This
is a coup: the Homeland Security takeover of US elections
On a scale of importance from 1 to 10, with 10 being the most important, this breaking development is a 500.
Jon
Rappoport
January
8, 2017
On
Friday, the traditional day of the week for quietly releasing big
news that will hopefully be ignored by the public—and also obscured
by the Fort Lauderdale Airport shooting—the chief of Homeland
Security announced that his office will be taking over US elections.
If
you can’t see the coup in progress, you need to keep looking until
the message comes through.
Read
carefully—ABC
News reports.
My comments are in brackets:
“Citing
increasingly sophisticated cyber bad actors and an election
infrastructure that’s ‘vital to our national interests’,
Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson announced Friday that he’s
designating U.S. election systems critical infrastructure…”
[Also
known as: “we’re taking over.”]
“’Given
the vital role elections play in this country, it is clear that
certain systems and assets of election infrastructure meet the
definition of critical infrastructure, in fact and in law’,”
Johnson said in a statement. He added: ‘Particularly in these
times, this designation is simply the right and obvious thing to
do’.”
[Also
known as: “we’re taking over.”]
“The
determination came after months of review and despite opposition from
many states worried that the designation would lead to increased
federal regulation or oversight on the many decentralized and locally
run voting systems across the country. It was announced on the same
day a declassified U.S. intelligence report said Russian President
Vladimir Putin ‘ordered’ an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at
the U.S. presidential election.”
[Also
known as: “we needed an excuse, a fake cover story for our
takeover, and Russia is it.”]
“Such
a change [in who controls the US election process] does not require
presidential action [or Congressional approval], and only requires
the secretary [of DHS] to first consult with the assistant to the
president for homeland security and counterterrorism.”
[Also
known as: “this is a coup by the White House.”]
“Johnson
said election infrastructure included storage facilities, polling
places and vote tabulation locations, plus technology involved in the
process, including voter registration databases, voting machines and
other systems used to manage the election process and report and
display results.”
[Also
known as: “We’re taking over every significant aspect of the
national election process.”]
“The
designation [of US elections as critical infrastructure] allows for
information to be withheld from the public when state, local and
private partners meet to discuss election infrastructure security —
potentially injecting secrecy into an election process that’s
traditionally and expressly a transparent process. U.S. officials say
such closed door conversations allow for frank discussion that would
prevent bad actors from learning about vulnerabilities. DHS would
also be able to grant security clearances when appropriate and
provide more detailed threat information to states.”
[Also
known as: “we can intercede in the election process and determine
its outcome without any need to pretend we’re being transparent;
only people we approve will know the details of how we run elections;
secrecy works.”]
“The
Obama administration has proposed international cyber rules for
peacetime that would expressly note that countries shouldn’t
conduct online activity targeting critical [US] infrastructure, which
will now also include election systems.”
[Also
known as: “in case there is any doubt, elections systems in America
will be property of the federal Executive Branch.”]
This
is a coup.
This
is equivalent to declaring a national state of emergency, including
martial law: the DHS, if it deemed it necessary, could utilize armed
agents to enforce the new directive and take over states’ offices
that resist.
Election-processes
belong to the states. But not anymore.
And
of course, with this awesome new power, the DHS could intercede,
behind the scenes, in the voting process and rig elections.
There
is an additional aligned factor at work in this op: the proposed
elimination of the Electoral College—yet another measure designed
to “federalize” the election process.
Most
people are entirely ignorant of the fact that the Constitution was a
pact among states. With reluctance, the independent states agreed to
relinquish certain specified powers to the newly created central
government, while retaining all other powers.
The
Electoral College was, therefore, a natural invention, because the
states would maintain crucial influence in determining the outcome of
presidential elections. State Electors would cast their presidential
votes based on which candidate won in their state.
Eliminating
the Electoral College now would add one more layer of federal control
over the whole country, and take control from the states. More
centralization.
Imagine
it. Only the popular vote counts. The states are dumped. And on top
of it all, the Dept. of Homeland Security has the power to run the
election process as a piece of “critical infrastructure.”
Rigging
the vote in New York and California, plus a few other populous
states, would decide the election. And in time, no one would think
about “New York” or “California” as separate entities—because
they wouldn’t be. They would just be “more land and people”
that are part of “wholly unified” America.
(To
read about Jon’s mega-collection, The
Matrix Revealed, click
here.)
This
is perfect for the “unity politicians” who spout empty rhetoric
every chance they get—“we’re all in this together.” As I
tirelessly point out, such slogans are nothing less than covert ops,
and their goal is roping in as many dullards as possible under a
messianic banner of A
Better Life for All under a Beneficent Government.
Also
known as: we the rulers decree, you the people submit; your survival
depends on us; we give and take as we will, and that shall be the
whole of the law.
Eventually,
why have presidential elections at all? Just allow the DHS to
determine which candidate will best serve the needs and desires of
the controllers.
It’s
cleaner, simpler, and more direct.
It’s
a coup.
Will
Trump cancel it?
Obama
is basically challenging him to do it—which would create one more
firestorm in the press directed at Trump.
“See,
the new president just stopped the DHS from protecting our sacred
free elections. Trump is exhibiting more treasonous cooperation with
his Russian masters…he’s leaving the door wide open for their
secret invasion against our liberties…”
The
timeline is clear. One: Hillary will surely win the election. Two:
Trump won the election. Three: Trump won because Russia “hacked the
election” in his favor. Four: We must protect our national election
process from foreign hacking. Five: Homeland Security must put itself
in charge of national elections.
Stay
tuned.
A
coup just occurred.
Jon
Rappoport
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.