Racing
toward the fiscal cliff
6
August, 2012
I
haven't written about the so-called fiscal cliff because, against
increasing evidence, I hold to Abba Eban's quote, "When all else
fails, men turn to reason."
But maybe not in today's America.
The fiscal
cliff is
the set of budget cuts and tax increases that would automatically
kick in next year. That is, unless Republicans and Democrats, the
Congress and the White House, can agree to new tax and budget
provisions, especially the shape of extending the Bush tax cuts. If
we fall off the cliff, according to the Congressional Budget Office,
the total effect could mean a 3.9 percent contraction in the growth
rate of gross domestic product next year.
The
fiscal cliff is replacing the eurozone crisis as the big deal facing
the U.S. economy. As the New
York Times reports,
businesses are reducing their investments for fear that reason won't
prevail. "Executives at companies making everything from
electrical components and power systems to automotive parts say the
fiscal stalemate is prompting them to pull back now, rather than wait
for a possible resolution to the deadlock on Capitol Hill."
President
Obama and most Democrats want to extend the tax cuts, but only up to
$250,000 in income (yes, even for top earners). Most Republicans want
all the tax cuts to continue and Mitt Romney pledges to attack the
deficit by aggressive spending cuts (mostly unspecific except for his
antipathy toward the relatively tiny help for Amtrak) but not for the
defense budget. Interestingly, both sides accept the right-wing
starting point of the need for austerity, despite the disastrous
results in Britain and the fact that U.S. Treasuries are a safe haven
and weren't
affected by last year's downgrade.
The borrowing costs for an economic stimulus would never be better.
But nobody in power is proposing it, despite the poor economy.
The
always essential Ezra Klein at the Washington
Post offers this
useful primer to
the fiscal cliff.
The
larger risk is a repeat of last year's budget deadlock, a sign that
America can no longer govern itself. That, and not reverting to
Clinton-era tax rates, is the biggest danger to the economy.
Ironically, Obama is taking what would once have been a conservative
position. Today's conservatives are really pushing forward a
revolution, believe in it or not, without precedent in American
history outside the imaginations of the likes of Ayn Rand. And as Mao
said, "A revolution is not a dinner party."

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.