And
of course the United States would NEVER do that! Lol
Bought
Out: China’s Attack on Agriculture
China is successfully
manipulating the economies of Australia and New Zealand for its own
gain
20
April, 2016
Economic
war is being waged in the South Pacific. Though it lacks the grizzly
kill zones of Iraq or Afghanistan, the quiet rolling slopes of New
Zealand and the browned plains of central Australia are pivotal
battlefields.
Agriculture
and, subsequently, the economies of both Australia and New Zealand
are being attacked by China through aggressive and all-too-often
underestimated policies. Being the largest trade partner of both
countries, China has a crucial role to play in these Western
economies. Chinese trends have repeatedly led to devastating
consequences for both Australia and New Zealand.
Assault on the Dairy Industry
To
most readers, this might seem a tad dramatic. Targeting dairy cows
doesn’t sound like warfare. But if the dairy industry makes up 25
percent of your exports—as it does for New Zealand—any threat to
the industry is a threat to the nation.
New
Zealand, the largest international producer of milk, has come under
such an attack.
Since
2014, milk prices have plummeted by 60 percent, leaving many farmers
exposed to crippling debt. One survey by Federated Farmers shows that
11.1 percent of New Zealand’s dairy farmers are under mortgage
pressure, with 3 percent at extreme risk.
The
effects of the swift downturn have hit the farmers and their families
hard. Reports indicate that suicide rates for those living in New
Zealand’s rural areas are 20-50 percent higher than in urban areas.
For
those trying to get away from the farm, there are falling prices to
contend with. According to Real Estate Institute, the median sales
price per hectare (2.47 acres) for dairy farms in New Zealand fell 19
percent from December 2015 to February 2016. Some farmers are holding
out until prices rise; others are strongly encouraged by the banks to
sell cheap to avoid bankruptcy.
For
those holding out, the costs are high. One agribusiness consultant
told RadioNZ,“I would argue that 80 percent of farmers
are going to be borrowing to keep going.”
The
farmers themselves aren’t the only ones feeling the pressure.
Lenders are also feeling the strain. New Zealand banks have lent $27
billion to
the country’s farmers. This equates to 10 percent of all lending in
the country. The debt is close to $7,000 per cow.
This
massive debt affects the entire economy. Forecast growth is bleak,
estimated by the central bank to be 2.3 percent in 2016.
Who to Blame?
How
could this collapse happen to an industry that only a few years ago
was thriving? The answer lies with New Zealand’s investors.
China
has been buying up big. In 2013, China bought a record 622,000 tons
of milk from New Zealand. Just last year, a tin of baby
formula sold
for $50 more in China than in Australasia.
Eager
to cash in on China’s desire for milk and baby formula, many
nations planned as though the rush would continue. Farmers and
governments invested heavily in the dairy industry. Business boomed,
particularly the dairy-oriented economy of New Zealand. New Zealand
assumed China would buy all it could produce and at a premium price.
Then
all of a sudden, the Chinese pulled out.
All
along China was manipulating the commodity price. The Chinese weren’t
using the baby formula and milk—they were stockpiling it. Beijing
pulled the same tactics on Australia’s mining industry in 2013.
China created an artificially
high demand,
built up stockpiles,
then pulled out of the market.
For
New Zealand, the results have been disastrous. Milk prices were at
$5.87 per kilogram (or just over 1 quart) two years ago. Today, they
are at $2.73 per kilogram.
Farmers
planned for the high prices to continue, not realizing the product
was being stockpiled. While hoodwinked by the Chinese, the nation is
in many ways the author of its own fate. Banks issued loans to help
farmers expand to fulfill China’s needs. But few stopped to
consider that China’s need for dairy would be short lived and that
farmers should invest based upon a more moderate economic climate.
Now farmers face mortgages and loan payments beyond their means to
pay.
This
plays right into China’s hands. Asia and the Pacific Policy Society
states:
It
is likely that corporate dairy farming companies’ properties and
private dairy farm sales will increase over the next accounting
period. If this happens, the Government and Overseas Investment
Commission may come under pressure from farm owners and lenders to
allow Chinese corporates to purchase New Zealand farms in fire sales,
to spare farmers from bankruptcy, and so that banks can recover their
funds.
China
is playing the long con: It sacrificed higher costs for dairy
products in 2015 for a shot at buying out cheap Kiwi farms.
China’s
artificial inflation of a market that is so pivotal to the survival
of New Zealand’s economy was a thinly veiled attack. The economic
effects have been catastrophic. New Zealand’s dairy industry is $28
billion in debt. That equates to 20 percent of its gross domestic
product. The average debt per dairy farm in New Zealand is now $2.4
million. Each farm averages less than 400 cows, with 50 percent of
those farms facing a second annual loss this year. All of this breeds
incentive to sell cheap to China.
Across
the Tasman Sea, Australia is faring no better.
Australia Sold to China
Australia
is even further down the road than New Zealand.
Tasmania’s
Van Diemen’s Land Company, Australia’s largest dairy farm, was
sold to Moon Lake, a Chinese company, earlier this year. The $220
million sale included 25 dairy farms on 17,000 hectares of land.
Tasmanian
independent M.P. Andrew Wilkie said, “Selling Van Diemen’s Land
to a foreign bulk commodity enterprise will result in milk or milk
powder shipped offshore in bulk.” He cited the current shortage of
baby formula—nicknamed “white gold” in China—due to Chinese
demand. The Chinese don’t just want the product; they want the cow
and the land it grazes on. New Zealand is heading in the same
direction.
Another
big sell in the works is that of the S. Kidman & Co. cattle
empire.
Chinese-owned
Shanghai Pengxin Company has offered $270 million to buy the Kidman
properties. Kidman is Australia’s largest private landowner. The
farms it may now sell to China run over 200,000 cattle, spanning
three states and territories with an impressive 39,000
square miles.
That is roughly the size of Kentucky or Iceland.
Time
and again we have seen politicians and lawmakers approve such deals,
deeming it to be in Australia’s best interest to encourage
international investment. All the while, the nation is sold to
foreigners.
The
aforementioned examples are just the tip of the iceberg. There are
plenty of examples to point to. China bought 50 farms in Victoria in
2014. It also bought Australia’s largest cotton farm in 2013. Over
the past five years, a number of large wineries and sugar farms have
also fallen to the Chinese.
Many
supporters of these deals argue that they promote development and
necessary investment the government couldn’t otherwise bring. But
there is also the risk of streamlining. China wants to invest more in
Australia’s rail and road network, gaining the ability to
streamline goods from Chinese farms in Australia to Chinese ports in
Australia then on to China itself.
Security Concerns
Then
there is national security to worry about, unrelated to the economic
attack. Chinese investment companies are often hand in glove with
China’s Communist Party, and they often have the same goals.
Financial
Review refuted
this, stating, “This is not about spies or intelligence
gathering by
our biggest trading partner. It’s about a fundamental reshaping of
the global economy and Australia’s relationship with the world’s
biggest economy.”
There is the century-long lease of
the Port of Newcastle—right down the road from the Royal Australian
Air Force (RAAF) Williamtown base. There is also the Landbridge
Group’s acquisition of the Port of Darwin for a century. Darwin is
the home of United States and Australian navies, air forces and
barracks. Then there is the convenient “sister port” agreement
between Qinzhou and the Port of Townsville—close to RAAFbase
Townsville. And don’t forget the China-connected firm buying
the land adjacent
to the Australia Security Intelligence Organization headquarters in
the nation’s capital, Canberra.
Can
anyone still believe that the companies Australia and New Zealand
trade with so eagerly are not tied to the belligerent Chinese
government? Read “China
Controls Darwin for a Century”
for an in-depth look at just one of these supposedly “private”
Chinese enterprises.
Feeding a Giant
In
a way, Financial Review is right. This isn’t just
about trade. But it has everything to do with trade.
New Zealand has sought to keep up with China’s demands, and in
doing so, it has exposed itself to crippling debt and the risk of
having to sell itself to Chinese investors. As for Australia, it has
already happened. Following the 2008 crisis, Australia poured money
into the mining sector and gave everything it could to China. Now the
market is gone, and economic pressure is leading to Australia selling
itself off piece by piece.
Napoleon
Bonaparte once said, “China is a sleeping giant. Let her sleep, for
when she wakes she will shake the world.” That giant has awoken in
Southeast Asia and Australasia. For years, we have done everything
possible to feed it and appease it. Now it is coming for our farms,
our ports and our industry.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.