Christchurch:
the lone gunman theory blown out of the water
Listen
to the last few seconds of the recording where the witness, who
challenged the gunman, describes how Tarrant jumped into the car with
other people
This is what stuff.co.nz says:
“RUMOUR: THERE WERE MULTIPLE GUNMEN
This
rumour makes absolute sense given there was an extended stretch of
time after the shooting where police had not yet confirmed the
massacres at both mosques were the result of a single shooter.
Given
police had arrested four people and held some of them for quite a bit
of time, it made sense to not "rule out" the possibility
that the alleged gunman was not working alone. This vacuum, when the
information was not actively dissuaded, was filled with people
assuming that there definitely was more than one shooter.
There
was not. Eventually police confirmed all three of the other arrests
were not people directly connected to the shooting. Two had been in a
car attempting to enter the cordon, one with a firearm. He was
charged with firearm offences. Another was an 18-year-old man who was
not directly connected to the shootings but was charged on Monday
with distributing the livestream.
We are still not sure whether the alleged gunman acted entirely "alone" in the sense that no one else helped plan the attack. This is something intelligence services are actively looking into. The gunman was clearly part of a wider internet white nationalist movement. But there was no second gunman.”
One Shooter Two Cars?
21
March, 2019
It
was drawn my attention that silver vehicle caught at Mosque differed.
I looked. Yup but I put it on the crap to sort later pile as I am not
touching anything on so called video footage with a 10 foot pile
until I have expert assistance as some thing not right and they reek
to high heaven.
As much as the fact Facebook could not stop the video which went viral seemingly propelled by a powerful virus that saw it pop up on thousand of people phones 24 hours after a world wide Facebook platform collapse. This came as Pentagon admitted it service providers were under siege as reported in the Wall Street General. It also arrived as John odest who was in New Zealand, Australia, for unknown made one public appearance to warn that NZ was “juicy” cyber target.
I will say I don’t care what you say but you don’t blast a wall (or windows) and not have bit fly off any more than you don’t fire a MSA and not have cartridge ejected.
Either the video I have witnessed I don’t think are authentic, have being spliced or touched up with CGI and lets face it some people have a very sick sense of whats fun. Because there most certainly were real victims and real casualties.
However I later witnessed one of those car in a separate video had moved and when went back closer look that video had gone.
However by using image provided to media of CTV footage, by police, of alleged vehicle on way to Mosque (Top) verse one detained by police Below) I think we have something real and concrete which people can focus on.
Your not allowed to share the video but screen shots of video that have being sent you are legally permissible.
I will also give my own devil advocates theory on how these two might be a mistaken For artistic purpose I might use image to illustrate a point and or it would not be the first time that a journo not having the goods has done a fake.
As much as the fact Facebook could not stop the video which went viral seemingly propelled by a powerful virus that saw it pop up on thousand of people phones 24 hours after a world wide Facebook platform collapse. This came as Pentagon admitted it service providers were under siege as reported in the Wall Street General. It also arrived as John odest who was in New Zealand, Australia, for unknown made one public appearance to warn that NZ was “juicy” cyber target.
I will say I don’t care what you say but you don’t blast a wall (or windows) and not have bit fly off any more than you don’t fire a MSA and not have cartridge ejected.
Either the video I have witnessed I don’t think are authentic, have being spliced or touched up with CGI and lets face it some people have a very sick sense of whats fun. Because there most certainly were real victims and real casualties.
However I later witnessed one of those car in a separate video had moved and when went back closer look that video had gone.
However by using image provided to media of CTV footage, by police, of alleged vehicle on way to Mosque (Top) verse one detained by police Below) I think we have something real and concrete which people can focus on.
Your not allowed to share the video but screen shots of video that have being sent you are legally permissible.
I will also give my own devil advocates theory on how these two might be a mistaken For artistic purpose I might use image to illustrate a point and or it would not be the first time that a journo not having the goods has done a fake.
But if so then the mistake is intentional as it says this is the car is time stamped with a date fitting the official narrative.
If not then yes we have two shooters at least and the jigs up.
Reminds me of the rainbow warrior were state sanctioned murder of peace activists in New Zealand in 1987 caught not because of the spooks but because kiwi are inquisitive lot and notice shit.
I cant help notice silver cars are vehicle of choice in each case and I am reminded of the P2 attacks in Europe were the idea was divide and conquer the citizen through a campaign of terror aimed at polarizing people and destroying people power.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.