Pages

Sunday, 1 April 2018

News from the UK

Moscow confronts London with 14 questions on ‘fabricated’ Skripal case

Moscow confronts London with 14 questions on ‘fabricated’ Skripal case
RT,
31 March, 2018

Russia’s Embassy in London has sent a list of 14 questions to the UK Foreign Ministry, demanding that it reveals details of the investigation into the nerve-agent poisoning of former double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter.
The questions, provided in full below, include a demand to clarify whether samples of the nerve agent А-234 (also known as “Novichok”) have ever been developed in the UK. The embassy’s statement calls the incident that started the recent diplomatic row a “fabricated case against Russia.”


1. Why has Russia been denied the right of consular access to the two Russian citizens, who came to harm on British territory?2. What specific antidotes and in what form were the victims injected with? How did such antidotes come into the possession of British doctors at the scene of the incident?3. On what grounds was France involved in technical cooperation in the investigation of the incident, in which Russian citizens were injured?4. Did the UK notify the OPCW (Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons) of France’s involvement in the investigation of the Salisbury incident?5. What does France have to do with the incident, involving two Russian citizens in the UK?6. What rules of UK procedural legislation allow for the involvement of a foreign state in an internal investigation?7. What evidence was handed over to France to be studied and for the investigation to be conducted?8. Were the French experts present during the sampling of biomaterial from Sergei and Yulia Skripal?9. Was the study of biomaterials from Sergei and Yulia Skripal conducted by the French experts and, if so, in which specific laboratories?10. Does the UK have the materials involved in the investigation carried out by France? 11. Have the results of the French investigation been presented to the OPCW Technical Secretariat?12. Based on what attributes was the alleged “Russian origin” of the substance used in Salisbury established?13. Does the UK have control samples of the chemical warfare agent, which British representatives refer to as “Novichok”?14. Have the samples of a chemical warfare agent of the same type as “Novichok” (in accordance to British terminology) or its analogues been developed in the UK?


A similar list, containing 10 questions, was sent to the French Foreign Ministry by the Russian Embassy in Paris. According to the document, Moscow wanted to know on what grounds France was involved in the British investigation into the Skripal poisoning.

It demanded that Paris reveal what kind of evidence was handed over to France by the UK, and also inquired if French experts were in possession of the samples of the nerve agent А-234 (also known as “Novichok”) or biomaterials from Sergei and Yulia Skripal.

Russia also demanded explanations on what made French experts conclude that the substance used in Salisbury attack was nerve agent А-234 and that it was of Russian origins. The final question on the list read: “Have the samples of a chemical warfare agent of this type or its analogues been developed in France and if so, for what purpose?”

Sergei Skripal and his daughter, Yulia, were discovered on a bench in Salisbury in early March, with the UK claiming a Soviet-designed nerve agent was used against them. Without a proper investigation being carried out, London said it was “highly likely” that Russia was responsible for the attack and introduced sanctions against the country, including the expulsion of Russian diplomats.

Moscow has denied all accusations, decrying them as a “provocation,” and demanded proof from the British side. However, London refused to cooperate with Russia on the case, denying its consular staff access to Russian citizen Yulia Skripal and turning down the request to provide a sample of the toxic substance in question.

Over 50 affected as Russia downsizes UK diplomatic mission in tit-for-tat response


Over 50 affected as Russia downsizes UK diplomatic mission in tit-for-tat response

Moscow’s decision to have the UK downsize its diplomatic presence in Russia to be equal to that of Moscow in London means that it must cut over 50 jobs at the British mission, according to the Russian foreign ministry.

On Friday, Russia announced its response to the UK’s expulsion of 23 Russian diplomats that London linked to double agent Sergei Skripal’s poisoning. In addition to expelling 23 British diplomats, Moscow also gave London one month to downsize its diplomatic presence in Russia.

The final number of staff in Russia should be equal to the number of staff at the Russian diplomatic mission in Britain. Similar measures were taken in response to the American expulsion of Russian diplomats over alleged interference in the 2016 presidential election in the US.


Britain says Aeroflot plane was searched to protect UK from ‘organized crime & harmful substances’


Britain says Aeroflot plane was searched to protect UK from ‘organized crime & harmful substances’

The controversial search of a Russian plane by British officials at Heathrow Airport was conducted to protect the UK from organized crime and the smuggling of harmful substances, the UK security minister has said.

Moscow had described the search of an Aeroflot plane as “illegal” and called for an explanation from British authorities.

It is routine for [UK] Border Force to search aircraft to protect the UK from organized crime and from those who attempt to bring harmful substances like drugs or firearms into the country,” UK Security Minister Ben Wallace said on Saturday. He insisted that once the “checks were carried out,” the aircraft “was allowed to carry on with its onward journey.”


The justification presented by London “only aggravates our doubts as to the real intentions of the team” that performed the unlawful search, the Russian Embassy in the UK said in response to the statement. Aeroflot and Russian airports “observe strict international security standards” on the presence of firearms and drugs on board and did not “give rise to doubts in that respect,” it added.



British ISIS torturers 'regret' beheadings, say revoking citizenship 'unfair'
Photos provided by SDF on February 9, 2018, showing captured ISIS members Alexanda Kotey and Shafee Elsheikh © SDF handout / Reuters
Two British ISIS members have described their brutal execution of hostages as “regrettable.” The men also said that the British government’s decision to revoke their citizenship denied them the chance of a fair trial.

El Shafee Elsheikh and Alexanda Amon Kotey were allegedly part of a four-member Islamic State (IS, formerly known as ISIS/ISIL) cell known as “The Beatles.” The cell became known for its brutal execution videos of hostages, including American journalists Steven Sotloff and James Foley in 2014.

The cell’s leader, Mohammed Emwazi, became known as “Jihadi John,” and appeared in many of the group’s videos, threatening the west from behind a mask. Emwazi was “evaporated”in a coalition drone strike in Raqqa, Syria in November 2015. Another member of the group, Aine Lesley Davis, was arrested in Turkey last year and sentenced to seven years in prison.

The Russians are being too damned civilised in the circumstances.



Russia has no plans to cease cultural cooperation with the United Kingdom and hopes that this sphere will continue to stay away from politics amid the ongoing diplomatic row with the United Kingdom, Russia's Deputy Culture Minister Alexander Zhuravsky said on Saturday.

"We have never unilaterally initiated to break off relations or cease cultural ties, that is why in this case… there were no unfriendly actions from the Ministry of Culture… We hope that culture will stay out of politics as before," 

No warning given. They ordered the crew out and when the pilot refused to leave they shut him in the cockpit: no witnesses to the search.


From the Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten: Friday evening the British Border and Customs authority at the London Heathrow airport, with no warning, searched an Aeroflot airliner in from Moscow. Contrary to the rules of international air travel, according to the airline, they ordered the pilot and the crew to leave the plane. The pilot refused, having regard to his duties as a captain. He was, as the Russian state-owned news Agency TASS, reported, forced to stay the cockpit, while the authorities were searching the plane.

The BBC reported that it had received the information on the customs action from the British foreign Ministry. In recent days the foreign Minister, Boris Johnson has stepped up his particularly sharp public criticism of Russia.

Russia lodged a sharp protest according to the spokeswoman of the foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova against this deed of the authorities. Russia calls on London to return to the international practices in air travel. “The behavior of the British police is a clear demonstration of the desire to board and tamper without a witness,” said Zakharova in the radio station Rossiya 24, according to RIA.

Employees of the Russian Ambassador went to the airport to investigate the situation.



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.