Video on ice nucleation in the Arctic designed to mask the true state of affaIrs

Is ice nucleation being used to mask melting of the sea ice in the Arctic?

TRANSCRIPT

Last year it was announced by some that there would be a blue sea event.

Monitoring the sea ice throughout last year with Margo we could see this was highly likely.

Yet, when the authorities produced the results it turned out that, in the words of the National Snow and Ice Data Center:

"This ties 2018 with 2008 and 2010 for the sixth lowest minimum extent in the nearly 40-year satellite record."

The reaction of the NTHE community was “we have dodged the bullet for another year”and the reaction was one of jubilation. In fact, I recall a gigantic party was organsied to celebrate the non-event.

Every year that I can think of since 2012 the record holder for low sea ice extent that has happened.

Margo and I demonstrated quite clearly that the ice was clearly very thin and not of good quality.

And yet ice can be mostly slush and paper thin and it is considered sea ice extent (15%, I think is the figure)

We have been observing large amounts of methane coming, not only from the industrialised countries and from the Siberian permaslush but from under the ice.

That does not happen where the ice is sound.

We had another riddle in that in areas where there is high salinity ice should not be forming at the comparitively high sea temperatures we were seeing. We had to compare data from different sources (Earth Nullschool and NASA Worldview and try to work out just what was happening.

Last night I listened to Jeff Rense talking to Dane Wigington of GeoEngineering.org

They were talking about the winter storms in the United States, weather whiplash and the like in the context of something that I was largely unaware of called ice nucleation.

I was just listening along until my ears pricked up when he started talking about the Arctic.

Unfortunately, the audio clip is not yet available but essentially he was saying that ice nucleation is being used to artificially nucleate ice on sea surfaces to hide the true state of affairs.

Even if the ice is mostly slush it is possible to say that sea ice extent is unremarkable.

From where I am sitting this seems like a credible explanation. It is, of course, a theory and there is no absolute proof but evidence there is aplenty unlike what the detractors are say.

But that is not something I am going to go into now

It would explain this phenomenon of ice which was mostly just slush no melting

Who knows? We could have indeed had a BOE last year, but they kept it from happening by creating a thin layer of ice that is passed off as an unremarkable sea ice thickness

First, lets briefly look at what ice nucleation is

Now let us have a look what is behind this from Dane Wigington's article:

“...Chemical ice nucleation processes must be seen to be believed.

The vast majority have no idea how powerful chemical ice nucleating / endothermic reacting materials are. The vast majority have no idea that such chemicals are being utilized by the global climate engineering cabal on a massive scale.

The use of such patented processes is not just for engineering winter storms on a rapidly warming world, but the same chemical elements are being used to artificially / chemically nucleate ice on sea surfaces.

Power structure funded disinformation individuals and sources, of course, never mention chemical ice nucleation (and its use by the geoengineers) while putting out completely false information about "global cooling" or "global warming is a hoax".

Such false narratives are extremely harmful to the critical cause of exposing and halting climate engineering. Such false narratives are also exactly what the power structure and the climate engineers want.

The climate science community also toes the line for the power structure and the geoengineers by never mentioning the ongoing climate engineering insanity in any way. To do otherwise is a very bad career decision, or worse.

The illegal federal gag order on all National Weather Service (NWS) and all all National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) employees (courtesy of the Obama administration) is further proof of this fact.

Sea surface chemical ice nucleation creates extremely anomalous patterns that resemble a chemical spill dispersion (because that is exactly what these patterns are).

The recent NASA satellite images below (taken in the polar regions) provide shocking proof of these sea surface patterns.”

He has provided the following pictures from NASA Worldview to illustrate