Looking at the evidence of "Agenda 21"and the climate change hoax

Exploring David Icke, 

Agenda 21 and the Non- 

Profit Industrial Complex

Seemorerocks

Even though I’m pretty obsessed with what’s happening in my own backyard, with the fires in Australia, I am doing what I normally do at this time of year and that is to take stock And try to make sense of some things that I don’t have time for during the year.

I have been making my way through the voluminous tome of David Icke's Everything You Wanted to Know But Were Never Told and trying to make sense of some things that I don’t have time for during the year.

It is giving me a good insight into the world of some of the more extreme conspiracy theories.

What has surprised me is that Ike’s writing It’s not as daft as I might have thought. Yes, it does seem that he believes and shapeshifting lizards but this is all within a larger context. 

He harks back to the Gnostic gospels and talks of archontic beings that could be compared With the concept of Demons, or the Devil, in Christianity. These beings are hiding true reality, which is that all we are in Icke’s words is “Consciousness having an experience” and so are distorting our perceptions of reality so they can control humans in their own demonic interests.

His book covers many subjects but one of them is Agenda 21 and what he calls “the climate change scam”. I decided to take a closer look, not to denounce or dismiss but to understand. 

I have a lot of interaction with climate change deniers who refer back to 
Agenda 21 as if it is a slam dunk that climate change is something made up the New World Order.

Their “arguments” are so spurious but I have never been able to take them seriously so I have decided to take some time to try and get an understanding of what this is all about.

THE LIBERAL RESPONSE

However, I must say that in my daily interactions on social media there is a funny sense in which I am more irritated by some of the liberals talking about climate change as if it is the only problem we are faced by.

To give an example, I wrote a piece on how through sale of water rights and fracking and mining Australia's water is being stolen.  But to this liberal numbskull this is nothing but "climate change denial"

It does not matter whether the information is truthful or not - it goes along with a closed mind that has not researched or gone through the issues.

To give another example, someone posted a comment that referred to the spraying of aluminium, barium and strontium leading to the desiccation of the country.  In response to this someone who fancies himself as well-educated and well-informed came out with a comment I see repeated from time to time - that aluminium is one of the most common elements on the planet.

It took me approximately 30 seconds to check on Google and to find out that aluminium cannot exist on its own in Nature.

https://education.jlab.org/itselemental/ele013.html

These people know it all and it seems to be sufficient (in their minds) to throw something into the works - the first thing that comes into their heads - even if it isn't true.

Perhaps it is a case of "it is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding" (Upton Sinclair)?

AGENDA 21

No wonder I have never been able to work the whole Agenda 21 thing out.  

I went looking on Google which is the fount of all official wisdom, and could find nothing that would give me a good sense of the specifics of Agenda 21, still less confirm or deny what the conspiracists like Icke are saying.

See how "helpful" Wikipedia (again, another fount for everything the Elite want us to believe).

The "21" in Agenda 21 refers to the 21st century. It has been affirmed and had a few modifications at subsequent UN conferences. Its aim is achieving global sustainable development. One major objective of the Agenda 21 initiative is that every local government should draw its own local Agenda 21.

The Agenda is a commitment to eradicate poverty and achieve sustainable development by 2030 world-wide, ensuring that no one is left behind. The adoption of the 2030 Agenda was a landmark achievement, providing for a shared global vision towards sustainable development for all.

Instead, they refer to a 500 page publication which, if you have the time and energy you can read HERE.

Not that I can confirm it without reading through a 500-page document but this is what Icke says the goals of Agenda 21 are, "in their own words"

• An end to national sovereignty
• State planning and management of all land resources, ecosystems, deserts, forest, mountains, oceans and freshwater; agriculture; rural  development; Biotechnology: and ensuring equity
• The state to define the role of business and financial resources 
• Abolition of private property
• Restructuring the family unit
• Children raised by the state
• People told what their job will be
• Major restrictions on movement
• Creation of human settlement zones
• Mass resettlement as people are forced to vacate land where they live
• Dumbing down education
• Mass global depopulation in pursuit of all the above.

If you look forward to Agenda 2030 this is what they are claiming as their "aspirational goals":

“ No poverty; zero hunger; good health and well-being; clean water and sanitation; affordable and clean energy; decent work and economic growth; industry, innovation and infrastructure; reduced inequalities; Sustainable cities and communities; responsible consumption and production; climate action; protecting life on land; peace, justice and strong institutions and partnerships to achieve these goals"

This reads like a very sick joke in 2020.

You'd have to be a fool (or perhaps a liberal) to be taken in.

Here are just a few things Icke is pointing to.

DR CALLAGAN AND DR. RICHARD DAY

David Icke cites Dr. Richard Day who he says was an Illuminati insider who invited medical students to put away their tape recorders and note pads while he gave a lecture that turned out to be an insight into what our Rulers had in store for the rest of us back then.   

The content of this lecture was revealed by Dr. Lawrence Dunegan who realised the importance of what was being said so wrote notes on napkins.

"Before he began his talk, Dr Day asked everyone to turn off all tape recorders and stop taking notes so that he could tell them, the prospective leaders of organised medicine, what was going to happen in the future. Dr Dunegan sensed that Dr Day's message would be important, ignored the request and noted the points made by him on a set of table napkins. He later wrote up these notes, which formed the basis for the three tapes."

A transcript of Dr Lawrence Dunegan’s taped reminiscences of off-the-record remarks by Illuminati Insider,Dr Richard Day on 20 March 1969 can be found HERE

Here are s few quotes from Dr.Day. 

"Generally, more highly educated people who have higher incomes can consume more resources than poorly educated people who tend to have lower incomes. In this case more education increases the threat to sustainability."

"Religious and epic tensions will be a defining element in the social landscape. Stagnation will coexist with unprecedented development as impoverishment, slums and chante between rich and poor. Religious and ethnic tensions will be a defining element in the social landscape. Stagnation will coexist with unprecedented development as impoverishment, slums and shanty towns rapidly expand alongside modern high-rises, technological advances and ever increasing levels of prosperity. This is the world of our future."

According to Dr. Day privately owned housing will become a thing of the past. The cost of housing and financing housing would gradually be made so high that most people couldn’t afford it; young people with more and more become renters, particularly in apartments or condominiums.

"People would not be able to buy (homes) and gradually more and more of the population would be forced into small apartments. Small apartments which would not accommodate very many children.…

"Ultimately, people would be assigned where they would live and it would be common to have non-family members living with you. It’s my way of your not knowing just how far you could trust anybody. This would all be under the control of a central housing authority. Have this in mind… When they ask, how many bedrooms in your house? Do you have a finished game room? This information is personal and is of no national interest to government under our existing constitution. But you’ll be asked his questions…"

Some of the things mentioned in Dr. Day in 1969 must have seen outlandish and even impossible. However, we look back in hindsight it is not difficult to conclude that there were certain things that the Elite had in mind for the rest of us even back then.

Megacities: urban future, the emerging complexity

David Icke talks about how people are being forced to live in smaller and smaller apartments. I don't see a particular evil in that but he also talks about the fire at Grenfell Towers which it is not difficult to see as an attempt to get poorer communities out of the Chelsea Borough in London, to support the gentrification of a rich neighbourhood. The building was refitted with cladding that was a fire risk and people were told to stay in place; the folk that survived were those that received phone calls from neighbouring towers that could see what was going on. Others sent panicked phone messages.

Many other buildings have been reclad in the same way.

If you look at this video obtained by the Intercept it shows the US military military hierarchy already knows is in the wings.

Here are some quotes:

"The future is urban. By 2030 urban areas are expected to grow by 1,.4 billion with that growth occurring almost entirely in the developing world. Cities will account for 60% of the world's population and 70% of the world's GDP. The urban environment will be the locus where drivers of instability will converge. By the year 2030, 60% of urban dwellers will be under the age of 18. the cities that grow the fastest will be the most challenged as resources become constrained and elicit networks fill the gap by over extended and undercapitalised governments

"Growth will magnify the increasing separation between rich and poor. Religious and epic tensions will be a defining element in the social landscape. Religious and ethnic tensions will be a defining element in the social landscape. Stagnation will coexist with unprecedented development as impoverishment, slums and shanty towns rapidly expand alongside modern high-rises, technological advances and ever increasing levels of prosperity. This is the world of our future."

Social structures will be equally challenged if not dysfunctional as historic ways of life clash with modern living, ethnic and racial differences are forced to live together and criminal networks offer opportunity for the growing mess of unemployed."

The Hunger Games Society

Often it is said that Hollywood will signal where the Elite wants to take us.  

One example of this is the movie series, the Hunger Games Society "that portrayed a dystopia in which a tiny few mega-rich people employed a vicious and merciless police/military state to impose their will upon a poverty-stricken population maintained in ongoing inter-generational slavery" (p.415).

Icke cites real-life examples such as people being made homeless while laws make it illegal to sleep rough and feeding the homeless is against the law in some places and people are subject to arrest.

Here are just a few examples:

• In case you think these are drug addicts and the like there are many people who had nice jobs and houses before the financial meltdown who are now in America's tent cities.

• We now have legislation whereby governments can take people's money deposited in banks to save the very banks that caused the meltdown(the bail-in).

• We only have to think back a few years to how the Greek government is simply stealing people's financial assets.

• Multitudes of people are being led to the financial abyss, shown by 45 % of Americans use half their monthly pay to service debt that excludes mortgage debt while the mega-rich own half the wealth and the world's wealthiest 62 people being worth the same as the poorest half of the human population combined in 2016.

Icke says that is where we are being taken and the Hunger Games Society is founded on a world government that would dictate to every community.  One can see the signs of this future perhaps in the globalist dictatorship of the European Union.

• "All food production and distribution will be strictly controlled in the Hunger Games Society and this is the motivation behind the incessant centralisation of food production and seed ownership by mergers and take-overs of giant corporations such as Monsanto and Bayer."

• In 1913 corn was 100% owned by farmers by 2013 it was 95% owned by corporations with 90% GM0.

• Nestle chairman Peter Brabeck stated water is not a human right, but that it has a market value and should be privatised

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-03/what-hunger-games-society-looks

You can read more about this in chapter 12 of Icke's book (pp.415-421)

Control of the weather

Icke talks of geoengineering and weather manipulation as  way to force people of the land and into human settlement megacities Is through control of the weather.

HAARP: Secret Weapon Used For Weather Modification, Electromagnetic Warfare

Something that I learned was that many leading figures In the wartime Manhattan Project would later work in weather modification and manipulation of the atmosphere because there are many cross overs between atomic bomb physics and those of weather control.

Edward Teller and others were amongst those who made the transition from went Manhattan project would later work in with weather modification and manipulation of the atmosphere because there are many crossovers between atomic bomb physics and those of weather control.

"Energetic weather manipulation would appear to have entered a whole new phase after the death of Nicola Tesla in 1943 when his cutting edge research documents and to the nature of the electrical atmosphere were confiscated by the US government new paragraph"

A researcher, Peter A. Kirby goes into this here:

Rockefeller asset Dr. Richard Day worked in weather control during World War 11 and he revealed what was possible in 1969 while explaining hiw this would be used to impose the 'new system' of those her represented.

Dr. Dunegan recalled:

"There was a mention of weather. This was another really striking statement. He said: and we can all soon will be able to control the weather. He said: I am not merely referring to dropping iodide crystals into the clouds to precipitate rain that’s already there, but real control. And weather was seen as a weapon of war A weapon of influencing public policy. It could make rain or withhold rain in order to influence certain areas and bring them under your control.

"There were two sides to this that we are rather striking. He said: on the one hand you can make trout during the growing season so that nothing will grow, and on the other you can make for a very heavy rains during harvest season so the fields are too muddy to bring in the harvest, and indeed one might be able to do both. There was no statement how this would be done. It was stated that either it was already possible or very, very close to being possible (in 1969)."

This is what David Icke has to say about HAARP and ionosphere heaters:

"So called ionosphere heaters were originally based on technology developed by Nicola Tesla in the first half Of the 20th century and included in his seized papers. They have been installed around the world with the potential to manipulate weather patterns even more fundamentally as technology has improved and HAARP is history in terms of capability. Weather manipulation is now the result of frequencies directed from many sources that meet the desired point to collectively contribute to the effect and the most powerful can create an earthquake. These techniques include manipulation of the scalar field (faced again on teslas research into the scalar phenomenon)"

https://weatherwars.blogspot.com/2005/11/scalar-weather-wars-have-begun.html

Agenda 2030 references to zero hunger and clean water are (according to Icke), worded to hide the fact that the plan is to centrally control the population and distribution of both food and water controls.

"Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people"
---Henry Kissinger

From Dr. Dunegan:

"There was a mention of weather. This was another really striking statement. He said: and we can all soon will be able to control the weather. He said: 'I am not merely referring to dropping iodide crystals into the clouds to precipitate rain that’s already there, but REAL control.' And weather was seen as a weapon of war A weapon of influencing public policy. It could make rain or withhold rain in order to influence certain areas and bring them under your control.

"There were two sides to this that we are rather striking. He said: on the one hand you can make trout during the growing season so that nothing will grow, and on the other you can make for a very heavy rains during harvest season so the fields are too muddy to bring in the harvest, and indeed one might be able to do both. There was no statement how this would be done. It was stated that either it was already possible or very, very close to being possible (in 1969)."

He also cites the following:

• In 1913 corn was 100% owned by farmers; by 2013 it was 95% owned by corporations with 90% GM0.

• There is a siege against small farms and smallholders that is connected to the increasing attacks on people growing their own food in their own or community gardens.

• Zoning laws ('you can't do that here')  are one of the major tools being employed. 

• Food production and seed ownership is being centralised – to whit Monsanto, Bayer and GMOs. The proposed $66 billion Bayer takeover of Monsanto would give them control of more than 25% of the worlds seeds and pesticides.

• In Oregon the government is claiming ownership of  every drop of water (even  rain or snow . One couple was told to destroy a 40 year old pond on their property because the government owns the rainwater. Officials threatened to destroy a 2000 acre organic farm with an 18 year organic certification by forcibly spraying Monsanto roundup and other pesticides to kill a weed.

And in Queensland, Australia...

https://cairnsnews.org/2018/07/29/qld-govt-says-it-owns-rainfall-once-it-hits-the-ground-on-your-property/

• Bayer is one of four biotech giants, along with Sygenta, Dow and DuPont, who are sponsoring the 'Agriculture in the classroom' programme (directed at children) in Canada to push GMO pesticide propaganda. 

• Fracking is another way that water is being used to clear people of the land by injecting toxic fluid into fractured shall rocks and poisoning groundwater supplies. You need to watch Max Igan's videos HERE and HERE on the Australian fires to see how this works.

Again, Dr Richard Day, back in 1969:

"Food supplies would come under tight control… Food shortages could be created in a hurry and people would realise the dangers of over population. Ultimately, whether the population slows down or not the food supply is to be brought under centralise control so that people would have enough to be well- nourished but they would not have enough to support any fugitive from the new system. In other words, if you had a friend or relative who didn’t sign on, and growing ones own food would be outlawed. This would be done under some sort of project."

"In the beginning I mentioned there were two purposes for everything – one the ostensible purpose, and the one the ostensible purpose here  that growing your own vegetables was unsafe, it would spread disease or something like that. So the acceptable idea was to protect the consumer but the real idea was to limit the food supply and growing your own food would be illegal."

CLIMATE CHANGE - REAL OR 

'HOAX'

One of the main reasons why I have not looked into Agenda 21 or Agenda 2020 is that it is directly associated with climate change denial.

David Icke makes use of the concept of "problem, action, solution". 

It is a bit of a mantra to those involved in conspiracy theory. I was surprised to find that Google censorship has not yet gone that far

However, I am broadly familiar with the term dialectic and have never found it used that way in philosophy - it has always been one of "thesis, antithesis, synthesis" without any suggestion of something "made up" or "concocted".

However, the concept does have some validity in my mind when connected with something like 9/11 or another false flag, but I cannot find ANY justification for its use linked with climate change.

This is typical of what he has to say:

"Repetition is the most powerful form of perception control even if you’re repeating baloney. It’s hot – it’s global warming – it’s cold – it’s global warming, burn the toast – it’s global warming. Oops, no sorry that’s the Russians." 

Icke correctly identifies the UN climate agenda (as opposeed to cliamte change itslelf) as a "scam". Of this later.

He quotes two of the main figures, Christiana Figuerres, one of the authors of the 2016 Paris Agreement and Otmar Edenhofer, described as "one of the world's leading experts on climate change policy, environmental and energy policy, and energy economics."

Mostly, they talk about "saving the planet" but sometimes the cat is let out of the bag and the real intentions are revealed.

"This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model"

– – –Christiana Figuerres, UN

And Otmar Edenhofer: 

"We redistribute de facto the worlds' wealth by climate policy...climate change policy is about how we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth"

"First of all, developed countries have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community. But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore.".

– – – Otmar Edenhofer, former UN climate official

https://www.azquotes.com/author/30831-Ottmar_Edenhofer

Aurelio Piccei of the Club of Rome, in the 1991 publication the First Global Revolution

“ In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill“

(NOTE: I have not read the above to confirm the quote and to find the context)

Icke maintains that climate change is nothing other than a "most powerful form of perception control" and is "baloney" and there is a combination of exploitation of natural cycles such as the el-Nino, a hiding of real intentions combined with falsification of the data.

The truth is not well-served by statements by Al Gore climate change is partly responsible for Brexit and is the  the principal cause of the war in Syria when he knows that it was caused by militarists who are a major part of the Agenda 21 agenda

So far so good... but I can see no justification for the conclusion that "climate change is a scam".  

'Problem, reaction, solution' is not an appropriate concept for a situation where there is no doubt that the climate change freight train is realer than real and rather than being fake it is worse (much worse) than is being let on.

Over the 8 years that I have been following this in depth I have not found that the mainstream is trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the public with climate change but rather the opposite.  Any situation that I have seen and the authorities and media are trying to downplay the whole thing (just have a look at anything I have written about Radio NZ, or NIWA and the like on this.

Everything I have seen indicates that the authorities are trying to cover up (and certainly not 'exaggerate' the seriousness of climate change and everything that goes with it.

The sphere of human affairs can be as corrupt as you like to paint it and there is any amount of evidence of this.  However, you cannot say the same about Nature.  Even if everything the governments, the UN, the media had to say was a complete lie that would not have the slightest effect on what is happening in Nature.   

In short, Gaia does not lie.

I was looking for a stronger argument that climate change is fake but I did not find it - or anything new.

His main arguments were as follows (briefly):

• He repeats the argument that CO2 is only a tiny part of the atmosphere and without it we would all be dead.  CO2 is a greenhouse gas - too little of it and we freeze; too much and we fry.  I have been aware of the greenhouse effect (as it relates to Venus) since approximately the age of 12. He also says it is good for plants and encourages growth - but that is anyone's definition of a straw man argument

CO2 Makes Up Just 0.04% of Earth's Atmosphere. Here's Why Its Impact Is So Massive

• He puts a lot of emphasis on claims by Dr.John Bates, a top scientist with NOAA who, in an article in the Mail on Sunday accused scientists of deliberately misleading the Paris meeting with exaggerations on global temperatures.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html

This article goes further into the article and confirms that he has doubled down on his accusations but is not any sort of climate change sceptic but says:

"It's not deep fraud or anything ....It's more a series of biases that seem to lead in one direction."

https://www.insidescience.org/news/retired-noaa-scientist-doubles-down-climate-data-controversy

No Data Manipulation at NOAA

• Another thing Icke cites to prove that the books are being cooked. According to him lower temperature records are being removed  and high temperatures are exaggerated.

• He repeats an accusation that information on a heatwave in Australia in 1896 were removed .

Extreme heat in 1896: Panic stricken people fled the outback on special trains as hundreds die.

This is the media response.  

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-12-21/1896-heatwave-killed-435-climate-scientists-cant-compare-today/11809998

https://theconversation.com/factcheck-was-the-1896-heatwave-wiped-from-the-record-33742

The Australian media is talking about it in response to the accusation but I have to admit there is no mention of it on anything can be called an encyclopedia.

This is from a list of heatwaves in Wikipedia.

• He quotes Al Gore as saying in 2007 that the Arctic sea ice would be gone would "be gone in as little as seven years from now" and puts forward a nonsensical claim that " the Arctic ice cap was found to have INCREASED by 43 per cent"

As a watcher of Arctic ice I can only laugh at this claim.

So, if I was to sum up David Icke and his chapter "Is it hot, or is it me?" it is a mixture of some things that are true and some fantastical conclusions that do not seem to me to be justified in the light of the evidence.

He does clearly show the fakery around much of the agenda but is completely wrong about the reality global warming. You couldn't be more wrong.

But it turns out I have better evidence than that.


CORY MORNINGSTAR AND THE NEW GREEN DEAL

“How do you vaccum up peoples fury and redirect it into a blind alley?”

—-Arundhati Roy

Cory Morningstar is a researcher who publishes her own blog the Wrong Sort of Green.  She was a regular guest on Nature Bats Last with Guy McPherson and Mike Ferrigan until they broke up acrimoniously in 2016 over Guy's putative stexting with a young woman in Australia.

She has also come from a background of environmental activism and came to her conclusions largely through her own personal experience.

She has written a five part article, The manufacturing of Greta Thunberg - for consent: the political economy of the non-profit industrial complex.

http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2019/01/17/the-manufacturing-of-greta-thunberg-for-consent-the-political-economy-of-the-non-profit-industrial-complex/

It is a long read and takes some time and effort to deal with the information. I have not got around reading her articles until now and it confirms most of the conclusions I have been coming to in the last year.

Greta was "found" by an organisation that looks more like a financial start-up company than an environmental organisation in Sweden called There's No Time.

Here is their video:




“Our goal is to become at least 100 million users. It is an eighth of all who have climbed on social media. Only last month we managed to reach 18 million social media accounts according to a media survey that Meltwater news made for us. At Facebook, we are currently seven times the number of followers among the world’s all climate organizations. We are growing with 10,000 new global followers per day on Facebook.” 

— Ingmar Rentzhog interview with Miljö & Utveckling, October 15, 2018

The deeper one looks the less this looks like a spontaneous "movement from below" than something that is well-planned and the goals are far from obvious.

It is hard not to be sympathetic to Greta and above all, all the young people who have joined Climate Strike.  How could you not?

But what if this is not what it is about and if the whole thing is a cynical attempt to save a faltering capitalist economy and use this to launch a "fourth industrial revolution"?

What if it's not at all about saving the planet, nature, but is about the further destruction of an already depleted planet?

Cory starts her article with a quote from Japanese American sculptor, Hiroyuki Hamada

“What’s infuriating about manipulations by the Non Profit Industrial Complex is that they harvest the goodwill of the people, especially young people. They target those who were not given the skills and knowledge to truly think for themselves by institutions which are designed to serve the ruling class. Capitalism operates systematically and structurally like a cage to raise domesticated animals. Those organizations and their projects which operate under false slogans of humanity in order to prop up the hierarchy of money and violence are fast becoming some of the most crucial elements of the invisible cage of corporatism, colonialism and militarism.”

Rather than try to summarise the article myself I will share the opening from Cory's article and suggest you look further as this is important information:

" WE DON’T HAVE TIME - As this term is quickly becoming the quote du jour as a collective mantra to address the ongoing environmental disaster that can best be described as a nod to the obvious, it’s true that we don’t have time. We don’t have time to stop imperialist wars – wars being the greatest contributor to climate change and environmental degradation by far – but we must do so. Of course this is an impossible feat under the crushing weight of the capitalist system, a US war economy, and the push for a fourth industrial revolution founded on renewable energy. Yet, inconvenience has nothing to do with necessity in regards to addressing a particular situation. What is never discussed in regard to the so-called “clean energy revolution” is that its existence is wholly dependent on “green” imperialism – the latter term being synonymous with blood.

"But that’s not what this series is about.

"This series is about new financial markets in a world where global economic growth is experiencing stagnation. The threat and subsequent response is not so much about climate change as it is about the collapse of the capitalist economic system. This series is about the climate wealth opportunity of unprecedented growth, profits, and the measures our elite classes will take in order to achieve it – including the exploitation of the youth.

"The “one kid immediately got twenty supporters” – from a Swedish network for sustainable business. What is going on – is the launch of a global campaign to usher in a required consensus for the Paris Agreement, the Green New Deal and all climate-related policies and legislation written by the power elite – for the power elite. This is necessary in order to unlock the trillions of dollars in funding by way of massive public demand".

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/jul/31/capitalism-is-part-of-solution-to-climate-crisis-says-mark-carney

These agreements and policies include carbon capture and storage (CCS), enhanced oil recovery (EOR), bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), rapid total decarbonisation, payments for ecosystem services (referred to as “natural capital”), nuclear energy and fission, and a host of other “solutions” that are hostile to an already devastated planet. What is going on – is a rebooting of a stagnant capitalist economy, that needs new markets – new growth – in order to save itself. What is being created is a mechanism to unlock approximately 90 trillion dollars for new investments and infrastructure. What is going on is the creation of, and investment in, perhaps the biggest behavioural change experiment yet attempted, global in scale. And what are the deciding factors in what behaviours global society should adhere to? And more importantly, who decides? This is a rhetorical question, as we know full well the answer: the same Western white male saviours and the capitalist economic system they have implemented globally that has been the cause of our planetary ecological nightmare. This crisis continues unabated as they appoint themselves (yet again) as the saviours for all humanity – a recurring problem for centuries.

Lastly, here is an article written by scientist Clive Splash about the Paris Agreement

https://www.clivespash.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2016-Spash-This-Changes-Nothing.pdf

This is so cynical that it could easily play into David Icke's Archontic world of control of the population in the interests in the Elite.

The usual responses of "this fails to come up with solutions" or "it fosters inaction" is highly typical of what we get these days and is talked about so well by David Icke and shows that there is not a care in the world about whether this is true or not.

It is.

But it is "off-theme" and thus to be denounced by those who control and manipulate our perceptions by all the methods described above.

I have taken time to full absorb this message but it will be a difficult pill to swallow for those who have any remaining hope of solving what is a complex and multi-faceted predicament that has everything to do with the way the world is run and the way money works (in this regard Cory advises giving up listening to the NGO's like 350.org and AVAAZ and to pay closer attention to the financial press where one can see what is really going on.

http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2012/09/10/avaaz-imperialist-pimps-of-militarism-protectors-of-the-oligarchy-trusted-facilitators-of-war/

As I have found constantly the deeper one looks the worse things look - especially as Australia burns.

Here is an interview with Patrick Henningsen, who is a climate change sceptic.

Cory Morningstar on the Subversion of the Climate Crisis 'Rebellion

And with Derrick Jensen who is not.

Derrick Jensen Resistance Radio w/ Cory Morningstar - April 3, 2016

CONCLUSION

This is the petition I will NOT be signing.

People respond very understandably by signing such petitions.  They are doing so out of the very best of motivations; they really want to make a difference.

There have been calls for a climate emergency for a long time, to take the climate emergency seriously.

But the worst thing about the world we live in is that over 99% of the population has been totally disempowered so we have been reduced to watching this dystopia from the sidelines.

Cory Morningstar (and also, to some extent David Icke) demonstrate why signing this petition is a waste of time. Essentially they are asking our leaders to respond to the emergency with everything that has been discussed above.

We are talking about a climate emergency. THEY are talking about a fourth industrial revolution.

Unfortunately, people do not like being told that their not-so-well-thought-out emotional responses are to no avail and are likely to round on the messenger, the bearer of truth.

That is exactly what I would expect in this case.