As
IDF strike kills entire family in Gaza, Israel is starting to get in
trouble
While
Hamas leaders hide in underground tunnels, the civilian population is
exposed to IDF strikes; the horrifying pictures from al Dalou family
liable to be Palestinian version of Lebanon village of Kafr Qana.
18
November, 2012
The
horrifying pictures that emerged Sunday evening from the home of the
al Dalou family in central Gaza are liable to be the Palestinian
version of the Lebanese village of Kafr Qana. Just as the pictures
showing the results of the Israeli bombing of Kafr Qana in July 2006
changed the face of the Second Lebanon War and turned world public
opinion against the Israeli operation, in the same way the
bombardment of the house in Gaza and the killing of all 12 of its
residents is liable to elicit Arab, European and, above all, American
pressure on Israel to stop the aerial attacks immediately.
Among
those killed in the house were five women, four children and three
men. Al Jazeera television repeatedly broadcast the pictures of the
bodies of the four children, who were 2 to 5 years old, lying next to
each other in the hospital in Gaza on Sunday.
The
live broadcasts from the house focused on documenting the attempts to
rescue survivors from the ruins, but the cameras recorded only the
discovery of another body there. Those pictures were broadcast all
over the Arab world, on the eve of the arrival of an Arab League
foreign ministers’ delegation, which was supposed to bring with it
a cease-fire agreement. We can assume that just as in 2006, when
Hezbollah retracted its intention of agreeing to a cease-fire in the
wake of the Kfar Qana incident, this event too will only cause Hamas
to toughen its positions toward Israel, in light of very sympathetic
Palestinian and Arab public opinion.
One
indication that the campaign in Gaza is starting to get into trouble,
as far as Israel is concerned, is the constant increase in the number
of casualties among Palestinian civilians. Even before the al Dalou
family, reports about casualties among children, women and the
elderly have been increasing over the past two days, while harm
caused to militants from Hamas or other organizations has been
relatively limited.
There
are several reasons for this: Hamas, of course, operates from within
a civilian population and conceals its arsenals in built-up areas.
The same is true of missile launchers, rockets and more. In addition,
most Hamas militants make sure not to remain above ground most of the
day. They stay in the network of tunnels built by Hamas beneath the
Gaza Strip in recent years and, in effect, are at very low risk
compared to the vast majority of the Gaza population. And the process
of launching the rockets is extremely quick and is sometimes done by
remote control, so that the ability to strike at those militants is
very limited.
And
still, no matter what the reason, the harsh pictures from Gaza of
small children who are wounded or killed arouse very unpleasant
feelings. On Sunday afternoon, for example, it was reported that
aside from the al Dalou family, 14 Palestinians had been killed in
Gaza so far that day. Among the dead were five children and three
women, including Tamer and Jumana Abu Asaifan, two babies who were
killed in a bombing in Jabalya; 9-year-old Tasneem Abu Nahhal; a
52-year-old woman, Nawal Abed al Ali; 18-month-old Eyad Abu Khousa;
and a woman named Saadiyya al-Theib.
One
possible explanation for the growing number of strikes against the
civilian population is the decline in the number of quality targets
available to Israeli intelligence and the Israel Air Force. In the
afternoon, there was a report of the assassination of the head of the
Hamas rocket program, Yahye Rabiya – of whom nobody in the Gaza
Strip had ever heard and whose name for some reason was not even
mentioned on the lists of those killed in Gaza.
But
the attacks on empty facilities belonging to Hamas -- or what used to
be called “bombing real estate” -- can also attest to a certain
frustration in the Israel Defense Forces in light of the continued
firing of rockets even more intensively, despite the innumerable
aerial strikes and bombings in Gaza.
Another
problem with which Israel has to contend is the fact that it is
doubtful whether the large number of casualties among Gaza’s
civilian population actually leads Hamas leaders to reconsider the
firing of rockets. Perhaps even the opposite is true. Apparently the
many pictures of women and children killed in the present campaign (a
total of 67 dead so far, including the organizations’ militants)
help to create especially supportive Palestinian and Arab public
opinion for Hamas.
On
the Internet and on the social networks, there is a clear call to
take revenge against the Israelis and to bomb Tel Aviv, as though
firing missiles at Gush Dan, the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, will
solve the problems of the Strip’s residents. Hamas at this stage
seems to be intoxicated by the support it is receiving from the
public and especially from the Palestinian media, which cast no doubt
and ask no questions, even for a moment.
Wrapped
in the warm embrace it is receiving from Arab countries, Hamas seems
to be in no hurry at all to end the fighting and is continuing to
present very inflexible positions in the negotiations being conducted
via Egypt regarding a temporary cease-fire.
At
this stage it looks as though the organization sees Israel’s
threats of a ground operation as empty posturing. A similar attitude
was heard from the Hamas leadership a few days after the start of
Operation Cast Lead in December 2008. Then, too, Hamas did not
believe that Israel would enter the Gaza Strip on the eve of
elections, and when the ground operation began, the Hamas members
fled from the fighting and left the population to absorb the fire.
It
appears that the organization’s leadership has not learned the
lessons of that campaign. Thus, tracking the Hamas media and the
arrogant words of the organization’s leaders sometimes gives you a
feeling that Hamas is about to conquer Israel at almost any given
moment. The most recent proclamations of the organization’s
military arm, Iz al-Din al-Qassam, included claims of firing a
missile that landed north of Herzliya, sinking an Israel Navy ship,
downing an IAF F-16 and more.
The
problem is that while Hamas members are claiming credit for
nonexistent achievements and are continuing the “fighting” while
they are hidden in fortified tunnels, the residents of the Gaza Strip
will continue to be the ones to pay the price. And the bombing Sunday
in the center of Gaza is just another painful example of that
phenomenon.
Gilad
Sharon is the son of Ariel Sharon, former PM
The
viewpoint of fascists
A
decisive conclusion is necessary
There
is no middle path here – either the Gazans and their infrastructure
are made to pay the price, or we reoccupy the entire Gaza Strip.
Gilad Sharon
18
November, 2012
Anyone
who thinks Hamas is going to beg for a cease-fire, that Operation
Pillar of Defense will draw to a close and quiet will reign in the
South because we hit targets in the Gaza Strip, needs to think
again.
With the elimination of a murderous terrorist and the destruction of Hamas’s long-range missile stockpile, the operation was off to an auspicious start, but what now? This must not be allowed to end as did Operation Cast Lead: We bomb them, they fire missiles at us, and then a cease-fire, followed by “showers” – namely sporadic missile fire and isolated incidents along the fence. Life under such a rain of death is no life at all, and we cannot allow ourselves to become resigned to it.
A strong opening isn’t enough, you also have to know how to finish – and finish decisively. If it isn’t clear whether the ball crossed the goal-line or not, the goal isn’t decisive. The ball needs to hit the net, visible to all. What does a decisive victory sound like? A Tarzan-like cry that lets the entire jungle know in no uncertain terms just who won, and just who was defeated.
To accomplish this, you need to achieve what the other side can’t bear, can’t live with, and our initial bombing campaign isn’t it.
THE DESIRE to prevent harm to innocent civilians in Gaza will ultimately lead to harming the truly innocent: the residents of southern Israel. The residents of Gaza are not innocent, they elected Hamas. The Gazans aren’t hostages; they chose this freely, and must live with the consequences.
The Gaza Strip functions as a state – it has a government and conducts foreign relations, there are schools, medical facilities, there are armed forces and all the other trappings of statehood. We have no territorial conflict with “Gaza State,” and it is not under Israeli siege – it shares a border with Egypt. Despite this, it fires on our citizens without restraint.
Why do our citizens have to live with rocket fire from Gaza while we fight with our hands tied? Why are the citizens of Gaza immune? If the Syrians were to open fire on our towns, would we not attack Damascus? If the Cubans were to fire at Miami, wouldn’t Havana suffer the consequences? That’s what’s called “deterrence” – if you shoot at me, I’ll shoot at you. There is no justification for the State of Gaza being able to shoot at our towns with impunity. We need to flatten entire neighborhoods in Gaza. Flatten all of Gaza. The Americans didn’t stop with Hiroshima – the Japanese weren’t surrendering fast enough, so they hit Nagasaki, too.
There should be no electricity in Gaza, no gasoline or moving vehicles, nothing. Then they’d really call for a ceasefire.
Were this to happen, the images from Gaza might be unpleasant – but victory would be swift, and the lives of our soldiers and civilians spared.
IF THE government isn’t prepared to go all the way on this, it will mean reoccupying the entire Gaza Strip. Not a few neighborhoods in the suburbs, as with Cast Lead, but the entire Strip, like in Defensive Shield, so that rockets can no longer be fired.
There is no middle path here – either the Gazans and their infrastructure are made to pay the price, or we reoccupy the entire Gaza Strip. Otherwise there will be no decisive victory. And we’re running out of time – we must achieve victory quickly. The Netanyahu government is on a short international leash. Soon the pressure will start – and a million civilians can’t live under fire for long. This needs to end quickly – with a bang, not a whimper.
With the elimination of a murderous terrorist and the destruction of Hamas’s long-range missile stockpile, the operation was off to an auspicious start, but what now? This must not be allowed to end as did Operation Cast Lead: We bomb them, they fire missiles at us, and then a cease-fire, followed by “showers” – namely sporadic missile fire and isolated incidents along the fence. Life under such a rain of death is no life at all, and we cannot allow ourselves to become resigned to it.
A strong opening isn’t enough, you also have to know how to finish – and finish decisively. If it isn’t clear whether the ball crossed the goal-line or not, the goal isn’t decisive. The ball needs to hit the net, visible to all. What does a decisive victory sound like? A Tarzan-like cry that lets the entire jungle know in no uncertain terms just who won, and just who was defeated.
To accomplish this, you need to achieve what the other side can’t bear, can’t live with, and our initial bombing campaign isn’t it.
THE DESIRE to prevent harm to innocent civilians in Gaza will ultimately lead to harming the truly innocent: the residents of southern Israel. The residents of Gaza are not innocent, they elected Hamas. The Gazans aren’t hostages; they chose this freely, and must live with the consequences.
The Gaza Strip functions as a state – it has a government and conducts foreign relations, there are schools, medical facilities, there are armed forces and all the other trappings of statehood. We have no territorial conflict with “Gaza State,” and it is not under Israeli siege – it shares a border with Egypt. Despite this, it fires on our citizens without restraint.
Why do our citizens have to live with rocket fire from Gaza while we fight with our hands tied? Why are the citizens of Gaza immune? If the Syrians were to open fire on our towns, would we not attack Damascus? If the Cubans were to fire at Miami, wouldn’t Havana suffer the consequences? That’s what’s called “deterrence” – if you shoot at me, I’ll shoot at you. There is no justification for the State of Gaza being able to shoot at our towns with impunity. We need to flatten entire neighborhoods in Gaza. Flatten all of Gaza. The Americans didn’t stop with Hiroshima – the Japanese weren’t surrendering fast enough, so they hit Nagasaki, too.
There should be no electricity in Gaza, no gasoline or moving vehicles, nothing. Then they’d really call for a ceasefire.
Were this to happen, the images from Gaza might be unpleasant – but victory would be swift, and the lives of our soldiers and civilians spared.
IF THE government isn’t prepared to go all the way on this, it will mean reoccupying the entire Gaza Strip. Not a few neighborhoods in the suburbs, as with Cast Lead, but the entire Strip, like in Defensive Shield, so that rockets can no longer be fired.
There is no middle path here – either the Gazans and their infrastructure are made to pay the price, or we reoccupy the entire Gaza Strip. Otherwise there will be no decisive victory. And we’re running out of time – we must achieve victory quickly. The Netanyahu government is on a short international leash. Soon the pressure will start – and a million civilians can’t live under fire for long. This needs to end quickly – with a bang, not a whimper.


No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.