NATO’s second-in-command says Russia is now an enemy, not a partner
NATO
Deputy Secretary General Alexander Vershbow now says that the allied
group has been compelled to treat Russia “as more of an enemy than
a partner,” according to an Associated Press report published
Thursday.
RT,
1
May, 2014
The
61-year-old former United States ambassador to Russia reportedly told
journalists this week that Moscow’s role in the ongoing crisis in
Ukraine has forced NATO to reconsider the alliance’s opinion on
Russia, and that additional troops may soon be mobilized to the
region as tensions worsen.
AP
journalist Robert Burns wrote on
Thursday that Vershbow said the Kremlin’s perceived part in the
recent events in Ukraine “marks
a turning point in decades of effort by NATO to draw Moscow closer.”
NATO’s
second-in-command reportedly told journalists that the alliance is
now considering new measures meant to counter any future acts of
aggression on the part of Russia aimed at partner nations, and soon
could deploy a larger number of combat forces to Eastern Europe.
Journalists
reporting for Civil.Ge wrote
on Thursday that Vershbow told the audience at a panel discussion in
Washington, DC one day earlier that NATO should deploy “defensive
assets to the region.”
“We
need to step up our support for defense reforms and military
modernization of Russia’s neighbors, and not just of Ukraine, but
also Moldova, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan,” Vershbow
said, according to the Civil Georgia site.
NATO
should think about “upgrading”
joint exercises among partner nations, the site quoted Vershbow as
saying during the event, while acknowledging that deploying forces to
Georgia would be a “controversial”
maneuver.
“It
is also important for the United States to show leadership… to make
sure that next steps that NATO will make, for example at the summit
in September, will be adequate response to what’s happening in
Ukraine,”
the Georgian Defense Minister Irakli Alasania said during the
discussion.
“The
West should now seize the opportunity and create the reality on the
ground by accepting membership of aspirant countries, by putting
purely defensive assets in aspirant countries and predominantly in
Georgia,” Alasania
added.
“What
is important now is to put some deterrent capabilities on the ground
like air defense and anti-armor capabilities that will give us a
chance to defend our freedom, because we know that if things go wrong
at this point no one is coming to save us; we’ve seen that in
2008.”
Earlier
this week, Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu said the builduip
of NATO troops near Russia’s border was “unprecedented.”
Weeks earlier, the US Air Force commander in charge of NATO’s
military presence in Europe said that US troops may soon
be deployed to
the region as tensions continue to worsen near the border between
Ukraine and Russia.
For
weeks now, officials in Washington and Kiev have claimed that the
recent separation of Crimea from Ukraine and the rash of uprisings in
the country’s eastern part are the direct result of destabilization
efforts spearheaded by Moscow, and both the US and European Union
have introduced several rounds of sanctions against Russia as a
result. The Kremlin has refuted these claims and rebuffed the
sanctions, however, and earlier this week Russian Pres. Vladimir
Putin accused the
White House of orchestrating the Ukrainian crisis.
“I
think what is happening now shows us who really was mastering the
process from the beginning. But in the beginning, the United States
preferred to remain in the shadow,” Putin
said this week.
Russia
and China Announce Joint Naval Drills as NATO Declares Russia an
Enemy
Now
that NATO has declared Russia an adversary where does that leave
China (Russia's closest ally)?
1
May, 2014
Today
NATO's second in command, Alexander Vershbow, declared that Russia is
now to be categorized as an enemy.
"Clearly
the Russians have declared NATO as an adversary, so we have to begin
to view Russia no longer as a partner but as more of an adversary
than a partner," said Alexander Vershbow, the deputy
secretary-general of NATO.
This
statement comes as China and Russia announced that they will be
carrying out joint Naval
drills in the South China Sea. This
show of unity sends a message on multiple levels.
Last
week the Obama administration vowed to defend Japan against China in
their territorial dispute over the Senkaku islands.
Our
commitment to Japan’s security is absolute and article five [of the
security treaty] covers all territories under Japan’s
administration, including the Senkaku islands,” Obama said during a
joint press conference with Japan's prime minister, Shinzo Abe.
China,
is obviously not happy about that. Nor are they happy about
Washington's overall push to contain them militarily in the region.
Though the Obama administration publicly denies that the recent drive
to shore up alliances with China's neighbors is geared towards
containment, no one is fooled (especially not Beijing).
Related: China
Moves To Militarize Space
Russia's
show of military solidarity obviously can't be separated from the
Ukrainian crisis. This week China made a number of statements
criticizing the latest round of 'sanctions' against Russia.
We
believe that sanctions are inconducive to the solution of problems.
On the contrary, they will escalate tensions,” China's Foreign
Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said on Monday.
So
if NATO has declared Russia to be an enemy, and the U.S. is openly
provoking China by injecting itself into territorial disputes, and
beefing up its military presence in the South China Sea, how long
until we start hearing the official war mongering rhetoric expanded
to encompass all parties in the 'axis of evil'? Answer: ASAPE (As
Soon As Politically Expedient).
Pentagon Admits "No Solution" To Replace Russian Rockets To Launch US Military Satellites
1
May, 2014,
While
the US
is quick to demand the rest of the world turn its economic back on
Russia -
especially the Europeans, it appears they are discovering - just as
Putin warned, the world is considerably more inter-dependent than
they thought. Following Chuck Hagel's orders to review the Air Force
reliance on Russian rocket engines used to launch US military
satellites, Bloomberg reports the Pentagon
admits it "has no great solution" to reduce its dependence
on the Russian-made engine.
As
Bloomberg reports,
The Pentagon has no “great solution” to reduce its dependence on a Russian-made engine that powers the rocket used to launch U.S. military satellites, the Defense Department’s top weapons buyer said.
“We don’t have a great solution,” Frank Kendall, the undersecretary of defense for acquisition, said yesterday after testifying before a Senate committee. “We haven’t made any decisions yet.”
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel ordered the Air Force to review its reliance on the rocket engine after tensions over Russia’s takeover of Ukraine’s Crimea region prompted questions from lawmakers about that long-time supply connection.
United Launch Alliance LLC, a partnership of Lockheed Martin Corp. and Boeing Co., uses the Russian-made RD-180 engine on Atlas V rockets.
“The US is certainly one of the world’s leaders. At some point it seemed that it was the only leader and a uni-polar system was in place. Today it appears that is not the case. Everything in the world is interdependent and once you try to punish someone, in the end you will cut off your nose to spite your face,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.