"By
Securing The Border, Trump Is Threatening Money-Flow For Lots Of
Connected Interests"
25
June, 2018
President Trump
doubled-down on his plan for
"immediate" deportation of illegal immigrants this morning,
explaining in a tweet that "hiring many thousands of judges, and
going through a long and complicated legal process, is not the way to
go," adding that this deterrence
approach "is the way to go to stop illegal immigration in its
tracks."
But, as
NBC News reports, that hasn't
stopped civil rights attorneys from flocking to the Texas border to
'protect' the rights of illegal immigrant parents not to be separated
from their children -
the exact same policy that is utilized on American parents when they
commit a crime with children in tow.
o to stop illegal immigration in its tracks."
Attorneys have become a lifeline for migrants in detention, responding as would clergy to a disaster or tragedy, as the legal labyrinth of immigration has become more complicated.
Although many are accustomed to the immigration system's complexities, attorneys are finding the situation created by the Trump "zero-tolerance" prosecutions full of never-before-seen hurdles and restrictions that hamper their access to children and parents and are making their work to ensure those with valid asylum and other claims get to stay more difficult.
Ali Rahnama, an immigration attorney from Washington, D.C. who works on public policy and high impact litigation, said he woke up last Monday and felt he needed to be on the border. He found a private donor to pay for him and a few colleagues to fly to the border.
Another attorney, Sirine Sheboya, is choking back emotion over the lengths mothers and fathers are going to be reunited with their children.
"We have people in there who are considering not continuing on with really strong asylum claims," she said stopping to catch her breath as the emotion breaks through, "because they think that maybe they will get reunified with their kids faster if they give up their claim. That's just wrong."
"We have men and women saying, 'My 5- and 6-year-old was holding my leg and was taken away,'" said Rahnama, who visited parents and guardians being held in the Port Isabel Detention Center. "They go to court and are told their child will be there when they come back and they come back and there is no child," he said.
Of
course, it's not just attorneys, Democratic
politicians are descending for their moment of social justice and
never-Trump warrior glory.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., spent 2½ hours in the Port Isabel Detention Center on Sunday night. After the visit, she told reporters stationed outside the center that officials of Immigration and Customs Enforcement told her that the center isn't where parents and children will come together as federal officials have said.
"The [immigration] officials made clear this is not a reunification center. There will be no children brought here. There will be no families brought together in this place," Warren said. "All that's happening here is the detention of mothers and fathers who lost their children."
Warren said she spoke to nine mothers and none the whereabouts of their children or had spoken to them.
"They are crying they are weeping," she said. "They have said they will do anything ... just, please, let them have their babies back."
One
quick question to Ms.Warren - what would you do with the children of
an American parent, who took his children along with him as he
committed a crime? Do they deserve better or worse treatment under
the law than an illegal immigrant - who crosses the border not at a
port of entry and then proclaims they are seeking asylum?
NBC
News reports that DHS
said late Saturday that some of the more than 2,000 children - about
522 - have been reunited with parents.
Officials said Port Isabel would be its reunification center.
Sometimes
it's not just children who attorneys have to locate, but some of the
parents as well. Efrén
Olivares of the Texas Civil Rights Project can no longer find three
clients who were part of a group of five parents who complained in a
petition filed with the Inter-American Human Rights Commission, part
of the Organization of American States, about the child separations.
"They were either released to the U.S. with notice to appear (at a court at a later date) or were deported. We are looking diligently to contact them. We gave them a number and asked them to contact us if they were released," Olivares said.
"We have not heard from them."
Surprise!
Here
is immigration expert Steve Cortes corrected host Fredricka Whitfield
on the reality of family separation at the U.S. southern border
during CNN’s Newsroom Sunday (via
The Daily Caller)...
The U.S. Border Patrol does not separate immigrant families who claim asylum if they appear at a legal point of entry to the U.S., Cortes, the former head of President Donald Trump’s Hispanic Advisory Council, said.
Until recently, only the families that tried to come into the country outside a point of entry - making them illegal immigrants - were separated.
Trump issued an executive order Wednesday that directed the Border Patrol to detain illegal immigrant families together and to begin reuniting children with their detained parents.
Whitfield
asked Cortes how he thought Trump’s plan to reunite “immigrant
families” would work out.
“Look, it will be a difficult process, but here’s the thing. The best way for — when you say immigrant families, by the way, it’s important to say illegal immigrant families,” Cortes responded, pointing out the omission. “That’s a very, very important adjective to add in there. Immigrant families have never been separated.”
“Illegal immigrant families have been separated, and I would say separated for a very good reason,” Cotez continued. “Why? Because their parents, unfortunately, or guardians … decided to commit a crime with children in tow. Much like an American committing a crime with children in tow, you get separated from you children. And that’s a terrible consequence for the kids.”
Whitfield
defended her characterization of immigrants crossing
the border illegally, pointing out that many were crossing the border
seeking asylum.
“If you show up to a port of entry in the United States with your children and request asylum lawfully, you are not separated from your family,” Cortes shot back, referring to the difference between applying for affirmative and defensive asylum.
Affirmative
asylum applies to immigrants entering the U.S. at a port of entry, or
immigrants who apply within a year of entering the U.S., whether or
not their entry was legal. Immigrants entering the country illegally
can apply for defensive asylum while they are being processed for
deportation.
“It’s not [legal]. You have to come to a check point, raise your hand and say, ‘I’m here for asylum,’” Cortes said.
“You can’t sneak across the border and then say, once you’re caught, ‘Oh, I meant to apply for asylum. That’s just not correct.”
Finally,
we note another of President Trump's tweets this morning that sums
the state of America and its media up very well...
Such a difference in the media coverage of the same immigration policies between the Obama Administration and ours. Actually, we have done a far better job in that our facilities are cleaner and better run than were the facilities under Obama. Fake News is working overtime!
And
while we are well aware that comprehending the facts behind this
sudden maelstrom of migrant misery headlines, here is the reality of
how this all started courtesy of 'The
Last Refuge' excellent twitter thread...
1. Once
you see the strings on the marionettes you can never watch the
pantomime the same way you did before you noticed them.
3. November 2012 – Election year campaign(s). Using wedge issues like “War on Women”, and “Immigration / Amnesty”, candidate Obama promises to push congress for “amnesty”, under the guise of “Comprehensive Immigration Reform”, if elected.
President Obama wins reelection.
4. December
2012 –
Immediately following reelection President Barack Obama signs an
Executive Order creating
the “Deferred Action Program“, or DACA.
Allowing millions of illegal aliens to avoid deportation.
5. According
to White House own internal documents and research, this Deferred
Action Program is what the Central American communities immediately
began using as the reason for attempted immigration.
6. In
both (A)
Border Control Study;
and (B)
DHS intelligence report;
the DACA
program is mentioned by the people apprehended at the border in 2013
and 2014.
7. May
2013 –
President Barack Obama visits South America. Following a speech for
Mexican entrepreneurs, Obama then traveled to Costa Rica, his first
visit as president.
8. cont..
In addition to meetings with Costa Rican President Laura
Chincilla, President
Obama attended a gathering of leaders from the Central American
Integration System, (CAIS).
9. The
regional network includes the leaders of Belize, El Salvador,
Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama. President Obama meets with
the leaders of the Central American Countries.
10. Summer
2013 – Numbers
of Illegal Unaccompanied Minors reaching the Southern U.S. border
from El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua doubles. 20,000+
reach U.S. Southern border by travelling through Mexico. Media
primarily ignores. fpc.state.gov/documents/orga…
11. October
2013 –
At the conclusion of the immigrant travel season. White House
receives notification that tens
of thousands of illegal Unaccompanied Minors should be anticipated to
hit the Southern U.S. border the
following Summer [2014].
12. An
estimated 850% increase in the number of Unaccompanied Alien Children
(UAC's) were reported to the White
House. fpc.state.gov/documents/orga…
[In 2012 less than 10,000 were projected]
13. January
2014 –
In response to the projections, the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) posts a jobs notification seeking bids to facilitate 65,000
Unaccompanied Alien Children. fbo.gov/index?s=opport…
14. IMPORTANT. This
job posting was January 2014. The
Obama administration was *planning for* 65,000 childhood arrivals. In
January 2014 they were taking contractor bids for services to be used
later in year. Almost no-one noticed.
15. On
January 29, 2014, the federal gov. posted an ad seeking bids for a
vendor contract to handle “Unaccompanied Alien Children“. Not
just any contract mind you, a very specific contract – for a very
specific number of unaccompanied minors:
"65,000." fbo.gov/index?s=opport…
16. [*Two Weeks Later*] February 2014 – President Obama visits Mexico for “bilateral talks”, in an unusual and unscheduled one day visit:
17. Spring 2014 – With a full year of DACA, successful transport and border crossing without deportation – DHS begins to notice a significant uptick in number of criminal elements from El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua; which have joined with UAC’s to gain entry.
18. Additionally, 2014
internal administration DHS documents reveal the “refugee” status
is now being used by both criminal cartels, and potentially by
Central American government(s) to
send prison inmates into the U.S.
19. June 2014 – Tens-of-thousands of UAC's from El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua hit the border and the headlines. Despite the known planning, and prior internal notifications, the White House claims it did not see this coming.
20. Internal documents including a –DHS Border Security Alert– show that in March, 2014, fully three months earlier, the White House was aware of what was coming in June.
21. June
20th 2014 –
Congressional leadership and key Latino Democrats from the Democrat
Hispanic Caucus meet with representatives from El Salvador,
Guatemala, Honduras and Mexico. kfgo.com/news/articles/…
22. June/July
2014 –
By the end of June the media
have picked up the story and it’s called “A Border
Crisis”. However,
the White House is desperate to avoid exposure to the known criminal
elements within the story.
23. July
3rd, 2014 – President Obama requests $3,700,000,000 ($3.7 billion)
in supplemental budget appropriations to deal with the border
crisis. Only
$109 million is for actual border security or efforts to stop the
outflow from El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua.
24. Hidden
inside the massive budget request is Obama seeking legal
authorization to spend taxpayer funds for lawyers and legal
proceedings on behalf of UAC’s and their families. Congress
is being asked to approve/fund executive branch’s violation of
immigration law (DACA).
25. Section 292 of Immigration and Nationality Act prohibits representation of aliens “in immigration proceedings at government expense“. President Obama was seeking authorization to use taxpayer funds to provide Illegal Aliens with government lawyers.
26. July
10th, 2014 –
Facing pushback from congress as well as sticker shock at the amount
he is requesting, President Obama sends his DHS team to Capitol Hill
to ramp up anxiety, and threats of
consequences: politico.com/story/2014/07/…
27. “We
are preparing for a scenario in which the number of unaccompanied
children apprehended at the border could reach up to 90,000 by the
end of fiscal 2014,” Johnson’s
testimony reads: politico.com/story/2014/07/…
28. Not only did the White House know what was going to happen (as far back as 2012), but White House actually constructed events to fall into a very specific pattern and intentionally did NOTHING to stop the consequences from the DACA executive order issued in December 2012.
29. This is the origin of the crisis. It all started with DACA. Having tracked this issue so closely through the years it often feels futile to discuss. It is an ongoing insufferable political game/scheme within the issue of illegal immigrants and "children".
30. Massive illegal immigration is supported by both sides of the professional political machine. There are few issues more unifying for the K-Street purchased voices of DC politicians than keeping the borders open and the influx of illegal aliens as high as possible.
31. The
U.S. Chamber of Commerce pays politicians to keep this system in
place. All
Democrats and most Republicans support mass immigration. Almost no DC
politicians want to take action on any policy or legislation that
stops the influx.
32. There are billions at stake. None of the GOP leadership want to actually stop illegal immigration; it’s a lucrative business. Almost all of the CONservative groups and politicians lie about it.
33. The
religious right is also part of the problem. In
the past 15 years illegal immigration and refugee settlement has been
financially beneficial for them.
34. There is no greater disconnect from ordinary Americans on any singular issue than the policy positions of Democrats and Republicans in Washington DC surrounding immigration.
President
Donald Trump is confronting their unified interests.
35. All
political opposition to the Trump administration on this issue is
structured, planned & coordinated. The
issue is a valuable tool for the professional political class to sow
chaos amid politicians. The resulting crisis is useful for them;
therefore they fuel the crisis.
36. Washington DC and the activist media, are infested with illegal immigration supporters; the issue is at the heart of the UniParty. Follow the money. It’s the Acorn business model:
37. Southwest Key has been given $310,000,000, in taxpayer funds so far in 2018. And that’s just one company, in one part of a year. Prior CTH research showed this specific “Private Company” nets 98.76% of earnings from government grants. taggs.hhs.gov/Detail/RecipDe…
38. Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, which provides foster care and other child welfare services to migrant children. “Faith Based Immigration Services” is a code-speak for legalized human smuggling. taggs.hhs.gov/Detail/RecipDe…
39. The
“faith-based” crew don’t want it to stop, because facilitating
illegal alien import is now the financial bread and butter amid
groups in their base of support. taggs.hhs.gov/Detail/RecipDe…
40. The man/woman in the pew might not know; but the corporation minister, preacher or priest (inside the process) surely does. BIG BUSINESS !! taggs.hhs.gov/Detail/RecipDe…
41. These immigration groups, get *MASSIVE* HHS grants and then pay-off the DC politicians and human smugglers. Billions of dollars are spent, and the business end of immigration has exploded in the past six years.
42. It’s a vicious cycle. Trafficked children are more valuable than adults because the organizations involved get more funding for a child than an adult. Each illegal alien child is worth about $56,000 in grant money. The system is full of fraud.
43. Approximately 65% of the money HHS provides is spent on executive pay and benefits, opaque administrative payrolls, bribes, kick-backs to DC politicians and payoffs to the South American smugglers who bring them more immigrants.
44. As best it can be determined, approximately 35% ($19,000) of HHS funds are spent on the alien/immigrant child; maybe. It gets really sketchy deep in the accounting.
45. All
of those advocates gnashing their teeth and crying on television have
no idea just who is controlling this process; and
immigration idiots like Ted Cruz are only adding more fuel, more
money, to the bottom line:
ng more fuel, more money, to the bottom line:
47. Beyond
enrichment schemes, the entire process of immigration, and
Washington-DC legalized human smuggling, has side benefits for all
the participants; child sexploitation, child labor, and yes,
much worse (you can imagine).
48. So
the next time you see this type of terribly misplaced "crying
girl" corporate propaganda:
49. Maybe,
just maybe, we can remember the *real* consequences of actual
legalized human smuggling that has been created -within the business-
by U.S. political policy. This
"crying girl":
50. /END
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.