There
seem to be two parallel and simultaneous developments:
- the Americans (illegally) setting up an airbase in north-eastern Syria
- the Turks invading northern Iraq (ostensibly to provide training to the Kurdish Pashmerga)
US
experts are reconstructing and equipping a desolate airport special
to carrying agricultural products in the region controlled by the
Kurdish forces in Hasaka region, Northeastern Syria, to turn it into
a military base.
By Fars
News Agency
4
December, 2015
The
Lebanese al-Akhbar newspaper reported on Saturday that a number of US
experts have entered the region since 50 days ago to develop and
prepare the runways with 2,500m length and 250m width to be used by
fighter jets.
Abu
Hajar airport which has not been used since 2010 is located in Tal
al-Hajar region in the Eastern countryside of Hasaka which is
controlled by the Kurdish People’s Defense Units (YPG).
The
airbase is located Southeast of the town of Rimelan, which is one of
the YPG’s main strongholds and “largest arms and ammunition
depots”.
The
US has not received or even asked for a permission from Damascus for
reconstructing the airbase. The United States does not have a UN
mandate for interventing in the Syria war.
The
airport will help enable Washington to add an additional safe place
to land its forces, commando units for instance, and bring in
military support to its allies who are working to finalize control
over Southern Hasaka countryside, al-Akhbar said.
The
report came over a week after the Kurdish region said that the US and
Kurdish forces were working together to construct a 10 hectare
military airbase South of the town of Rimelan in the village of
Rimelan al-Basha.
“American
experts are directly supervising the airbase with a Kurdish
workforce,” the reports claimed, saying that US unmanned aerial
vehicles (UAVs) had been flown from the facility to test it.
The
report also said that two helicopter had flown over the town of
Rimelan on November 24 and landed eight US military specialists at
the airport.
Interestingly,
the Kurdish YPG issued a statement saying that “two unknown
helicopters” had flown over Rimelan on the same day.
The
following day, the Kurdish media said that residents in the nearby
village of Cil Axa had heard helicopters overhead, although they
claimed they were Turkish.
"NATO
and the United States should change their policy because the time
when they dictate their conditions to the world has passed,"
Ahmadinejad said in a speech in Dushanbe, capital of the Central
Asian republic of Tajikistan
‘Turkish
Troops on Iraqi Ground Could Be Used to Fight Against PKK’
Baghdad
is demanding the immediate withdrawal of Turkish troops from northern
Iraq. Radio Sputnik discussed the issue with political analyst and
former advisor to Iraqi President Jalal Talaban, Hiwa Osman.
4
December, 2015
Earlier,
various media reports said that about 130 Turkish military
personnel had been deployed to the Mosul area allegedly
to provide training to Kurdish Peshmerga.
The
deployment "is considered a serious violation of Iraqi
sovereignty," the statement added.
Turkish
media earlier reported that around 150 Turkish soldiers backed
by 20 to 25 tanks had been transported to the Bashiqa
area northeast of Mosul, Daesh's main hub in Iraq.
Speaking
to Sputnik in an exclusive interview, former Iraqi advisor
to the president Hiwa Osman said, “It is very difficult
to tell right now because the full information is not out,
but judging by the statements of the Prime Minister
and the President of the Republic it doesn’t seem to be
any official Iraqi knowledge. There may have been deals with the
Kurdish political party on the ground to come and train
some of its forces but that is again according to some
Turkish officials.”
Osman further said, “We are yet to hear from the KDP as to exactly what is going on because if they are to enter they will be entering through the KDP territory the political party that is led by Mossaud Barzani, President of the region and we haven’t heard anything from him yet.”
“Judging by their track record over the last year and a half, Turkey is really not serious about fighting ISIL and their number one priority is the PKK the Kurdistan Workers' Party that is fighting ISIL and they see them as a threa to themselves. One fear is that these troops could later on fight the PKK,” the analyst noted.
“Turkey has done this in the past. They came in the mountainous areas of Iraqi Kurdistan to come after PKK but they weren’t so successful in the past. I don’t think that they will be successful this time.”
Talking about what stance NATO will take on this new development, Osman said that NATO is something that Turkey uses to try and hide behind to avoid fighting ISIL.
“Even with the PKK it has forced many countries to enlist them in their lists of terror because it is using its membership of NATO. They shouldn’t use NATO as carte blanche for everything they want to do. If I was NATO I would seriously reconsider this,” Osman said.
He also said that Turkey started to move only after Russia seriously started to get involved in the war against Daesh (ISIL). “I think they fear that if they don’t do anything, there will be implication that they don’t mind what ISIL is doing in the region.”
He went on to say that since Russia got involved things have started moving faster and had Russia not gotten involved Daesh would have kept growing stronger. “Today there is a serious player i.e. Russia and Vladimir Putin. I think he is the only one in this coalition who knows exactly what he wants and Russian involvement has forced everyone else to be clear in exactly what they want and to find themselves a role.”
Baghdad
Summons Turkish Envoy Over Troops' Deployment in Iraq
The
Iraqi Foreign Ministry has summoned the Turkish envoy in Baghdad on
Saturday over the deployment of Turkish forces near the northern city
of Mosul, Reuters reported.
4
December, 2015
Baghdad:
Turkish Tanks Enter Iraqi Province Without Authorization
On
Friday, various media reports said that about 130 Turkish military
personnel had been deployed to the Mosul area in Iraq allegedly to
provide training to Kurdish Peshmerga militia fighting against Daesh
(also known as ISIL or the Islamic State terrorist group).
The
Iraqi ministry described the deployment of Turkish forces in Iraq
without the permission of Baghdad as a "hostile act."
Earlier
in the day, Baghdad has called on Ankara to "immediately"
withdraw its forces, including tanks and artillery, which it has
deployed in the country's northern Ninawa province, without Baghdad's
consent, according to a statement from the press service of Iraqi
Prime Minister Haider Abadi obtained by RIA Novosti.
Moreover,
Iraqi authorities called on Turkey to "respect good neighborly
relations" and "immediately withdraw its military from the
territory of Iraq."
Is
Washington Edging Towards Full-Scale Military Operation in Iraq,
Syria?
The
Obama administration recently announced its plans to send 50 special
operations troops to Syria and 100 more commandos to neighboring Iraq
in what many view as breaking the promise not to send boots on the
ground in the two countries plagued by sectarian violence and
terrorism.
4
December, 2015
The Obama administration recently announced its plans to send 50 special operations troops to Syria and 100 more commandos to neighboring Iraq in what many view as breaking the promise not to send boots on the ground in the two countries plagued by sectarian violence and terrorism.
The
White House tried to brush these legitimate concerns aside,
claiming that the US will not be dragged into large-scale
military operations like the ones in Iraq and Afghanistan
in the 2000s.
"The
obvious reason that all presidents and senior administration
officials initially downplay the mission and role of US military
interventions is to catalyze domestic political support. This is
because opinion polling of Americans reveals that they
overwhelmingly do not support wars that they believe will be
unilateral, long, bloody, and costly," conflict prevention
expert Micah Zenko wrote for the National Interest.
One
would imagine that the 100 special operations forces will be deployed
to Iraq to take part in the existing mission aimed
at training and assisting the Iraqi security forces. But their
powers seem to go well beyond the non-combat scope. These
troops will be able to "conduct raids, free hostages, gather
intelligence and capture ISIL leaders," US Army Colonel Steve
Warren detailed.
These
developments fuel fears that what was once supposed to be a
limited engagement is gradually turning into a larger and
potentially deadlier operation.
"Now
'specialized' troops will conduct high risk operations to simply
attempt to capture and kill a few more Islamic State members,
of which there is apparently an inexhaustible supply," Zeno observed
Daesh,
also known as ISIL, has proved to be quite resilient in the
face of the US-led coalition. In mid-2014, the CIA estimated
that the terrorist group numbered approximately 30,000 people.
Earlier in December, US defense chief Ashton Carter told the
House Armed Services Committee that Daesh was an approximately
30,000-strong force.
In
other words, the number of militants remained relatively the
same in the sixteen months of the US-led operation aimed
at exterminating them, giving credence to the opinion that
Washington's anti-Daesh strategy does not seem to be working.
Instead
of reevaluating and formulating a new approach, Obama has
opted for "downplaying a US military commitment, then
incrementally increasing that commitment and approving new missions,
all while consistently claiming that there has been absolutely no
mission creep and no violation of previous pledges," Zenko
asserted.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.