Graph
of the Day: Decline of U.K. wildlife, 1968-2010
29
July, 2013
Watchlist
Indicator showing the average population trend for 77 moths, 19
butterflies, 8 mammals and 51 birds listed as UK BAP priorities,
1968-2010. Species are weighted equally. The indicator starts at 100;
a rise to 200 would show that, on average, the populations of
indicator species have doubled, whereas if it dropped to 50 they
would have halved. Dotted lines show the 95% confidence limits.
Graphic: RSPB
22
May 2013 (RSPB) – Between 1995 and 1999, 577 species were
identified as priorities for conservation in the UK under the UK
Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP). The list was reviewed in 2007, and
doubled in length to 1,150 species. Since then, national biodiversity
strategies have been developed so that each of the UK’s four
nations now have their own list of priority species.
We
have developed a new Watchlist Indicator, showing the overall trends
in populations of 155 species that were listed as UK BAP priorities,
and present it here for the first time. Lack of comparable data meant
that we were unable to include trends for any species of plants or
fungi, despite these making up 48% of the UK BAP list, nor any
invertebrates other than butterflies and moths.
Since
1970, the indicator has dropped by 77%, representing a massive
decline in the abundance of priority species. There was a steep
decline in the early years of the indicator, but this is to be
expected because it was these declines that led many species to be
included in priority lists in the first place. What is important is
whether the decline has stopped in response to conservation action:
worryingly, it has not. The indicator declined by 18% between 2000
and 2010, suggesting ongoing declines in priority species. It may
now be stabilising, but more years of data are needed to confirm
this.
As
with all composite indicators, the Watchlist Indicator hides
considerable variation in individual species. Some priority species,
such as the bittern and Adonis blue butterfly, have shown
substantial recoveries since they were added to the first priority
species list in 1995 thanks to creative and concerted conservation
efforts. However, many species are showing continuing, and in some
cases severe, or even accelerating, declines.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.