US
allows Royal Dutch Shell to drill in the Arctic
Royal
Dutch Shell has been granted permission by the US government to begin
tentative drilling in the Chukchi Sea off the Alaskan coast.
RT,
31
August, 2012
Getting
the right for preliminary drilling is a step forward in the company’s
long-delayed effort to develop lucrative Arctic reserves.
Shell
will be allowed to begin preparatory work, but cannot drill in the
oil fields until the government verifies its spill containment
system, the US Interior Department said. The company has already
spent $4.5 billion in exploring for oil and gas off Alaska's coast.
Shell
has faced several delays in its planned Arctic drilling, and has been
eyeing offshore in Alaska since 2005. Fierce opposition from
environmentalists impeded previous plans. The groups say Shell had
not met the commitments laid out in its drilling plans and should not
be allowed to move forward at this point.
Shell's
vice president for Alaska Pete Slaiby put the government's decision
to allow some drilling as "exciting", saying that even if
Shell's drilling this year was limited, that would be an important
accomplishment.
Shell
has asked the government to extend its oil drilling season in the
Chukchi Sea beyond the September 24 deadline currently in place.
Without an extension, the chances of completing a well this year are
slim, Slaiby said.
Rival
Exxon Mobil has already teamed
up with the Russian oil company Rosneft to explore the vast
Arctic regions of Russia.
In
another development Exxon Mobil and Shell are reportedly seeking
greater stakes and operating control in the one of the world’s
biggest oil fields – the $46 billion Kashagan field in Kazakhstan.
Both companies are said to be in talks with the Kazakh government to
extend their production-sharing agreement for 20 more years according
to Bloomberg Businessweek.
Shtokman
is not put on hold indefinitely - Total
French
oil company Total, Russian group Gazprom, and Norway's Statoil have
not decided to postpone the Shtokman project in the Barents Sea
indefinitely, according to Total.
RT,
31
August, 2012
In
a statement on Friday Total said it "would like to point out
that there has been no decision by partners to postpone Shtokman
project." The company said it and partners in the Shtokman
project were studying the viability of the project as current
financing cost were too high.
Earlier
this week Gazprom, the main shareholder in the project, said the
Shtokman partners had decided the project was too expensive to
proceed with. Gazprom hasn’t commented on Total’s statement yet.
Launched
in the 1990s the huge Shtokman project, has been put off by several
factors, including the shale gas revolution in the United States
which had been viewed as a primary export market for Shtokman. High
costs and disagreements between partners have also hampered the
development of Shtokman.
Located
in Russia’s Arctic, the Shtokman gas field is one of the largest
deposits holding almost 4 trillion cubic meters – enough to meet
global demand for about a year. Gazprom holds a controlling stake of
51% in Shtokman, while Norway’s Statoil owns 24% and Total holds
25%.
US
shale gas threat to Shtokman
Though
Russia’s Gazprom named high costs as the reason for the Shtokman
project being put on ice, experts say the US shale gas revolution
contributed to the decision. The day before Gazprom's announcement on
Shtokman, Russia's Minister of Economic Development Andrey Klepach
said he sees "serious" risks posed by shale gas to the
revenue of Gazprom from 2014, as higher supply from the US may hurt
prices and demand for Russia's pipeline gas.
"Gazprom
undervalued the importance of shale gas, but is starting to look at
it seriously," Deputy Economy Minister Andrei Klepach said as he
presented a weaker outlook for the country’s exports in 2012.
“Thanks
to booming shale gas production the US could become a gas exporter by
2022. In 2011 gas exports from the US rose by 36.2%,” said Yulia
Voitovich from Investcafe. As US gas imports decline, its traditional
sources Algeria, Qatar, Nigeria and Australia are beginning to tap
new markets such as Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, she
explained.
“The
US shale gas itself won’t compete with Russia’s pipeline gas, but
growth in US production could result in reduced gas exports from
Russia”.
The
country’s Energy Ministry has already announced plans to adjust its
strategy through to 2030. Meanwhile Gazprom has set up a committee to
review the development of shale-gas projects.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.