Geoengineering:
Dangerous Proposal Or Lethal Reality?
by
Dane Wigington
29
September, 2012
In
recent years there have been numerous scientists and scientific
agencies discussing the challenges with global warming and suggesting
ways to remediate further global warming from occurring. These
solutions, labeled as “geoengineering”, range from the realistic
and possible, to the clearly impossible and absurd. The question is:
Is geoengineering currently being advertised as a ‘proposed
solution’ when in reality geoengineering is already taking place?
If geoengineering is occurring, is it a reasonable strategy to combat
global warming, or is it a potentially catastrophic measure that has
lethal consequences? Lastly, is the intent of geoengineering being
advertised to the general public as a way to stop the problems
associated with global warming, when in actuality there are other
agendas taking place?
The
massive elephant in the room is that geoengineering programs are
real; they are currently being deployed across the globe and have
been for at least several decades. Stratospheric Aerosol
Geoengineering (SAG) and Solar Radiation Management (SRM) are
programs designed to saturate the stratosphere with reflective
aerosols through the use of modified jet aircraft. Unfortunately,
most scientists are either turning a blind eye to SAG and SRM, or are
simply misleading the public intentionally as to their existence.
These programs are stated in numerous patents and documents (about
150), are openly discussed in U.S. Congressional hearings on weather
modification, and are outlined by numerous scientific agencies
including the Royal Society, the United Nations, and the UK
Meteorological Society.
Those
unconvinced of the current deployment of such aerosol campaigns need
only look more closely at the available data now accumulating across
the globe. An objective analysis on just the surface can convince
even those who are most skeptical that indeed geoengineering is
occurring and there are devastating effects taking place.
- Consistent horizon-to-horizon aircraft trails that slowly expand and merge until the entire sky is often covered with a blanket of artificial cloud. Bright trails that seem to dissipate (but leave the sky a silvery white, often with “cob web” like wispy clouds) appear to be yet another method of dispersing geoengineering particulates.
- Elements such as Barium, Aluminum, Strontium, and Manganese showing up in lab tests of precipitation in lethal quantities across the globe. For example, a lab test for a single rain event taken in Shasta County, California in 2006 measured 7 parts per billion (ppb) for aluminum, already high, and less than five years later at the same location a single rain event measured 3450 ppb for aluminum. This is an increase of nearly 50,000%.
- According to the California Air Resources Board (CARB), which has studied aerosols migrating from China and other locations around the globe, elevation in aluminum ratings are NOT due to any aerosols that may be migrating from China due to their industry.
- Tests have determined that the soil PH has been so radically changed in the forests of the Pacific Northwest, that tests from Shasta and Siskiyou Counties for example, have changed as much as 15 times toward alkaline.
- Aquatic insect populations have been severely affected by metal contamination in the formerly pristine watershed in regions of northern California. Aquatic insect population has declined as much as 95%, according to 35-year US forest Service veteran biologist Francis Mangels.
- “Global dimming” — the reduction in the amount of global direct sunlight that reaches the earth’s surface -– has increased 20% due to reflective metal particulates in the atmosphere reflecting sunlight.
- Global drought is now the norm with few exceptions.
- Verified massive ozone holes are now present over the northern and southern hemispheres.
- Atmospheric conductivity has increased radically, thus leaving the earth more prone to increased lightning strikes.
- The Arctic Methane Emergency Group (AMEG) has recently called for “emergency war-time-scale geoengineering” to avert a planetary emergency unfolding in the Arctic — an attempt to stop the imploding Ice cap and methane mass expulsion.
- The US military has repeatedly stated its intense interest in such programs for strategic military purposes, i.e. “Owning The Weather By 2025″ (pdf here).
Some
may be shocked to know that the above examples exactly match the
expressed goal of numerous geoengineering patents. In addition, the
metals that are showing up all over the globe also precisely match
the elements named in numerous geoengineering patents. It does not
appear that this bombardment of toxic materials (notably aluminum,
barium, strontium) is decreasing either; on the contrary, it appears
to be increasing rapidly. Unfortunately, many government officials,
including Obama Science advisor John Holdren, have openly stated
their support for global aerosol geoengineering.
In
the midst of all this metal showing up in our soil and water, our
forests are suffering huge losses. Forest fires are out of control
around the northern hemisphere. At of the end of August, over
74,000,000 acres burned in Siberia alone. Many other countries have
had prolonged states of emergency from record wild fires as well.
Drought, the main consequence associated with geoengineering
aerosols, also is reaching an epidemic level this year.
It
is important to understand how forest fires and drought apply to
geoengineering. In addition to robbing the environment of moisture,
an atmosphere saturated with geoengineering particulates also
increases atmospheric conductivity. With the forests at record low
moistures levels due to the drought this year, the effects of the SAG
and SRM have proved a devastating combination as dry-lighting strikes
have become widespread, thus fueling spontaneous wildfires.
Clearly,
with geoengineering, the weather on the earth can be modified by the
timing and quantity of particulates being sprayed into the
environment. This begs the question of the true intent of
geoengineering. Is it a potential way to gain power via control of
the weather rather than a proposed solution to prevent global
warming? It appears as though the primary motivation for pursuing
geoengineering by the U.S. military may be the strategic advantage of
weather modification during times of war. Controlling the weather
creates a powerful force multiplier for a nation’s military during
a conflict. For example, if one nation were able to ground an entire
country’s air force because of severe weather, or create a drought
so bad that a nation is weakened internally and rebellion against its
leaders takes place, a nation could win a war before firing the first
shot.
The
U.S. military historically has been vocal about the desire to be able
to modify the weather going back to the 1940’s, when they partnered
with General Electric, which was researching weather modification at
that time. For the third time, the president of Iran has stated that
he believes his country is the victim of ongoing NATO
weather-modification assaults that have left his country in a dire
state of drought. Officials in Pakistan also have made similar
accusations. Recently, when the government of Thailand drug its feet
in regard to granting a new base in their country for the U.S. to
“monitor” weather changes (conduct weather modification?) they
were decimated by record flooding. Coincidence?
Closer
to home, don’t overlook the still-worsening drought decimating the
continental U.S. Is it yet another coincidence that Monsanto (the
world’s largest genetically modified seed company) has introduced
its newest drought- and aluminum-resistant corn in the midst of this
unfolding disaster? This point is well documented in the recently
released film “Why In The World Are They Spraying” produced by
film maker Michael Murphy. Murphy also documents in the film the
weather derivatives market, which amounts to casino bets place on
weather catastrophes — where they will occur and who they will
effect. Could this be the corporate/industrial/military complex
manufacturing weather catastrophes and then making massive profits of
the damage done? All indications point towards a new type of
profit-investment market, disaster capitalism.
Who
are the players that appear to be involved? Things that can be said
for certain are, The Raytheon Corporation, which is up to its neck in
weather-modification patents and appears to do all the weather
modeling for The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA)
and the National Weather Service. Another player in this gamble on
the future of our planet is The Lockheed Martin Corporation, which is
also heavily invested in the weather modification business and
appears to do all the weather modeling for the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA). Could the foxes be watching the hen house? Are
they predicting weather at this point, or giving us the “weather
schedule”? If they were, would they want to disclose this?
Many
ask if the materials that are being deposited in our atmosphere are
part of jet fuel, or are they part of a “payload” delivery system
that is actually sprayed, however all data points to the latter.
First, there is already a patent for a “powder contrail generator”
which would be used for this exact geoengineering purpose. Next, the
massive amount of metal aerosol tonnage proposed by geoengineers to
be dispersed on an annual basis (20,000,000 tonnes according to
internationally recognized geoengineer David Keith), is simply far
too much for any type of fuel additive. There are also countless
compelling photos and extensive film footage that clearly indicate
spraying from separate nozzles on the plane. Shockingly, some of this
footage actually shows spray coming from the front wing of a
rear-engine jet, with visible spraying from nozzles starting and
stopping at various times.
So,
why in the world are they spraying if it is doing so much damage to
the planet and life on earth? It would seem because they can, and
there is no one to stop them. The craving for absolute control
appears to have no bounds or limits even if that quest puts the
seekers themselves at risk. Why did the same power structure feel the
need to detonate more than 1,800 nuclear weapons even though that has
contaminated all life? Why has the same power structure constructed a
nuclear arsenal large enough to destroy life on earth some 12,000
times over?
Coming
up with an answer to such questions is difficult. What it is possible
to say is that a mountain of data confirms the harsh and lethal
reality of global geoengineering. The ongoing spraying appears to be
completely disrupting all natural weather patterns, creating
catastrophic global droughts, shredding the ozone layer,
contaminating our soils and waters, and even more critical, poisoning
every breath we take with microscopic metal and chemical nano
particles that are extremely damaging to the human body.
As
if all this was not enough, the damage done to the planet now appears
to have reached a critical point. Catastrophic methane release has
been triggered on the East Siberian shelf of the Arctic. Though
methane is often considered to be about twenty times more potent a
greenhouse gas than C02, this is over a hundred-year time horizon.
Over a twelve-year time horizon, methane is considered to be perhaps
100 times more potent than CO2. To put this in context, the methane
release that has been triggered is a global game-changer in and of
itself, with potential consequences that are unimaginable. Global
geoengineering is literally putting life on earth in a dangerous
balance. All available data has led this author to the conclusion
that short of nuclear annihilation, the ongoing global geoengineering
atmospheric spray programs are the greatest and most immediate threat
to life on earth.
So
what can we do? Raise awareness at a grass roots level. This is the
only way to battle this issue. All governmental agencies and
representatives are part of the corporate/industrial complex and no
ground can be gained through the “system”. I say this after ten
years of effort working in conjunction with the California EPA, the
Cal Energy Commission, the Cal water quality, the USDA, USFS and
other institutions. Only when the population at large is made aware
of the fact that they are being sprayed like lab rats can the
geoengineering be brought to a halt. If the population is aware,
military personnel and families will then be aware, and we would hope
they would at some point refuse to participate in their own demise.
There are many good people in the military that would care if only
they were informed. Certainly, they will never be told by the system
they are in.
How
do we raise awareness? From our own home computers we can all work to
locate and identify people, groups, and organizations that would care
if they only had a clue. These groups can include journalists,
environmental organizations, ADD groups, Alzheimer’s, autisms and
agriculture organizations. The list is endless. The film mentioned
above, “Why In The World Are They Spraying” can and should be
handed out. The film producer has generously allowed reproduction as
its goal is to get the word out, not for profit. (Though it should be
mentioned that the only way the film producer’s efforts can
continue is by film sales, so if you really want to help, buy at
least one commercial copy then make duplicates from that). The
website “geoengineeringwatch.org” is also a tool for educating.
It’s
up to us. Geoengineering is not just another environmental issue, it
is the issue. The ongoing implementation of these programs is
virtually decimating the biosphere from top to bottom. If it is not
brought to light and to a halt, all other issues will soon enough
become moot. Geoengineering is a lethal reality.
_______________
Dane
Wigington has an extensive background in solar energy. He is a former
employee of Bechtel Power Corp. and was a licensed contractor in
California and Arizona. Personal residence was feature in a cover
article on the world’s largest renewable energy magazine, Home
Power. He owns a 1,600-acre “wildlife preserve” next to Lake
Shasta in northern California. He focused his efforts and energy on
the geoengineering issue when he began to lose very significant
amounts of solar uptake due to what ever-increasing “solar
obscuration” caused from the aircraft spraying as he also noted
significant decline in forest health and began testing and research
into the geoengineering issue about a decade ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.