BLOCKED for "flat Earth theories and creationist beliefs"

I feel free to talk my mind now and have cut the "umbilical 

cord" with the man with a stroke of genius destroyed by his 

own hubris.


When was my last post espousing flat earth theories and 

creationist beliefs"?

Thrown out of the “Tribe”

Today I tried to re-post the following onto Guy Mcpherson's Facebook page, Nature Bats Last and found I couldn't. because I had been BLOCKED

https://robinwestenra.blogspot.com/2019/08/an-update-on-methane-climate-and-arctic.html

On the basis of that I went onto a friend's computer and found this from Pauline 

Panagiotou-Schneider

Unfortunately, because of Robin Westenra’s recent blog post wherein he damns Guy and Kevin Hester, (and I presume me as well-ffs Am I chopped liver?) for 1) our too-short visit to see him in NZ in July where we drove five hours to see him while also trying to meet up with another NBL member we had never met(sadly that didn’t happen),

and 2) for the technical issues on the NBL radio show with him were he claims Guy and Kevin (those evil geniuses) had some kind of mastermind plot to push him “out of the tribe” (paranoid much?) by causing technical issues... cuz no one ever had tech issues on the show before, said no one ever;

We are therefore giving our dear, but much confused friend, a break from NBL until he figures out that we love him and are not plotting behind his back.

Robin’s recent embracing of chemtrails may have caused the confusion clouding his judgment. Sadly, that’s a topic we don’t tolerate here any more than we do discussion of flat Earth theories or creationist beliefs.

****

What follows are my comments on the above:

Read this to see the ACCURATE version of events.

https://robinwestenra.blogspot.com/2019/07/an-act-of-rejection.html?fbclid=IwAR3dStEnTSynEv5KRP5-MklNPn14pv85WzPxABanpzcBZk1JL6szUhmX5Uw

They did not drive five hours

The visit (the date of which they got wrong TWICE) was pre-arranged and

the ferry, which they got off, is 15 minutes away, not five hours.

However, it is not just the fact of being there that matters.

You do not, in my values, visit someone in their home just to be rude and look into a cellphone and leave without so much as a word of thanks or even “goodbye”

I have looked into (but not "embraced" “chemtrails”) but I have veered towards religion - something which they hate almost as much as the Dark One does.

"Robin’s recent embracing of chemtrails may have caused the confusion clouding his judgment. Sadly, that’s a topic we don’t tolerate here any more than we do discussion of flat Earth theories or creationist beliefs."

I have never, even ONCE posted anything on their Facebook page that reflects any of the above and I have never (sic) espoused "flat Earth theories or creationist beliefs" in ANY form, privately or publicly but only very specific observations about Arctic ice which they seem to be disinterested in).

What I say in my blog or on my Facebook page is none of their business although, in their eyes, they possibly think it is especially as Kevin Hester said on the radio interview that I had been "working on their behalf".

The arrogance is almost unimaginable as I have never worked on anyone else's behalf (or at least not since I was working for a short while for CollapseNet).

With the comments on the radio show they seem to prove their point. There were technical problems whether or not they had it before. But, as usual, it is ALWAYS someone else’s fault.

You can listen to the interview here, which, technically-speaking, in my mind is a disgrace.  

As I remember it was highly- stressful to get to this point and that was after a failure of the studio to connect us . something Pauline is denying in her version.

Always someone else’s fault.

Now, I have to distinguish between the message and the messenger.

Pauline seems to want to paint me as “paranoid much” but I can tell you who IS paranoid

I suspect that some examples have been removed from the website because I have seen a whole raft of accusations in recent months.  

While on the visit Guy was on the point of accusing Peter Wadhams of the same (because he did not respond to some invitation of the "Great Man").

All this from someone who seems to have given up on the science and is just going through the motions for presentations and interviews.

Every time I have mentioned particular data relating to methane or the Arctic ice the response has been one of total disinterest.

And what am I supposed to do with this?

"We are therefore giving our dear, but much confused friend (sic), a break from NBL until he figures out that we love him (sic) and are not plotting behind his back."

Go onto my knees, beg forgiveness and do a mea culpa?

It seems that that started from the day I started independent research with Margo and wasn't taking all my cues from one person.

P.S.

From Pauline Schneider, via Facebook:

"Robin, as long as you believe that we somehow insulted you and “pushed you out of the tribe” when we came to see you, you will be mistaken.

As long as you insist upon insulting Kevin, Guy and me this way, you will be mistaken.

We love you and Pam.

We were excited to see you.

You have disgraced our short visit with your insults on your blog.

When you remember that we love you, please let me know."

I hope you feel better soon.

This came through as a comment on Facebook that, sadly, I have to see as being quite true:

_{"A few years ago, some of Guy’s detractors, those who disliked him but otherwise agree with his insights, predicted that there would soon be built a cult of personality around him, the basis for a kind of religion, which he would stoke. At the time, I scoffed at that. Now, I’m not so sure. There does seem to be a cult of personality around him, and as others have observed, he seems to be growing ever more narcissistic.”}