Financially-strapped
Nevada city declared disaster
There
are no signs of rioters, wind-damaged homes or flooding. The brand
new City Hall features gleaming marble floors and the public
recreation centers offer Zumba, karate and Pilates classes
22
June, 2012
Despite
all of its suburban trimmings, North Las Vegas is officially a
disaster area.
After
five years of declining property taxes, massive layoffs and
questionable spending, leaders of the blue-collar, family-oriented
city outside Las Vegas declared a state of emergency, invoking a
rarely used state law crafted for unforeseen disasters.
No
matter that the statute, which allows municipalities to suspend union
contracts and avoid paying scheduled salary increases, doesn't
actually include fiscal emergencies among the list of potential
disasters.
"It
says, in case of 'emergency such as.' You can't list how many
different types of emergencies there are in the world," City
Council member Wade Wagner said of the move, which will save the city
$9 million.
There
are many cities across the nation grappling with declining property
values and growing expenses like North Las Vegas, but few, if any,
have declared financial emergency.
Stockton,
Calif., and Los Angeles explored similar emergency declarations and
were met with legal challenges. In Buffalo, N.Y., court officials
upheld a wage freeze in 2006 that allowed the city to address its
four-year $127 million deficit and avoid financial disaster.
North
Las Vegas is among Nevada's hardest-hit cities, at a time when the
state is dealing with the nation's highest unemployment rate and an
unrelenting tide of foreclosures and bankruptcies. Every few months,
the state threatens to take over the city.
Even
so, the financial disaster declaration is unprecedented in Nevada,
raising questions about whether North Las Vegas is overreaching at
the expense of its employees and reputation.
"It
makes it sound like our buildings are all on fire and they don't have
water to put it out or something," said Jennifer Meyers, who
moved to the city before the housing collapse so her kids could play
in the street without worrying about crime.
"It
doesn't sound like a place you would want to move to," she said.
Union
workers, long among the highest compensated government employees in
southern Nevada, claim the city won't be able to defend the emergency
designation in court. The police union filed a lawsuit Friday
claiming the city was misusing the law.
"Everybody
in the city is basically using all their time and all their effort to
try to break the unions," said Sgt. Leonard Cardinale, president
of the North Las Vegas Police Supervisors Association.
Public
perception turned against the city's public safety workers after some
union leaders put up billboards last year that read: "Warning:
Due to recent police layoffs, we can no longer guarantee your
safety!"
It
isn't hard to make the case that North Las Vegas, Nevada's
fourth-largest city, is in trouble.
As
its population more than doubled to 223,394 in 2010 from 115,488 in
2000, the city doubled its staff, built a new park each year and, in
2009, started construction on a sparkling $130 million City Hall.
For
nearly two years, the city, where residents have long paid the
highest tax rate in southern Nevada, has teetered on the edge of
insolvency.
One
in every 195 homes is in foreclosure, the state's highest rate. Once
the nation's fastest growing city, it lost more than 3,000 businesses
in three years after the recession hit in 2007. Its total revenue has
plunged from $817 million in 2009 to $298 million this year.
Hundreds
of municipal workers have received pink slips and still the city
struggled to close a $30 million budget gap. As a final body blow,
Fitch Ratings downgraded the city's bond rating last month to a "BBB"
with a negative watch.
By
2013, the city will have shed more than 800 employees since the
recession began.
City
officials concede they are far from the urban disasters brought on by
Hurricane Katrina or the Los Angeles riots, but argue all the same
that North Las Vegas' fiscal crisis shouldn't be downplayed.
Without
the emergency declaration, the city claims it would have to lay off
217 public safety workers to afford the salary increases required
under its police and fire union contracts. Libraries would close and
recreation centers would no longer offer swimming and Spanish
classes.
"We
are in a fiscal emergency," Wagner said. "North Las Vegas
is ground zero basically for foreclosures in the nation. There are
only a handful of places that have been hit as hard as North Las
Vegas.
"So
because our property taxes have declined so much, we really had to
invoke this," Wagner said.
Since
then, residents have urged City Hall to keep its libraries and
recreation centers and sacrifice public safety, which accounts for 66
percent of the city's budget. In all, the city expects to go from
1,000 public safety employees in 2011 to 721 in 2013. The City
Council voted Wednesday night to turn its jail services over to the
city of Las Vegas in a move expected to save $16 million annually.
Residents
like Bob Borgersen are fed up with the unions and the council for not
being able to compromise as the city continues to struggle. He blamed
the council for not saving when its property tax income was flush.
"It's
bad. The property values have gone down to nothing," he said.
"They didn't think ahead, unfortunately."
Approving
Billions in Cuts to Social Services, California Reaches a Budget Deal
Just
10 days before the start of the new fiscal year, Gov. Jerry Brown and
the Democratic-controlled Legislature reached a budget deal on
Thursday to close a nearly $16 billion budget gap.
22
June, 2012
The
agreement came after days of negotiations, with legislative leaders
reluctant to make the cuts that Governor Brown said were urgently
needed.
That
the budget met its deadline for only the third time in the last two
decades was seen as a cause for celebration, though the spending plan
hardly contained good news.
And
even more cuts loom on the horizon if voters do not approve Governor
Brown’s proposed tax increase, which will be placed before them in
November. Besides an array of immediate cuts, the budget includes $6
billion in trigger cuts, coming primarily from the state’s
education system, if voters do not back the tax measure.
The
cuts already in the deal rely on limiting eligibility for welfare and
other changes to social services programs. The deal will put a
24-month limit on the state’s welfare program, although it allows
for some exceptions in counties with high unemployment. It also cuts
the number of spaces available in state-subsidized child-care
programs.
“This
agreement strongly positions the state to withstand the economic
challenges and uncertainties ahead,” Governor Brown said in a
statement. “We have restructured and downsized our prison system,
moved government closer to the people, made billions in difficult
cuts, and now the Legislature is poised to make even more difficult
cuts and permanently reform welfare.”
The Legislature is
expected to vote on the deal next week.
Under
the governor’s tax proposal, the state would receive $6.9 billion
in taxes from an increase in sales tax to 7.75 percent, up from 7.5
percent, and a surcharge on income tax for those earning more than
$250,000 a year. If voters reject the plan, an additional $6 billion
will be carved out of the budget next January, primarily from the
state’s primary schools and higher education system.
But
Mr. Brown’s tax plan will have to compete with a rival tax increase
proposal backed by the state’s Parent Teacher Association, which
would use the revenue to send more money to public schools.
Last
year, the Legislature passed an optimistic budget plan and later had
to cut nearly $1 billion when the revenue did not come in as
expected. Then, in May, Governor Brown announced that the state’s
budget gap had grown to $16 billion, rather than the $9 billion his
administration had projected in January.
Optimistic
revenue projections have troubled the Legislature for the last
several years, as the state has grappled with a financial crisis of a
seriousness not seen since the Great Depression. When Mr. Brown took
office last year, he pledged not to rely on gimmicks that many had
criticized the Legislature for using in the past.
“As
always, the negotiations were tough,” Darrell Steinberg, the State
Senate leader, said in a statement. “But we move forward together
with a state budget that’s structurally balanced, setting us on the
path to putting this nagging deficit behind us.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.