This is of course in the realm of conspiracy theory (in its true sense). We can never know for certain but questions remain over the 2011 earthquake.
Study Raises More Serious Questions About The Christchurch Earthquake Who Knew It Was Coming And Why?
A report by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission adds to speculation
and mysteries surrounding possible foreknowledge of the Christchurch
earthquake in 2011
By Peter Drew
24
February, 2018
What
really happened with the Christchurch earthquake which decimated the
city in February 2011? Is there more to this disaster than many
people realise? Did some people know it was coming? Or even worse?
A
study by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission Research Foundation
looking at earthquake precursors and predictors in the ionosphere has
added some intriguing new elements to the hypothesis that some people
knew the Christchurch earthquake was coming. According to this new
research, a number of earthquakes in New Zealand have been associated
with measurable disturbances in the ionosphere in the days preceding
the earthquakes, but that the Christchurch earthquake had a uniquely
different and unexplained type of disturbance of the ionosphere.
More
on the interesting findings of this study shortly, but to help put
some broader perspective on this issue let us first look at what are
some extraordinary occurrences and coincidences surrounding the
Christchurch earthquake which add to theories that high level US
officials knew that the earthquake was about to strike. If so, how
did they know this and why was it kept from the New Zealand public?
Was the Christchurch earthquake even more sinister than a simple
matter of foreknowledge by the US? Could it potentially have been
triggered artificially, either accidentally or perhaps even
deliberately?
On
the day of the Christchurch earthquake the 2011 US-NZ Pacific
Partnership Forum was being held in Christchurch with many high level
representatives present from both the US and New Zealand, with
meetings scheduled to go all day. Why did a number of delegates from
US Congress who were at that forum suddenly cut and run for the
airport at 10.00am, two hours before the earthquake struck, and
relocate to Prime Minister John Key’s offices in Wellington?
Why
did Thad Allen, a US government specialist in disaster rehabilitation
and infrastructure rebuilding, and Tim Manning, Deputy Director of
FEMA (US Federal Emergency Management Agency), just by coincidence
happen to be in Christchurch at the time of the earthquake and were
able to take on a significant advisory role with the earthquake
management response? This was in exactly the same way as the
coincidence in Haiti whereby a group of US disaster response experts
just happened to be in Haiti for disaster training exercises the day
before and the day of the Haiti earthquake, and were then able to
take control of the emergency response in 2010? An amazing set of
coincidences. Why did Janet Napolitano, US Homeland Security
Secretary, suddenly cancel her visit to Christchurch two days before
the earthquake struck?
But
perhaps of most interest, when Hillary Clinton and her team were
notified by that a 6.3 magnitude earthquake had just struck
Christchurch, her team’s response was just three words…….“and
on cue”
Hillary
Clinton and her husband, former US President Bill Clinton, also
happen to have very significant links to the 2010 Haiti earthquake
and the supposed infrastructure rebuilding through the Clinton
Foundation. The Clinton Foundation is now under serious investigation
for major fraud, including the ‘loss’ of many billions of dollars
of Haiti disaster relief funds. More on that interesting topic later.
In
a stunning coincidence, both the Haiti earthquake in 2010 and the
Christchurch earthquake in 2011 both had major military training
exercises in operation in the immediate vicinity, with that training
being specifically for emergency response to a major disaster such as
an earthquake. For the Christchurch earthquake, this included a
massive military exercise taking place just outside of Christchurch
with over 100 troops whose disaster response training suddenly went
live as they were on hand to support the immediate earthquake
response. The HMS Canterbury was conveniently parked at Lyttleton
Harbour with emergency food supplies ready. This is remarkably
similar to the situation in Haiti 2010.
Alongside
this, on the afternoon of the earthquake, while a major national
emergency was in full swing across New Zealand, why did Prime
Minister John Key stop to sign over the seabed exploration rights for
New Zealand, including the Canterbury Basin, to the giant oil mining
company Anadarko just four hours after the earthquake struck?
Shouldn’t he have had more important matters on his mind at that
time? Some people estimate this agreement as being potentially worth
trillions of dollars.
Anadarko
just happened to have their seismic exploration boat, the Aquila
Explorer, stationed off the coast of Christchurch at the time of the
earthquake, which is a point that the New Zealand government have
been very anxious to try to deny. More on that important point later,
but is this related in any way to the fact that the Aquila Explorer
possessed seismic technology which had HAARP (High-Frequency Active
Auroral Research Project) technology which can create a disturbance
in the ionosphere potentially of the sort which has now been linked
to the ionosphere anomaly shown in this new study by the New Zealand
Earthquake Commission?
Speculation
and theories regarding foreknowledge of the Christchurch earthquake
are quite varied. The slightly less sinister theory is that certain
people in the United States had the capability to read the natural
earthquake precursors, and they were just taking precautionary
measures. However, even if this were the case, it is still an
extremely serious crime to not divulge this information to try to
save lives. A similar case of that happening in Italy resulted in six
scientists being charged with manslaughter, which was subsequently
overturned seven years
later.http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/10/seven-year-legal-saga-ends-italian-official-cleared-manslaughter-earthquake-trial
Added
to this theory is that perhaps the seismic technology on board the
Aquila Explorer somehow acted to inadvertently impact the ionosphere
which helped to trigger the earthquake. There is also a far more
sinister theory that the Christchurch earthquake was what is referred
to as a man-made ‘eco-terrorism’ strike by powerful Deep State
forces for nefarious purposes. That theory may sound ridiculous,
impossible, and crazy. But is it? The evidence to support this theory
is considerable indeed.
How
does a man-made earthquake work?
What
is an ‘eco-terrorism earthquake’, and why would this potentially
have been targeted on Christchurch in 2011? The US Deep State
military and others have for many decades possessed the knowledge and
the technology to trigger artificial earthquakes in specific
locations.
“Others
[terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby
they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely
through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of
ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they
can wreak terror upon other nations…It’s real, and that’s the
reason why we have to intensify our [counter terrorism] efforts.” –
US Secretary of Defence, William Cohen, 1997
The
technology to artificially trigger earthquakes was first discovered
as far back as the early 19 hundreds by genius scientist Nikola
Tesla, the inventor of remote control technology and the original
brainchild of what is now wifi.
Tesla
discovered the power of directed high frequency energy. That concept
has since been evolved and harnessed by Deep State forces to be able
to create a number of different large scale environmental impacts,
including large scale weather modification and triggering artificial
earthquakes. Triggering artificial earthquakes uses a similar method
to how a crystal glass can be shattered by the high frequency sound
waves of an opera singer. In the case of earthquakes, it is low
frequency electromagnetic waves, rather than sound waves, that have
the shattering effect deep underground.
Nearly
100 years later and this is what Tesla’s technology now looks like.
This is an SBX radar platform, of which there are a number travelling
around the world owned by US defence giant Raytheon which have HAARP
capabilities.
Dr
Nick Bergich and Jeanne Manning provide some excellent explanations
for how the HAARP technology works and its purposes in this exert
http://haarp.net/ from their ground breaking book ‘Angels Don’t
Play This HAARP – Advances in Tesla Technology’
The
brief video clip in the link below demonstrates how HAARP can be used
to trigger an
earthquake.https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=how+haarp+creates+an+earthquake&&view=detail&mid=CFFBF3F219F959F170C4CFFBF3F219F959F170C4&&FORM=VDRVRV
The
US attempts to conceal its HAARP military weaponry
At
a meeting of European Parliament in 1999, the uncertain but
substantial military threats posed by HAARP weapons were a major part
of the agenda. The following are a few exerts from the various
motions put forward for discussion regarding HAARP at that
meeting:http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A4-1999-0005+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
(European
Parliament) Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research
Project) by virtue of its far reaching impact on the environment to
be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical
implications to be examined by an international independent body
before any further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal
of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give
evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting held by its
competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected
with the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP)
programme currently being funded in Alaska;
On 5 February 1998 Parliament’s Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament held a hearing the subject of which included HAARP. NATO and the US had been invited to send representatives, but chose not to do so. The Committee regrets the failure of the USA to send a representative to answer questions, or to use the opportunity to comment on the material submitted.(21)
HAARP can be used for many purposes. Enormous quantities of energy can be controlled by manipulating the electrical characteristics of the atmosphere. If used as a military weapon this can have a devastating impact on an enemy. HAARP can deliver millions of times more energy to a given area than any other conventional transmitter.
By manipulating the ionosphere one could block global communications while transmitting one’s own. Another application is earth-penetrating, tomography, x-raying the earth several kilometres deep, to detect oil and gas fields, or underground military facilities.
HAARP has links with 50 years of intensive space research for military purposes, including the Star Wars project, to control the upper atmosphere and communications. This kind of research has to be regarded as a serious threat to the environment, with an incalculable impact on human life. Even now nobody knows what impact HAARP may have.
HAARP is a project of which the public is almost completely unaware, and this needs to be remedied.
We have to beat down the wall of secrecy around military research, and set up the right to openness and democratic scrutiny of military research projects, and parliamentary control.
So,
it is clear that back in 1999 the European Parliament considered
HAARP to be a real potential threat to the world and that the US were
keen to try to keep this technology a secret as much as possible.
Over
the past 15 years there have been claims of a number of major
earthquakes having been man made. The Haiti earthquake in 2010 is
probably the one that has received the most coverage, including then
President of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, stating that he believed the
Haiti earthquake was caused by a ‘tectonic weapon’ of the
US.https://www.livescience.com/8071-chavez-tectonic-weapon-caused-haiti-quake.html
There
have also been theories and evidence put forward about the possible
role of HAARP with the Fukushima earthquake in Japan in March 2011,
shortly after the Christchurch earthquake. Like the Christchurch
earthquake, NASA scientists have found anomalies with the ionosphere
and electromagnetic pulses several days prior to the Fukushima
earthquake which are consistent with HAARP
technology.
So,
if the theory about the Christchurch earthquake being an
‘eco-terrorism’ attack were correct, what could be the motive of
that attack, how would it have been done, and who would have been
involved or complicit? The standard three points of a crime scene
investigation – Who, Why, and How, and what evidence is there to
support the theory?
Method
Let’s
start with the question of how. As just stated, artificial
earthquakes can be triggered by using HAARP technology. The largest
and most powerful HAARP station is located in Gakona, Alaska. HAARP
technology can send several billion watts of electromagnetic energy
into the ionosphere which can be used for a number of different
purposes, including reflecting this electromagnetic energy back into
the earth at specific frequencies to trigger an earthquake on an
existing fault line.
In
order to use HAARP to trigger an artificial earthquake, radio waves
are transmitted into the ionosphere at low frequency, specifically
2.5 Hz, which is the same frequency that is given off by an
earthquake. This transmission of a specific earthquake inducing
frequency is combined with seeding the lower level atmosphere with a
large quantity of metallic nano-particles.
This
process of atmospheric seeding allegedly enhances HAARP’s
capabilities in transmitting and directing its energy when used in
tomographic (ground penetrating) mode. If this is directed in the
right way to an existing fault line then it can trigger an
earthquake. According to HAARP scientists, for an artificial
earthquake to be triggered in this way, the HAARP generated radio
frequency would need to be focussed into the target area several days
prior to the earthquake occurring, and this can be done from a HAARP
station which is on a different part of the planet.
The
seeding of the atmosphere with these nano-particles is done through a
process of large scale stratospheric aerosol spraying, or
stratospheric geo-engineering, using aircraft.
So
the next question. Is there any evidence of HAARP technology being
deployed in the days leading up to the Christchurch earthquake which
could potentially be linked to the anomaly of the ionosphere found by
the New Zealand Earthquake Commission? Also, is there any evidence of
the associated atmospheric spraying or geo-engineering that we can
see above?
The
activation of the HAARP installation in Gakona, Alaska is measured
using their HAARP ‘Induction Magnetometer’. As shown in this
graph below, the HAARP technology at Gakona was active for at least
two days immediately prior to the Christchurch earthquake.
How
does this graph correspond with the unusual ionosphere anomaly found
for the Christchurch earthquake in the new study by the New Zealand
Earthquake Commission? The study by the New Zealand Earthquake
Commission looked at daily fluctuations in the ‘Total Electron
Content’ (TEC) in the ionosphere in the days preceding a major
earthquake to see if there were any patterns which could be used as
earthquake precursors. The study looked at four major earthquakes in
New Zealand, including Darfield 2010, Christchurch 2011, Seddon 2013,
and Lake Grassmere 2013.
Below
are the TEC ionosphere graphs for the days leading up to the Darfield
and Lake Grassmere earthquakes.
Compare
this to the TEC ionosphere graph below prior to the Christchurch
earthquake and we can see that there is something significantly
different going on with the ionosphere for the Christchurch
earthquake .
TEC
chart for Christchurch earthquake
February 18th, 2011
February 18th, 2011
According
to the NZ Earthquake Commission report, the chart shown here for
Christchurch corresponds to the time of greatest anomaly in the
ionosphere prior to the Christchurch earthquake. While the anomaly
peaked on February 18th, it was spread over a number of days prior to
the earthquake. The area of greatest anomaly, which ‘has two
centres – about 150km north-east and south-east of Christchurch –
includes Christchurch itself’. The report goes on to say ‘We
have no explanation for the spatial distribution of the anomaly………the
precursor time of three days and the concentration of spatial
anomalies at locations not far from Christchurch suggest that the
anomaly could be associated with the preparation process of the
Christchurch earthquake’
So
we have an unexplained anomaly in the ionosphere immediately
preceding the Christchurch earthquake, which is different in
characteristic to other major earthquakes that were studied in New
Zealand. During the same time period, or extremely close to it, we
have some significant activity in the HAARP Induction Magnetometer
from the Gakona HAARP station which is a technology that is designed
specifically to impact the ionosphere.
Unfortunately
we do not have access to the Gakona HAARP chart for the days prior to
February 20th to be able to fully cross check this with the
ionosphere anomaly found by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission.
But we can certainly say that there was significant HAARP activity
occurring from the Gakona HAARP station around the same time as the
ionosphere anomaly found by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission
Do
we have any other potential man made influences on the Christchurch
ionosphere at the time of the earthquake?
The
Birdlings Flat Research Station in Akaroa, just outside Christchurch
bears remarkable similarities to the HAARP facility in Gakona,
Alaska.
The
Birdlings Flat Research Station “operates much like a transistor
radio but on a massive scale”. Pulses are sent up 60-120 kilometres
into the atmosphere where they are mostly absorbed, and some of it is
reflected back into the ground. While the Birdlings Flat Research
Station is operated by the University of Canterbury, it is funded by
the New Zealand Ministry of Defence. Why would it be funded by the
Ministry of Defence?
The
Birdlings Flat Research Station “operates much like a transistor
radio but on a massive scale”. Pulses are sent up 60-120 kilometres
into the atmosphere where they are mostly absorbed, and some of it is
reflected back into the ground. While the Birdlings Flat Research
Station is operated by the University of Canterbury, it is funded by
the New Zealand Ministry of Defence. Why would it be funded by the
Ministry of Defence?
As
well as the Birdlings Flat facility, 30km north of Christchurch in
Eyrewell is the location of New Zealand’s only Ionosonde. This is a
swept frequency vertical sounding radar and gives information on the
electron density in the ionosphere. The Ionosonde is operated by the
Physics & Astronomy Department of the University of Canterbury
under a contract of the New Zealand Defence Force.
In
addition to the Birdlings Flat facility, which looks extremely
similar to a HAARP facility, the giant US defence contractor,
Raytheon, had a base at Christchurch Airport at the time of the
Christchurch earthquake. Raytheon is one of the largest defence
technology companies in the world and specialises in advanced
weaponry and homeland security. It has very strong links to HAARP
technology, and its technology includes the mobile SBX radar platform
shown earlier. Shortly after the Christchurch earthquake, the
contract for this base shifted from Raytheon to Lockheed Martin. We
also have Anadarko’s ship, the Aquila Explorer, just off the coast
of Christchurch at the time of the earthquake which possessed a large
radar dome with HAARP technology likely capable of influencing the
nearby ionosphere, or at least supporting other HAARP technology.
Why
was the New Zealand government so keen to try to cover up the fact
that the Aquila Explorer was parked right outside Christchurch the
day before and the day of the Christchurch earthquake? On February
8th 2013, the New Zealand government held a public meeting about
seabed mining at the Takahanga Marae, Kaikoura, to address public
concerns about the government’s plans for Anadarko to begin deep
water drilling off the coast of Kaikoura. Multiple government
officials attended that meeting, including Simon Bridges, the
Minister for Energy. When asked about the location of the Aquila
Explorer ship at the time of the Christchurch earthquake the
government officials were visibly evasive on this question and
eventually came back and said that it was in Wellington at the time.
This is despite a written testimony from a crew member of the Aquila
Explorer confirming it was actually off the coast of Christchurch at
that time, and eye witness accounts to support this.
A
little further south in New Zealand, near Invercargill, there is the
Unwin Radar of the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN)
international radar network. Was this facility also involved in some
way at the time of the Christchurch earthquake? On February 21st
2011, one day before the earthquake, 107 Pilot Whales were found
beached at Mason Bay on Stewart Island at the bottom of New Zealand’s
South Island, very near the SuperDARN facility. It is thought by many
scientists that high powered radio frequency technology can interfere
with the sonar navigation systems of whales and dolphins which can
cause
strandings.
So
we certainly have some interesting information regarding the
potential for HAARP activity and potential man made anomalies with
the ionosphere in the Christchurch area and nearby around the time of
the earthquake that could be linked with the unexplained ionosphere
anomaly which the New Zealand Earthquake Commission have now
discovered.
As
mentioned earlier, the second part of triggering an artificial
earthquake is the seeding of the atmosphere with metallic
nano-particles through atmospheric spraying operations commonly
referred to as ‘chemtrails’, or more accurately referred to as
‘geo-engineering’ through stratospheric aerosol spraying by
aircraft. In the period immediately leading up to the Christchurch
earthquake there were reports of aircraft engaging in large scale
stratospheric spraying activity around the Christchurch area.
This
stratospheric aerosol spraying was not limited to just the period of
time immediately preceding the 2011 Christchurch earthquake, and was
not limited to just the Christchurch area. During 2010 and onwards
the New Zealand government had been repeatedly challenged on the
issue of aircraft engaging in large scale stratospheric aerosol
spraying campaigns, in particular around the upper and middle parts
of the South Island during 2010 and early 2011. The then mayor of
Kaikoura, Kevin Heays, wrote several times about this to Dr Nick
Smith, Minister for the Environment. In one letter to Dr Smith, Mayor
Heays stated that I ‘have personally been observing what has been
commonly termed as the formation of “chem-trails” throughout our
sky’. Mayor Heays went on to say that what he was seeing ‘clearly
indicated that normal passenger and freight air traffic was not
responsible for this phenomena’
Dr
Smith refused to personally respond to Mayor Heays about his
concerns, however one of Dr Smith’s staff did respond to Mayor
Heays to deny any awareness by the New Zealand government regarding
stratospheric aerosol spraying. Here is an exert from Mayor Heay’s
response to the New Zealand government on their denial of knowledge;
Your
“unawareness” of any evidence to support any such thing as you
have stated in paragraph 2 concerns me immensely. Evidence is indeed
all over the world and on some major governmental agendas as we speak
– including the British government and the US Congress. I
respectfully suggest that if our government and their directors are
indeed “unaware”, then a rapid and intense course be attended to
become “aware”. You reasoning that my sightings and those of many
others throughout our skies are…..”the result of normal air
traffic” is, to be blunt, bollocks. The directions of these trails
I refer to are not on the flight paths of domestic or international
airlines, nor do we “top dress” over the Pacific Ocean
In
addition to this, in January 2011 every MP in New Zealand was written
to in order to raise concerns about the then obvious programme of
large scale stratospheric aerosol spraying in parts of New Zealand,
including the Christchurch area. While this was also met with almost
universal denial by the government, the then leader of the New
Zealand Maori Party, the Hon Tariana Turia wrote this in response on
February 2nd 2011, less than three weeks before the Christchurch
earthquake.
I
acknowledge your letter regarding atmospheric geo-engineering and
chemtrails…….I appreciate your insights relating to this
phenomena in so far as it informs our understanding of current and
future environmental threats…….Our country needs patriots like
yourself who are willing to fight the big fight against international
giants.
It
would seem then that there was considerable awareness and concern
about stratospheric aerosol spraying in various parts of New Zealand
in the months leading up to the Christchurch earthquake, as well as
eye witness reports of large scale spraying activity specifically in
the Christchurch area immediately leading up to the earthquake.
So
in terms of evidence for how an artificial earthquake could have been
triggered in Christchurch, we have an unexplained anomaly with the
ionosphere found by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission which
corresponds very closely with the HAARP Induction Magnetometer from
Gakona around that time. We have what looks very much like a HAARP
station at Birdlings Flat just outside of Christchurch which is
funded by the Ministry of Defence, we have the Ionosade facility at
Eyrewell, and we have Raytheon, an exotic weapons company strongly
linked to HAARP technology based at Christchurch Airport. In
addition, we have the HAARP capable Aquila Explorer sitting just off
the coast of Christchurch at the time of the earthquake which the New
Zealand government does not want the public to know about. We also
have a huge amount of stratospheric ‘geo-engineering’ in the area
at that time, which is a key ingredient for creating the necessary
conditions for triggering an artificial earthquake, which the New
Zealand government also does not seem to want the public to know
about.
As
an additional point, in this video we see John Key in a press
conference accidentally call the Christchurch earthquake a man-made
disaster. He did this not once but twice during this press
conference.
In
Part Two. Peter examines the “who” and “why” behind the
Christchurch Earthquake and gives his verdict!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.