Opposition in Meltdown as
White House Admits ‘We’ll
Need to Live With
Coronavirus’
5 July, 2020
It’s no surprise that the White House has been struggling to come up with a singular message for its position on the coronavirus crisis. In the United States, you not only have the federal health officials who are gracing the podium daily and constantly shifting their narrative, but you also have 50 different state governors pursuing markedly different strategies regarding lockdown and mitigation. After months of disparate statements, it seems that the Trump Administration has finally settled on a common sense talking point, admitting that the virus may not be fully ‘eradicated’ any time time soon and that country must now “Learn to live with it.”
“The virus is with us, but we need to live with it,” said one White House official this week.
A seemingly sensible approach heading into the November election, but one which will no doubt draw fire from the anti-Trump Democrat-led resistance, whose campaign strategy has now shifted to blaming the President for every aspect of the crisis.
Not surprisingly, opposition media have descended into hysterics and demagoguery over this latest admission, as evidenced by the Daily Beast emblazoning “LIVE FREE AND DIE” in red, along the top of its latest resistance piece.
Over the last three weeks, the mainstream media backed by their pharmaceutical giants, have ramped-up their propaganda campaign claiming that there is a “crippling surge of cases” across the country. Officials are raising the alarm because of reports that 55,000 new cases of coronavirus have been detected, as media continue crowing that “infection rates are hitting new records in multiple states.”
What they are not telling the public is that the US is also conducting a record number of coronavirus tests – resulting in increase in positive tests, or what the media like to refer to as “cases,” giving the false impression that it’s another outbreak of the plague. Naturally, the majority of these news cases are from the demographic least at risk to complications from coronavirus, namely, younger age groups.
In reality, in the absence of any proper epidemiological context, the number ‘cases’ is relatively meaningless, because it says nothing about the threat the public health. The only two statistics which can indicate what is the true threat to public health are an rise in hospitalizations and deaths (along with their age and health profiles) which can be directly attributed to COVID-19. This is the data that matters. Any numbers outside of this are patently useless.
The reason why touting a high number of “cases” is fairly useless is because this ignores the hard facts which the data returned has already show us:
Age Demographics – The overwhelming majority of COVID fatalities have been in one specific demographic: elderly people with multiple comorbidities. In fact, the odds of a young person actually being hospitalized for coronavirus are significantly less that getting in an automobile accident, while they are at greater risk of being set upon by influenza or numerous other common viruses. COVID simply doesn’t rate among the most common illnesses which a pose a threat to young people, or even middle aged people for that matter. The data from every country proves this.
Location and Venue – Proportionally, the majority of all COVID deaths in the US have occurred in a few major cities, and in one or two particular setting. In cities like New York, Los Angeles, Detroit, and of those ‘hot spots’ most fatalities have been in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities for the elderly: “The New York Times (June 27) is reporting that 43 percent of all US COVID deaths are occurring in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities for the elderly. In at least 24 states, more than 50 percent of all COVID deaths are occurring in these facilities. The Times fails to mention deaths of the elderly at hospitals or, at home, cut off from family and friends. The situation is far worse than the Times makes it out to be.”
Most People Already Have Immunity – When you put aside the hype and hysteria for a moment, you will learn that one of the reasons most people are asymptomatic and not affected by coronavirus is because we have wonderful innate immune response systems already within us. These are called adaptive immunity responses, which feature T cells and other antibodies already on board from our previous encounters with coronaviruses. This line of defense is especially effective in younger populations.Common sense. This adaptive immunity is in addition to any new antibodies you may have acquired from carrying the new or “novel” coronavirus. But for some reason, this doesn’t fit the ‘pandemic’ narrative being promoted by mainstream media, government, he pharmaceutical industry and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Conclusion: In general, the vast majority of global population has NEVER been at risk of hospitalization or death from COVID 19 – nor will it ever be, certainly not more than other more common infectious diseases like Influenza, Malaria or Tuberculosis. While the international coordinated response to COVID has mimicked that of a major plague, the reality is that this coronavirus will not affect over 99.5% of the population – therefore, it should not rise to the level of ‘pandemic.’
Hence, the idea that coronavirus is a deadly pandemic that’s threatening civilization… is fabricated construct. So too are all of the ‘New Normal’ policies, rules and requirements which have been hastily constructed around this impressive pseudo-science spectacle. That includes all of the lockdowns, social distancing, masks, immunity passports, school closures and proposals for mandatory vaccinations. These measures have nothing to do with the actual threat posed by this particular pathogen and everything to do with a broader agenda of social control, and the consolidation of political and economic power upwards.
Question everything which government and media are presenting to you, and also look at the data that matters.
Taking Liberties’ with special guest Richard Grannon and more
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.