When
Mosul falls Isis will flee to the safety of Syria.But what then?
Robert
Fisk
18
October, 2016
Syria’s
army and Hezbollah and Iranian allies are preparing for a massive
invasion by thousands of Isis fighters who will be driven out of Iraq
when Mosul falls. The real purpose behind the much-trumpeted
US-planned "liberation" of the Iraqi city, the Syrian
military suspect, is to swamp Syria with the hordes of Isis fighters
who will flee their Iraqi capital in favour of their "mini-capital"
of Raqqa inside Syria itself.
For
weeks now, Western media and the American experts it likes to quote
have been predicting a Stalingrad-style battle to the death by Isis
inside Mosul – or a swift victory over Isis followed by
inter-sectarian Iraqi battles for the city. The UN is warning of
massive refugee columns streaming from a besieged city. But the
Syrians – after witnessing the sudden collapse and evacuation of
Palmyra when their own army retook the ancient Syrian city earlier
this year – suspect that Isis will simply abandon Mosul and try to
reach safety in the areas of Syria which it still controls.
Already,
Syrian army intelligence has heard disturbing reports of a demand by
Isis in towns and villages south of Hasaka – a Syrian city held by
regime forces and Kurds in the north of the country – for new
electricity and water supplies to be installed for an influx of Isis
fighters from Mosul. In other words, if Mosul falls, the entire Isis
caliphate army could be directed against the Assad government and its
allies – a scenario which might cause some satisfaction in
Washington. When the Iraqi city of Fallujah fell to Iraqi army and
militia forces earlier this year, many Isis fighters fled at once to
Syria.
Sayed
Hassan Nasrallah, the Hezbollah leader who sent thousands of his men
to fight (and die) in the struggle against Isis and Jabhat al-Nusra
in Syria, said in a speech marking the Ashura commemorations last
week that the Americans “intend to repeat the Fallujah plot when
they opened a way for Isis to escape towards eastern Syria” and
warned that “the same deceitful plan may be carried out in Mosul.”
In other words, an Isis defeat in Mosul would encourage Isis to head
west to try to defeat the Assad regime in Syria.
These
suspicions have scarcely been allayed by a series of comments from
American generals and US military sources over the past few weeks.
The newly appointed US commander in the region, Lt Gen Stephen
Townsend – heading what the US has presumptiously called ‘Operation
Inherent Resolve’ – has said that not only Mosul but the Syrian
city of Raqqa would be captured “on my watch”. But who exactly
does he think will capture Raqqa? The Syrian army still intends to
fight on to Raqqa from its base on the the Damascus-Aleppo military
road west of the city after an attempt earlier this year which was
abandoned for political rather than military reasons. Russia
apparently preferred to concentrate its firepower on other militias,
especially Nusra/al-Qaeda, which both Moscow and Damascus now regard
as being far more dangerous than Isis.
Both
have noticed how Nusra – which changed its name to Jabhat Fateh
al-Sham, the "Support Front for the People of the Levant",
in the hope of escaping its al-Qaeda roots – is increasingly
referred to by both Western politicians and journalists as “the
rebels”, along with a plethora of other militia outfits fighting
the Syrian regime. An unidentified US general was quoted last month
expressing his concern that Iraqi Shia forces might seize the town of
Tal Afar on the Iraqi-Syrian border in order to trap Isis fighters
inside Iraq – and thus prevent their flight into Syria. Isis itself
is reported to have abandoned Tal Afar several days ago.
The
US-based Military Times online magazine (which, as the saying goes,
is "close" to the Pentagon) has argued that General
Townsend, who has a mere 5,000 US troops on the ground in both Iraq
and the far north of Syria, must “pursue Isis into Syria, where the
US has few allies on the ground” – which is quite an
understatement – while Townsend himself is talking of “a long,
difficult fight” for Mosul. He has also referred to a “siege”
of Mosul. These are the dire predictions in which the Syrians do not
believe
Assad’s
own army, with its 65,000 fatalities in a battle that has now lasted
five years, has already been bombed by the Americans at Deir Ezzor at
a cost of at least 60 dead – Washington described this as a mistake
– and is now preparing to challenge the huge influx of Isis
fighters which could cross the border after the collapse of Mosul.
Nasrallah himself made an intriguing allusion to this in his speech.
He suggested that if Isis forces are not defeated by the Iraqis
themselves in Mosul then the Iraqis – presumably the Iraqi Shia
militia which are one of the spearheads of the government army –
“will be obliged to move to eastern Syria in order to fight the
terrorist group”.
Given
the possibility that Syrian troops and their Russian allies may have
to confront this same group, it’s little wonder that they are
trying to conclude their capture of eastern Aleppo – whatever the
cost in lives – before the fall of Mosul.
US WARPLANES INGORE ISIS CONVOYS FLEEING MOSUL – REPORT
Donate
The
US-led coalition’s warplanes are ingoring military convoys of the
ISIS terrorist group moving from Mosul in the Iraqi province
of Nineveh to Syria, the Irainian Fars News Agency reported
citing a source in the predominantly Shia Popular Mobilization Units
(PMU or Hashd al-Shaabi).
“Much surprised the ISIL convoys that have been escaping from Mosul to Syria have not come under attack by the coalition fighter jets,” Fars News Agency quoted the source as saying.
The
source reportedly noted that ISIS is now confused in Mosul and
the Iraqi forces have obtained lots of information about the
terrorists’ positions in the city.
We
recall, Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar Al-Abadi announced the official
start of operation to liberate Mosul from ISIS on Monday.
ISIS in Mosul may use chemical weapons & 1,000s of civilians as human shields – IOM
Displaced
people who fled Mosul are pictured at a refugee camp in Duhok, Iraq,
October 16, 2016. © Ari Jalal / Reuters
RT,
18
October, 2016
The
International Organization for Migration (IOM) has sounded an alarm
amidst the carnage surrounding the recapture of Mosul, Iraq, where
there are fears Islamic State militants will unleash chemical attacks
and use tens of thousands as human shields.
Meanwhile,
contingency plans are being implemented at national and international
levels. Speaking by phone, IOM’s chief of mission for Iraq, Thomas
Weiss, told Reuters there are forecasts that the offensive will cause
displacement on a massive scale, as the Iraqi military has now
reached the outskirts of Iraq’s second largest city.
"Tens
of thousands of people may be forcibly expelled, they will be getting
trapped between fighting lines under siege, they may be even held as
human shields,"
he said, as cited by Reuters.
Weiss
added that IOM staff have been stocking up on gas masks since rumors
began circulating about an imminent gas attack, but they’ve found
few so far. “We
also fear, and there has been some evidence that ISIL (Islamic State,
IS, formerly ISIS) might be using chemical weapons. Children, the
elderly, disabled, will be particularly vulnerable,” he
said.
“I
think the first thing for us to acknowledge… is that, while ISIL
has been in charge of Mosul, they have engaged in a violent campaign
to bring that city under their control. They’re killing civilians
all the time,”Josh
Earnest told a press briefing. “So,
the idea that we – that somehow the Iraqi security forces –
should delay the operation because of their concern or the
humanitarian situation in Mosul, that doesn’t make sense.”
Earnest
went on to say that coalition forces will nonetheless work to save as
many lives as possible, while bringing up the UN’s earlier
announcement that it was undertaking measures to address“significant
or widespread humanitarian concerns.” Tents
have reportedly been set up, and there is “a
lot of planning” to
provide food, water and other essential items to people fleeing the
conflict zone, Earnest said.
Others
at a national level have also been looking at contingency measures,
like France, which will hold a meeting on October 20 to discuss
stabilizing Mosul after the fighting.
“For
Raqqa, a similar method will be needed to Mosul. It will take time
and political will, but we have to organize ourselves,” Foreign
Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault told a diplomatic press briefing on
Tuesday. “We
can’t let Islamic State reconstitute itself or strengthen to create
an even more dangerous hub. We have to prepare ourselves,” he dded.
The
new offensive has also sparked warnings and speculation as to how IS
may react once Mosul is done – whether it will spread to other
parts of Syria, or whether the fall of the city will precipitate a
mass exodus of militants to Europe.
“As
far as I know, the city is not fully encircled,” Russian
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Tuesday. I hope it’s because
they simply couldn’t do it, not because they wouldn’t do it. But
this corridor poses a risk that Islamic State fighters could flee
from Mosul and go to Syria.
The
Russian FM’s remarks come just as the Syrian government said it is
certain that the US-led coalition is planning to let IS fighters slip
through.
“We
will be evaluating the situation and take decisions of both political
and military nature if this happens,” Lavrov
added. “I
hope the US-led coalition, which is actively engaged in the operation
to take Mosul, will take it into account.”
The
battle is now in its second day, and there are already unconfirmed
reports of militants securing deals to flee the city among the
civilians.
Islamic
State seized Mosul in June of 2014, when it was Iraq’s
second-largest city. The terror group’s leader then turned it into
a major military stronghold, and it is believed that between 4,000
and 8,000 IS militants are entrenched there, according to Reuters.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.