Tiny
fragments of a device of apparent extraterrestrial origin may hold an
invaluable secret to advancing health care in the US, but open
discussion of that fact may be subjected to information policing by
the Obama administration.
The
sad irony of the situation is that a president who campaigned and won
on a platform of truth and openness and who has just presented a
comprehensive plan on ABC in prime time to reform the nation's
medical care may unwittingly be preventing discussion that could lead
to a breakthrough which would revolutionize health
care.
Complex
miniature devices of unknown and apparent extraterrestrial origin
have exhibited a remarkable ability to be assimilated into the human
body as foreign objects without inflammation or rejection by the
human immune system. The mysterious coating on these objects, if
fully understood, could revolutionize organ
transplant and other operations that require pins, screws and plates
to be implanted in the human body.
The
New York Times, however, is reporting that while
the Obama administration
has asked the public for new ideas with the unveiling of an
open-government website, the administration is considering steps to
curtail free speech and discussion of the UFO issue on the prejudiced
supposition that UFO subjects are somehow 'fringe' –the modern term
for heresy, which was considered a crime against the church when
Galileo published his findings in opposition to the conventional
wisdom of his time.
The
White House tried to screen out some of the more unusual comments in
the second phase of the process. Ms. Noveck summarized the
most significant ideas, then invited comments on them
at blog.ostp.gov.
Visitors could flag off-topic comments, which were then shunted to a
separate part of the site. That reduced the birth certificate and
U.F.O. comments to a relative trickle. —The New York Times
The
argument goes –from guys like Clay Shirky,
who ought to know better –that important public debate should not
be 'hijacked' by a vocal minority. This view is more likely ill
informed than disingenuous, but in either case it flies in the face
of the facts. The UFO issue can hardly be painted as the interest of
a 'fringe' minority.
Polls
show that 50 +% of the American people believe some UFOs are
extra-terrestrial spacecraft and 85 +% believe their government is
not telling the truth of the matter.
Suppressing
free speech on matters such as physical evidence of UFOs
uncomfortable to the psyche of a select few who would monitor the
content of the public debate is an insidious form of censorship.
The
spirit of the first amendment aside, what is at stake is a health
care breakthrough that would save millions of dollars and thousands
of lives –if research is funded and accomplished to understand why
the mysterious devices exhibit an unusual ability to assimilate
themselves inside the human body with no reaction from the immune
system.
***
The
fragments in question are the remnants of an enigmatic device removed
from the toe of a subject which was apparently some kind of tagging
and tracking unit. Veteran implant-removal specialist Dr.
Roger Leir made
the announcement at a press conference held by the Paradigm Research
Group immediately after the 2009 X Conference in Washington,
D.C. Leir's presentation
of the biological nature of the mysterious implants was complemented
by the results of a material analysis conducted by Dr
Alex Moser, Ph.D.
The
implications of the material's composition and apparent function are
paradigm shifting. At the time, the implant analysis report was
overshadowed by Apollo 14 Astronaut Edgar Mitchell's statement of
belief that ET has been here for some time and that the elements of
the government who
actually know this have been keeping that information
highly compartmentalized.
Since then, however, a highly credentialed physicist has spoken out
on the issue, a nationwide radio host has investigated the report and
the story has begun to gain legs.
For
just-the-facts UFO investigators, Leir and Moser offered
the compelling news of the 2009 X-conference press conference: hard
evidence that can be analyzed and
results that point toward non-human origin of the device.
Due
to a number of unusual characteristics documented in the analysis,
there are only two conclusions that can be arrived at as to the
origin of the implants:
Either
an unknown agency of extraterrestrial nature is manufacturing highly
sophisticated biomechanical devices
and implanting them inside human bodies,
Or
some terrestrial agency with enormous resources has achieved
nanotechnology fabrication capability beyond currently known limits
and is doing the same thing.
Either
possibility is unsettling.
That
the first possibility is a credible concern alone is enough to be
front-page news. The mainstream media truth embargo about UFO/ ET
evidence or the amount of science required to present the story may
account for the fact it wasn't.
Here
is what we know:
Background:
In
2003 a sophisticated use of the
Roper Organization by Bigelow resulted
in a solid estimate that of about 2% of the population has likely had
an experience of the nature termed abduction. In order to avoid any
kind of data skewing it was necessary not to telegraph the nature of
the inquiry.
Certain questions designed to reveal characteristics pointing to
abduction were inserted into in three separate Limobus surveys
conducted by Roper. A false positive trigger question was included to
identify those who could not have been abducted but were giving
positive answers.
Successful
abductions include selective amnesia of the event and thus accounts
of abduction often need to be retrieved by hypnotic regression. A
large percentage likely goes unreported.
Roper's
representative American sample of about 6000 adults (with a sampling
error of 1.4 percent!) showed that one out of every 50 people met
the abductee profile.
This figure suggests that about 33,000,000 individuals had been
abducted in America. A closer look at these specific profiles showed
that these people were not "average" at all. —Report on
the Roper Analysis Data
A
characteristic of the accounts is the implantation of a small device
at various locations on the body. The presumed reason for this would
be subject tracking and data gathering –a process humans have
developed while gathering information about the other species
inhabiting our planet. Once you consider an advanced intelligence of
some form operating in our biosphere, the notion of small implants
for data capture and tracking is a trivial leap.
Dr.
Roger Leir is
an acknowledged pioneer in the field of implant detection and
removal. Since 1995, he has conducted 15 surgeries to remove
enigmatic objects from subjects who reported abduction experience by
non-human entities. These surgeries removed miniscule metallic
devices detected by X-Ray. The objects themselves constitute some of
the rare hard evidence of extraterrestrial origin –and thus
technology and thus intelligence –available in the wake of tens of
thousands of UFO sightings annually worldwide.
The
most recent and significant of the implant removal cases is the
object removed by Leir last
year and presented at the conference.
The
Devices:
While
in the body, a device is identified on X-Ray, located precisely with
a CAT scan. It shows up as a metallic object where one should not be.
There is no apparent entry point, which implies that the object was
either inserted with an advanced form of medical implant technique or
somehow grew in place. The latter is highly unlikely given the
complex nature of the device.
The
devices exhibit a measured magnetic field of 5 mGauss.
A refrigerator door magnet, by comparison is 15mGauss.
There are no natural objects in the human body we know of that have
magnetic fields anywhere near this strong. There are some magnetic
fields associated with the operation of the nervous system, but these
are extremely weak (on the order of micro Gauss, or less). The
earth's magnetic field is approximately 300 mGauss,
in most areas, so this is about 1/ 30th of the earth's magnetic field
strength.
Alex Moser speculates
that the magnetic field of the device may have a function in powering
it, via zero-point energy, or in helping to generate the radio
signals it was emitting before removal from the subject.
The
devices emit RF transmissions on several frequencies, ranging from
the extremely low frequency of 9 cycles per second, which corresponds
to a naturally occurring human brain wave frequency up to the
gigahertz range. The 9 Hz ELF frequency observed is said to have
applications in mind control.
The
17 MHz signal is in an aeronautical mobile (aircraft communication)
band, and the 20 GHz frequency
is in a satellite communication band.
While Moser thinks
that the implant may have had mind influencing/ control as one of its
functions, he also considers it possible that aliens use our
communication bands for some of their own (heavily encrypted)
messages, perhaps to be able to more easily listen in on human
communications.
No
recordings of the RF emissions has been made and no attempt made to
do signal analysis of the emissions, so what information may be being
broadcast, if any, is unknown at this time.
As
for power output, Moser reports
that "we do not have quantitative data on the signal strength,
but an educated guess as to the power output would be
10-100 mWatts.apparently
transmitting continuously, unlike an RFID chip,
which only transmits a very low-power RF burst, when irradiated by a
nearby transmitter. Monitoring of the signals did not take place for
a sufficiently long time interval to determine whether the
transmissions were influenced by the subject. The signals ceased
after removal from the subject. In this case, the cessation of
transmission may have been due to the implant breaking into pieces on
removal, but the RF signals also ceased in previous implants which
were removed intact."
The
power source for these embedded devices is unknown. One assumption is
that power for the device is somehow biochemically extracted from the
surrounding body.
A
second theory from Dr. Koontz contends that the low frequency
emanations from the device may be the signature of a scalar energy
extraction system –which could lead to an understanding of
propulsion systems required to travel to the stars.
The
interface between the unusual object and the human body is a thin
later of material which connects the object with the surrounding
tissue in such a way that the foreign body becomes part of the human
body. There seems to be a coating on the outer edge of the object
that facilitates this process. The potential for this coating to
remove the issue of inflammation and rejection of implanted material
in the human body is significant. All medical procedure that involves
stitching together the human body with pins, screws, stints and
plates would benefit from this coating.
No
known incident explains the presence of the object in the
subject's subject's body. We don't know how it got there, we
don't know why it wasn't rejected, we don't know what powers it and
we don't know why it is emitting RF transmission on range specific
frequencies.
The
Material:
Once
removed, analysis of the object fragment indicates a level of
material fabrication beyond the limits of publicly announced human
capability. It also demonstrates material components not consistent
with materials found on earth.
Included
in the complex structure are carbon nanotubes,
small molecular constructions of carbon atoms, which terrestrial
science is just beginning to understand and utilize.
One
of the most significant indicators of extraterrestrial origin is the
variance of isotopic ratios of the composite elements from normal
terrestrial elements. If
you take an element such as Nickel or Silver, there are several
different isotopes of that element available in nature. The isotope
of an element refers to the specific arrangement of the electrons
orbiting the nucleus, and a moderately heavy element like a metal may
have the same number of electrons arranged in different numbers in
the bands surrounding the nucleus.
The
ratio of common isotopes of an element is fixed and common to the
element on earth, however specimens recovered from space exhibit
different ratios of the isotopes than terrestrial atoms.
The
extracted implant material exhibits isotopic ratios at variance with
that of terrestrial elements. If this measurement is correct, the
implication is that the only way this material could have been
manufactured is if the fabrication facility had access to a supply of
extra-terrestrial materials or the technology to produce
non-terrestrial isotopic ratio metal –an unlikely possibility.
When
researching this kind of UFO evidence, however, one must proceed
carefully. In an email, Moser expressed
a concern that one of the measured isotopic ratio anomalies may
be instrumentation or measurement error.
Moser's caveat
is that "as stated in the report, the analysis lab could not
give adequate explanation for the Ni isotopic anomaly. However, I am
fairly certain the error is derived as described in the report (beam
broadening as a result of high nickel loading within the analyzer)."
This
does not explain all of the isotopic ratio anomalies, however, and
further research is needed.
Prior
Isotopic Ratio Anomalies:
The
2009 Leir implant
removal is the first time such material has been detected in an
obviously fabricated operational device inside a human being,
although there have been reports of isotopic anomalies in
material alleged to have been recovered from a crashed ET
spacecraft.
A
1997 report in CNI News
discusses in detail the major prior instance of isotopic anomalies in
alleged extraterrestrial material, which has not been followed up
with adequate verification research:
On
the morning of July 4, 1997, in an auditorium in Roswell, New Mexico,
hundreds of news reporters and other interested onlookers came
together for what was billed as a press conference on the scientific
testing of an object said to have been recovered from the crash of a
UFO near Roswell in 1947.
The
main speaker, Dr. Russell Vernon Clark, a chemist from the University
of California at San Diego, delivered prepared comments and then
immediately left the auditorium, frustrating many journalists who
wanted to ask him questions. Even so, Vernon Clark's
announced findings undoubtedly represented the biggest surprise of
the week-long festival called Roswell UFO Encounter 97. —CNI News,
1997
These
graphs, from the 1997 CNI News
report, reproduced here with permission, shows the isotopic ratio
differences in the 1997 sample from naturally occuring elements
Posts
