts of difficulties.”

Graeme Smith, of the International Crisis Group, said members of the High Peace Council themselves do not expect much progress.

The main forces that were killing a lot of insurgents in recent years are leaving,” he said. “The insurgents don’t have a whole load of incentive to negotiate until they find out where the military balance lies after the withdrawal.”

Speaking at a heavily defended army academy just outside Kabul, Mr Karzai told Nato officials that the handover would help cement support for the Afghan security forces.

From tomorrow, our security and defence forces will now be in the lead,” he said. “From here, all security responsibility and all security leadership will be taken by our brave forces.”

Some 97,000 international troops remain in the country. From now until the end of next year their role will be largely to train and advise local forces.

The transfer of the last 95 districts from Nato to Afghan control include some of the areas still affected by Taliban attacks, including Kandahar — the spiritual home of the movement — and territories that border Pakistan.

Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Nato secretary-general, was in Kabul for the handover. He said the coalition will help militarily if and when needed but will no longer plan, execute or lead operations.

Ten years ago, there were no Afghan national security forces. Five years ago, Afghan forces were a fraction of what they are today,” he said.

Now you have 350,000 Afghan troops and police. A formidable force. And time and again, we have seen them dealing quickly and competently with complex attacks. Defeating the enemies of Afghanistan, and defending and protecting the Afghan people.”


US to join direct peace talks in Qatar with Taliban over Afghanistan's future
'Peace and reconciliation' milestone comes after US drops request for formal rejection of al-Qaida as precondition to talks



18 January, 2013

The US is to open direct talks with Taliban leaders within days, it was revealed on Tuesday, after Washington agreed to drop a series of preconditions that have previously held back negotiations over the future of Afghanistan.

In a major milestone in the 12-year-old war, political representatives of the Taliban will shortly meet Afghan and US officials in Doha, the capital of Qatar, to discuss an agenda for what US officials called "peace and reconciliation" before further talks take place with Afghan government representatives soon after.

The move came on the day that Nato forces handed official control of nationwide security to Afghan troops. Less than 12 hours later, the US confirmed that four US personnel died at Bagram air base near Kabul, in what was thought to be a mortar attack.

Earlier the Taliban, in a statement announcing their plans for peace talks and an office in Qatar, said they would not allow anyone to threaten or harm other countries from Afghan soil – a move senior US administration officials described as an important first step to the Taliban severing ties with al-Qaida.

The US has agreed that a formal rejection of al-Qaida by the Taliban leadership would now be a "negotiating aim" rather than a precondition for talks. It will also seek a commitment from the Taliban to end its insurgency in Afghanistan and recognise women's rights in the country.

"This is an important first step but it will be a long road," said one senior US official. "We have long said this conflict won't be won on the battlefield, which is why we support the opening of this [Doha] office."

White House officials say they believe the Taliban delegation at the talks represents the movement's leadership, and includes more radical groups such as the Haqqani network. Officials said the US would have a direct role in the talks starting starting this week in Doha, but the substantive negotiations over the future of Afghanistan would then be led by the Afghan government.

Speaking later, Ben Rhodes, deputy national security adviser, said: "The United States will be supporting a process that is fundamentally Afghan-led … We can play a role in talking to the Taliban as well in supporting that peace process – and because we have issues of our own to bring up with them."

A Taliban spokesman said the group was opening the Doha office to "reach understanding and initiate talks with countries of the world for the purpose of improving relations with them", and to support a peaceful, political solution to end the "occupation of Afghanistan".

The proposal for a Doha office has been on the table since 2011, and several senior Taliban figures have been living in Qatar for many months now, but the group had not publicly embraced plans for peace talks.

In Kabul, Afghan president Hamid Karzai said he hoped the opening of the Taliban office would bring the start of talks between the High Peace Council he set up to lead government negotiation efforts, and the insurgents.

However the Afghan leader, who has long been lukewarm about efforts to set up a Taliban base in Qatar, also called for any negotiations to move back to Afghanistan as soon as possible. "We hope that our brothers the Taliban also understand that the process will move to our country soon," he told a news conference in Kabul, although US officials stressed that moving talks to Afghanistan would take time.

Karzai also announced that Nato forces had handed official control of nationwide security to Afghan troops on Tuesday. Foreign soldiers will still be fighting on the ground and supporting Afghans with air power, medical evacuation and other key capacities until the end of next year.

Barack Obama is understood to have informed G8 leaders of the breakthrough at a dinner at the Northern Ireland summit on Monday night.

The deal on talks with the Taliban was partly brokered by Pakistan and the emir of Qatar after "months of diplomatic spadework" also involving Germany, Norway and the UK. In 2011, Hillary Clinton suggested that Taliban leaders would have to renounce violence for a peace process to work.

"Over the past two years, we have laid out our unambiguous red lines for reconciliation with the insurgents: they must renounce violence; they must abandon their alliance with al-Qaida; and they must abide by the constitution of Afghanistan," she said. "Those are necessary outcomes of any negotiation. This is the price for reaching a political resolution and bringing an end to the military actions that are targeting their leadership and decimating their ranks."

But on Tuesday, that position appeared to have soften somewhat. "We don't expect them to break ties with al-Qaida [immediately]," said one of the US officials speaking on an off-the-record conference call. "That is an outcome of the process." He said the expected Taliban statement opposing the use of Afghan soil for foreign attacks was "a first step in distancing them from international terrorism".

The Taliban also appeared to have softened on their long-term demand that foreign troops leave before talks can start. Karzai, despite his misgivings about overseas talks and initial opposition to the Qatar office visited the Gulf state twice this year, apparently paving the way for Tuesday's breakthrough.

Afghan president Hamid Karzai, who has always said he would prefer talks to take place in Afghanistan, was initially lukewarm about the Qatar plans, but has visited the state twice this year, apparently paving the way for today's breakthrough.

Monday, 11 March 2013

Karzai accuses Washington


Never believe rumours until they have been officiallly denied

Categorically false’: US dismisses Karzai’s accusations of Taliban terror collusion
The US has denied that it is collaborating with Islamic terrorists in Afghanistan to prolong the stay of its forces beyond next year, refuting an accusation made by President Hamid Karzai in the wake of a series of suicide bombings.


10 March, 2013

Two explosions on Saturday killed 19 people in two different locations, including one in front of the Defense Ministry in the country's capital Kabul.
"Yesterday's bombings in the name of the Taliban were aimed at serving the foreigners and supporting the presence of the foreigners in Afghanistan and keeping them in Afghanistan by intimidating us," Karzai said in a televised speech, who has been in power since 2001.

Afghan National Army soldiers remove a damaged car from the site of a suicide attack in Kabul March 9, 2013 (Reuters / Mohammad Ismail)
Afghan National Army soldiers remove a damaged car from the site of a suicide attack in Kabul March 9, 2013 (Reuters / Mohammad Ismail)

The terrorist acts coincided with Chuck Hagel’s first visit to Kabul as the US Defense Secretary, in which he was meant to discuss the gradual reduction of America's presence and the fates of Afghans held in custody by US forces.
"This attack was a message to him," Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said in the aftermath of the detonations.

Chuck Hagel speaks to the press following his meeting with Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai in Kabul on March 10, 2013 (AFP Photo / Jason Reed / Pool)
Chuck Hagel speaks to the press following his meeting with Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai in Kabul on March 10, 2013 (AFP Photo / Jason Reed / Pool)
But this is not how Karzai saw the incidents.
"Taliban leaders and representatives are talking with the US abroad every day," he claimed.
The Taliban, a radical Islamic movement that controls swathes of the country, refuses to recognize Karzai’s legitimacy.
The Taliban has “strongly rejected” the accusations in an email communiqué.
The US and NATO forces commander in the country, General Joseph Dunford, also rebuffed Karzai’s allegations.
``We have fought too hard over the past 12 years, we have shed too much blood over the last 12 years, to ever think that violence or instability would be to our advantage,'' Dunford said.
Meanwhile, the US embassy in Kabul reminded Karzai that it has not even held talks with radicals following a breakdown in negotiations exactly a year ago, and insisted that it has “long supported an Afghan-led process for Afghans to talk to Afghans”.
Karzai has form of making dramatic anti-American statements – including referring to NATO troops as“pillaging occupiers” – whether out of personal frustration, or a desire to portray himself as a sovereign leader and not an American puppet to his domestic audience.
Gen Dunford stated that he had never heard Karzai express similar views to him in private.
The explosions and the fallout appear to have derailed what already promised to be tumultuous talks between uneasy allies.
Karzai and Hagel cancelled a joint news conference on Sunday, although US officials maintained that this was simply a security precaution, insisting the two men would still meet one-to-one.
They have a lot to discuss, following a string of apparent disagreements.
The US has just reneged on a promise to hand over Bagram prison, in the east of the country, which harbors those US intelligence believes to be some of the most dangerous Taliban insurgents.
Although no official reason has been given, Karzai proclaimed last week that “we know there are innocent people in these jails, and I will order their release, as much as I am criticized for it”, and the statement appears to have infuriated Washington.
Karzai also recently admonished NATO forces for a raft of alleged wrongdoings.
He has demanded that US troops move out of the region of Wardak, which borders Kabul, after alleged incidents of torture and extrajudicial killings by US troops, which have been strenuously denied by the Pentagon.
He also accused the US of directing CIA-trained local operatives, to kidnap an Afghan student, before releasing him at the Afghan President’s insistence. The US says that it has neither captured nor released anyone.
The points of contention come amid a US withdrawal from the mountainous country, after more than a decade at war.
There are currently about 66,000 US troops in Afghanistan, but that number will be halved next year. It is not clear how many will remain beyond that time.
``We will tell the NATO where we need them, and under which conditions. They must respect our laws. They must respect the national sovereignty of our country and must respect all our customs,'' Karzai declared on Sunday.
The US has poured billions of dollars into training local police, army and security forces, to ensure that order does not collapse as soon as its ground forces leave. But the initiatives have met with local resistance (with recruits frequently shooting their NATO mentors) and suspicion from Karzai, who says the new organizations are opaque and are not under full command of his government.



Wednesday, 23 January 2013

The Taliban responds to Prince Harry

Earlier in January we featured an article with comments by Mujahideen leader, Hekmatyar about Prince Harry killing 'innocent Afghans while drunk'.

I got a comment from someone saying this was 'lies' and 'bullshit'

Well, here's the confirmation.  The prince talks about taking people out, firing an Apache helicopter's weapons system is a 'joy' because he loves playing Playstation.

The mental illness of Prince Harry


22 January, 2013

Poor Captain Wales: as Prince Harry spoke out in a series of video interviews with media outlets that were only just released, he has incurred a response from the Taliban blasting his comments as evidence of “mental problems” or post-traumatic stress disorder.

Harry, who returned Monday to the U.K. at the end of his deployment, was a gunner in an Apache helicopter; when asked by media during the course of his posting whether he had killed Taliban members, he replied, “Yeah, so lots of people have. The squadron’s been out here. Everyone’s fired a certain amount.” He also said that firing the craft’s weapons system is “a joy for me because I'm one of those people who loves playing PlayStation and Xbox, so with my thumbs I like to think I'm probably quite useful.”

Today the Taliban responded through a spokesperson to the AFP, saying, “There are 49 countries with their powerful military failing in the fight against the mujahideen, and now this prince comes and compares this war with his games, PlayStation or whatever he calls it. . . . This is a serious war, a historic war, resistance for us, for our people. . . But we don't take his comments very seriously, as we have all seen and heard that many foreign soldiers, occupiers who come to Afghanistan, develop some kind of mental problems on their way out.”

(Beyond discussing his role in Afghanistan, the prince also touched on his infamous trip to Las Vegas over the summer, saying it was a moment in which he was being “too much Army and not enough prince.” To which we say, the British Army sounds like fun?)