Showing posts with label Roger Stone. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roger Stone. Show all posts

Friday, 1 February 2019

The falling-out of Roger Stone and Jerome Corsi

Roger Stone and Jerome Corsi fall out in the context of the Deep State Mueller witchhunt

Yesterday I reported on the following:
It has been so long since I covered the InfoWars circus that I had to do a bit of research on what is happening.
The first thing I noticed was the absense of any coverage by infowars.com and any mention of their Washington DC correspondent, Jerome Corsi who is now being described as an "ocasional contributor"
The Mueller Investigation seems to have all the morbid fascination of the Stalinist show trials of the 1930's.
Imagine. They turned out (CNN in tow) to arrest Roger Stone in the early hours with fully- armed SWAT team, machine guns pointed at Stone's chest and made his 72-year old wife stand out in her nightgown barefoot.
Unless you are a card-carrying liberal fascist it would be hard to see the injustice of this.


Friday the Mueller Special Counsel sent 20-29 armed FBI operatives in six vehicles and a CNN camera crew to film the arrest of Trump associate Roger Stone at his home in a predawn raid.

Roger Stone was arrested barefoot and in his shorts outside his apartment.
On Monday Roger Stone told Judge Napolitano in a FOX Nation interview that his 72-year-old wife was also forced to stand outside barefoot and in her nightgown.
For some strange reason this was not aired on CNN who had a camera crew at Stone’s home during the arrest.

Here Roger Stone talks about his experience.


Now, it turns out that the fascist state is able to get the former friends to turn on each other and the liberal echo chamber is having a field day


This goes into more detail

In an apparent bid to protect Roger Stone, Infowars has been waging a war on former employee Jerome Corsi



18 January, 2019

Alex Jones’ Infowars outlet is waging a public relations campaign against its own former Washington, D.C., bureau chief Jerome Corsi, who appears to be increasingly entangled in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.

After reports surfaced on September 5 that Corsi had been subpoenaed to appear before a grand jury convened by Mueller, Infowars used its website and social media account to signal how Corsi should testify. The since-suspended Infowars Twitter account tweeted on September 5, “Want to know what former InfoWars DC bureau Cheif (sic) Jerry Corsi will tell Mueller’s grand jury?” The tweet linked a 2017 Infowars article authored by Corsi that attempted to defend Donald Trump confidant and Infowars host Roger Stone -- who is also embroiled in the Mueller investigation -- against accusations that Stone was involved in the release of emails that Russian intelligence officers stole from Clinton campaign chair John Podesta. The implicit suggestion of the tweet was that Corsi, a former Infowars employee, should give testimony absolving Stone, a current Infowars employee, of any wrongdoing.

The Infowars tweet presaging Corsi’s testimony echoed a tactic employed by President Donald Trump during Mueller’s investigation. On December 3, Trump tweeted: “‘I will never testify against Trump.’ This statement was recently made by Roger Stone, essentially stating that he will not be forced by a rogue and out of control prosecutor to make up lies and stories about ‘President Trump.’ Nice to know that some people still have ‘guts!’”
Trump’s public coercion of Stone raised questions about whether the tweet constituted criminal witness tampering.

Later, as Corsi’s legal woes increased -- beginning in November when Corsi said he expected to be indicted -- Infowars turned on him and labeled him a traitor, with Stone driving the majority of attacks.

In evaluating the conflict between Infowars and Corsi, it’s hard to know whose claims about the hacked emails to believe -- if any -- because the major players are all inveterate liars. But it's clear that after trying to play nice with Corsi, Infowars has taken out its knives.

How Corsi and Stone got tangled in Mueller's investigation

Corsi and Stone are both reportedly under investigation by Mueller’s team for the same reason. On October 7, 2016, WikiLeaks released emails stolen from Podesta just hours after news broke of a 2005 recording in which Trump bragged about sexually assaulting women. According to U.S. intelligence agencies, the emails were hacked by individuals working on behalf of the Kremlin. Part of Mueller’s investigation is to determine if Trump associates colluded with Russia, and Corsi and Stone’s contacts with WikiLeaks in 2016 have brought them both under scrutiny. Stone, who testified about WikiLeaks before a closed session of the House Intelligence Committee in September 2017, has denied having knowledge of the hacked emails before they were released, but he has also offered an ever-changing story in public remarks about what happened in 2016. Corsi is under investigation because Mueller reportedly has emails suggesting that he served as an intermediary between Stone and Wikileaks.

Background: Jerome Corsi and Infowars

Corsi, a conspiracy theorist best known for driving the “birther” smear about President Barack Obama that Trump later championed, joined Infowars as the outlet’s Washington, D.C., bureau chief on January 30, 2017. Corsi had spent years working at conspiracy website WND, and he was friendly with Infowars prior to joining the outlet. (For example, a July 2015 Infowars article references an appearance Corsi made on The Alex Jones Show in support of then-candidate Trump.)

Corsi’s role with Infowars helped the fringe outlet gain additional access within the Trump administration. In May 2017, Infowars announced that Corsi had been granted temporary credentials to attend press briefings at the White House, and controversy quickly erupted because of the outlet’s history of pushing conspiracy theories about the 2012 Sandy Hook mass shooting and numerous other tragedies. Sure enough, on May 22, 2017, Corsi broadcast live from an empty James S. Brady Press Briefing Room and discussed his hopes of obtaining a permanent pass. Infowars founder Alex Jones, clearly pleased with the imbroglio, told his listeners that the press pass wasn’t that important because “most of the meetings don’t happen at briefings, they happen at dinners, like he was at one with the vice president a few nights ago,” adding, “Oop, maybe I’m not supposed to say that.”

In March 2018, when Corsi still worked at Infowars, he threw a major on-air tantrum about Mueller. Corsi was upset about reports that the FBI had recently detained and questioned Ted Malloch at the direction of Mueller’s team. Malloch, an informal Trump campaign adviser and frequent Infowars guest, was reportedly questioned about Stone and about WikiLeaks’ release of the hacked Podesta emails. (When Malloch was detained, Infowars called him an “Infowars Correspondent” in an article.)   

Corsi repeatedly tweeted about the detention on March 28 and 29, writing that he was going to “POUND” Mueller, claiming, “MUELLER in PANIC MODE grabs Ted Malloc (sic),” and writing that he was joining an “EMERGENCY BROADCAST” on Infowars to talk about the detention. In an appearance on the March 29 broadcast of The Alex Jones Show, Corsi challenged Mueller to a fistfight, saying, “I'm fed up with this. I want to say to Mueller, let's go out in the backyard of the Justice Department. You got to have some -- let's duke it out. I mean, you want to behave like a thug? … Well this is what you deserve.”

Perhaps it was Corsi who was in “PANIC MODE.” In November, it was revealed that Mueller is in possession of emails that suggest Corsi and Stone knew that WikiLeaks had Podesta’s stolen emails before they were released. Stone emailed Corsi in 2016 telling him to “get to” WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, and Corsi forwarded the message to Malloch before later reporting back to Stone to share what he said Assange’s future plans were.

A January 17 Infowars article claimed that Corsi was dismissed by the outlet in June 2018 “because of his failure to adequately establish a Washington bureau, his failure to maintain White House press credentials, and his generally poor work performance.” The article further claimed that “The Washington Post is set to publish a false story claiming that Jerome Corsi was hired by Infowars at the behest of Roger Stone as part of a ‘hush money’ operation and that this is a line of inquiry for the Mueller investigation into Russian collusion.”

Did Infowars attempt to influence Corsi’s testimony before Mueller’s grand jury?

Infowars’ response to the September 5 report that Corsi had been compelled to testify could easily be interpreted as an attempt to influence Corsi’s dealings with Mueller’s team. The since-suspended Infowars Twitter account tweeted on September 5:
The tweet linked to an Infowars.com article authored by Corsi and published in March 2017, which denied that Stone had anything to do with WikiLeaks’ release of hacked emails.

Then on September 12, Infowars published a video with the headline “What Will Jerome Corsi Tell Mueller’s Grand Jury?” that teased Stone’s appearance with “Alex Jones live via Skype to discuss former Infowars Bureau Chief Dr. Jerome Corsi’s upcoming testimony before Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s grand jury.” In the video, both Jones and Stone claimed that they had not spoken to Corsi since Mueller subpoenaed him. Stone went on to say that if Corsi testified “truthfully,” it would be “entirely exculpatory” for him “because you see it was Dr. Corsi who educated me to the fact that Tony Podesta along with his brother John were deeply involved in Ukraine.” Stone’s reference to Podesta and Ukraine is an attempt to argue that his infamous August 2016 tweet that “it will soon the Podesta’s time in the barrel” was not a reference to having foreknowledge of the hacked emails, but instead referred to a different matter. As with the September 5 Infowars tweet, the article and video appear to pressure Corsi to testify in a certain way about Stone.

Infowars turns on Corsi

As Corsi’s legal troubles worsened over the following months -- on November 26, Corsi said he would reject a plea deal from Mueller, and in January, it was reported that several Corsi associates, including his stepson, had also been subpoenaed -- Infowars turned on its former Washington, D.C., bureau chief. A search of Infowars.com shows headlines about Corsi began to take on a more negative tone in November (i.e., “Explosive! Roger Stone Responds To Corsi’s Flip-Flop Concerning Working With Assange”).

In January, Infowars has turned up the heat even more. On January 2, it published an article with the headline “Roger Stone Believes Jerome Corsi Works for Mueller,” and on January 17, it posted an article titled “Roger Stone Explains His Beef With Jerome Corsi and Larry Klayman.” The outlet also promoted a video where “Roger Stone calls out Jerome Corsi for lying about fabricating a cover story together to hide foreknowledge of Wikileaks publishing of the Podesta emails.”

Here’s a list of all the Infowars headlines and subheads mentioning Corsi since September:

SEPTEMBER 2018

NOVEMBER 2018

JANUARY 2019

Infowars broadcasts have followed a similar pattern; the January 2 broadcast of The Alex Jones Show was advertised with the tagline: “Joining today’s broadcast is Roger Stone breaking down what he calls the ‘treachery’ of Dr. Jerome Corsi.”

Jones set up Stone’s appearance by making a number of very personal attacks on his former employee Corsi. He began by claiming that “I don’t go after Corsi with any pleasure” before saying that he fired Corsi after encountering him at a Washington, D.C., restaurant “drunk off his ass.” Jones also said that Corsi started “talking massive crap about me, Roger, everybody” at the restaurant, that Corsi is a “lunatic,” that he is “like fruit, his expiration date has hit,” and that he has no respect for Corsi.

For his part, Stone said that Corsi “was perfectly willing to bear false witness against me on multiple points that are complete fabrications.” Jones ended the segment with a rant, screaming, “I will not sit there and watch some piece of crap Russian agent like Mueller accuse [Stone] and me of being goddamn -- I said I wouldn’t do it, lord, I apologize -- accuse me of something I haven’t done. I’m sick of it.”


Update (1/22/19): Corsi sued The Washington Post on January 21 and alleged in a civil complaint that he had remained on the Infowars payroll until January 18, earning $15,000 a month. He claims that the payments were terminated after a Washington Post reporter made inquiries about them at Infowars.

An alt-Right response

The real reason Jerome Corsi just threw Roger Stone under the bus


Roger Stone gives his version - he's pretty angry!

Roger Stone Explains His Beef With Jerome Corsi and Larry Klayman




Right now, it seems the only winner is the Deep State. Have they got Trump in their sites?

Expressed in a melodramatic way...

Wednesday, 30 January 2019

John Kiriakou on the Roger Stone indictment

I have not had a chance to catch up with these fast-moving events but I have noticed that InfoWars, the party most involved with these two, has been silent.



Censorship on Infowars.com

Lee Stranahan And John Kiriakou on the #DeepState and Roger Stone Indictment






JEROME CORSI BETRAYS ROGER STONE IN MUELLER PROBE BY PROMOTING DEMOCRATIC PARTY TALKING POINTS

H.A. Goodman





ROGER STONE REFUTES JEROME CORSI MUELLER PROBE TESTIMONY ON TRUMP CAMPAIGN ALLEGATIONS
H.A. Goodman



THIS SINGLE EVENT WILL SHOCK THE NATION!! PENDING

AMTV




Sunday, 27 January 2019

On the Roger Stone Indictment

Pelosi Aghast - Stone Indictment Proves That Trump Campaign Deliberately Campaigned For Trump


Image result for roger stone arrested
28 January, 2019

On Friday Roger Stone, a political consultant who in 2016 publicly supported the Trump campaign, was arrested on criminal charges filed by special counsel Robert Mueller. He has since been released on bail. Stone is indicted (pdf) in five cases for making false statements, one attempt of influencing a witness and an obstruction of a proceeding.

Since May 2017 the former FBI chief Mueller investigates an alleged collusion between Trump, his campaign and something Russian with regards to the 2016 election. No evidence has been produced so far that substantiate any such collusion. The people who fanatically claim that there must have been such a connection are now disappointed. The long awaited Stone indictment was one of their last straws. But there is absolutely nothing in it that hints at any collusion.

All these alleged crimes were committed in relation to an appearance of Stone before a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) investigation.

During the 2016 election Stone publicly claimed that he was in direct communication with Wikileaks and its editor Julian Assange. Steve Bannon, then part of the Trump campaign, asked Stone to ask Wikileaks at what time it would release new batches of emails that had been obtained from the Democratic National Committee. The Trump campaign was naturally interested in using these releases to attack the competing candidate Hillary Clinton.

Wikileaks and Assange denied that they had any relations or communications with Roger Stone. It later turned out that Stone had two contact persons, the New Yorker comedian Randy Credico and the conservative writer Jerome Corsi, who he MIGHT have had some contact or insight into Wikileaks. The indictment says nothing about their relations to Wikileaks.

During his appearance in front of the HPSCI Stone misremembered, contradicted or lied about several details related to his earlier false claim. He also asked Randy Credico to lie to the committee. Those are the only issues the indictment is about. It is about the lies of a notorious liar which became process crimes when he repeated them during an investigation. Stone himself denies emphatically that he committed any crime and promises to defend himself in court.

Nowhere does the indictment say that this has anything to do with the Trump campaign, Russia, Wikileaks or the not existing relations between them.

But some media will not tell you that. The New York Times falsely headlines:

The first graph:
The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, revealed on Friday the most direct link yet between parallel efforts by the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks to damage Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election using Democratic Party material stolen by Russians.
There follow 28 paragraphs about the arrest and others issues, five pictures and the above graphic, but no explanation of the supposed link which, according to the indictment, Stone claimed to have but which never existed.

Stone claimed to have contact with Wikileaks. Bannon asked him to ask Wikileaks a questions. Stone had no relation with Wikileaks. He responded with second hand rumors and publicly available information. End of the story.

Mueller found no connection between the Trump campaign and anything Russia to influence the election. He indicted some people of issues unrelated to the elections. Others committed process crimes by lying to the investigation. He also indicted some Russians for money laundering and hacking. But those cases are quite dubious and will anyway never come in front of a court.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi attempts to divert from this disappointing outcome of the Mueller investigation. The Russian influence turned out be nothing. The collusion claim is dead. She is not allowed to blame Hillary Clinton for being the most unlikable candidate who run a lame campaign. Who then can be blamed for the outcome of the 2016 election? 

After some deep thinking Pelosi finally found the people who are guilty of winning Trump the election:

Washington, D.C. – Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued this statement after Special Counsel Mueller released a seven-count indictment of top Trump campaign advisor Roger Stone, for lying to Congress, witness tampering, and obstruction:
The indictment of Roger Stone makes clear that there was a deliberate, coordinated attempt by top Trump campaign officials to influence the 2016 election and subvert the will of the American people. ...

Top Trump campaign officials deliberately tried "to influence the 2016 election"? Holy moley! They "subverted the will of the American people" by asking them to vote for Trump? Incredible! The Trump campaign worked to get Trump elected? Isn't that illegal?

In the face of 37 indictments, the President’s continued actions to undermine the Special Counsel investigation raise the questions: what does Putin have on the President, politically, personally or financially? Why has the Trump Administration continued to discuss pulling the U.S. out of NATO, which would be a massive victory for Putin?

Last week we listed the many good things Trump did for Russia which proves that he is totally under Putin's influence. But that was meant as satire. In fact Trump made dozens of decisions that severely hurt Russia's interests. He lauds NATO and uses it to press other states to buy more U.S. weapons.

Do the Democrats think that spewing such nonsense will attract voters? Or is it a diversion from the fact that they fail to attack Trump's disastrous policies on all but the most minor issues?

Saturday, 26 January 2019

The FBI brings CNN along with them to arrest Roger Stone at 3 am.

Russiagate Farce: FBI Brings CNN Camera Crew to Film 3am Arrest of Roger Stone

25 January, 2019

The FBI dispatched a SWAT Team in full body armor along with a CNN camera crew to film the 3am arrest of former Trump advisor Roger Stone at his home in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. 

The staged media event came after a secret indictment of Stone on Thursday – not for anything relating to Trump-Russia Collusion’, but for unrelated ‘process crimes’ deriving from the Mueller investigation itself. Charges against him include lying to the House intelligence committee and Special Counsel probe, obstruction, and witness tampering. Stone maintains that the arrest was “politically motivated” and says he will be pleading ‘not guilty’ and will fight the charges in trial if necessary.

The FBI dispatched a SWAT Team in full body armor along with a CNN camera crew to film the 3am arrest of former Trump advisor Roger Stone at his home in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. 

The staged media event came after a secret indictment of Stone on Thursday – not for anything relating to Trump-Russia Collusion’, but for unrelated ‘process crimes’ deriving from the Mueller investigation itself. Charges against him include lying to the House intelligence committee and Special Counsel probe, obstruction, and witness tampering. Stone maintains that the arrest was “politically motivated” and says he will be pleading ‘not guilty’ and will fight the charges in trial if necessary.


IMAGE: A defiant Stone outside of the court house in Ft. Lauderdale.

Interestingly, prosecutors did not charge Stone with conspiring with WikiLeaks, or with the “Russian GRU” military intelligence agency who Mueller claims (despite having no real evidence) hacked the emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta.

Stone maintains that he is being “falsely accused” of making false statements to the House intelligence committee, and that any error he may have made in his testimony to Congress was not intentional.

Stone appeared at court in shackles later this morning, and was then released on a $250,000 bail. He did not enter a plea. This point was later reiterated by President Trump on social media:


“I will never testify against Trump.” This statement was recently made by Roger Stone, essentially stating that he will not be forced by a rogue and out of control prosecutor to make up lies and stories about “President Trump.” Nice to know that some people still have “guts!”
67.2K people are talking about this


Deep State Media Circus

One of the most bizarre parts of this story was the role played by the embattled cable news network CNN in the arrest. For some unknown reason, the armed FBI raid was conducted with a full CNN camera crew in tow, providing a live broadcast feed of Stone’s pre-dawn arrest.

CNN proceeded tp market the staged media event as a “CNN Exclusive”, with network supporters claiming that such an FBI ’embed’ was nothing more that a ‘tip off’ from a secret ‘source’ inside the FBI. Critics are asking why the FBI needed CNN to provide PR for this high-profile arrest event – and whether this unofficial government-corporate partnership is really politically motivated.

Neither the FBI, nor CNN, have fully explained how the Democratic party-aligned TV network was allowed to embed with the FBI in what appeared to be an overblown theatrical performance – complete with a full detachment of agents, carry semi-automatic weapons and wearing body armor in order to apprehend the 66 year old political pundit. Watch:








"FBI. Open the door.”

Watch exclusive CNN footage of the FBI arresting longtime Trump associate Roger Stone. Stone has been indicted by a grand jury on charges brought by special counsel Robert Mueller. https://cnn.it/2FZxnjd 



Watch exclusive CNN footage of the FBI arresting longtime Trump associate Roger Stone. Stone has been indicted by a grand jury on charges brought by special counsel Robert Mueller. https://cnn.it/2FZxnjd 

The fact that CNN’s has acted as the unofficial public relations arm of the FBI and the Mueller probe is disturbing to the say the least, and has raised serious questions about their claims of being an impartial news outlet.

He Said, She Said’

If Roger Stone was not actually involved in any ‘Trump-Russia Collusion’, then what is the Mueller probe targeting him?

According to RT International
It is alleged that Stone, who officially left the Trump campaign in August 2015, told campaign officials in July 2016 about future WikiLeaks (referred to in Mueller’s document as “Organization 1”) releases of damaging information found in leaked Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails. US intelligence claims the emails were hacked by Russian “government actors.”
During Trump’s campaign, Stone boasted about having connections with WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange, but later said it wasn’t a direct link. Instead, he said that he relied on New York radio host Randy Credico (named “Person 2” in the Thursday indictment) as a “go-between.”

It is believed that if Stone contests the charges and does take a plea bargain – then the Mueller probe will not have enough evidence to prosecute him, as this week’s allegations are recycled from old assertions which were believed to be ‘dead in the water’ before, but which were the only remaining plot lines which Mueller could attach to Stone.


Summary of arrest: NO crime by Trump, NO crime by Trump campaign, & NO crime by Stone during campaign. Indeed, no charge would exist at all but for , as these are all process charges that only exist because exists. Crime? Violating witch hunt rules.
Some legal commentators believe that this morning’s arrest is simply the last desperate attempt by Mueller to salvage some credibility from an investigation which has taken 2.5 years and cost at least $30 million in taxpayers funds – but never produced any real evidence of ‘Russian collusion’ with the 2016 Trump campaign.

It is believed that a desperate Mueller team may also stage another arrest next week – of author and ‘conspiracy theorist’ Dr Jerome Corsi, a former media associate of Stone, which is said to be Mueller’s final desperate attempt to conjure some connection between Julian Assange, WikiLeaks and the 2016 Trump campaign.

STAY TUNED FOR MORE UPDATES

DONALD TRUMP TO BE ARRESTED NEXT!! ROGER STONE GOES DOWN!




Peter Lavelle speaks common sense