You’ve
got to recognise a predicament when you see it.
Liberals
may pretend there’s no problem and say that Europe can and must
absorb millions of Muslims out of ‘humanitarian’ concern.
Maybe
you can absorb millions of people from the Middle East and
Africa but the situation captured in the photo below is the result.
These
idiots also spout nonsense such as 'there's plenty of
resources ('infinite resources") to feed 7.6 billion souls
while,at the same time, continuing - even accelerating - trashing the
planet.
The
same liberals have no compunction about bombing the countries of
these people (out of ‘humanitarian’ concern of course!)
The
Right are equally deluded because they think if
you kick out these masses of migrants (the overwhelming majority of
which are seeking a better way of life) you can return to
how things were before.
I
have always been as tolerant and mindful of the underdog as any
person but when the result of western policies is such as this I have
to say I have to agree to the people from the ‘Right” - the
liberal “Left” is completely delusional if not outright lying.
This
is what is called blowback. It is also the result of intentional
policies as well.
Fascism
does not just arise out of a vacuum (because there are ‘bad’
people out there). It takes hold because of what we are describing
here. People want to hold onto what they had and tend to lash out at
the wrong targets.
In
any case, this cannot end well – especially when you take into
account the other predicaments this human civiliation faces.
20
March, 2018
After
the murders of
much of the staff at the French satirical magazine Charlie
Hebdo in
Paris on January 7, 2015, the hostage-taking and slaughter at
a kosher supermarket two
days later confirmed what was already obvious: France was a target of
Islamic terrorism.
A huge demonstration,
organized in Paris on January 11, brought together a million and a
half people, with politicians from around the world in attendance.
For
a brief moment, France seemed to be the country where the multitudes
were ready to stand up for freedom of speech,
and the government was ready to fight for Western values.
Unfortunately,
that impression did not last long.
For
years, freedom of speech in France has been in the process of being
crushed, particularly regarding Islam and Islamic terrorism.
Journalists who said that Islam often did not look much like a
religion of peace but more like a religion of war were systematically
and harshly prosecuted. Charlie
Hebdo's
new director and editor-in-chief were also not spared: they
were sued as
early as 2006, the year the magazine republished the Danish Mohammed
cartoons. They were sued again in 2007, 2012 and 2013. The writer
Michel Houellebecq was summoned to
court in 2010 for saying that Islam is a "stupid" religion.
The first judicial sentence against
the polemist Éric Zemmour dates from 2011. The website Riposte
Laïque was
established in 2007 to fight censorship, defend secularism, and
preserve the right to criticize Islam. Lawsuits against
its founder, Pierre Cassen, immediately became overwhelming.
Judicial
harassment against those who still dared to speak "incorrectly"
about Islam did not stop after the murders at Charlie
Hebdo:
rather, they intensified. The
terrorist attacks that took place in France in November 2015 and in
July 2016 did not lead to any demonstrations; merely to displays of
sadness, fear and resignation.
French politicians used empty
words,
spoke of the dangers of "fanaticism" and said that France
was "at war" -- but they never named an enemy. Journalists
and writers who said that terrorists attacking France were Muslim,
and that "Islamism" was not foreign to Islam, had
to answer for
their words in court and were fined thousands of euros.
Both Éric Zemmour and Pierre Cassen have spent hours on trial providing conclusive evidence -- in vain.
Since
the election of President Emmanuel Macron a year ago, the situation
has become worse. On
June 20, 2017, at the end of a post-Ramadan iftar dinner
he shared with Muslim leaders, President Macron stated that
"...no one should make believe that Islam is not compatible with
the Republic"; that " no one should say that France reject
Muslim faith" and that "attempt to give Islam the image of
a religion condoning murder and terror" must be condemned. Most
French critics of Islam got the message and cautiously chose
silence. Riposte
Laïque did
not, but here were consequences.
On
January 20, 2018, Pierre Cassen was convicted of "incitement to
hatred against Muslims" and a fine of
$12,000 was imposed on him. He was also given a three-month suspended
prison sentence. He will soon be tried again for repeating the same
"crime", and could be sent to prison.
Several
European governments have made it clear that criticizing Islam may
lead to prosecution and
conviction. Recently, British, Danishand German citizens
have been handed suspended sentences. If Pierre Cassen is imprisoned,
it will be the first time that someone in a Western democracy is sent
to jail for criticizing a religion.
Worse,
Cassen is not even the author of the article targeted by the judges,
and the article only
says what is obvious: that extremist Muslims are at war with France
and the West, and that incitement to kill infidels is present in the
Qur'an. Cassen was sentenced as the editor of Riposte
Laïque;
since 2012, however, Riposte
Laïque has
been hosted by Switzerland and has a Swiss editor. Pierre Cassen no
longer even has an official role in the organization. He is just easy
prey because he lives in France. Pierre Cassen, clearly a victim
of prosecutorial
abuse,
is planning to apply for political asylum in Switzerland.
Two
members of the French National Assembly, Gilbert
Collard and Marine
Le Pen,
a former presidential candidate who secured 35% of votes in the May
2017 run-off, were also recently charged with "inciting
violence". They did not even publish texts criticizing Islam.
After a journalist compared their party (National Front) to the
Islamic State, they tweeted photos
showing atrocities committed by the Islamic State, and added under
the photos: "This is the Islamic State". They are also
facing serious fines and prison sentences. The photos they tweeted
are not even secret: they are widely available on the internet.
Originally,
Collard and Le Pen were protected by parliamentary immunity. Their
parliamentary immunity, however, was revoked by
an almost unanimous vote in the French National Assembly. This is the
first time that members of a democratic Western government risk being
imprisoned for publishing widely available photos of Islamic crimes.
French
laws are being used more and more often by the French justice system
to suppress any criticism of Islam. Furthermore, in a dangerous
inversion of reality, critics of Islamic terrorist violence are now
systematically presented by French judges as examples of incitement
to hatred and violence. The threat of jail time is added to the
threat of fines.
Consequently,
those who criticize Islam -- or who just show the results of Islamic
terrorism -- are victims of fierce prosecution, while hate-filled,
racist organizations are never touched. The
Islamic "Natives
of the Republic"
movement, for instance, regularly publishes texts saying
that " greedy Jews control the global financial system" and
that "Zionists kill Palestinian children for pleasure" but
are never condemned. Houria Bouteldja, the spokesperson for the
movement, published a book describing
Jews as vicious supporters of "Islamophobia", and stating
that the Holocaust is "infinitely less than a detail" of
history. She recently took part in anti-Israel demonstrations where
flags of Hamas and
Hezbollah were waved and portraits of murderers of Jews were held up.
Jewish organizations expressed their indignation and filed complaints
-- to no avail.
The
French government and the French justice system claim to treat all
religions equally, but they treat Islam as if it were "more
equal than others" -- able to enjoy special privileges.
In France, attacks against Islam are benign and rare, but lead to severe convictions: in January 2016, a man dropped slices of ham in front of a mosque.
He was immediately sent to jail for several weeks. Attacks against Christianity, however, are countless, sometimes violent, but almost never lead to any conviction. French theaters produce anti-Christian shows almost every year. In a play called "On the Concept of the Face of God," currently on tour throughout the country, for almost two hours, a large portrait of Jesus Christ is insulted and covered with matter that is supposed to be feces. The French Ministry of Culture subsidizes the tour. No theater director, however, would imagine producing an anti-Islam show.
Six
to eight million Muslims live in France, and the number
is increasing.
France's 400,000 remaining Jews have not yet left France, but every
year their the numbers shrink.
Practicing Christians vanish; churches are often empty.
Polls
show that a significant proportion of
the French population thinks that Islam is a threat, but French
authorities choose to harass those who speak of this threat.
In
2005, the situation was already serious. Muslim riots took
place throughout the country. French President Jacques Chirac asked
imams to restore calm and began to abandon the French government's
sovereignty over many districts. A few years later, President Nicolas
Sarkozy claimed to organize an
"Islam of France", based on a structure he had created in
2003 when he was Minister of the Interior. He asked French Muslim
leaders to call for "moderation". He failed: French
Muslim leaders said
unanimously that "Islam is not violent" and "does not
need moderation". He promised to end "no-go zones" and
to take back the districts abandoned under Jacques Chirac. He also
failed; in 2006 there were already 751
no-go zones in
France, and "as of last count," that number is no
different. President François Hollande did nothing and let the
situation rot. President Emmanuel Macron now speaks of the need to
"reorganize the Islam of France" but instead appears to
surrender.
In
2005, Muslim riots took place throughout France. President Jacques
Chirac began to abandon the government's sovereignty over many
districts. Pictured: Riot police watch as a warehouse burns in the
Paris suburb of Aubervilliers on November 4, 2005, on the eighth
consecutive night of rioting. (Photo by Pascal Le Segretain/Getty
Images)
Macron
recently said he wants to create the post of "Grand Imam of
France", a man who would be the "spiritual
leader"
of Islam in France. He added that he would like to see
the construction of
large "cathedral mosques" in every important French city.
He also wants the Arabic
language to
be taught in every high school, to maintain a relationship between
Muslims and the language of their religion. He promises affirmative
action in
favor of Muslims and a more resolute fight against "those who
attack Islam". He never uses the words "radical Islam".
He speaks of "radicalization", but says that the main
danger is the "radicalization
of secularism".
He does not hide that those who defend secularism -- and a clear
separation between the government and Islam (Riposte
Laïque,
for example) -- are an obstacle on the path he intends to follow.
Clearly, the fight against "radicalization of secularism"
is in high gear!
"Who has the right to say that in thirty to forty years, France will not be a Muslim country? No one in this country has the right to extinguish our right to hope for a society that is globally faithful to Islam ".
Every
day in France, men such as Marwan Muhammad have more reason to hope.
Prominent Islamic preacher Tariq Ramadan is presently being held at the Fleury-Mérogis prison near Paris: judges could not dismiss the overwhelming charges against him of rape. Some French Muslims still claim he is being unfairly accused. Many others say he is an impostor and seem ready to get rid of him. They say it is urgent to create "authentic French Islamic institutions" fully "recognized by the French government". President Macron could not have said it better. The Islamization of France will not stop.
President
Macron recently said he wants a law against
"fake news". If
the law is adopted, all online magazines in France that do not
broadcast what the government defines as "true news" could
be subject to immediate government suspension. If they are located
outside France, access to them would be blocked.
Islamic
online magazines and websites are not on the list of "fake news"
providers. What online magazines and websites top the list? Those
that question Islam.
GERMANY:
Angela Merkel threatens to take away your children if you criticize
fake Muslim refugees or her mass Muslim immigration policies
16 March, 2018
Any person who posts “xenophobic” or “Islamophobic” statements on Facebook or takes part in a demonstration against “Muslim refugee centers” could soon lose the right of contact with his/her own children, even if no criminal offense was committed, according to the German Bar Association.
GERMANY:
Angela Merkel threatens to take away your children if you criticize
fake Muslim refugees or her mass Muslim immigration policies
Any
person who posts “xenophobic” or “Islamophobic” statements on
Facebook or takes part in a demonstration against “Muslim refugee
centers” could soon lose the right of contact with his/her own
children, even if no criminal offense was committed, according to the
German Bar Association.
AnonymousNews
As more and more people are speaking out and demonstrate against the
reception and accommodation of Muslim invaders (putting their needs
before the needs of native Germans), they also risk losing their
jobs.
Children
must be removed from homes where there is a xenophobic parent because
of the “wrong values” imparted upon them. It doesn’t even
matter if what the parent is doing is not illegal or punishable under
the law.
Any
parent who tells a child that he/she would prefer to live in
neighborhood without any Syrian Muslim refugees could turn the child
into a threat against the refugees which would endanger the child’s
welfare. That is why Federal Justice Minister Heiko Maas (SPD) had
agreed in mid-September with Facebook officials to intervene in the
social media network to take action against “inhuman and right-wing
slogans against immigrants in the network.”
Therefore,
should “right-wing” parents not agree to change their
“xenophobic” behavior, the right to see their own children could
be taken away. Haas is totally under control of the far left wing
elements in Germany.
UK:
Police told victim of Muslim rape gang not to mention the ethnicity
of her rapists
It
appears that British officials were willing to go to any lengths, and
sacrifice any number of young British girls, to appease the new
masters of the country.
“Grooming
Gang ‘Raped’, ‘Gave Drugs, Alcohol’ to Foster Care Home
Runaways,” by Victoria Friedman, Breitbart,
March 9, 2018 (thanks to The
Religion of Peace):
Two “vulnerable” 14-year-old girls who were living in a care home were groomed, given drugs and alcohol, and were raped over a two-year period by a gang of ten men, a court has heard.
Opening the prosecutor’s case at Bradford Crown Court, Kama Melly QC told the jury that both girls were in the care of the state at the time, describing them as “sadly ripe and vulnerable to manipulation”….
The prosecution alleged that one victim had run away from the home with a female friend, both aged 14, and were then approached by one of the defendants in a car who began grooming them for sex, reports the Telegraph & Argus.
Ms. Melly then detailed that one girl was taken to meet other men who used “fear” and “manipulation” to “satisfy their sexual desires”.
The following charges relate to alleged abuse committed between July 2009 and July 2011:
Saeed Akhtar, 54, Bradford, denies two charges of causing or inciting child prostitution and one charge of rape.
Naveed Akhtar, 42, Bradford, denies three charges of rape.
Izar Hussain, 31, Bradford, denies three charges of rape, and an additional allegation of attempted rape.
Mohammed Usman, 30, Bradford, pleaded not guilty to two charges of rape.
Kieran Harris, 27, Ravensthorpe, Dewsbury, pleaded not guilty to two charges of rape.
Yasar Majid, 36, Milton Keynes, denies a single charge of rape.
Fahim Iqbal, 27, of no fixed abode, pleaded not guilty to aiding and abetting rape.
Zeeshan Ali, 31, Bradford, denies a single charge of sexual assault.
Parvaze Ahmed, 35, Bradford, denies three charges of rape.
Basharat Khaliq, 37, Bradford, denies assault by penetration and five charges of rape.
The
case only came to court after one of the alleged victims watched a
programme, years after the alleged abuse took place, which was
related to the Rotherham
abuse scandal where
Muslim, Pakistani-heritage men groomed and sexually abused more than
1,500 mainly white girls.
The
now young woman then asked her boyfriend to call the BBC Look
North television studio where her details were taken and passed onto
police, after which an investigation was launched.
Ms
Melly told the court: “Frustrated at the lack of coverage… her
partner contacted Look North, telling them the abuse was ‘much
wider than Rotherham’.”…
The
prosecutor went on to say that the police did nothing to help the
alleged victim until her boyfriend called the television studio years
later….
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.