That's
probably putting it rather mildly. I wouldn't rely on al-Jazeera for
anything regarding the Middle East
Al-Jazeera’s
political independence questioned amid Qatar intervention
Al-Jazeera’s
editorial independence has been called into question after its
director of news stepped in to ensure a speech made by Qatar’s emir
to the UN led its English channel’s coverage of the debate on
Syrian intervention.
30
September, 2012
Journalists
had produced a package of the UN debate, topped with excerpts of
President Obama’s speech, last Tuesday when a last-minute
instruction came from Salem Negm, the Qatar-based news director, who
ordered the video to be re-edited to lead with the comments from
Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani.
Despite
protests from staff that the emir’s comments – a repetition of
previous calls for Arab intervention in Syria – were not the most
important aspect of the UN debate, the two-minute video was re-edited
and Obama’s speech was relegated to the end of the package.
There
are hints at staff dissatisfaction within the film, available for
viewing on al-Jazeera’s website and YouTube, which notes that the
emir “represents one of the smallest countries in the Arab world …
but Qatar has been one of the loudest voices condemning Syria”.
The
episode left a bitter taste among staff amid complaints that this was
the most heavy-handed editorial intervention at the global
broadcaster, which has long described itself as operating independent
of its Qatari ownership.
An
al-Jazeera spokesman said the emir’s speech was “a significant
development” that day and the broadcaster “consequently gave it
prominence”.
Obama’s
speech had been carried live, the spokesman added, and the emir’s
comments were balanced with disagreement from the Egyptian president,
Mohammed Morsi.
However,
insiders said Morsi’s contribution had to be taken from an
interview with another broadcaster, because none of the world leaders
speaking at the UN had, or was, intending to take notice of the
emir’s comments.
Al-Jazeera
English was set up in 2006 by the Arabic broadcaster of the same name
and both are owned by the Qatari state. The network, founded in 1996,
gained credibility with audiences in the region for its seemingly
independent coverage in the post 9/11 period. Its English channel was
launched to offer an alternative, non-western-centric worldview.
However,
in recent years, Qatar has taken steps to consolidate its control
over the channel as the country seeks greater political influence in
the Gulf.
In
September 2011, Wadah Khanfar, a Palestinian widely seen as
independent, suddenly left as director-general after eight years in
the post and was replaced by a member of the royal family, Sheikh
Ahmed bin Jassim al-Thani, a man with no background in journalism.
In
his resignation letter, Khanfar said, after noting that the channel
had been criticised by Donald Rumsfeld and hailed by Hillary Clinton,
that “al-Jazeera is still independent and its integral coverage has
not changed”.
He
added: “When we launched in 1996, media independence was a
contradiction in terms”, but al-Jazeera had managed “to
pleasantly surprise” its critics by “exceeding all expectations”.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.