South
China Sea feud: Beijing rebukes Washington's 'biased' stance
China’s
Foreign Ministry has called on an American diplomat to protest State
Department accusations that Beijing is hindering diplomatic efforts
in the South China Sea. It’s just the latest controversy in the
countries' already tense relationship.
RT,
5
August, 2012
The
ministry said on its website that Assistant Foreign Minister Zhang
Kunsheng had summoned the US Embassy's Deputy Chief of Mission Robert
Wang to present "strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition"
to the statement from Washington.
On
Friday, the State Department said that Beijing’s establishment of a
military garrison in the area runs against "collaborative
diplomatic efforts to resolve differences and risk further escalating
tensions in the region,” according to Reuters.
In
the statement, the US voiced support for diplomatic efforts by
Southeast Asian nations negotiating with Beijing, who claims
virtually all of the South China Sea as its own.
But
the Philippines has also claimed the territory.
And
it’s no wonder that the sea is coveted by both nations, as its
waters and islands are rich in oil and gas.
According
to China's Ministry of Geological Resources and Mining, the South
China Sea may contain up to 17.7 billion tons of crude oil.
Ministry
spokesman Qin Gang said Friday’s remark "completely ignored
the facts, deliberately confounded right and wrong, and sent a
seriously wrong signal, which is not conducive to the efforts
safeguarding the peace and stability of the South China Sea and the
Asia Pacific region."
Washington’s
response comes just five days after China established the city of
Sansha on a remote island 220 miles from its southernmost province.
Sansha is intended to administer hundreds of thousands of square
miles of water in an area where China wants to strengthen its control
over disputed islands.
Since
the establishment of Sansha, “the US government and several
politicians have repeatedly made irresponsible remarks on the issue,
reflecting Washington's attempts to meddle in Asian affairs,”
China’s state-run news agency Xinhua said.
The
Philippines has called Sansha's creation unacceptable – and it’s
not the first time the two countries have clashed.
Within
the South China Sea lies the Scarborough Reef – the site of an
intense standoff between Beijing and Manila.
The
dispute began last April, when Chinese fishing boats were stopped by
Philippine vessels at the reef.
Manila
sent a navy ship to the site, and China responded by sending more
vessels of its own.
The
US backed a mutual withdrawal agreement between the two countries in
June. However, Manila says Beijing has broken the agreement by using
barriers to block Philippine access to the reef.
Washington
maintains that it holds a neutral position on the dispute, but
Beijing disagrees – mainly because of joint military drills
between the US and the Philippines last April.
According
to CBS News, the United States has consistently said that it refuses
to take sides, although it is obliged to defend the Philippines from
outside aggression, under an existing mutual defense treaty.
But
America’s actions have angered China, and Beijing isn’t keeping
quiet.
China
accuses the US of trying to isolate it from neighboring nations. "The
US selectively takes sides in these disputes. By doing so, Washington
intends to alienate China from countries around the South China Sea,”
Xinhua reported.
In
July 2010, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said her country had a
"national interest" in the South China Sea. Since then,
Washington has taken a series of unilateral actions in the region,
according to Xinhua.
Earlier
this year, US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced that he would
raise the Navy's Pacific Ocean deployment by 10 per cent.
But
China has made it clear that it is uninterested in American
intervention.
And
as the ongoing debate over the Scarborough Reef continues, the
question remains whether the US will work with China and Southeast
Asian countries to maintain stability in the Asia-Pacific region –
or simply add more fuel to an already blazing fire.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.