Proof Of Huge Democrat Election Fraud – Mail Returned, Votes Still Cast
Stan
Vaughan was a candidate in Nevada’s assembly district 15, who has
huge proof of fraud in his district. It’s the Democrat kind that
involves falsified, non-existent voters who somehow still managed to
cast votes. In 9,200 instances, the persons supposedly registered to
vote don’t live at the address provided, as verified by Mr.
Vaughan’s clever idea to send an individual piece of mail to
registrations in which he had reasons to question their validity. Las
Vegas, and the State of Nevada, at a minimum have a huge problem but
it’s likely much larger than that.
He
conducted a random check of 200 of the registrants whose mail was
returned by the US Post Office as being invalid and found that 185 of
them still voted. If that factor of 92.5% fraudulent voting is
extended out to the 9,200 pieces of returned mail, there were 8,510
fraudulent votes cast in Mr. Vaughan’s district.
As
bad as that is, the problem is much worse. Mr. Vaughan has the
Election Department cumulative daily voter turnout rolls in which
some serious and impossible anomalies were found to exist. Through
November 2nd the reports indicated that 10,000 people in his district
had voted and as of two days later another 2,466 had voted. However,
1,900 votes by independents, 3rd party and non-partisan voters
disappeared in that two day period of time.
At
the same time another 3,200 increase in Democrat turnout was
registered while 1,000 Republicans are shown to have voted. The total
number of votes recorded during that two day period was 2, 466.
There’s no way the number of votes cast could have decreased
without fraud being involved and the totals simply don’t match up.
Somebody is monkeying with the system and generating 180% voter
turnout as well.
“Edward
Snowden, Willie Nelson, Waylon Jennings and dozens of movie stars
were registered to vote and when Mr. Vaughan attempted to vote
for himself he
was informed that he had already voted. Others reported a similar
experience and all were given provisional ballots which would only be
counted if the vote total was within 1%.
Provided
the Democrats were able to maintain a cushion of 1% in their
fraudulent vote levels, his and many other American votes are never
counted, effectively nullified by the Democrats, including what are
surely many illegal aliens.
President-elect Trump lost the state by
only 27,000 votes. The fraud exposed by Mr. Vaughan represents
roughly a third of that number, in just one small district
representing 1/42 of the state’s voters.
Hillary Clinton scores HUGE success in Wisconsin recount! After a full day recount Hillary gained ONE vote on Trump
Alex Christoferou
The
first day of Wisconsin’s recount narrowed the gap between Hillary
Clinton and President-elect Donald Trump by one vote.
In
response to demand’s from Green
Party candidate Jill Stein,
Wisconsin began recounting its ballots on Thursday.
After
the first full day of recounting the votes and adding up the
tally, Hillary
Clinton gained a single vote on Donald Trump. Yes,
all the fuss and money directed by Jill Stein, towards recounting
votes in three US states that Trump won, has resulted in a single
vote difference.
The
result of the Wisconsin recount will prove to be extremely close to
the already certified count that gave Trump the state…which will
also certify Jill Stein’s demise and demotion into the history
books as a useful idiot for Hillary Clinton’s never ending
sore losing tirade.
Trump defeated Clinton in Wisconsin’s initial tally by about one percent, or just over 22,000 votes. Nevertheless, Green Party candidate Jill Stein (who finished a very distant fourth) is demanding a full recount after suggesting fraud or technological glitches may have swayed the results.
But the first results to emerge suggest the final tally will be rather close to the original one. Only Menominee County, home to the Menominee Indian Reservation, fully reported its recounted results on the first day. It found 17 extra votes for Stein and 12 for Libertarian Gary Johnson, while removing two votes from Trump and one from Clinton.
When putting all the results together, that means the first day of the recount narrowed the gap between Clinton and Trump by just a single vote.
At her current pace, Clinton will overtake Trump in Wisconsin in approximately 74 and a half years. Unfortunately, the recount is expected to last just two weeks.
From a day ago
Pennsylvania Judge rules to finally put an end to Jill Stein’s election recount drive
Jill
Stein's election recount circus is coming to a whimpering end.
A
judge in Montgomery County Pennsylvania decided
that it is time for Jill Stein to end her recount effort, and fade
away into obscurity with her reputation now fully tarnished and
corrupted by Hillary Clinton.
After
hearing arguments from attorneys representing Jill Stein’s campaign
and the Montgomery County Board of Elections, Judge Bernard A. Moore
dismissed the petitions of voters in 78 precincts to recount votes or
forensically analyze voting machines due a lack of evidence and
improperly filed petitions.
The
Times Herald of
Montgomery County reports on what should be the end of Jill Stein’s
useless and reckless recount push…
“What we keep going back to is that our voting machines are not connected to the internet,” said board of elections Solicitor Nicole Forzato. “Montgomery County takes great, great pride in being concerned about its infrastructure for IT generally, and they have gone through a vigorous process to make sure our technology general, including voter services technology and the voting machines are safe and secure to use.”
The judge did not give an explanation of his dismissal, but objections made by Forzato focused on two areas: first, that there was insufficient evidence to suggest that the machines had been tampered with in any way and second, that the petitions were not filed properly with the proper fees.
Stein campaign attorney Ilann Maazel argued that voting machines throughout Pennsylvania were vulnerable to hacking. He stated that the effort to request a recount or analysis of the machines was to make sure every vote was counted.
“We know that Donald Trump won the vote of machines in Pennsylvania. We want to know who won the vote of the people,” Maazel said.
Maazel also argued that the manner in which the petitions were filed, county-by-county and district-by-district, was a result of “byzantine” election statutes in the commonwealth.
“They’re requiring fees that don’t exist, they are proposing deadlines that don’t exist,” Maazel said.“The Republican Party is saying that over 27,000 people in 9,000 districts have to request a recount or there can’t be a recount anywhere. What kind of system is that? That is a disgrace.”
Jill
Stein when on the liberal friendly, anti-Trump, show “The View”
to try and keep her (and Hillary’s) election circus live.
Meanwhile
Tucker Carlson takes on Jill Stein’s campaign manager, David Cobb,
over her efforts to initiate a recount in multiple states.
The
Pennsylvania ruling is not shocking given that even Jill Stein
admitted there was “no
evidence of fraud at the ballot box.”
Zerohedge
reported yesterday that
Jill Stein was also defeated in a Wisconsin court for failing to
present any credible evidence of vote tampering.
While this should come as a shock to precisely no one other than some disaffected Hillary supporters who were hoping for a miracle, Jill Stein’s request for a full “hand recount” in the state of Wisconsin has officially been denied by Dane County Circuit Judge Valerie Bailey-Rihn. According to the StarTribune, the request was denied after the judge found that Stein failed to show any mistakes or irregularities that would bring a machine recount into question.
A Wisconsin judge has refused to order local officials to conduct the state’s presidential recount by hand.
Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein requested the recount last week. She alleged — without evidence — that the state’s voting equipment may have been hacked.
The state Elections Commission has ordered the recount to begin Thursday but rejected Stein’s request that county clerks conduct the recount entirely by hand. Stein filed a lawsuit seeking an order for a statewide hand recount.
Stein’s attorneys argued during a hearing Tuesday evening that the best way to determine if a cyberattack occurred is to check ballots by hand against electronic tabulations from Election Day. State lawyers countered there’s no evidence to suggest any attack took place.
Dane County Circuit Judge Valerie Bailey-Rihn refused to issue the order, saying Stein’s team failed to show any mistakes or irregularities
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.