Showing posts with label Ian Shilling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ian Shilling. Show all posts

Monday, 30 April 2018

Sunday Wire with Ian56 and Vanessa Beeley

'Exposing the Government-Media Complex' with guests Ian Shilling, Vanessa Beeley

Listen to "Episode #231 – 'Exposing the Government-Media Complex' with guests Ian Shilling, Vanessa Beeley" on Spreaker.


This week the SUNDAY WIRE broadcasts LIVE as host Patrick Henningsen is joined in-studio by Mike Robinson editor of the UK Column to discuss this week's top stories from the US, Europe and beyond.

In the first hour we'll go London to speak with independent media critic, Ian Shilling (follow him on Twitter at Ian56789) to talk about the British government and mainstream media's recent attack on bloggers and independent journalists who dare to challenge the official party line on alleged 'chemical attacks' by Syria and Russia.

Later in the second hour we'll try 21WIRE associate editor, Vanessa Beeley, to discuss her recent trip to Syria covering the conflict there, and also what witnesses in Douma said about the White Helmet's staged video purporting to be a chemical attack and subsequent the US-UK-France missile strike.


All this and much more. Enjoy the show...

Thursday, 26 April 2018

BBC hit-piece on "Russian trolls"

BBC propaganda is manipulative and uses innuendo and insinuation to create an impression


The BBC hit-piece made from the journalist Gabriel Gatehouse has appeared on-line. When I listened to the interview yesterday and heard this person reeling off questions from a piece of paper rather than conduct a proper interview I thought it was just a young wet-behind-the ears 20 -year -old who knew nothing.

Turns out he is one of the BBC’s “authorites” who speaks passable Russian and has been based ther among other places.



What hit me between the eyes was that he used the same footage from the Douma hospital that has been exposed as a fake by Syrian doctors speaking to Robert Fisk, amongst others without a single fact fact to back up the contention.

The whole narrative, according to the BBC, is beyond question without the need for facts to back it up and anyone who questions it,backed up with facts and testimony is just a “Russian bot” and is “parroting Russian propaganda”.

When I played it to a trusted friend she reacted strongly and called it “sinister”, as it indeed is. Pam observed that “they use sophisticated audio and visual effects to manipulate the minds of the audience tomake the Russians appear unreliable and sinister”.

The words that come to mind for me are: manipulative, innuendo, insinuation.

And of course lies of various desscriptions.

Watch the BBC version"



And compare it with the actual inteview (in full, as captured by Ian560).



Veteran journalist, John Pilger (who alone is worth more than a whoel batallion of contemparary BBC hacks) expresses the nature of the BBC better than anyone.


John Pilger: BBC is one of world's most refined propaganda services


Dr Marcus Papadopoulos on Sputnik discussing the true nature of Western media


As I was putting this together I found these comments I made a year agao:

Just as I will not engage with anyone who wants to push their own agenda including abrupt climate change I will not engage with anyone who denies what is happening geopolitically and makes throw -away comments about "fake news" , a meme that has been invented by a mainstream media that lies for a living on things that matter.

For those people who cast aspersions on Russian media I have been following media every day for almost 6 years and I have never once found a case where RT or Sputnik consciously lie or mislead. Their facts are almost invariably correct. They may omit things that don't suit them or show bias like any media.

This is in contrast with CNN, WaPost, NYT, BBC, Guardian who have concocted whole stories that have been demostrated to be totally false.

With all the acusations against RT etc I have NEVER ONCE found that they could give any examples of where they have lied. They are simple 'anti-democratic' (as in 'anti-Soviet') and guilty simply because they do not go along with the prevailing narrative and push with war against Russia, Syria. Iran and North Korea.


Wednesday, 25 April 2018

Ian56 Interview with BBC reporter Gabriel Gatehouse @ggatehouse for Newsnight


Ian56 (Ian Shilling) shows up BBC lies

Ian56 Interview with BBC reporter Gabriel Gatehouse @ggatehouse for Newsnight




This really has made my day.

Ian Shilling (Ian56) has revealed the lies of the BBC in advance of their Newsnight programme by releasing the entire interview in advance.




What it is a “journalist” (really a wet-behind the-ears stenographer) asking a series of question in what is clearly not designed to be an interview but to provide audio material that can be cut and edited into something they can use to distort, or even put words into his mouth.

To this end he reels off a list of events, whether he thinks they are false flags or staged events or not in some sort of expectation that he might come up with a ‘yes’ or a ‘no’ that can be used to paint the picture of a stupid conspiracy theorists.

Ian is far more clever than that and gives lengthy explanations for each that gave the evidence which showed where he stood without actually saying so.

Masterful, I would say.

Ian managed to use the situation to show up the ignorance and disinterestedness of the “interviewer”as well as the lies of the British government and media – in particular, the BBC.






My recording of my interview with BBC's Newsnight reporter Gabriel Gatehouse:-


Video link https://youtu.be/sFbPG6fOU1M

Gabriel's description of the piece he is producing to be aired on BBC's Newsnight April 24th:-

"I’m doing a piece for Newsnight about information wars. I’ve interviewed quite a range of people, including Tara McCormack of the Syria Working Group in the UK, and Ben Nimmo of the Atlantic Council. They provide very differing perspectives about what happened in Syria and Salisbury respectively. Your name came up in my discussions with Ben Nimmo. He said he thought you might be working for a Russian troll factory. It seems you took the opportunity to set the record straight on sky news. I’d be keen to hear your perspective."

The material I asked Gabriel to read after our interview had finished - sent to him on DM's:-

Short summary of the Atlantic Council's funding and background on DFRlab

https://www.reddit.com/r/syriancivilwar/comments/8ds45y/russian_bots_on_twitter_according_to_british/dxq4r5k/

Excellent article about my "relationship" with the Atlantic Council / DFR lab's Ben Nimmo & his personal Vendetta against me. His personal attacks against me have been running for some months:-

Oh Those Embarrassing Moments: Atlantic Council's Ben Nimmo Outs 'Russian Bot' That Turns Out To Simply Be A UK Citizen Tired Of UK Government Warmongering
https://steemit.com/news/@clarityofsignal/oh-those-embarrassing-moments-atlantic-council-s-ben-nimmo-outs-russian-bot-that-turns-out-to-simply-be-a-uk-citizen-tired-of-uk

Douma

Debunking the Douma False Flag / Staged Event by Jaish-al-Islam and White Helmet terrorists:-

Contrary to Neocon War Propaganda there is ZERO evidence of Assad ever using chemical weapons on his own people. The #FalseFlag's carried out by al-Qaeda linked terrorists in Ghouta August 2013, Khan Sheikhoun April 2017 and Douma April 2018
http://ian56.blogspot.com/2018/04/contrary-to-neocon-war-propaganda-there.html

I neglected to give Gabriel, Robert Fisk's excellent on the ground report from Douma:-

Legendary Middle East War Reporter Robert Fisk Reaches Syrian 'Chemical Attack' Site, Concludes "They Were Not Gassed"
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-17/famed-war-reporter-robert-fisk-reaches-syrian-chemical-attack-site-concludes-they

Khan Sheikhoun April 2017 
The Khan Sheikhoun alleged "gas attack" staged by al-Nusra and White Helmets terrorists in Idlib April 2017:-

US Intel 100% know that Assad did NOT use chemical weapons in Idlib, so what's Trump's Game?
http://ian56.blogspot.com/2017/04/the-false-flag-chemical-weapon-attack.html

Some of the alleged "victims" of the alleged chemical attack in April 2017 were admitted to hospital in Turkey, BEFORE the attack took place. This is not suspicious at all (sic).
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2017/10/un-report-on-khan-sheikhoun-23-of-victims-hospitalized-before-the-incident-happened.html

Gabriel then said the UN Report on Khan Sheikhoun had claimed "Assad did it"- but this report was a pure farce:-

I said:-
Nope the UN's report on Khan Sheikhoun was a complete joke. See former UN senior weapons inspector Scott Ritter's (of Iraq fame 2002/2003) write up on the UN report. There is NO chain of custody for the samples supplied to the UN by the al-Nusra terrorists in Idlib, or from Erdogan's Turkey from the alleged victims in Turkish hospitals.

If there's no Chain of Custody, there's no evidence. All we have is the word of the al-Nusra (al-Qaeda terrorists) who controlled Idlib and the town where the alleged chemical weapons attack took place.

Why the hell should anyone take the word of a terrorist who had every reason to stage a False Flag "chemical weapons attack"? The US & UK governments & media unquestioningly took the word of the terrorists. This is NOT Journalism. This is PROPAGANDA - regime change propaganda for the benefit of the terrorists who Assad is fighting.

You remember al-Qaeda right? They are the guys the US & UK governments accused of hijacking 4 planes and flying 2 of them into the World Trade Center on 9/11 murdering 3,000 Americans.
These are the guys the US & UK are SUPPOSED to be fighting (but are actually supporting in Syria).

The terrorists with the same al-Qaeda ideology also carried out the Bali bombing murdering about 200 Australian holiday makers and murdered 52 people in the terrorist attacks in London on 7/7 2005.

Khan Sheikhoun is a CLASSIC example of the mainstream media, including the BBC, NOT doing Journalism. Its very, very basic when examining the evidence of a potential chemical weapons attack to ensure the Chain of Custody of the samples - so why didn't the media stand up and say we don't have any Chain of Custody because no responsible independent party (like an OPCW investigations team) could visit the site of the alleged attack because it was infested with terrorists and it wasn't safe for anyone to go there who wasn't an ally of the terrorists?

I gave Gabriel some pictures comparing the Tokyo 1995 Subway attack using real sarin with First Responders wearing full Hazmat suits, versus the fake "sarin" staged event in Syria April 2017, where the White Helmets didn't even bother wearing gloves 

Skripal poisoning 

The best evidence from a a month ago - read the comment and the article debunking each one of the UK government claims:-

Craig Murray's article on "Russian to Judgement"
http://www.unz.com/article/russian-to-judgement/#comment-2250937

The following about the Skripal's was not included in my DM's to Gabriel.

UK government now seem to be changing their story, saying the poison was delivered "in a liquid form" - so not via a gel smeared on Skripal's front door handle, by a Russian wearing a full Hazmat suit at 4 O'Clock Sunday morning, unseen by anyone, then?

There is also considerable doubt as to what poisoned the Skripals.
"Military grade" Novichok will kill someone within 2 or 3 minutes if inhaled or within 20 minutes maximum, if absorbed by the skin.
So if the poison was on Skripal's front door handle why did it take between 3 or 7 hours - from leaving Sergei Skripal's house to having an effect,with them collapsing on the park bench around 4pm?
The government's official narrative is so full of holes - its like a slice of gorgonzola. 


The leaked Swiss OPCW lab's report says the Skripal's samples given to them by the UK government contain BZ toxin - which is slow acting and is a far less lethal toxin than nerve agents. I am awaiting more clarification on this evolving story.

N.B. we have no hard evidence that the Skripal's were actually poisoned. Yulia Skripal has not been allowed to do an interview to camera and there are no pictures of the Skripal's in hospital. Why????
There are also no pictures of the Skripal's collapsed on the park bench and being attended to by members of the public (as the UK government's official narrative claims happened). Why not? Almost every unusual event in a public space is recorded by someone on their phone camera - its so easy to take pictures (or short videos) these days.

Yulia Skripal seems to be being held hostage and incommunicado at an unknown location by the UK government. Surely she would want to speak with her boyfriend / fiancee in Russia, or her cousin Viktoria after the most terrifying event of her entire life?

Background to the escalating conflict with Russia from 2013 and the ongoing "Russiagate Hoax" started by the Hillary campaign in 2016 and still on-going in fits and starts (with absolutely zero credible evidence to back up the ridiculous claims).

Russiagate Background and History

Your Comprehensive Guide To, And History Of, The Russiagate Hoax
http://ian56.blogspot.com/2018/02/your-comprehensive-guide-to-and-history.html

MH17

You (meaning Gabriel) refused to answer my questions on MH17, which were:-

Who benefited from the shooting down of MH17?

There are only 2 realistic suspects, the separatists in Donbass (possibly with Russian gov help)
or
the Regime in Kiev (or their Neo Nazi militia allies, or Oligarchs) installed by Obama and Neocon Victoria Nuland in an illegal Coup D'Etat using Neo Nazi thugs and snipers to murder both protestors and police.

The Co- Founder of the Svoboda Nazis Andrei Parubiy was in charge of the buildings controlled by the protestors and used by the snipers to murder both protestors and Police in February 2014.
Andrei Parubiy is now the speaker of Ukraine's Parliament (or Rada).
Go do a google search using "Parubiy Svoboda"

Full Timeline of Obama and Neocon Nuland's Coup in Ukraine from March 2013 to Feb 2014
http://ian56.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/how-february-coup-in-kiev-was-plotted.html

So who gained from shooting down MH17?

Was it Putin?
Nope. As guaranteed by the mainstream media which contains ZERO journalists, Obama & Cameron immediately blamed Putin and the ethnically Russian separatists in Donbass, based on nothing but hot air and ZERO evidence. The SAME day or day after MH17 was brought down.

Russia was subjected to sanctions based on ZERO evidence and no motive, plus other undeserved penalties

Did the pro Russian separatists in Donbass benefit from shooting down MH17?
Nope - pretty much the same reasons as Putin.

Did the Regime in Kiev benefit from the shooting down of MH17?
Boy they SURE did. Russia got sanctioned, they got the support of Western media for IMF loans and they were hoping for massive amounts of US weapons and military logistical support.
Obama refused to give them most of the weapons they wanted. The US gave Kiev a couple of dozen of clapped out Humvee's with machine gun turrets and the UK government gave them around 20 cast off Stryker armoured cars.
Kiev continued to get CIA satellite pictures and AWACS surveillance to monitor the movement of the separatist forces.
They also got the US to start training the Ukraine army, which also included the Neo Nazi militias like the Azov brigade. Training started on Hitler's birthday April 20th 2015 - how appropriate! 

Where is the evidence for a BUK missile being fired to shoot down MH17?
We have no CIA / Pentagon infra red satellite pictures which would have pin pointed the site of any Buk missile launch to within 10 metres or less. Nope no pics.

Where are the dozens of pictures and videos from ordinary people within 10 to 15 miles of the supposed BUK launch site. A BUK missile trail is visible for 10 to 20 minutes after the launch (depending on the wind velocity, there was very little wind on that day). 

There are around 100,000 people living within around 10 miles of the alleged BUK missile launch site. (edit the true figure is nearer 250,000).
We would expect at least 10,000 of those people to have seen this massive rocket trail (its unmissable) and maybe 1,000 people or so, to take some pictures of it. But there are NO pictures. The only alleged pic to be taken is a discredited forged pic by a couple of Kiev regime supporters, which Bellingcat used in their Fake laughable "analysis" of MH17.

There are videos of luggage and other debris raining down to the ground near the MH17 crash site though.

The CIA know EXACTLY how MH17 was shot down and they will have a very good idea of who by. But they're not telling anyone and they're not providing any hard evidence (like infra red satellite pics).

The body of the Dutch Safety Board (DSB) and Joint Investigation Team (JIT) reports on MH17 is inconsistent with a thin skinned civilian airliner being shot down with a 96kg BUK missile warhead filled with 7,000 pieces of shrapnel from near head on, exploding 1 to 2 metres away from the cockpit. The damage is too light. There's too little shrapnel in the cockpit, plane or bodies. The Australian coroner's report says NO BUK missile shrapnel was found in any of the 50 to 100 Australian victims. Huh???

All this is just very basic journalism, basic Critical Thinking, and very basic research. But NOBODY in the Western media is interested in doing any Journalism or doing any basic research. They are ONLY interested in pushing propaganda on behalf of the Warmongers.

In fact nobody in the media is interesting in asking any questions at all. That's why the US & UK government's can get away with massive crimes and massive lies at will. There is no "Free Press" in the US & UK mainstream media - there is only a propaganda factory. Exactly like Stalin ran in the USSR or Goebbels ran in the 1930's.

My apologies for rabbiting on. But it really is about time that someone from the BBC started reporting something approximating to the truth using basic journalism, Critical Thinking and basic research instead of a shed load of lies by acting as stenographers for a corrupt War Criminal government - see Iraq, Libya, Syria, genocide in Yemen etc.

Gabriel: "Thanks for sending your thoughts Ian. I’m not ignoring you. Just got to crack on writing this story."

Me "Yes I understand. When you have a spare hour please read my links and DM's. Perhaps you could do it tonight after you get home and had something to eat?


An hour-long interview with Richie Allan that is worthwhile listening to.
Ian Shilling - The Journalist Who Owned SKY News After He Was Accused Of Being A Russian Bot!

Richie Allen


If you missed an equally-impressive performance, standing up to TWO hostile journalists from SKY News
"Russian bots" - Ian56 Completely Refutes UK Government's Malicious Allegations

Of "Russian bots' that are bloggers and warmongering media propaganda

Oh Those Embarrassing Moments: Atlantic Council's Ben Nimmo Outs 'Russian Bot' That Turns Out To Simply Be A UK Citizen Tired Of UK Government Warmongering


 in news •  4 days ago
Screen Shot 2018-04-20 at 9.09.41 AM.png
For the past few months, Ben Nimmo, the head of the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Labs has had his eye on one Twitter account in particular and he has relentlessly framed that account as being that of an influential "Russian bot" that is linked to the Kremlin. This post will reveal that the Atlantic Council's Ben Nimmo has displayed utter incompetency and a shameful display of research (or lack thereof), considering his position as head of DFR Lab, and considering the large amount of money that the Atlantic Council receives and spends on supposedly 'countering' disinfo (to be read as acting as "Thought Police") for the global elitist establishment.
A quick look at the Twitter feed of Ben Nimmo and The Atlantic Council's DFR provides screenshots highlighting the dates and times that Ben Nimmo was focused on the account Ian56.
Link to Ben Nimmo's Twitter account:
Images from link - Note in the first Tweet he celebrates Twitter taking Ian56's account offline.
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.41.17 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.45.11 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.46.02 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 1.49.25 PM.png
Note the ridiculous colorful graph in the retweet below. These types of colorful, meaningless, undecipherable graphics are constantly used by DFR Labs to paint a picture of supposed Russian troll activity. The account he retweets is very likely simply another newly created DFR Labs account. Doing such is a common and obvious psyop technique. I will provide other examples of these ridiculous colorful meaningless graphs at the conclusion of this post. It is my opinion that the Russian 'trolls' Ben Nimmo and the Atlantic Council refer to are, in actuality, simply concerned citizens of mainly western countries expressing their opinions and dissatisfaction regarding western imperialism and the crimes of the global elite, as well as their acolytes in top tier positions within government and corrupted mainstream media, these 'Russian trolls' are actually well-intentioned western citizens such as Ian56.
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.51.35 AM.png
Example of Ben Nimmo citing Ian56 as a pro-Kremlin troll - DFR report:
Screenshots from link:
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 9.12.06 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 9.13.33 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 9.14.48 AM.png
Additional images show Ben Nimmo's focus on Ian56:
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.53.20 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.53.33 AM.png
Due to Ben Nimmo and The Atlantic Council's allegations, on Friday April 20th, 2018 the owner of the account Ian56 decided to reveal himself to Sky News UK and revealed that not only is he NOT a Russian bot, but instead he is actually a concerned UK citizen who is upset with the war crimes of his own government and the murderous global elitists within it.
That Sky News interview is here:
Note in the interview above that both Sky News TV presenters first try to frame up the 'Russian bot narrative' for the public audience for the first 3 minutes and then, when questioning Ian, they attempt to discredit him through his past posts that are not related to the issue at hand. Note they also state that Ian has been "identified by the government". This statement in particular should be of serious concern to all British citizens as it implies that the Atlantic Council is acting on behalf of the UK government to identify UK citizens that do not adhere to the 'official' government line on matters related to foreign policy and global warmongering that benefits a select few elitists within the power structure. Thus, freedom of speech is in very serious danger of being cut off if official government affiliated organizations such as the Atlantic Council are allowed to "police thought" on the Internet and go after (dox) or shut down (via Twitter/Facebook/You Tube) concerned UK citizens that question 'official' government narratives that are clearly dubious and nefarious in nature. Up is down and down is up these days as people like Ian are castigated and censored while terrorists still have all their social media sites up and running. The terrorists are being given a free pass by western governments and the Atlantic Council. If one takes a look at the Atlantic Councils DFR Labs Twitter feed they will see that there is never any mention of any terrorists in Syria these days. They have simply forgotten about them. This could only be intentional omission. This is the Atlantic Council after all. What happened to the terrorists?
What we are seeing is Big Brother watching in the real world. Up is down and down is up. This is what George Orwell warned of in his classic dystopian novel "1984". The enemy has been switched from EastAsia to Eurasia without the public realizing it. Four years of anti-Russia propaganda will do that to ya. Metaphorically, Ian is Winston Smith from the novel while The Atlantic Council and Ben Nimmo are the deceptive "Thought Police" holding the keys to Room 101 which is controlled by the British government. Ian is all of us who are concerned about what the soulless, corrupt, murderous top tier people in government are doing with our tax money. If Ian is raked over the coals and silenced by Twitter (which is also colluding with the government) for simply wanting to stop war then we all are in the same undemocratic new fascism boat. We are all in danger of being shut down for speaking truth to power. We all are Ian. And yes Twitter did shut down Ian's account and silence him as all this went down this past week. There is no way to prove why Twitter did such, but it is highly likely that they acted upon information provided by The Atlantic Council and its incompetent employees. Ben Nimmo's tweet shows he celebrated Ian's account being locked. Ian's account is now back up and running, but this occurred only after he revealed who he was to Twitter and Sky News UK. He has a right to privacy and to speak his mind just like all of us do. Who is to say what is allowed? Gatekeepers like Ben Nimmo? I think not.
Who does Ben Nimmo think he is? The arbiter of truth? I think not.
Screen Shot 2018-04-20 at 9.22.58 AM.png
More images from Ian's Twitter account related to how he felt about the Sky News interview:
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.34.23 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.34.59 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.35.19 AM.png
The Guardian UK is still rolling with the misinformation on Ian and PartisanGirl from Australia at the time of this posting with no corrections made in regards to their publicly presented misinformation.
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 8.34.39 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 10.20.45 AM.png
On April 2nd, 2018 the CarrCenter Harvard in Washington D.C. held a two day Disinfo Symposium that featured Ben Nimmo and a number of his disinfo graphs and associates. Yours truly was even featured on one of the graphs as a Kremlin troll disinfo agent even though I am a USMC veteran and naturalized American citizen originally from the UK. 21st Century Wire was also featured along with my site in the same graph. Patrick Henningsen is an American living in the UK who runs 21st Century Wire and thus, he is also not a Russian bot (whatever a Russian bot is? Note these terms they bandy about have no real solid contextual meaning. They are purposely left ambiguous by them in order to blanket label dissenters to government policies). It just goes to show that anyone can end up on their radar if they simply tell the truth about what is really going on......me, Patrick, Ian, Vanessa Beeley, Eva Bartlett, Piers Robinson, Tim Hayward, Partisan Girl.......the list goes on. My focus has been on exposing terrorists and their supporters in OUR governments. That is what concerns me, and it is definitely of concern to me that Ben Nimmo and his Atlantic Council associates have decided that true patriots like me and Ian and the aforementioned truth revealers are now targets for character assassination by government orgs and their complicit media associates.
Screen Shot 2018-04-20 at 11.07.54 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-20 at 11.06.47 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 12.10.19 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 12.12.03 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-20 at 11.03.20 AM.png
Note also Bloomberg and New Yorker anti-Russia propagandist Masha Gessen at podium in image directly above.
Link to CarrCenter@Harvard Twitter account:
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 10.21.48 AM.png
Link to Tweet above (with Twitter links to 'official' disinfo outlets mentioned)....
Now lets look at what the Atlantic Council's "Thought Police" are trying to keep off the public radar. This is what they don't want people to know about the White Helmets who are actually terrorists disguised as rescuers.
Huge Cache of White Helmets Exposed Links All In One Massive Volume For Sharing and Red Pilling - Over 400 Images in 22 Files
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 10.24.07 AM.png
Roger Waters of Pink Floyd has recently came out and said what many of us have known all along and told the world about the fact the White Helmets are terrorists posing as rescuers of children in Syria. The genie has been let out of the bottle. What the Atlantic Council is participating in is damage control and obfuscation of these unpleasant highly revealing truths.
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 10.26.09 AM.png
Link to Roger Waters White Helmets speech from Barcelona. HD version:
Now lets look at the connections between Atlantic Council players that provide propaganda and disseminate info that helps facilitate the White Helmets ruse upon the general public.
Revealing the Links Between Brown Moses, Bellingcat, PropOrNot and the Atlantic Council in Relation to Psy Ops for Syria and Ukraine
Incriminating Video: European Endowment for Democracy Pledges Grant to SMART News Agency (FSA Promoters) in Syria in 2014 - Link also provides extensive evidence that the western supported Free Syrian Army is made up of terrorists groups that are affiliated with al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda in Syria) and ISIS.
This link exposes some of the lead White Helmet terrorists and their info agents, including Mouaz Moustafa who met with John McCain and introduced him to Syrian jihadists.
Now back to Ben Nimmo and his Tweets.....
As of Saturday April 21st, DFRLab's Twitter account has not made a peep about Ben Nimmo's major mistake made regarding Ian56. No apology has been forthcoming. I guess that one is going to just be swept under the rug.
Now for some more examples of the colorful graphs and misinfo that simply confuse and prove absolutely nothing. Here also are images with some incriminating material that clearly shows that The Atlantic Council provides info that props up the White Helmets in Syria. Between the White Helmets images I will provide more links with extensive evidence showing clearly that they are indeed terrorists.
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 11.00.18 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 11.12.13 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 11.01.36 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 11.02.17 AM.png
Massive White Helmets Photo Cache Proves Hollywood Gave Oscar to Terrorist Group
“Now You See Me” – Over 100 White Helmet Self-Posted Facebook Images Expose Fake Humanitarian Group as FSA Terrorists Linked with Al-Qaeda
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 11.04.47 AM.png
Direct Terrorist Collusion: Over One Dozen Videos Capture White Helmets Working Side-By-Side With Terrorist Groups in Syria
Additional images from DFRLabs show Atlantic Council/ Deep State connections -
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 11.05.59 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 11.07.04 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 11.15.08 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 11.16.38 AM.png
Tweets below reveal how anytime British politicians are criticized during elections or at other times, the old 'Russian trolls' trope is rolled out by Ben Nimmo and his Atlantic Council disinfo associates. The meme of labeling everyone who disagrees with UK, EU and US (western) government policies as a Russian troll grew old, tired and stale back in 2016, but apparently no one told Ben Nimmo or The Atlantic Council. The irony of calling everyone who disagrees with government actions a Russian troll is that doing such leads to the labeled person waking up to the fact that its all lies, an excuse to cover up for western governments nefarious doings, particularly when it comes to support for terrorist groups operating in Syria, which is now being more and more fully revealed. It must be considered that the use of this pathetic technique now and in the future constantly removes and/or negates the ability of western citizens to openly criticize their own governments for criminal acts. Thus, we can clearly see the modus operandi for such labeling of concerned citizens by certain parties affiliated with said corrupted governments. In a sense, it is a perpetual false flag being conducted against concerned western citizens who are against wars that enrich a select few global elitists and their proxies. Ironically, these citizens are actually being forced (through government taxation) to pay to be censored, propagandized and intentionally misled. The people that are conducting this perpetual false labeling and obfuscation of truth are not actually patriots. They are deceivers working against the best interests of the 99% of the general public held hostage to this insanity. Those that are being falsely labeled and silenced are the real patriots. Hence the actual reason for the You Tube/Google/Deep State censorship now. People are waking up to the lies and the Deep State is trying to keep that massive public wake up from happening. They are trying to put a lid on it and keep it beneath the surface of overall public perception.
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 11.17.29 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 11.18.23 AM.png
Wikispooks link on the Atlantic Council, plus screenshot:
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 11.29.39 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 11.30.40 AM.png
Wikipedia link for the description of who is actually behind the Atlantic Council.
Screenshot from link:
Screen Shot 2018-04-21 at 11.27.15 AM.png
Caveat: All information above, and my opinion derived from such, was acquired through postings conducted online by the individuals mentioned within the material and other researchers. I leave it up to diligent citizens to judge for themselves the validity of the aforementioned material and my opinions related to such, as is their right. This information is posted as a public service. Sometimes true patriotism requires dissent and revealing that which the powers that be would prefer remain in the shadows. I subscribe to the philosophy of USMC General Smedley Butler and believe war is a racket, a rich man's trick. I am a Marine Corps vet (1st Battalion, 6th Marines, 2nd Mar Div) who loves America and hopes to help save lives of innocent people and my brothers and sisters in the Armed Forces during this time of wars of deception and false flags (White Helmets). I believe my posts here at Steemit and my Clarity of Signal Wordpress site are very important for humanity right now and recommend people get red pilled and research these issues thoroughly themselves. I reserve my right to free speech and my opinion based on all the above information which is easily accessible online (Imagine if the mainstream media bothered to do the same when it comes to real reporting and research).
DFR Labs has previously equated my Clarity of Signal account with the alt-right movement (a false term concocted to divide and obfuscate, like so many others) when I revealed unpleasant truths about the Ukraine War and particularly the Azov Battalion's Nazi leanings. That post of theirs is here. It is notable that that narrative they were pushing fell apart. My personal response to their misreporting is provided at the link. I hope more people see this and concerned US, UK and EU citizens pick up the flag and do what I am doing and what Ian56 is doing, and what so many other truth revealers are doing. Now is the time for humanity to move past these wars for profit and hegemony, and instead work together towards a better world for all of us and not just the corrupt, murderous, warmongering global elite. I believe that is what Ian56 set out to do and in that respect I want to salute him as a true patriot and bringer of truth in an age of propaganda, false flags and deception conducted by western governments. The man deserves accolades, not the BS that the pathetic Ben Nimmo and the Atlantic Council chose to throw at him.
Link  to Ian's statement submitted to Sky News UK regarding why he is not a Russian bot.