Posts
This was a major report from TruNews on something that has had ZERO coverage in mainstream, western media but has had considerable coverage in the Middle East, from Egypt to the UAE.
POMPEO BOMBSHELL: HILLARY CLINTON’S MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD EMAILS SHOCK ARAB WORLD
Today on TruNews we discuss the new Clinton emails being circulated in the Middle East, confirming her role as Mother of the Brotherhood of terrorists that set the region on fire under President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden.
We also detail the revelations in the new Hunter Biden emails, including bonafide proof of a company connected to the Chinese Communist Party paying $30 million for the son of the former VP to “make introductions.” Lastly, we address the escalating war of censorship, as the social media oligarchs interfere in the upcoming U.S. election by silencing stories which embarrass and expose the corruption of their chosen winner.
Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart, Edward Szall. Airdate 10/15/2020
Watch the broadcast HERE
I have done a bit of checking for myself. They talk in great detail about coverage from a UAE-based paper called al-Ain.
Emails from former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton keep causing an uproar around the world, exposing Qatar-led conspiracies against Gulf and Arab states as part of its hostile policy which threatens the security and stability of the region.
The emails this time demonstrate coordination between Clinton and the Qatari television network, al-Jazeera, in support of Washington's stance against former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak during the January 2011 protests.
One of these emails sent by al-Jazeera to the Assistant Secretary of State for Public Diplomatic Affairs showed that the Qatari channel hailed the preliminary position of US President Barack Obama against Egypt, which expresses the emotions of the people.
In the email al-Ain obtained a copy of, al-Jazeera expressed hope that Obama will continue this policy during the next critical days.
The Qatari channel has also renewed its interest in holding a meeting with the American president.
This email is dated January 29, 2011. This is the same day the US president announced his support for the protesters in Egypt against Mubarak
There are two articles from Egypt's al-Ahram in English.
The Clinton-Brotherhood connection revealed
The release of Hillary Clinton’s private e-mails lays bare the Obama administration’s relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood and Qatar
The US State Department released hundreds of former US secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s private e-mails on Saturday. The release, ordered by US President Donald Trump in an open political move ahead of America’s presidential election, revealed a lot about how the Obama administration handled the Arab Spring uprisings.
Trump told Fox News on 8 October that 33,000 of Clinton’s e-mails were with the State Department. Trump is currently trailing the Democratic Party’s candidate Joe Biden who was vice president in the Barack Obama administration in which Clinton served as secretary of state. The release of Clinton’s private e-mails could negatively affect the image of Biden.
Walid Phares, a former political advisor to Trump on Middle East Affairs, said in a TV interview on Sunday that “Hillary Clinton’s private e-mails should be of a particular importance to the Arab world because they reveal a lot about her policies in the Middle East and the Arab world while she was the Obama administration’s secretary of state.
“I think many people in the Arab world suspected that the Obama administration had a hand in fuelling what came to be known as the Arab Spring revolutions, and that it played a significant role in helping political Islam movements — particularly Muslim Brotherhood — reach power in a number of Arab countries, but they lacked concrete evidence,” said Phares. “Now there is evidence, in the form of Clinton’s e-mails which show that the Obama administration was deeply involved in preparing the ground for the Arab Spring revolutions and doing everything possible to spread chaos in the region.”
In one e-mail Clinton asked Qatar to fund the Arab Spring uprisings through “the Clinton Foundation” in order to help overthrow Arab regimes, particularly that of Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak. The Clinton Foundation received $1 million from Qatar without informing the state department of the donation.
Another e-mail, dated September 2012, revealed that Clinton visited Doha, the capital of Qatar, and met a delegation from Al-Jazeera channel and Muslim Brotherhood activists.
The e-mail shows Clinton supporting the Brotherhood’s demand that Qatar fund “a Muslim Brotherhood TV channel” to be the voice of political Islam in the Arab world and the Middle East. Qatar was ready to donate $100 million to fund the proposed channel with the stipulation that Khairat Al-Shater, the Muslim Brotherhood’s deputy supreme guide, take charge. Clinton also discussed the possibility of Qatar funding a Muslim Brotherhood newspaper in Egypt.
The e-mails also show that Clinton met in Qatar with the former Qatari prime minister Hamad bin Jassem Al Thani and promised that the Obama administration would give every possible support to Al-Jazeera and Muslim Brotherhood media outlets.
Wadah Khanfar, the former director of Al-Jazeera channel, was in close contact with Clinton during the days preceding the overthrow of Hosni Mubarak. Khanfar asked Clinton to intervene when the Mubarak regime decided to sever Internet connections and close Al-Jazeera’s office in Cairo. Clinton responded by issuing a public statement demanding Internet be restored.
E-mails from late 2010 reveal Khanfar urging the Obama administration officials, particularly Clinton, to intervene to change the regimes in Egypt, Libya and Syria. It was revealed that Homa Abdine, the daughter of a Muslim Brotherhood family and Clinton’s top aide, played a central role in facilitating contacts between Clinton and the Qataris, Khanfar and other Muslim Brotherhood activists.
Other e-mails, released on Monday, reveal that Clinton was in constant contact with Egypt’s former Muslim Brotherhood President Mohamed Morsi.
A TV programme on MBC Masr TV channel on Monday showed e-mails purporting to show Clinton cooperating with Morsi to “dissolve” Egypt’s Interior Ministry and judicial system. Since coming to power in July 2012, Morsi had been at loggerheads with judges and the Interior Ministry and appointed a Brotherhood minister of justice to rid the judicial system of Mubarak loyalists.
Other e-mails show Clinton rebuking Morsi and complaining that Egyptian security forces did nothing to protect the American embassy from protesters riled because of a YouTube video deemed critical of Islam and the Prophet Mohamed.
Morsi also complained to Clinton $1 billion of US economic assistance to Egypt had gone to the Egyptian army.
Other e-mails show that after winning more than 50 per cent of seats in the People’s Assembly in 2012 the Muslim Brotherhood’s political arm, the Freedom and Justice Party, moved to forge an alliance with the Salafist Nour Party. To facilitate this, the group chose Saad Al-Katatni, a Brotherhood leader close to the Nour, as parliamentary speaker.
Most Egyptian commentators said the e-mails came as no surprise, and contain little that is new. Abdel-Moneim Said argued in an article in Al-Masry Al-Youm on Tuesday that Washington’s desire to get rid of secular regimes in the Arab world and replace them with Islamist ones dates back to the George W Bush administration.
“After the 11 September attacks, America’s think tanks came up with the theory that it was the repression of political Islam in the Arab world that pushed radicals like Osama bin Laden to attack America,” wrote Said. “Bush’s secretary of state Condoleezza Rice was the one who adopted this theory and pushed it forward.
“When Obama came to office in 2008 he espoused this theory and his secretary of state Hillary Clinton put it into effect.
“The e-mails shed a lot of light on how Clinton used the Arab money and TV channels to pave the way for the Arab Spring and help the Brotherhood reach power in Egypt and change the regime in Libya. While Egypt was able to boot the Muslim Brotherhood from power in 2013, Libya fell into chaos from which it has yet to escape.”
More Hillary e-mails
Private e-mails of former US secretary of state Hillary Clinton have once again caused controversy. But will the US election see an impact
While recently released Hillary Clinton e-mails triggered uproar across Arab social media because of their revelations about the Barak Obama administration’s role in manufacturing the “Arab Spring”, their impact in the US seems quite muted.
This is may be because the US media is so focused on the US forthcoming elections, even though it is widely believed that the White House ordered Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to release these e-mails at this time precisely for this reason. The point was to embarrass the Democrats as a means to muster support for the Trump campaign.
Observers of US affairs generally agree that foreign policy issues, in general, have relatively little influence on voters’ decisions, whether in presidential or legislative elections. If this is the case, what is the point of declassifying Hillary Clinton’s e-mails dating to just under a decade ago? Why now, as the race between Trump and Joe Biden enters its last lap? Did the Trump campaign really believe the release of these confidential e-mails would have a significant last-minute impact on voters’ views?
If so, much depends on how Republican campaign strategists handle them, and specifically on how successful they are in linking these e-mails’ revelations of the crimes Clinton committed as secretary of state under president Obama to the issues of foremost concern to voters in the US today.
To use these documents to weaken Biden, Republicans will need to home in on the hypocrisy of the Democrats who claim to represent American values while their foreign policy flagrantly tramples on them.
The Republicans could claim, for example, that the very Democrats who abused US values during the Obama era would have no compunction against doing the same if re-elected to the White House. They would argue that Hillary Clinton arrogantly endangered the lives of millions in the Middle East when she chose to ally with the Islamists and their chief organisational entity, the Muslim Brotherhood, despite her knowledge of this group’s extremist views, their antagonism to women’s rights and their intolerant attitudes towards affiliates of other faiths.
In addition to betraying American principles opposed to discrimination and the dissemination of hatred by working with the Muslim Brotherhood whose ideological-terrorist offspring struck the US (as was the case with Al-Qaeda), she deceived the US public by claiming that her government supported the Arab Spring revolutions in order to promote the spread of democracy, civil rights and humanitarian values.
The Clinton e-mails reveal that Washington was colluding with Qatar and the Muslim Brotherhood to supplant existing governments with Islamist extremists who had succeeded in deluding her that they would more willingly do Washington’s bidding than the rulers that she described as despots.
Republicans might add that the Clinton plan that pretended to promote democracy ended up destroying three Arab countries (Syria, Libya and Yemen), and giving an unprecedented boost to terrorist groups who killed millions and displaced many more.
In order to turn the Clinton e-mails into a successful campaign gambit, the Republicans will need to arouse US voters’ conscience and persuade them that a Biden administration will follow Obama’s and Clinton’s lead in sowing anarchy abroad in the name of spreading democracy. As mentioned above, as a general rule, foreign policy issues carry relatively little weight in elections.
But voters might be less likely to cast their vote for a candidate they fear would follow policies that would abuse US values and implicate Americans in acts tantamount to crimes against humanity, as the Democrats had done during the time when Clinton was secretary of state.
Republicans might also underscore how Clinton and Obama jeopardised the lives of US diplomats in Libya. The US ambassador to Libya was killed in 2012 by one of the extremist groups Clinton backed against former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. It was the same mistake that the US committed when it supported Osama Bin Laden who would subsequently turn against the US.
Although US policy at the time when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state may have won the support of a handful of Arab liberals, it stirred widespread anti-American feeling among the vast majority of the Arab people, because it was they who ended up paying the price for the violence and upheaval caused by the US’s adventure to ostensibly spread democracy in the Arab world.
This said, Republican strategists will still have to connect the dots between the Democrats’ hypocrisy abroad and manifestations of their hypocrisy at home. They will need to show that Democrats’ policies abroad and their policies at home are two sides of the same coin.
They could argue, for example, that the dissemination of anarchy and conflict abroad in the name of democracy is not inseparable from Nancy Pelosi’s constant attacks against Trump for failing to observe Covid-19 guidelines and then, herself, being caught on camera in a beauty salon flouting those same guidelines, or her failure to object to anti-Trump protests in the aftermath of the George Floyd murder even though those demonstrations flagrantly violated precautionary measures to which the Democrats claim to be more committed because they are more concerned for the US public’s health and wellbeing than their Republican rivals.
Finally, the Republicans can use the contents of the Clinton e-mails to warn US voters that a Biden-Harris victory would jeopardise US interests in the Middle East, whereas the Trump administration had succeeded in gaining widespread popularity for US policy because of its respect for these peoples’ cultural specificity and its unwillingness to toy with their fates as the Obama administration had.
And strangely, there was some coverage in Israeli media
Hillary Clinton’s Emails Exposed – ‘American Support for Political Islam and Chaos’
12 October, 2020
The recent exposure of Hillary Clinton’s emails is arousing resentment in the Arab media in moderate countries as they demonstrate her apparent support for extreme Muslim elements in the Middle East and the chaos caused by the so-called Arab Spring.
Some of the emails from former US Secretary of State Clinton that were recently released as part of President Donald Trump’s election campaign apparently reveal direct American involvement in the Arab Spring events and a deep connection between the Obama administration and Qatar that included a joint effort to establish a media channel and an economic fund to be used by the Muslim Brotherhood as a means of intervention in Arab countries in the region.
One of the emails reveals a plan between Clinton and the Qatari government to establish a media channel with initial funding of $100 million. This plan followed complaints from the Muslim Brotherhood about the weakness of their media system compared to other media outlets.
The idea was to establish a communication channel run by the Muslim Brotherhood and similar to the Voice of America.
The emails revealed that the intention was to place Khairat el-Shater, a senior member of the Muslim Brotherhood and an Islamist activist who ran for president in Egypt, at the head of the media channel and entrust him with the $100 million.
The emails also reveal the depth of the connection between Clinton and the Obama administration and the Qatari Al Jazeera channel as a propaganda mouthpiece that supports political Islam organizations and encourages chaos in Arab countries.
Among other things, it appears that Clinton acted to market a positive image of President Barak Obama through Al Jazeera and portray him as a supporter of Muslim communities.
The emails indicate that Clinton met with the heads of Al Jazeera at the Four Seasons Hotel in Doha, Qatar, during a quick visit that left her no time to visit an American base there. Clinton met the American officers for a brief meeting, after a meeting between her and the directors of Al Jazeera.
The meeting was also attended by senior Qatari government officials and also included the possibility of a reciprocal Qatari visit to the United States.
The exchange of messages shows that Clinton sought to take advantage of the channel and broadcast a 15-minute program in Arabic that would emphasize the Obama administration’s commitment to Muslim communities around the world.
Clinton also asked to meet with Qatari journalists for a discussion on the relationship between the Obama administration and Qatar.
Another issue that emerges from the emails is the launch of an Egyptian-American investment fund, which was also intended to operate in Tunisia, for economic and welfare purposes. Jim Harmon, an American banker close to Obama, was elected to head the fund, but alongside the first $60 million from Egypt, Qatar had pledged a $2 billion aid package to Egypt.
The emails indicate that the Qataris had sought to use the fund to intervene in the affairs of Egypt and Tunisia with money derived from the Muslim Brotherhood’s patronage. One of the emails reveals that Harmon urged Qataris to join the American effort in this matter.
The emails also reveal that in July 2009, one of the US State Department officials met with senior Hamas figures Mahmoud Al-Zahar and Bassem Naim for a meeting in Switzerland, which was also attended by the US Ambassador to the United Nations Thomas Pickering. At the end of the meeting, Naim expressed hopes that it was the beginning of the correction of the injustice that lasted in the three years prior to the meeting.
Another email reveals that Saud bin Faisal, the former Saudi foreign minister, hung up the phone on Clinton when she demanded he not send troops to Bahrain in 2011. It should be noted that the Saudis then acted to save the Bahraini regime from a so-called popular uprising inspired by Shiite organizations affiliated with the Iranian regime.
There are articles in the Arab media stating that the emails are further evidence of the Obama administration’s volatility and lack of support for the Arab regimes alongside incomprehensible support for extremist movements and political Islam.
Articles in the Arab media attack US presidential candidate Joe Biden, stating that he “belongs to the same rotten tree” and that if he wins the world will witness far more serious events than the events of 2011 and the Arab Spring, which the Obama administration promoted as if they were spontaneous popular uprisings.
Articles claim that the email affair exposes Obama’s destructive role and the depth of his ties to Qatar and the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as Al Jazeera’s assistance in these efforts.
The various testimonies indicate that Clinton pulled the strings of the so-called Arab Spring though she knew it was not a spontaneous event and helped promote them through the investment fund as well.
“This is a testament to Obama’s dark chapter,” read one of the Arab articles, “a testimony to American support for political Islam and chaos.”
An article also notes that Biden at the time opposed bin Laden’s assassination.
The Clinton email affair was at the center of the 2016 election in the US, helping Donald Trump to portray his rival as corrupt and unfit for office.
Since then, Trump has been raising the issue and demanding the emails be exposed. Trump expressed frustration that current Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has so far failed to release some of the classified emails and expressed dissatisfaction with him, prompting Pompeo to promise to disclose the emails.
Some historical background
Cast your mind back to the "Arab Spring" in Cairo in 2011
The people of Egypt had their own ideas about Hillary ("Monica, Monica...!") and Barack Obama.
"Obama does not negotiate with terrorists, he supports them"
That approach put Clinton squarely in the administration’s “realist” camp. As she describes in her new memoir “Hard Choices”:
America will always do what it takes to keep our people safe and advance our core interests … Sometimes that means working with partners with whom we have deep disagreements.
The Clinton campaign is attempting once again to sweep important questions under the rug about top aide Huma Abedin, her family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and to Saudi Arabia, and her role in the ballooning Clinton email scandal.
The New York Post ran a detailed investigative piece over the weekend about Ms. Abedin’s work at the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs from 1995 through 2008, a Sharia law journal whose editor in chief was Abedin’s own mother.
This is not some accidental association. Ms. Abedin was, for many years, listed as an associate editor of the London-based publication and wrote for the journal while working as an intern in the Clinton White House in the mid-1990s.
Her mother, Saleha Abedin, sits on the Presidency Staff Council of the International Islamic Council for Da’wa and Relief, a group that is chaired by the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has made an unannounced visit to Libya aimed at showing support for the Libyan people and building ties.
Mrs Clinton was in the capital Tripoli for only a few hours - the first US cabinet-level official to visit since Col Muammar Gaddafi was ousted.
She said she hoped that Col Gaddafi would be captured or killed.
Her visit comes as fierce fighting erupted again in the former Libyan leader's hometown of Sirte.
Black Africans are being sold in open-air slave markets, and it’s Hillary Clinton’s fault. But you won’t hear much about that from the news media or the foreign-policy pundits, so let me explain.
Footage from Libya, released recently by CNN, showed young men from sub-Saharan Africa being auctioned off as farm workers in slave markets.
And how did we get to this point? As the BBC reported back in May, “Libya has been beset by chaos since NATO-backed forces overthrew long-serving ruler Col. Moammar Gadhafi in October 2011.”
And who was behind that overthrow? None other than then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
SEVEN YEARS AFTER the popular uprising against Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi and the NATO intervention that removed him from power, Libya is extremely fractured and a source of regional instability. But while Congress has heavily scrutinized the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi a year after Gaddafi’s overthrow and death, there has been no U.S. investigation into the broader question of what led the U.S. and its allies to intervene so disastrously in Libya.
However, a corruption investigation into former French President Nicolas Sarkozy is opening a new window into little-known motivations in the NATO alliance that may have accelerated the rush to oust the Libyan dictator.
Last month, French police detained and questioned Sarkozy about illicit payments Gaddafi is said to have made to Sarkozy’s 2007 presidential election campaign. A few days after Sarkozy was released from detention, he was ordered to stand trial for corruption and influence-peddling in a related case, in which he had sought information on the Gaddafi inquiry from an appeals court judge. The scandal has highlighted a little-appreciated bind that Sarkozy faced in the run-up to the Libyan intervention: The French president, who took the lead among Europeans in the military campaign against Gaddafi, was eager to compensate for diplomatic blunders in Tunisia and Egypt and most likely angry about an arms deal with Gaddafi that went awry. Sarkozy, it now appears, was eager to shift the narrative to put himself at the forefront of a pro-democracy, anti-Gaddafi intervention.
The U.S. State Department under the leadership of Secretary Hillary Clinton continued a program to embolden foreign, revolutionary, social media activists to agitate for regime change in various parts of the world. The program arguably had major, detrimental consequences for the trajectory of the Middle East.
Recent leaks show a memo that top Clinton aide Huma Abedin sent to her boss stating, “I’m giving you credit for inspiring the ‘peaceful’ protests,” with regard to Egypt, with quotation marks around the word “peaceful.”
The United States government is believed to have utilized a program called the Alliance of Youth Movements Summit, co-founded by a close Hillary Clinton adviser, to provide networking opportunities for an activist plotting to overthrow Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak several years before the “Arab Spring” protests that led to widespread regime change in the Middle East.
Through the Alliance of Youth Movements Summit, the U.S. learned that the Muslim Brotherhood was supportive of a plan to overthrow Mubarak. The U.S.-supported Muslim Brotherhood later briefly ruled Egypt after Mubarak’s ouster.
Now they can no longer really dismiss it all as "conspiracy theory". I suppose the only possible response from the media and the Democrats is censorship and silence.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.